Chambakkara Canal protection wall collapse raises public safety concerns
Tripunithura: A 50-m stretch of protection wall along Chambakkara Canal collapsed on Wednesday night, bringing traffic along the busy Kannadikadu-Chambakkara Canal Road to a complete halt.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The incident followed heavy rainfall and years of structural neglect, raising serious questions about safety and planning of canal-side infrastructure.
The collapsed section lies on wards 2, 3 and 4 of Maradu municipality, where a safety fence and footpath were recently constructed as part of Canal Shore Beautification project. However, opposition councillors of the municipality alleged that the work, done using ₹62 lakh from MLA fund, was unscientific and ignored the weak base of the existing protection wall, which is over 40 years old.
Following the incident, a parked car was saved with the help of fire and rescue services and locals after it slid dangerously close to the collapsed area.
According to ward 5 councillor Sheeja Sankumar, she earlier raised concerns about the vulnerability of the protection wall stretch in her ward, particularly due to frequent movement of barges transporting chemicals to FACT plant in Ambalamugal. She submitted a written complaint to irrigation department and raised the issue in the municipal council, warning of the dangers.
However, she alleges that the council, dominated by ruling UDF councillors, went ahead with beautification projects in their wards while ignoring the high-risk ward 5.
Meanwhile, municipality chairperson Antony Ashanparambil told TOI that he has written to district collector, urging immediate action under disaster management plan. "The collapsed structure is a 40-year-old side wall maintained by inland waterways department. Similar incidents occurred at other sections in the past. Municipal council passed a resolution last year demanding urgent intervention in the matter," said Ashanparambil.
Municipality opposition leader CR Shanavas demanded a detailed inquiry into the alleged irregularities that led to the collapse of the protection wall.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
NEET PG 2025 not before this date of August? Here's what NBEMS told the Supreme Court
The National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) has informed the Supreme Court that it will not be able to conduct the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for Postgraduate (NEET PG) 2025 before August 3, according to a post on X (formerly Twitter) by Supreme Court advocate Satyam Singh Rajpoot. Rajpoot, who represents the United Doctors Front (UDF), stated in his post that NBEMS, in its affidavit to the court, mentioned August 3 as the earliest feasible date to conduct the exam in a single-shift format across all centres, given the massive scale of operations involved. Here is the X post made by advocate Satyam Singh Rajpoot: This proposal by NBEMS comes in after the Supreme Court's ruling to scrap the two-shift format and conduct the NEET PG exam in a single shift owing to fairness concerns. Why did SC bar two-shift format for NEET PG? The Supreme Court's ruling came after multiple petitions were filed by medical aspirants and the UDF. The petitioners argued that a two-shift format could lead to discrepancies in difficulty levels across question sets, undermining the fairness and credibility of the exam. Represented by SC advocate Satyam Singh Rajpoot, UDF emphasized that such a system would disadvantage candidates based solely on the shift they were assigned. Agreeing with these concerns, the Bench observed that conducting the exam in two shifts would be 'arbitrary' and that the principle of uniformity in evaluation would be violated. On May 30, the court formally directed NBEMS to conduct NEET PG 2025 in a single shift to uphold the integrity of the exam process. NBEMS suggests new date for NEET PG 2025 In compliance with the court's directive, NBEMS has proposed a new exam date. The board explained that rescheduling was essential to make arrangements for conducting the test in a single shift for all aspirants across the country. Conducting NEET PG in a single shift is a massive undertaking, requiring the coordination of over 1,000 exam centers in more than 250 cities and the deployment of around 60,000 personnel including invigilators, technical staff, and security. NBEMS stated that maintaining exam integrity while accommodating a large number of candidates in a synchronized, single session necessitates significant preparation. It also stressed that ensuring adequate facilities, safety protocols, and smooth delivery of question papers nationwide takes time and cannot be rushed. The Supreme Court is currently reviewing NBEMS's affidavit and is expected to take a final call on the proposed date. Meanwhile, the board has urged candidates to keep checking its official website for further announcements related to the new examination schedule. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
New Indian Express
16 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Row erupts as IUML Panchayat picks Sangh-affiliated lawyer, UDF moves to reverse decision
MALAPPURAM: The appointment of R Krishnaraj, a vocal Sangh Parivar supporter, as legal counsel in a High Court case by the Muslim League-led Vazhikkadavu panchayat has triggered political controversy, prompting the United Democratic Front (UDF) to swiftly intervene on Tuesday. Following strong objections from Congress-led UDF leaders, the panchayat administration has now clarified that the decision will be revoked. The controversy emerged amid fears within the UDF that the selection of a lawyer known for his radical Hindu views could adversely impact the front's prospects in the upcoming Nilambur by-election, which includes Vazhikkadavu panchayat. The panchayat's administrative committee has since explained that Krishnaraj was appointed by the block development officer, who was temporarily serving as panchayat secretary. The appointment pertained to a routine case involving the assignment of a number to a building.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Bulldozers vs sticks: Residents protest eviction for ‘MLA colony'
1 2 3 Raipur: About 20 kilometers from the Chhattisgarh capital, tension is escalating in Nakti village, where 85 homes belonging to nearly 250-300 villagers may soon be razed after the administration served eviction notices on encroached lands. The villagers said that the govt has plans to build an MLA housing colony on this land but authorities haven't confirmed it yet. The villagers, especially women, have been sitting in protest with sticks in hand, for the past few days, against the move stating that they are ready to sacrifice their lives but will not give up their ancestral land. "The 30 acres land is recorded as 'community grazing ground' and over 30-35 houses with 250-300 families have been living here for 40 years. We got an eviction notice and we went to SDM. Outsiders are occupying land all across, and the govt is calling us illegal?" said a villager, wishing anonymity. He said that there were more than 15 houses built under PMAY while others also being built were put on hold, stating that it was a govt land and we were encroaching it illegally. Soon after, official notices were issued and residents were ordered to vacate the land, prompting widespread anger and protest. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Espagne : séjours tout compris à prix doux Vacances en Espagne | Liens de recherche En savoir plus Undo Speaking to TOI, Raipur collector Gaurav Singh said, "Notices are served to all those who encroach govt lands. They can appeal a civil or SDM court in case of objection. But I ensure, every action is taken as per the rules and regulations." The women were angered with the notice and an elderly resident Kamla Yadav said, "Even if a bulldozer rolls over my chest, I will not surrender my land." Another woman asked, "How can our homes be illegal when electricity poles, transformers, and water tanks were built here with govt help?" Officials indicated that the bulldozers can reach the village any time as per the eviction notice but it's confirmed that the land belongs to govt. Issued under Section 248 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code (1959), the notice claims that 85 families have illegally occupied land in survey No. 460 totalling 15.47 hectares, land measuring 38 acres in khasra no. 460, which must be vacated voluntarily or face forced eviction. With no clear word from the administration on whether PMAY houses will be spared, villagers live in daily fear of the bulldozers. But they say the standoff between people and those in power continues — sticks versus state.
