Ford government studied, shelved Hwy. 401 tunnel research in 2021
Those findings are in documents obtained by CBC News through a freedom of information request. The briefing notes for senior government officials, dated Feb. 19, 2025, lay out the history of work on the controversial proposal that Ford first floated publicly last year.
"The project was paused in late 2021 based on government direction," civil servants wrote in the briefing note.
"The planning study was not advertised, and no additional work has occurred on the project."
Ford's plan would see the tunnel built from Mississauga in the west to Scarborough in the east. In April, the government began the process of finding a firm to complete a new feasibility study into tunneling or building an elevated expressway above the current highway. That study isn't expected to be completed until 2027.
But the documents obtained by CBC News show that the government appears to have already conducted its own analysis and quietly shelved that detailed work five years ago. The planning study has not been released and it's not clear why the work was stopped.
The civil servants say in the documents that the study examined options to compare "assumptions, findings, costing, and technical design considerations."
WATCH | Experts say proposed tunnel could cost $100B:
Pair of ministries, consultant prepared the 'high-level analysis'
The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Ontario worked on the study with the help of an outside engineering consultant. They "conducted a high-level analysis on three tunnel concepts and two elevated roadway concepts," the note says.
That work appears to have been prompted by a number of unsolicited proposals to government between 2019 and 2021 from companies pitching plans to build a 401 tunnel. The submission of such proposals is not unusual, and Ontario created a policy framework and submissions portal to streamline the process in 2019, the documents say.
"(The proposals) received by the government in 2019 led to an initial assessment of the feasibility and benefits of a tunnel or similar large-scale capital infrastructure project on the central Highway 401 corridor, which would add capacity in support of decreasing congestion," the note says.
The documents say firms Aecon, Cintra and Acciona all submitted unsolicited proposals. The note does not provide specifics about each individual plan but says one proposed two tunnels under the existing 401 from Highway 427 in the west to Bayview Avenue or Leslie Street in the east. One of the tunnel concepts consisted of two "large-diameter, five lane, double-deck" tunnels, the documents note.
Crombie calls for 'full transparency'
Neither Premier Doug Ford nor Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria's offices responded to a request for comment.
Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie is calling on the government to release all of the reports on the tunnel. Ontarians need to be able to evaluate the merits of what could be the single most expensive infrastructure project in the province's history should it move ahead, she said.
"I'd like to know what the economic benefits are," she said.
"I'd like to know what the environmental impacts would be. Will it meet the goal of reducing traffic and gridlock?"
Crombie said she's skeptical the tunnel would cut congestion on the highway. It's possible the government shelved the work in 2021 because the civil servants found the mega-project wasn't feasible, she said.
"That's why we ask for full transparency and an opportunity to see the feasibility study," she said.
WATCH | How Toronto is tackling congestion:
Chow explains how Toronto is tackling congestion, gridlock
3 months ago
Critic calls for release of Hwy. 401 tunnel reports
NDP transportation and infrastructure critic Jennifer French said the Ford government needs to be transparent about what it already knows about the cost and feasibility of the tunnel.
"This just speaks to the fact that everything the government does, whether it's infrastructure projects, transportation projects, we are always the last ones to know," she said.
"If the premier is drawing from the report, or if he's ignoring the report, I would like to know."
Vetting unsolicited proposals is very challenging for governments, said Matti Siemiatycki, director of University of Toronto's Infrastructure Institute. He's not surprised that after receiving the three plans from the private sector, that the government wanted to work on its own 401 tunnel analysis.
"Some of them are complete hair brain schemes, and some of them have a kernel of truth to them," he said generally of unsolicited proposals. "It's very complicated and challenging for governments to sift through them and try to figure out the signal from the noise."
Siemiatycki said the 401 tunnel could take decades to build and cost tens of billions of dollars. For that reason, the government should release as much of its feasibility work as possible, including information in the unsolicited proposals that isn't proprietary to the firms, he said.
