NATO Summit At Hague Shows Once Again Europe Has Surrendered To Trump
By Nitya Chakraborty
The Rambo of the global diplomacy Donald Trump joined the NATO summit at Hague on June 24-25 with a triumphant smile after organizing the ceasefire between Israel and Iran in their 12 day war and strongly imparting the signal that no one matters in the world affairs now excepting the U.S. President. The major European nations which were resorting to anti-Trump rhetoric in the last four months since the last February summit of NATO completely took an about turn and agreed to what Trump wanted. The NATO declaration issued on June 25 was a total vindication of Trump line on imposing 5 per cent of the members respective national incomes on defence spending gradually by 2035. Spain was the only dissenter but Trump threatened Spain and said that he would take care of Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez later.
Just remember what happened at the last meeting of NATO and later at the Munich Security Conference of European nations in February this year. US vice president J D Vance termed the European nations as freeloaders and said that USA would no longer carry the burden of defending Europe. French President Emanuel Macron as also Germany talked of independent defence arrangement without depending on USA. European Union members prepared alternative plan for a European security system on its own strength. Only NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, being a pragmatist remained silent. He knew how far the key powers of Europe could go with their plan without assistance from the USA.
So this time at the Hague summit, Rutte was ecstatic at the sight of Donald Trump. He presented the joint declaration as a victory of Trump. He sent a private message saying you will achieve something which no other American President, in decades, could have done. Rutte even said that Trump had done the right thing by persuading the Europeans to do what they did not do on their own.
After so much flattery and seeing the European leaders of NATO in bended knees, Trump was overwhelmed. 'This was a tremendous summit, and I enjoyed it very much,' he said at a news conference at the end of the meeting. He added that he understood the central role the United States plays in the defense of Europe. 'They want to protect their country, and they need the United States and without the United States, it's not going to be the same,' he said.
The NATO declaration made no mention of Ukraine's membership though that was at the agenda. That was done as per wishes of Trump that Ukraine need not be a member of NATO. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had a meeting with Trump at Hague but he did not come out of the meeting pleased though the NATO sources said that Ukraine will be getting arms and equipment from NATO member countries. At the G-7 meeting in Canada last week, Trump could not meet the Ukrainian President because he had to rush to Washington on account of Israel-Iran war by skipping the second day of the summit.
In the last two weeks since June 13 when Israel started the war against Iran, Trump did not allow any power to take any initiative to stop the war. France, Germany and Britain talked with Iran about a formula but Trump totally ignored that. President Putin wanted to mediate but Trump just told him you look after Ukraine and nothing more. China circulated a four point proposal but it was not discussed at any level. So all through it was Trump and Trump alone who dealt with the issues of negotiations projecting himself as the only world leader who matters in the year 2025 in global diplomacy.
