Questerre reports second quarter 2025 results
CALGARY, Alberta, Aug. 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Questerre Energy Corporation ('Questerre' or the 'Company') (TSX,OSE:QEC) reported today on its financial and operating results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025.
Michael Binnion, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Questerre, commented, 'Our production averaged over 3,000 boe per day in the quarter after the tie-in of the three (1.5 net) Kakwa North wells. We are assessing both owned and third-party processing capacity for these existing volumes and future growth. A follow-up drilling program is now scheduled for the second half of next year.'
Commenting on developments in Quebec, he added, 'Interest is growing in our natural gas discovery as a secure and reliable supply in Quebec, particularly among industrial gas users. It is also being considered as the supply for the 550 MW Becancour thermal power plant as it may be converted to produce power for peak demand periods. As we work towards a business solution, we are also following the legal process to protect our shareholders' rights. We recently filed an application for leave to appeal a decision by the Quebec Court of Appeal to reinstate certain provisions of Bill 21 prior to our hearing on the merits of the case.'
Highlights
Kakwa North wells tied-in and on production
Questerre filed leave to appeal to Supreme Court of Canada following Quebec Court of Appeal ruling on Bill 21
Average daily production of 3,091 boe per day for the quarter, almost doubling production from the same period last year
Net cash from operating activities of $6.3 million and adjusted funds flow from operations of $5 million despite significantly lower realized prices
Following the tie-in of the Kakwa North wells, production volumes this year increased materially compared to last year. Production averaged 3,091 boe/d for the quarter (2024: 1,559 boe/d) and 2,414 boe/d for the first half of the year (2024: 1,612 boe/d).
Higher production volumes were partly offset by the lower realized liquids prices resulting in higher revenue for the quarter and six months ended June 30 compared to last year. For the quarter, petroleum and natural gas sales totaled $13.7 million (2024: $8.8 million) and $22.8 million year to date (2024: $17.8 million). The higher revenue contributed to adjusted funds flow from operations of $5 million (2024: $4.5 million) in the quarter and $8.5 million for the first six months of the year (2024: $7.4 million) and cash flow from operations of $6.3 million for the quarter (2024: $3.1 million).
The revenue was offset by higher expenses and contributed to a net loss of $0.7 million for the quarter and year to date (2024: $1.3 million income for the quarter and $1.1 million year to date). Capital expenditures in the quarter were $1 million (2024: $7 million) and $18.9 million year to date (2024: $9.7 million).
As at June 30, 2025, effectively no amounts were drawn on the facility and the Company held unrestricted cash and term deposits of $18.3 million. As of June 30, 2025, the Company had a net working capital surplus of $13.2 million (2024: $27.6 million surplus).
The term "adjusted funds flow from operations" and 'working capital surplus' are non-IFRS measures. Please see the reconciliation elsewhere in this press release.
Questerre is an energy technology and innovation company. It is leveraging its expertise gained through early exposure to low permeability reservoirs to acquire significant high-quality resources. We believe we can successfully transition our energy portfolio. With new clean technologies and innovation to responsibly produce and use energy, we can sustain both human progress and our natural environment.
Questerre is a believer that the future success of the oil and gas industry depends on a balance of economics, environment, and society. We are committed to being transparent and are respectful that the public must be part of making the important choices for our energy future.
Advisory Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains certain statements which constitute forward-looking statements or information ('forward-looking statements') including its assessment of processing capacity for existing volumes and future growth, the operator's plans for follow-up drilling, and the Company's views on interest in its natural gas discovery growing among industrial gas users. Forward-looking statements are based on several material factors, expectations, or assumptions of Questerre which have been used to develop such statements and information, but which may prove to be incorrect. Although Questerre believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on them because Questerre can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Further, events or circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted as a result of numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including, without limitation: the implementation of Bill 21 by the Government of Quebec and certain other risks detailed from time-to-time in Questerre's public disclosure documents. Additional information regarding some of these risks, expectations or assumptions and other factors may be found under in the Company's Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2024, and other documents available on the Company's profile at www.sedar.com. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date hereof and Questerre undertakes no obligations to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.