That also includes release of the current feasibility study planned by the province when it's completed, he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
36 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Letters to the editor, Aug. 10: ‘Canada should now take all concessions off the table … it is time to be tough against a tyrant'
Re 'Poilievre says Carney has failed with Trump, urges narrow countertariffs' (Aug. 8): I worry that Canada might capitulate to bullying from Washington like so many other countries have done. From my perspective, Canada should now take all concessions off the table, including elimination of the digital services tax. Canada should also impose tariffs on non-USMCA-compliant vehicles and other goods from the United States. Hit back on any other items that can generate revenue to compensate our people from the impact of tariffs, including energy and oil and gas. Perhaps Canada and Britain can reach a deal on steel. Both countries export to the U.S; if what each country makes complements the loss of U.S. trade, it could be win-win. It is time to be tough against a tyrant. Bullies are encouraged by acquiescence. Fawning is disgusting and encourages him. Janet Henley St. John's Re 'Carney announces $1.2-billion in lumber industry supports' (Report on Business, Aug. 6): Get around U.S. softwood tariffs by going metric. Years ago, we went metric for weights and measurements at great expense, for little payback. There would certainly be costs involved, but if we went metric on softwood manufacturing, then the world would be our market and not just the United States. We would lose the U.S. market, but then, as Donald Trump said, they 'don't need anything Canada has.' Frank Best Collingwood, Ont. Re 'Trump's firing of economic data collector raises alarm' (Aug. 4): Examples from Greece, China, and Argentina of the disastrous results of political interference in non-political institutions are helpful. But we don't have to look far to see similar examples much closer to home. Not long ago, the Harper government didn't seem to like the policy implications of demographic information, so the long-form census was cancelled; for similar reasons, scientific input into public discourse was silenced. And there are more current provincial examples of attacks on public institutions and processes. Institutional interference that serves only political purposes is always corrosive. It is well and good to be reminded of this by observing the international experience. However, that does not obviate the need to be aware of the same phenomena, past and present, occurring right here. Kent Sargeant Calgary Re 'How Norway cracked the electric-vehicle code' (Aug. 1): Here's one way to shift to more electric vehicles. Fully charged EV batteries should be modular and available for exchange at gas stations. It should take less than one minute when all EVs are designed for quick battery replacement. The removed batteries should then be sent to large central facilities that refurbish and recharge them, then send them back to services stations. Motorists don't own the batteries; the cost could be added to monthly electricity bills. This method would require little new infrastructure and no need for motorists to replace expensive long-term batteries. 'Refuelling' times would be faster than filling a tank with gasoline. Frank Foulkes Professor emeritus, department of chemical engineering and applied chemistry, University of Toronto Re 'What's in a number?' (Letters, Aug. 2): Several correspondents have argued strongly for lowering the voting age to 16. That, by lowering the voting age, democracy is strengthened. That, in particular, it is our youth who will have to live with the downstream results of today's political decisions. And, at present, the future has no vote. So why stop at 16? Since those under 16 have even more riding on the future, their votes should be cast by their mothers, acting on their behalves. I guarantee child poverty and related issues would be cleared up within a couple of election cycles. Just look at what the senior vote did for my demographic. Here is an opportunity for Canada to show the world we take the future of our youngsters very seriously. Allan Portis Toronto Re 'A long ballot satire within satire' (July 30): So the Longest Ballot Committee believes that election laws would be better made by a citizens' assembly. Why stop there? Given the issues with electoral politics on every file, why not turn Parliament itself into a citizens' assembly – that is, appoint members by random lottery? (The modern term for this is sortition.) If they want real democracy, regardless of leaning left or right, return democracy to its roots: This is how officials were appointed in ancient Athens, where elections were deprecated by Aristotle as a recipe for oligarchy. People on juries act seriously. It can work in Parliament, too. Mark Tilley Middlesex County, Ont. Re 'Vancouver mourns the loss of its iconic Kitsilano Beach log' (Aug. 2): While I understand the city's concern for safety, the removal of the beloved giant driftwood from Kitsilano Beach without thought for the community has truly left us saddened. For generations, this magnificent piece served as a play area for children, a sunset gathering spot for friends and families and no less a peaceful place for meditation for many of us. It wasn't just a piece of wood, it was a keeper of memories and a symbol of community connection. It's not too late to commemorate this driftwood's profound impact. I urge Vancouver officials to work with residents to create a meaningful legacy, be it through an art installation, a memorial plaque, poetry embedded nearby or ultimately a safe, remodelled structure that pays tribute to the original. Beryl Woodrow Vancouver Re 'Cleaning after my mother's death taught me about what can't be replaced' (First Person, Aug. 1): I, too, despaired at the task of cleaning out my mother's home after she died almost two years ago. My mom was also an organized 'keeper.' When I would gently chastise her for the multiple accumulated notepads, or stacks of balls of wool we'd come across while valiantly searching for some other crucial item, she'd smile and say, 'I will use them one day!' I'm now ashamed that this occasionally annoyed me. (I did, surreptitiously, do away with my childhood Encyclopedia Britannica set. I'm sure she noticed, but didn't say a word.) The smallest things made my heart skip a beat when I came across them after her death: her favourite lipstick tucked in the back of a drawer, a delicate and frayed silk scarf not worn for years, a copy of a note to a dear friend. I carry one of her many handwritten shopping lists-bookmarks in my wallet. Andrea Cooper Murphy Toronto Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@