Gaza still remains an issue and Israel is killing Palestinians consistently. All nations are talking and giving statements but no country including China and Russia are taking concrete steps to stop the killings. This should be main priority of Trump if he really wants to emerge as a peacemaker. Gaza killings by Israel is the latest humanitarian disaster. It has to be stopped. (IPA Service)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
US says deal with Beijing will expedite rare earth exports from China
WASHINGTON - The United States has reached an agreement with China on how to expedite rare earth shipments to the U.S., a White House official said on Thursday, amid efforts to end a trade war between the world's biggest economies. President Donald Trump earlier said the United States had signed a deal with China on Wednesday, without providing additional details, and that there might be a separate deal coming up that would "open up" India. During U.S.-China trade talks in May in Geneva, Beijing committed to removing non-tariff countermeasures imposed against the United States since April 2, although it was unclear how some of those measures would be walked back. As part of its retaliation against new U.S. tariffs, China suspended exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets, upending the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. "The administration and China agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement," a White House official said on Thursday. The understanding is "about how we can implement expediting rare earths shipments to the U.S. again", the official said. A separate administration official said the U.S.-China agreement took place earlier this week. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was quoted as saying by Bloomberg: "They're going to deliver rare earths to us" and once they do that "we'll take down our countermeasures." On Friday, China's commerce ministry said the two countries recently confirmed details on the framework of implementing the Geneva trade talks consensus. It said China will approve export applications of controlled items in accordance with the law. It did not mention rare earths. While the agreement shows potential progress following months of trade uncertainty and disruption since Trump took office in January, it also underscores the long road ahead to a final, definitive trade deal between the two economic rivals. China has been taking its dual-use restrictions on rare earths "very seriously" and has been vetting buyers to ensure that materials are not diverted to U.S. military uses, according to an industry source. This has slowed down the licensing process. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls of its own preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. In early June, Reuters reported China had granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three U.S. automakers, according to two sources familiar with the matter, as supply chain disruptions began to surface from export curbs on those materials. Later in the month, Trump said there was a deal with China in which Beijing would supply magnets and rare earth minerals while the U.S. would allow Chinese students in its colleges and universities. (Reporting by Nandita Bose and David Lawder; Additional reporting by Steve Holland, Ryan Patrick Jones and Kanishka Singh, Joe Cash in Beijing;writing by Costas Pitas; Editing by Lincoln Feast and Christopher Cushing)
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
Trump speaks of deal 'signed with China'
27 June 2025 11:45 WASHINGTON (dpa)US President Donald Trump on Thursday mentioned a signed agreement with China, without providing details."We just signed with China yesterday," the Republican said at an event at the White House while talking about making deals with other president also suggested that there could "maybe" be a "very big" deal with Trump launched a trade war in February with Beijing, the world's two largest economies have been locked in a tit-for-tat tariff fight that have unnerved global markets. In April, Trump increased tariffs on goods from China to as much as 145%. There were signs of easing weeks ago. According to Trump's statements earlier this month, the two countries agreed in principle to reduce export restrictions on rare earths. He also spoke of an agreement in the tariff dispute.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Why western-led regime change in Iran will backfire spectacularly
The US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites on 22 June marked the beginning of what many have long feared: direct US involvement in Israel's escalating aggression against Iran. While President Donald Trump has insisted that the strikes are limited and that his administration is not seeking regime change, the region's history suggests otherwise. Israel has repeatedly drawn the US into Middle East conflicts through misleading intelligence - first in Iraq, and now in Iran. Given this precedent and Iran's warning of "everlasting consequences", it is unlikely that US involvement will end here. Instead, it risks aligning with Israel's longstanding objective: the collapse of the Islamic Republic. