logo
Can't clap with single hand: SC gives interim bail to 23-year-old influencer in rape case

Can't clap with single hand: SC gives interim bail to 23-year-old influencer in rape case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday in its order granted interim bail to a 23-year-old accused of raping a 40-year-old woman.
Noting that the 40-year-old woman was "not a baby" and "a single hand can't clap", the Supreme Court on Wednesday granted interim bail after observing that the charges had not been framed even though he has been in jail for nine months.
"On what basis have you (Prosecution and Delhi police) filed the case under Section 376 (Rape) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). She is not a baby. The woman is 40 years old. They have gone together to Jammu. Why have you invoked section 376? This lady goes to Jammu seven times and the husband is not bothered," observed a bench of the top court, led by Justice B V Nagarathna and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court Sentences Man to Life Imprisonment for Attempting to Murder Child in 2017
Court Sentences Man to Life Imprisonment for Attempting to Murder Child in 2017

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Court Sentences Man to Life Imprisonment for Attempting to Murder Child in 2017

New Delhi: A Delhi court, while sentencing a man to life imprisonment for attempting to murder a 5-year-old child in 2017, observed that the conduct of the man did not deserve any leniency. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court of Additional Sessions Judge Amit Sahrawat, on June 4, noted that the man inflicted several stone blows on the head of the child and also gave multiple blade cuts on different body parts from head to toe, leaving him at the spot in a bloodbath to die. "Inflicting numerous blade marks all over a seven-year-old child's body, trying to batter his head with a stone, and leaving the minor to die in a pool of blood showed the man's 'barbaric mentality,'" the court said. The ASJ was hearing the arguments on the quantum of sentence against Mohammed Moi alias Mohit, who was sentenced under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 364 (kidnapping to commit murder). Expressing anguish, the court wondered how the convict, a father of three children, attempted to murder the child in such a brutal manner. The act of giving multiple blade marks on the face, shoulder, hand, legs, etc., of the minor child shows the barbaric mentality of the convict, and it also shows the heinousness of the offence, the judge noted. Noting that aggravating factors against the man in the present case are the age of the victim child and the manner of committing the crime, the judge said that at the time of the incident in 2017, the victim child was aged about five to seven years. The convict gave several stone blows to the head of such a minor child and also gave several blade cuts to the body of the child, thereafter leaving the child in a bloodbath at the spot.

Drama in Odhav: Wanted criminal threatens suicide during arrest attempt
Drama in Odhav: Wanted criminal threatens suicide during arrest attempt

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Drama in Odhav: Wanted criminal threatens suicide during arrest attempt

Ahmedabad: A high-voltage scene unfolded in the Odhav area on Friday when a man wanted in multiple criminal cases threatened to jump from a fourth-floor flat as police teams closed in on him. The accused, identified as Abhishek alias Shooter Sanjaysinh Tomar, 25, was wanted by several police stations across the eastern part of the city for various bodily offences. Ahmedabad City Crime Branch was tracking him for months. Acting on a tip-off, multiple teams from the agency arrived at a flat in Odhav, where the accused was reported to be staying. As officers approached the flat, the accused locked the door from inside. After repeated commands to open the door went unanswered, the team forced entry. Upon entering, they found the accused climbed onto the ledge of the kitchen balcony at the rear of the flat. Standing at the edge, he began recording a live video on social media and threatened to jump, creating panic in the area. The cops immediately informed the control room and requested assistance from the fire department. Rescue arrangements were made while the officers tried to de-escalate the situation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 4 Ways to Retire Comfortably With £500k Fisher Investments UK Undo After some time, the team managed to overpower him without allowing the situation to worsen. He was taken into custody, and further legal procedure is underway. The accused is allegedly involved in crimes related to bodily harm and previously posted videos online brandishing weapons, said crime branch cops. Tomar is wanted in three active FIRs — two registered at Krishnanagar police station and one at Nikol police station. The cases include charges under IPC sections 365 (kidnapping), 325 and 324 (grievous hurt), 294B (obscene acts), 114 (common intention), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506(2) (criminal intimidation), and Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act. In addition, one FIR from Nikol police station includes IPC 115(2) for attempt to commit a serious offence. Tomar has a long history of involvement in bodily crimes, as reflected in earlier FIRs filed at Krishnanagar police station. These cases cover charges including assault, intimidation, mischief, and repeated violations of the Gujarat Police Act.

FIR now must if plaint clearly discloses cognizable offence
FIR now must if plaint clearly discloses cognizable offence

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

FIR now must if plaint clearly discloses cognizable offence

Mumbai: The State Police Complaints Authority (SPCA) on Thursday directed all police stations and chowkeys in the state via the Director General of Police, Maharashtra, that the registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the criminal procedure code if the information disclosed to the police by the victim at the first instance clearly shows commission of a cognizable offence, wherein no preliminary inquiry is permissible. "If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence, but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not. If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered," the authority has stated in its order citing similar orders from the Supreme Court in the past. The order came upon a case wherein a central government employee had approached Satara police over a serious physical abusive assault by his senior in th office. However, despite it being a cognizable offence upfront, and that being incumbent upon the police to register an FIR, the local police did not follow the law, and on the contrary, registered an NC. The SCPCA has not only directed the DG to file compliance of the order within next two weeks, but also directed the home department to initiate disciplinary or legal actions against the four police officials who did not file FIR. In cases where preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, a copy of the entry of such closure must be supplied to the first informant forthwith and not later than one week. It must disclose reasons in brief for closing the complaint and not proceeding further, the authority stated further. "Accordingly, it was mandatory that preliminary inquiry should be made time-bound and in any case, it should not exceed fifteen days generally, and in exceptional cases by giving adequate reasons, six weeks time is provided. The fact of such delay and causes of it must be reflected in the General Diary entry," stated the copy of the order obtained by TOI. The order was issued by the three-member authority led by retired Justice Shrihari Davare as chairperson along with Umakant Mitkar and Vijvay Satbir Singh as the members. "The police officer cannot avoid his duty of registering an offence if a cognizable offence is disclosed. Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence," the order stated further pointing out that the scope of preliminary inquiry is not to verify the veracity or otherwise of the information received but only to ascertain whether the information reveals any cognizable offence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store