I made one change to my daily routine and it helped to lose weight
Like countless women, I've grappled with body image issues for most of my life. It really kicked off in my teens - as a child of the 90s, I grew up in the heyday of the ultra-thin craze, bombarded by magazines that would snap unflattering images of celebrities. They'd magnify a completely natural skin fold, then brand it with disdain as "flab".
There was a time my weight nosedived to a mere five and a half stone. Eventually, I reached a much sounder place both in body and mind, but now at 34 and with my wedding on the horizon next year, I've been feeling disheartened and low due to the extra pounds that have slowly accumulated ever since the coronavirus pandemic.
Similar to many office workers, I transitioned to working from home amid the global lockdowns, which signalled the end of my daily 45-minute walk to and from the newsroom each day.
I also moved out of my top-floor flat - in a beautiful but old building devoid of lifts - for a quaint little two up, two down terrace. I never expected to yearn for those taxing five flights of stairs, let me tell you.
I put on around two stone. Reader, I am not an exercise or fitness girly. I do love walking and am partial to swimming, but not much else. An obsession with Buffy the Vampire Slayer led to me getting my blackbelt in Karate at 13 but I haven't found any local classes nearby to take that up again.
A lifelong insomniac, I will never be someone who sets my alarm at 5am to go for a run. Shudder.
I'm certainly not going to fall back into the dark headspace of my teenage years but I do want to feel more confident in my body, and lose some of the weight I've gained in the last five years.
Getting back to a similar weight that I was in 2020 has, at times, felt like an impossible goal but one daily habit has made a massive difference and impact so far.
So, what is it? It's simple: walking and, more specifically, aiming to get my 10,000 steps each day. The NHS advises adults to 'do at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity activity a week or 75 minutes of vigorous intensity activity a week', and to 'spread exercise evenly over 4 to 5 days a week, or every day'.
My problem was trying to cram everything into the weekend and forgoing enough movement during the busy working week. Now the warmer weather and lighter nights are here, I've made it my mission to get 10,000 steps every day and though I still have a fair way to go until I'm happy, I can definitely feel a difference.
There's countless videos on social media of people documenting the changes to their bodies just by getting their steps in and I can honestly say it's working for me, too.
I'll go to the park, I'll do a few laps around the block on my lunch break; I'm just making more effort to get out of the house and on my feet.
In the Black Friday sales of 2023, I bought a beautiful dress to wear for my friend's wedding in the summer of 2024. It was only available in the next size up and when it arrived and I tried to try it on, I was horrified that I couldn't even zip it closed.
Fine, I thought, I'll send it back. But I forgot. It was banished to the back of my wardrobe and when the wedding rolled around, I pulled it out and, realising it was far too late to get a refund, tried it on. It fit!
The only thing I'd changed about my routine was getting my steps in. It's a lot harder to do in the winter and I fell out of the habit of it but now summer is back again, it's part of my daily routine - and it's working.
It doesn't feel taxing or strenuous - in fact, it's a really lovely thing to do each day. On one occasion, my friend joined me and we took our dogs for a walk around the park. We talked one another's ears off and it didn't at all feel like we were exercising.
I don't want to focus on numbers on a scale as I think that can defeat the purpose of exercise which, to me, is about staying healthy and feeling comfortable in your own skin - something I am definitely getting closer to each day.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
6 hours ago
- Scotsman
How Nigel Farage let his mask slip and revealed what he'd really do to Scotland
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... On Monday, Nigel Farage finally hauled himself away from his holidays and found his way up to Scotland (apparently for only the third time in five years). And while the media can never resist a circus, during his interviews with journalists, Farage let the mask slip. The Clacton MP blurted out his plans to replace the Barnett Formula – the funding mechanism that ensures Scotland gets a fair deal for devolved services based on the UK Government's spending in England. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It was as a result of the Barnett Formula that the UK Labour government delivered the largest budget settlement for the Scottish Government in the history of devolution and £5.2 billion of additional funding for Scottish public services. This means that overall spending per head of population can be as much as 17 per cent higher in Scotland. Nigel Farage is an English nationalist who doesn't care about Scotland (Picture: Carl Court) | Getty Images Historic imbalances Last year, the Scottish Government's own figures found that spending in Scotland outstripped all the revenues raised by over £22bn, even when North Sea taxes were taken into account. That means people in Scotland benefit from £2,417 more per head of additional spending compared to the UK average. In other words, it's the Barnett Formula that addresses historic imbalances and ensures that wealth is redistributed throughout the UK so that everyone has the best chance of accessing our NHS and using public services, no matter where they live. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But Farage isn't interested in delivering for Scotland. He is an English nationalist who called as early as 2014 for the Barnett Formula to go, and as leader of the so-called UK Independence Party told the BBC: "We've heard a lot from Scotland but the tail cannot go on wagging the dog any longer." Farage does not only have contempt for Scotland – it extends to our NHS. He has repeatedly called for the NHS to be privatised and replaced with health insurance. In other words, forcing working families to pay from their own pockets for lifesaving care. Feeding off voters' despair Now, with his comments on scrapping the Barnett Formula, the Reform leader has said the quiet part out loud. Reform would trash our public services to win over voters in its English heartlands. I understand why Nigel Farage appeals to voters. He's like the scam artist who targets people at their lowest – and the reality is that after nearly two decades of the SNP's managed decline, Scots are fed up. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But Reform are feeding off this despair without offering any real solutions of their own. So let's be under no illusion – the former stockbroker is not interested in Scotland. He doesn't understand Scotland and he really doesn't care about Scotland. Rather than trying to come up with genuine ideas to improve our NHS or public services, Farage is spending thousands on racist adverts targeting Scottish Labour's leader, Anas Sarwar. Anas is a former NHS dentist who was born and brought up in Glasgow and has spent his life campaigning for working Scots. And unlike Reform, Scottish Labour has made fixing the NHS our number one priority. Scots who are sick of the SNP's incompetence are right to want change – but it's Scottish Labour that is ready to deliver it.