Certain information set out herein may be considered as 'financial outlook' within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The purpose of this financial outlook is to provide readers with disclosure regarding Questerre's reasonable expectations as to the anticipated results of its proposed business activities for the periods indicated. Readers are cautioned that the financial outlook may not be appropriate for other purposes.
(1) For the three-month period ended June 30, 2025, liquids production including light crude and natural gas liquids accounted for 1,690 bbls/d (2024: 931 bbls/d) and natural gas including conventional and shale gas accounted for 8,409 Mcf/d (2023: 3,767 Mcf/d). For the six-month period ended June 30, 2025, liquids production including light crude and natural gas liquids accounted for 1,346 bbls/d (2024: 955 bbls/d) and natural gas including conventional and shale gas accounted for 6,412 Mcf/d (2024: 3,942 Mcf/d).
Barrel of oil equivalent ('boe') amounts may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio has been calculated using a conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil and the conversion ratio of one barrel to six thousand cubic feet is based on an energy equivalent conversion method application at the burner tip and does not necessarily represent an economic value equivalent at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalent of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication of value.
This press release contains the terms 'adjusted funds flow from operations' and 'working capital surplus' which are non-GAAP terms. Questerre uses these measures to help evaluate its performance.
As an indicator of Questerre's performance, adjusted funds flow from operations should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, cash flows from operating activities as determined in accordance with GAAP. Questerre's determination of adjusted funds flow from operations may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. Questerre considers adjusted funds flow from operations to be a key measure as it demonstrates the Company's ability to generate the cash necessary to fund operations and support activities related to its major assets.
Three months ended June 30,
Six months ended June 30,
($ thousands)
2025
2024
2025
2024
Net cash from operating activities
$ 6,288
$ 3,141
$ 9,646
$ 5,769
Change in non-cash operating working capital
(1,283
)
1,314
(1,099
)
1,659
Adjusted Funds Flow from Operations
$ 5,005
$ 4,455
$ 8,547
$ 7,428
Working capital surplus is a non-GAAP measure calculated as current assets less current liabilities excluding risk management contracts and lease liabilities.
CONTACT: For further information, please contact: Questerre Energy Corporation Jason D'Silva, Chief Financial Officer (403) 777-1185 | (403) 777-1578 (FAX) |Email: info@questerre.comSign in to access your portfolio
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Schneider Electric Infrastructure Ltd (BOM:534139) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong ...
Release Date: August 08, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Schneider Electric Infrastructure Ltd (BOM:534139) reported a strong order growth of 42.1% compared to the same period last year, indicating robust demand for its products and services. The company has a significant backlog that is 25% higher than the previous year, ensuring future revenue streams. Schneider Electric Infrastructure Ltd (BOM:534139) is strategically positioned to benefit from India's growing focus on green energy, with a substantial portion of new orders coming from renewable energy projects. The company is actively engaging with policymakers and stakeholders to influence and adapt to emerging market trends, particularly in digital and sustainable infrastructure. Schneider Electric Infrastructure Ltd (BOM:534139) is investing in capacity expansion to meet future market demands, with all projects progressing as planned. Negative Points The company's gross margins decreased by 1.5% compared to the previous year, attributed to the absence of exceptional credits that were present in the prior period. Sales growth was moderate at 4.8%, partly due to project delays and spillovers into the next quarter. EBITDA margin decreased by 2.4 percentage points, reflecting challenges in maintaining profitability amidst rising costs. Employee costs increased by 11.8%, driven by inflation, salary hikes, and additional headcount, impacting overall profitability. The company faces competitive pressures in the industry, with many players expanding capacities, which could impact future margins. