Nuclear option: Indonesia seeks to grow energy, cut emissions
Indonesia is hoping going nuclear can help it meet soaring energy demand while taming emissions, but faces serious challenges to its goal of a first small modular reactor by 2032.
Its first experiment with nuclear energy dates to February 1965, when then-president Sukarno inaugurated a test reactor.
Sixty years later, Southeast Asia's largest economy has three research reactors but no nuclear power plants for electricity.
Abundant reserves of polluting coal have so far met the enormous archipelago's energy needs.
But "nuclear will be necessary to constrain the rise of and eventually reduce emissions", said Philip Andrews-Speed, a senior research fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
President Prabowo Subianto has promised to ensure energy security while meeting a pledge to eliminate coal-powered electricity generation within 15 years.
Coal accounts for around two-thirds of electricity generation in Indonesia, which targets net-zero by 2050.
The government wants 40-54GW of the 400GW it projects will be generated nationwide by 2060 to come from nuclear.
It hopes to kickstart capacity with a reactor on Borneo "by 2030 or 2032", according to Energy Minister Bahlil Lahadalia.
It will be a small modular reactor, which has a lower capacity than traditional reactors but is easier to assemble and transport.
The total number of plants planned has not been detailed, but the government has begun scouting locations -- a challenge for a country located on the seismically active "Ring of Fire".
"Currently, 29 potential locations have been identified for the construction of nuclear power plants," Dadan Kusdiana, acting secretary general of the National Energy Council (DEN) told AFP.
All are outside the country's biggest island of Java, in line with government goals to develop the archipelago's centre and east.
The sites would also put facilities near energy-hungry mining sites.
- Ring of Fire -
While Japan's quake and tsunami-triggered Fukushima disaster has stalled nuclear progress in some parts of Asia, proponents say nuclear can be done safely in Indonesia.
"North Java, East Sumatra, West Kalimantan and Central Kalimantan are considered as low-risk zones," said Andang Widi Harto, a nuclear engineering researcher at Yogyakarta University.
"These low seismic risk regions also coincide with low volcanic risk regions," he added.
Countries from Vietnam to Belgium are also growing or retaining nuclear capacity as they struggle to meet net-zero goals to combat climate change.
While Indonesia may not be alone in the nuclear pivot, it has little domestic expertise to draw on.
It will look abroad for help, said Kusdiana, citing "serious interest" from providers including Russia's Rosatom, China's CNNC and Candu Canada.
The Indonesian subsidiary of US company ThorCon is already seeking a licence for an experimental "molten-salt reactor".
It wants to use shipyards to build small reactors that will be towed to coastal or offshore locations and "ballasted" to the seabed.
Kusdiana said DEN has also visited France's EDF SA to explore possible cooperation.
French President Emmanuel Macron is due in Indonesia this week as part of a Southeast Asia tour.
EDF said there were currently "no discussions underway on nuclear with Indonesia," though its CEO Bernard Fontana will be part of Macron's delegation.
A second French firm, Orano, also said it had not discussed collaboration with Indonesia.
- 'Sceptical' -
Given the challenges, which also include connectivity issues, waste disposal and potential domestic opposition, some experts warn Indonesia's nuclear timeline is overambitious.
"I would join others who are sceptical that Indonesia can deploy nuclear power at any significant scale in the next ten years," said Andrews-Speed at the Oxford Institute.
Environmentalists would like to see Indonesia focus more on meeting its clean energy targets with renewable sources.
While hydroelectric accounts for over seven percent of Indonesia's electricity generation, solar and wind contribute tiny amounts and could be significantly ramped up, experts say.
Cost and "high corruption" are also obstacles, said Dwi Sawung, energy and urban campaign manager at NGO WALHI.
"There is not enough left in the government and PLN (state electricity company) budget," he told AFP.
The government has not said how much it expects the nuclear ramp-up to cost, but Kusdiana insists the money will be there.
"Various potential international investors... have shown interest", including Russia, the United States, Denmark, South Korea and China, he said.
ebe-mrc/sah/tc/lb
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What to Know About the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as Iran Mulls Exit
Iran could be poised to withdraw from an international accord that seeks to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. This follows growing tensions with the United Nations' atomic watchdog, compounded by Israel's attacks on the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. Should Iran pull out of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, it would reduce the chances of a diplomatic solution to Tehran's atomic ambitions and be a serious blow to global arms-control efforts.

Washington Post
44 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump fires nuclear regulator as White House seeks to soften oversight
A top nuclear safety regulator was fired by the White House in a two-sentence email Friday night as the administration attempts to dilute the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's independent oversight of power plants. The email, sent to Commissioner Christopher Hanson by Trent Morse, a deputy director of presidential personnel, does not give any reason for the firing. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders aimed at speeding up approvals of nuclear reactors on U.S. soil during his term. One of the orders last month accused the commission of stifling the nuclear power industry by being overly cautious about safety.


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump will not sign onto joint G7 statement on Iran
President Donald Trump does not intend to sign onto a joint statement calling for de-escalation between Israel and Iran that had been drafted by G7 leaders in Canada, according to a person familiar with the matter. The draft statement, which had been spearheaded by European officials at the summit, said Israel has a right to defend itself and that Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. 'Under the strong leadership of President Trump, the United States is back to leading the effort to restore peace around the world. President Trump will continue to work towards ensuring Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon,' a White House official said in response to a question about Trump's plans when it came to the joint statement. Trump's decision not to sign the statement sets up an immediate divide with his counterparts before the summit even gets underway in the Canadian Rockies. This is a developing story and will be updated.