Daily Record
6 hours ago
- Daily Record
Former Stirling care home site could be sold off for housing
The facility was briefly used for people recuperating from Covid more recently, but was once the focus of a campaign to save it from the axe. A former Stirling care home site, which was once at the heart of a heated local campaign, looks to be on the cusp of being sold for housing. Beech Gardens, off Polmaise Road in Torbrex, is situated within the original curtilage of the listed Batterflatts House and was purpose-built as a care facility. In recent years the home was closed and declared surplus as a part of the reconfiguration of care services across the Forth Valley, following the creation of the Stirling Care Village. In 2009, however, it was at the centre of a local campaign to keep it open after it was threatened with the axe in council cuts. While the heated battle resulted in it being given a stay of execution, its use was eventually phased out and it was used for respite care for a period. During the Covid pandemic it was upgraded, along with Allan Lodge, to support NHS patients in recovery being moved out of the hospital environment. NHS used the facility briefly, and the building was returned to the council. In a report due before a special meeting of Stirling Council on Thursday, officials said: 'Since the pandemic, the property has attracted interest from several parties, from within the council, and a formal asset transfer request was subsequently withdrawn. 'Current running costs for 2024-2025 were £32,953, which includes £11,641 of rates, £6,404 standing charges on utilities, and £14,908 on security. 'An external marketing agent was appointed to market several council-owned surplus properties and development sites, including Beech Gardens.' The officials said any changes to the site must protect the character and appearance of the designated conservation area and the adjacent listed building - with a single-story structure essential. Any future development should also prioritise the use of the existing building, unless it can be demonstrated that the structural condition makes retention 'unfeasible at a reasonable cost and all reasonable efforts to retain, repair and reuse the building have been exhausted'. The site is said to be 'well-suited for residential purposes, including private housing, social housing, or residential care'. At the closing date in March, there were five offers received, ranging from £500,000 to £150,000. Two offers had no suspensive conditions, or the offer was unconditional. Two offers were subject to either condition surveys or title and site services investigations. One offer was subject to obtaining satisfactory funding. The report added: 'Given its position as the most financially advantageous and that it is not subject to any suspensive conditions, it is recommended that Urban Nest Scotland Limited's offer be taken forward as the preferred bidder. 'Urban Nest Scotland Ltd proposes to develop the site for private housing and is in a position to progress with the conclusion of missives on the council approval. 'Urban Nest has held initial discussions with the Planning team regarding their development plans. 'This disposal will result in the release of the property, the achievement of the capital receipt, and the reduction of revenue budget pressure in this fiscal year.' At Thursday's special meeting, councillors will be asked to approve the preferred bidder and disposal of Beech Gardens.
ITV News
7 hours ago
- ITV News
Who is Ian Paterson the butcher surgeon and what did he do?