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with NSE:JASH. Q: Can you provide more specifics on the order wins this quarter and the segments driving growth? Also, why have gross margins been lower this quarter? A: (Unidentified_3, Managing Director and CEO) The lower margins are a timing issue, not a long-term concern. We are confident in meeting our full-year margin and profitability targets. The order wins are spread across various segments, and while power and grid remain our core business, contributing 40-45% of our revenue, other segments like data centers and energy are also contributing to growth. However, these segments can vary quarter to quarter. Q: What caused the moderate sales growth this quarter, and will the spillovers be captured in the next quarters? A: (Unidentified_3, Managing Director and CEO) The 5% sales growth was due to project delays that shifted some sales into Q2. This is not a concern as these will be captured in subsequent quarters. We maintain our full-year guidance, supported by a strong 26% growth in order backlog. Q: What is the outlook for H2 in terms of growth and margins? A: (Unidentified_4, Chief Financial Officer) With a strong order backlog, we expect better numbers in the upcoming quarters. The backlog and order inflow are strong indicators of improved performance in H2. Q: Is there any impact from geopolitical announcements or tariffs from the US on India? A: (Unidentified_3, Managing Director and CEO) There is no major impact on us from the recent geopolitical announcements or US tariffs. Q: Can you provide guidance for FY26 in terms of revenue growth, margin, and order flow? A: (Unidentified_4, Chief Financial Officer) We do not provide specific guidance, but the strong order backlog and our focus on execution suggest a positive outlook. We are optimistic about future performance despite a muted Q1. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - New plan to limit Russian energy, protect US trade
President Trump has become increasingly angry with Russian President Vladimir Putin. For about two months he has been threatening the Kremlin with 'secondary' sanctions, which would impose high duties on imports from the nations which continue to purchase Russian energy resources. The Russians seem unfazed by Trump's warnings (as well as by Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) recent remarks), citing their resilience to sanctions. Several authoritative sources argue that the U.S. simply cannot afford to impose even 100 percent duties on China, India or Turkey. If all of Russia's energy trading partners were subjected to new tariffs, the U.S. would hijack a significant part of its foreign trade and ruin its trade relationships with at least 26 countries. I agree with those who believe the new tariffs cannot be put in place by Trump's updated deadline for Russia. We have seen that 125 percent duties on China lasted less than a month, and in recent days, President Trump has announced 50 percent tariffs against Brazil, 25 percent tariffs against India and 15 percent tariffs on the European Union. One hundred percent duties don't seem plausible. I would urge changing the overall approach to make the tariffs more affordable. The goal appears to be to cut Russia's energy supply to the world. Trump's plan should make Russian oil more expensive to the buyers (by the way, the European 'oil price cap' approach has failed. It resulted in discounts for the Russian oil, thus encouraging its smuggling and creation of Russia's 'shadow tanker fleet'). In this sense, Trump's position looks more effective — but the major problem lies in the numbers. The predecessor of Trump's strategy — the bill proposed by Sens. Graham and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) — calls for the duty to be applied to all imports coming to the U.S. from Russia's energy trading partners. I believe it is too radical and, frankly speaking, not very justified because of the lack of differentiation. A much better option would be to relate the tariffs to the actual amount of money countries pay to Moscow. For example, India sent $115 billion in its goods and services to the U.S. in 2024 and paid $49 billion for Russian oil that year. China exported $513 billion in goods to the U.S. in 2024 while it bought Russian oil, gas, and coal for up to $76 billion. The EU's figures stood at $939 billion and $34 billion, correspondingly. If the U.S. applies 100 percent tariffs linked to the Russian energy resources imported, it would fix additional duties for India this year at 42.6 percent of its exports to U.S., China's at 14.8 percent and Europe's at a mere 3.6 percent. These figures are not so astonishing. On the one hand, they seem manageable, and on the other hand, they still double the price of Russian oil for importing nations. If this strategy is taken as the principal one, the overall additional duties would equal the entire volume of Russia's energy exports, $261.9 billion for 2024. As the U.S. combined imports of goods and services amount to $4.11 trillion, the figure makes less than 6.5 percent in additional tariffs. It looks like a fair price for knocking Russia out as self-proclaimed 'energy superpower.' The measure would make Russia's 'shadow fleet' useless, since it doubles the price for Russia's energy for any country except those with zero exports to the U.S.. But these, if they exist, aren't significant oil importers that might be helpful to Moscow in substituting the vanishing demand for its oil and gas. I suggest amending Graham and Blumental's bill to impose the duty for goods or services imported into the U.S. to an amount that corresponds to each country's imports of Russian energy resources for the previous year. It would be a right recipe to destroy the Russian energy exports in two to three years and put Putin's economy on the brink of collapse without ruining America's trade ties to its major commercial partners. Should Trump adopt such a plan on Aug. 11, the chances of stopping Russia's aggression against Ukraine could rise significantly. Vladislav Inozemtsev is special adviser to the Middle East Media Research Institute's Russian Media Studies Project and is co-founder and senior fellow at the Center for Analysis and Strategies in Europe. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Smartest High-Yield Energy Stocks to Buy With $2,000 Right Now