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has already hinted that Israel's military actions could lead to the removal of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The US may publicly deny its intent, but historically it often ends up supporting or fulfilling Israel's strategic ambitions - including direct military engagement with Iran, which it had previously ruled out. Indeed, the US strikes triggered further escalation, with Iran retaliating on 23 June by launching what were widely described as "symbolic" missile attacks on US installations, including the al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar and sites in Iraq. Scholars have long warned that the push for regime change in Iran rests on a dangerous and ill-informed strategy However, if the confrontation intensifies, Washington could still seize the opportunity to pursue what some have called an "ultimate solution": the removal of the regime in the name of regional stability. Although Trump announced a ceasefire with Iran on Monday evening, which could yet collapse, the underlying tensions remain unresolved, and the broader strategy behind the strikes remains unchanged. There remains a prevailing assumption, especially among Israeli and US lawmakers, that regime change in Iran would bring stability to the region. Scholars such as Vali Nasr, however, have long warned that this idea rests on a dangerous and ill-informed strategy. It also raises a deeper question, often overlooked in policy circles: would regime change actually dismantle the ideological system that sustains the Islamic Republic? Ideological continuity It is a grave misunderstanding to assume that the political and ideological system in Iran would unravel with the removal of Khamenei. The ideological foundation of the Iranian revolution is deeply intertwined with the concept of wilayat al-faqih, a theological principle that underpins the Islamic Republic. The Iranian people will never forgive or forget US-Israeli attacks Read More » This centuries-old doctrine within Twelver Shia Islam grants senior jurists a guardianship role during the occultation of the twelfth Shia Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi. Under the leadership of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the 1979 revolution introduced wilayat al-faqih into the political sphere - an idea that had been confined mainly to religious scholarship. While there is disagreement among Shia scholars about the extent of the jurist's political role - Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani in Najaf, Iraq, for example, does not endorse its political application - there is general consensus that Shias should emulate the most senior jurist, marja al-taqlid, for religious and spiritual guidance in the absence of the Imam. While there are several possible successors to Khamenei, the next leader will almost certainly emerge from the Qom Seminary - the foremost Shia centre of learning in Iran, which continues to promote Khomeini's vision, including his interpretation of wilayat al-faqih. In other words, removing Khamenei would be unlikely to change the system. The ideological basis of the Iranian regime is not dependent on one leader. It is institutionally embedded in Iranian Shia Islam and will continue to reproduce the revolutionary doctrine at the heart of the state. Transnational strength Iran's global soft power is often profoundly underestimated. While most states have diasporic communities, Iran is unique in its ability to command transnational ideological loyalty. The impact of the 1979 revolution extended far beyond Iran's borders and its Shia population. It was a transformative moment in global politics, especially for Muslims - and above all, for Shia Muslim communities. The revolution carried deep theological and philosophical significance, especially regarding the doctrine of wilayat al-faqih. While many Twelver Shia Muslims reject Khomeini's political interpretation of this doctrine, others maintain a strong ideological commitment to the revolution. This allegiance is not limited to Iran: Shia communities in Pakistan, Lebanon, India, Iraq and beyond continue to express solidarity with the Islamic Republic. In diasporic settings, particularly in Europe and North America, support for the revolution is not limited to Iranian nationals. This sets Iran apart from other Muslim-majority countries. For example, while Sunni Muslims may feel a spiritual connection to Mecca and Medina, or even to the Wahhabi tradition, few would defend the Saudi regime. By contrast, admiration for the Islamic revolution and its institutions can be found among various ethnicities within Shia diasporic communities - grounded not in national loyalty, but in ideological and spiritual solidarity. If the regime were toppled by external force, that ideological support for the Islamic Republic would likely deepen. Any externally imposed replacement would face widespread rejection from Shia communities worldwide. Global network Iran has cultivated a vast global patronage network that now spans six continents. From Buenos Aires to Jakarta, from Africa to Europe, from London to New York, these networks maintain connections with followers of Khamenei. Shia communities may face disruption, but the ideological ties that bind them to Iran would remain intact They offer not only spiritual guidance, but also practical advice on daily matters. Even in the event of regime removal, these networks would not simply vanish. Shia communities may face disruption, but the ideological and institutional links would remain intact and could help the regime's global support base stay connected, sustain solidarity, and potentially aid a future ideological resurgence. The essential question remains: what would regime change actually achieve? It is unlikely to weaken the regime's ideological support base, either domestically or globally. If that is the case, then whose interests would such a change actually serve, apart from Netanyahu's expansionist ambitions and those of Israel's far-right government? After US attack, Iran could reconsider its nuclear strategy Seyed Hossein Mousavian Read More » There are serious grievances within Iranian society, particularly among secular and reformist voices. Economic hardship, political repression and restrictions on civil liberties have generated widespread frustration. These realities must not be dismissed. But externally imposed regime change has never worked in the Middle East, and Iran is unlikely to be the exception. On the contrary, such a move would almost certainly trigger chaos with far-reaching consequences. The real question now is not whether Iran's system can endure external pressure - but how far the US and its allies would prioritise Israel's agenda, even at the risk of extending a conflict that would ultimately undermine their own regional interests. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