An ITV documentary, Bodies of Evidence: The Butcher Surgeon, uncovers the shocking story of Ian Paterson and his victims. Paterson, who was based in Birmingham, is currently serving a 20-year sentence for his crimes, after carrying out needless operations over a 14-year period. While working as a breast surgeon consultant, he was diagnosing cancer when there wasn't any and cutting patients open for no reason. He was found guilty in 2017 of 17 counts of wounding with intent and three counts of unlawful wounding. This film from the ITV Exposure strand talks to victims, fellow doctors and a key whistleblower to tell the extraordinary story of how the system allowed Paterson to perform unnecessary and damaging surgery on so many for so long. Here's a guide to who Ian Paterson is and how he performed damaging surgeries: Who is Ian Paterson? The breast surgeon, 62, is currently serving 20 years for his 14-year campaign of botched operations he carried out in the West Midlands. Paterson, who is due to be freed in 2027, was jailed in 2017 for wounding with intent and unlawfully wounding nine women and one man he treated between 1997 and 2011. He convinced cancer patients to undergo operations in NHS and private hospitals by inventing or exaggerating the risks of tumours to earn extra cash and maintain a successful reputation. Where did Ian Paterson work? Paterson was a consultant breast surgeon in the West Midlands, working in both NHS and private practice at Heartlands Hospital, Solihull Hospital, Good Hope Hospital, Spire Hospital Parkway and Spire Hospital Little Aston. When was Ian Paterson suspended? Ian Paterson was not suspended from carrying out his NHS or private work until 2011. Whistleblowers said they reported concerns about Paterson years before this. What is the Paterson inquiry? The Paterson inquiry investigated how the surgeon was able to carry out unnecessary surgeries undetected for so many years. In 2020 it found "patients were let down over many years" by the NHS and private hospitals and opportunities to stop Paterson were "missed, time after time". Inquiry chairman the Rt Rev Graham James, Bishop of Norwich, said there was a culture of "avoidance and denial", which allowed the breast surgeon to carry out unnecessary and botched operations on hundreds of women. The inquiry recommended that the NHS Trust, which employed Paterson, and private health firm Spire Healthcare recall all of Paterson's patients. How many victims did Ian Paterson have? A total of 675 out of 1,207 women who underwent the unregulated treatment had died by 2017. More than 750 victims have already successfully claimed after receiving unapproved and life-threatening surgery from Paterson, who treated more than 11,000 patients. Will they get compensation? Public and private hospitals Paterson worked for have already paid out millions of pounds to those he operated on and their families. Spire Healthcare, which runs the private hospitals where Paterson operated, has paid out £13.1 million in compensation and set aside an additional £4.6 million for "future costs". Spire Healthcare told ITV News: 'An additional £4.6m has been set aside to complete the ongoing patient reviews and settle future claims and costs. Spire continually reviews the level of the fund's provision, which is dependent on the amount and size of claims received and any new information gained.' The latest investigations Five investigations into Patterson's practices have been conducted following two independent reports, a criminal trial, and one government inquiry. The most recent, which has been suspended, is examining the deaths of 62 women who were operated on by Paterson and later died of breast cancer. How much will it cost? Despite the fact that the inquests are due to finish in 2026, the Birmingham City Council is allocating funding until 2028. More than £2.5 million has already been spent. The costs all relate to the administration of the inquests, including fees for the coroner, legal counsel, solicitors and legal teams representing the NHS. What has happened at the inquests into the deaths of his patients? Ian Paterson refused to attend the first of more than 60 inquests touching on the deaths of his former patients because he believes the coroner's investigation is "biased", the court has been told. The breast surgeon was ordered by coroner Richard Foster to appear remotely at Birmingham and Solihull Coroner's Court to give evidence at the inquest of Chloe Nikitas, who died at the age of 43 in April 2008. Mr Foster issued a ruling on the 21st October saying he could 'find no reason' why Paterson could not attend the inquest and give evidence remotely from prison, and said it was 'disappointing' to the families of the victims that he had decided not to appear. Paterson had been accused of attempting to delay the hearings after lodging an application to have his witness summons revoked the day before the first inquest was due to start on October 10. He cited health concerns, a lack of legal representation, and 'inadequate facilities to prepare.' The first inquest into the death of one of Paterson's patients heard on the 22nd October that a mother who was given a "cleavage-sparing" mastectomy then had her breast cancer return. Chloe Nikitas, an environmental consultant from Tamworth, was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2002 and was treated by the West Midlands"butcher" surgeon. He told her he could perform a mastectomy, which would leave some skin behind to ensure her cleavage would look normal. She then discovered a lump in the same breast in 2005, which was the same type of cancer she had three years earlier. That cancer diagnosis was terminal, and she died at the age of 43 at the Priory Hospital in April 2008. The inquest into the death of Ms Nikitas is the first of 62 into the deaths of Paterson's former patients scheduled to be heard at Birmingham and Solihull Coroner's Court over the next eight months. The second inquest into the death of another of Paterson's victims opened on the 29th of October. Elaine Turbill, who was 63 and from Solihull, was diagnosed with breast cancer and had a mastectomy carried out by Paterson the following month. The inquest in Birmingham heard that Elaine, who worked as a legal secretary, had been married for 40 years and had two children. In a statement, her daughter Gemma said her mother was a "kind, loving and friendly person whose smile lit up a room. She enjoyed going to church, cooking and gardening and loved family trips to Mablethorpe to "smell the sea air". Elaine Turbill died in 2017. Her daughter said seven years on, the pain never goes away. She said she feels her mother's death could have been prevented, which would have given her the opportunity to see her second grandchild. These inquests are currently suspended, and not a single inquest has been heard so far this year, with several hearings cancelled. Birmingham City Council has been contacted for a response.