CBC
37 minutes ago
- CBC
Sour news for pickle lovers: Bick's pickles no longer stocked at some Canadian retailers
It's kind of a big dill. Popular pickle brand Bick's, which is made only for the Canadian market, is no longer on the shelves of some Canadian retailers, a consequence of the ongoing trade war between Canada and the United States. While it's a jarring change for many shoppers, it may push consumers to buy more homegrown options and there could be other ripple effects that affect Canadian jobs and businesses. At several Safeway grocery stores in Edmonton, a sign on the shelf reads "Bick's pickles are currently unavailable as an unfortunate impact of tariffs. We are pleased to offer a selection of alternatives for your shopping convenience." Parent company Sobeys did not respond to several requests for comment. Pickles caught in tariff war "We're sad to hear that Bick's is embroiled in this tariff dispute," said Steven Oakland, the CEO of TreeHouse Foods Inc., which owns the Bick's brand. After the U.S. slapped tariffs on Canadian goods in March, the Canadian government retaliated with a long list of counter tariffs, among them a 25 per cent tariff on "cucumbers and gherkins." "I think a lot of retailers feel that 25 per cent tariff makes them just too expensive frankly," Oakland said, adding that retailers started reaching out to him with cost concerns at the start of the trade war. "The food business is a low-margin, high-volume business. And so there isn't 25 per cent either on the retailer side or the manufacturing side. So that has, in some cases, really inhibited the retailers' availability to justify carrying them." Oakland estimates that Bick's is still available in 70 per cent of the Canadian retail environment but said the company has been doing outreach to try and change the Canadian counter tariff, including reaching out to the governor of Illinois. 'An intertwined business' Bick's began as a Canadian company, was later acquired by a U.S. company and production was moved south of the border around 2014, Oakland said. However, the ties between the two countries have stayed strong. "We continued to prioritize Canadian cucumbers for that product. [It's] why we went to a Canadian lid supplier… It's just been an intertwined business and now we've got a border dispute that just makes that transfer back and forth across the border expensive," he said. While the pickles are assembled in Green Bay, Wis., Oakland said the company buys 11 million pounds of Ontario cucumbers every year and said all the lids on the jars come from an Ontario manufacturer. Now, the company finds itself in an awkward situation or — some might even say — a pickle. Sales are down about 25 per cent in the last three months, according to Oakland, who said, going forward, the company will buy fewer pickles and lids from its Canadian partners. Buy Canadian sentiment With patriotism surging amid trade tensions, many shoppers are opting to buy Canadian, but there could also be unintended consequences for a company such as Bick's, according to experts. "If buy Canadian means that people aren't buying Bick's, as an example, then Bick's is buying fewer cucumbers from Canadian producers. Then that buy Canadian is sort of coming back to bite, pardon the pun, the Canadian farmers," said food economist Mike von Massow from the University of Guelph. Kwaku Afesorgbor, a professor in the department of food, agriculture and resource economics at the University of Guelph, suggests it is ultimately customers who pay the cost. Afesorgbor said customers often end up absorbing the cost of tariffs or, if the product is no longer available, they face fewer options for what they can buy, which eventually affects their pocketbook. 'It's not great' Crystal Porcher wouldn't be offended if you called her a pickle enthusiast. The Edmonton woman grew up eating pickles and admits to eating the crunchy snack at least twice a week. She even has a pickle tattoo on her hands, one of 10 of her favourite food items. "If you're out in a pub or having a beer or whatever, they're usually on the menu and I am guilty of just asking for a bowl of pickles, even if it's just a side with something else," Porcher said. With several brands in the fridge at any given time, Porcher is still processing that pickles have been caught up in the trade war. "Personally, it's not great. Obviously I'm gonna be paying more for something that I love to eat. I'm not going to stop consuming an entire part of my diet because the prices increase a little bit. Obviously if I can't find them, I'll have to suss out some other options," she said. Food products caught in trade war The issue with Bick's spotlights how food products have been tangled up in the tariff dispute. "There are other products that have somewhat complicated supply chains, and I suppose pickled vegetables are an example of that," said John Cox, executive vice president of Pickle Packers International, a trade association of the pickled vegetable industry. Cox said the organization is advocating for duty-free transportation north and south of food products under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). He argues that it is particularly important for the pickled vegetable industry, which he said is competitive with slim margins. "When you have a 25 per cent import duty added to the cost of production, it makes it impossible to be profitable," he said. "I'm concerned for the long-term prospects for Bick's." For Oakland and TreeHouse Foods Inc., the timing couldn't be worse. "Having lived in Ontario myself for 11 years, I understand how important barbecue season is and I just hate that Bick's is embroiled in this right now," Oakland said.