Key Points The energy sector is seeing a big shift, with the world moving from dirtier energy sources to cleaner ones. TotalEnergies is an integrated energy giant that's got a big yield and a growing electricity business. Enbridge is a high-yield midstream giant shifting toward natural gas and dipping into renewable power. 10 stocks we like better than Enbridge › Between 2020 and 2050, electricity is expected to rise from 21% of final energy use in the United States to 32%. That's a huge change and one that is directionally similar to the changes taking shape throughout the world. Some energy companies are sticking to their oil and natural gas roots. Others, like TotalEnergies (NYSE: TTE) and Enbridge (NYSE: ENB), see the writing on the wall and are preparing now. If you have $2,000 to invest today, getting ahead of the curve could be a good call for your portfolio. What do TotalEnergies and Enbridge do? TotalEnergies is what is known as an integrated energy company. It has operations in the upstream (oil and natural gas production), the midstream (pipelines), and the downstream (chemicals and refining). Each of these segments of the broader energy sector operates a little differently through the energy cycle. And, thus, having an integrated business model helps to soften the peaks and valleys inherent to this commodity-driven business. Enbridge is focused on the midstream space. It essentially collects tolls from customers that use its energy transportation assets, including things like pipelines and storage. This model provides reliable cash flows as the volume passing through its midstream system is more important than the price of oil and natural gas. Focusing on the midstream is a good call for investors who want energy exposure but who would rather avoid commodity risk. What are TotalEnergies and Enbridge doing differently? Basically, the core of both of these businesses is still oil and natural gas. That's not a bad thing. Although there is an energy transition taking place, it is likely to be a decades-long affair. They are, thus, using profits from dirtier energy sources to fund their investment into cleaner energy sources, like renewable power. For example, both TotalEnergies and Enbridge have been investing in renewable power like solar and wind. TotalEnergies has also been buying electric utility businesses. Enbridge, meanwhile, has also been focused on increasing its exposure to reliable natural gas businesses, like regulated natural gas utility operations, which are expected to be important transitional assets as the world moves in a green direction. To be fair, neither TotalEnergies nor Enbridge is jumping in with both feet here. They are dipping their toes in, slowly building businesses as the world begins its transition away from carbon fuels. The idea is to change with the world, while many of their peers are simply sticking it out as long as they can with carbon fuels. If you like the idea of hedging your bets, however, TotalEnergies and Enbridge will be good choices for you. With $2,000, you can buy around 33 shares of TotalEnergies and 42 of Enbridge. You'll be rewarded with big yields, too The energy transition angle is interesting on its own. But the big story is that TotalEnergies has a lofty 6.5% dividend yield while Enbridge's yield sits at 5.9%. The average energy stock's yield is around 3.4%. And both have long histories of supporting dividends through the market cycle. Enbridge's record is better, with 30 annual increases. TotalEnergies' resilience shone through during the coronavirus pandemic when it maintained its dividend even as its European peers cut their dividends. There is one caveat here. Both Enbridge and TotalEnergies are foreign companies, so investors have to pay foreign taxes (a portion of which U.S. investors can claim back come tax time). And the actual dividends collected will vary along with exchange rates. But if you want to have energy exposure, collect large dividends, and prepare today for a future that's "cleaner", these two energy giants should be on your radar right now. Do the experts think Enbridge is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Enbridge make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,060% vs. just 182% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 877.64%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Enbridge and TotalEnergies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Enbridge. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Smartest High-Yield Energy Stocks to Buy With $2,000 Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