CBC
37 minutes ago
- CBC
Carney says Canada's trade with U.S. is mostly tariff-free. But that's not the whole story
It's become a common refrain when Canadian politicians are asked about retaliatory measures or negotiations in the ongoing trade war: 85 per cent of Canada's trade with the U.S. is "tariff-free." Prime Minister Mark Carney said as much on Tuesday and again on Friday, when pressed for information about his next salvo in the dispute with the U.S. after President Donald Trump imposed 35 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods that aren't compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). "We're in a situation right now where 85 per cent of our trade with the United States is tariff-free," Carney told reporters at a news conference in Trenton, Ont., on Friday. But "85 per cent" only roughly describes Canada's exports to the U.S. which have the potential to qualify for exemptions under CUSMA — not the proportion of exports that is actually spared from Trump's tariffs. Citing that percentage alone understates the costs Canadian businesses are facing as Trump imposes more tariffs, argues Tyler Meredith, founding partner of the policy-based public affairs firm Meredith Boessenkool & Phillips. U.S. Census Bureau data shows that last year, only about 38 per cent of U.S. imports from Canada were traded under CUSMA provisions. Data on how many Canadian companies are CUSMA-compliant is not readily available. An analysis of the effect of tariffs by the Yale Budget Lab published on Thursday assumed that 50 per cent of Canada's exports to the U.S. are now certified. Meredith says applying for CUSMA exemptions can be a daunting process for small businesses. But he said that faced with higher tariffs, they may be considering either taking on the costs of certification — or looking at markets beyond the U.S. "We are one of the most trade-dependent on the United States of any developed country," said Meredith, a former economic adviser to the Trudeau government. "If the consequence is that trade overall falls, as we are seeing now in the data, that's going to be a cost that we disproportionately bear relative to other countries." Prior to Trump's tariffs, Canadian exporters could trade with the U.S. under Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status. That allowed them to trade with very low tariffs — or none at all — without registering for preferential treatment under CUSMA. All World Trade Organization (WTO) members, such as Canada, have MFN status when trading with each other. How do Canadian goods get preferential treatment? Products are certified CUSMA-compliant if they meet the agreement's rules of origin. Their eligibility is determined on a case-by-case basis since they must meet product-specific requirements. A certain amount of the product needs to be made in Canada with Canadian inputs to qualify for an exemption. Steve Mallia, owner of Starfield Optics, a Toronto-based manufacturer of telescopes and accessories, said registering his small business for CUSMA benefits "wasn't a priority" until Trump began threatening Canada's sovereignty and economy in January. "We saw our orders dry up literally overnight so we knew we had to make a change," said Mallia, who runs the business with his wife Natalie. His only other employees are a part-time bookkeeper and a chartered accountant, he said. In the past eight months, Mallia has been researching the process for claiming preferential treatment under CUSMA — without the same legal resources as a large corporation. The experience has made him feel that "the little guy" is being forgotten by the Canadian government during the trade war, he said. "This is the part that takes up a lot of time and costs money," Mallia said. "The last thing I want is to ship something and then, you know, customs gets ahold of [the product] and they go, 'You know what? He didn't use the right colour ink.'" Since March, more Canadian exporters reported that they would absorb tariff costs or raise prices than apply for relief through Canada's remission program, according to a report published in July by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB). In exceptional circumstances, the federal program grants companies relief from the payment of tariffs applied as of March 4 on products from the U.S. or issues refunds for tariffs already paid. The federation, which advocates for the interests of small businesses, surveyed its members about the actions they have taken to mitigate risks during the trade war. Why not fire back with more counter-tariffs? Carney was asked on Tuesday whether he would retaliate against the U.S. with a new tariff rate, days after failing to reach a deal by the Aug. 1 deadline. "We've always said we will apply tariffs where they had the maximum impact on the United States and minimum impact in Canada," he said. Unlike most countries subjected to Trump's tariffs, Canada has a comprehensive trade agreement with the United States in CUSMA. U.S. tariffs kick in for dozens of countries, sparking protests, outrage 2 days ago More than 60 countries were hit with U.S. President Donald Trump's latest wave of tariffs on Thursday. Despite global backlash and signs his own economy is taking a hit, Trump continues to promise even steeper tariffs ahead. The country is also one of few to have retaliated against the U.S. in response to Trump's economic disruption, a step Canada took before the U.S. targeted virtually all of its global trade. Wednesday, Trump threatened to hit goods imported from India with a total of 50 per cent tariffs, citing New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. And Trump imposed tariffs on dozens of countries' exports last week through an executive order. Tariffs now vary between 10 per cent for the U.K. and 41 per cent on war-torn Syria. That same order brought the total tariff rate of Brazil — Latin America's largest economy — to a staggering 50 per cent.
