logo
For a single mom worried about keeping her kids fed, weathering inflation means wasting nothing

For a single mom worried about keeping her kids fed, weathering inflation means wasting nothing

CNN11-03-2025

The thoughts come quickly for Bianca Panelosa – make toilet paper and napkins from old rags, dilute juice and milk for cereal, ask the kids to eat less. The single mother of three, with a fourth on the way, waits in the cold predawn hours outside a food fair in north Houston, brainstorming ways to make ends meet so she can feed her children.
'I'm just trying to work it out,' says Panelosa. 'I'm still thinking.'
Panelosa remembers how she beat the odds before: surviving domestic violence and escaping homelessness after a divorce – which forced her to move back in with her parents. This time, it's tariff wars and rising prices at a time when she can't work.
Two of her children have disabilities. 11-year-old Adan is autistic and has Down syndrome. 6-year-old Andy can't walk upright. Her youngest, 3-year-old Naomy, helps 34-year-old Panelosa tend to her brothers.
The cold wind whistles and another thought flashes – boil tap water to drink instead of using bottled water. She's done it before; she'll do it again to help stretch the $400 she receives in SNAP food stamps every month – which is already not enough.
Cracks are beginning to show in the US economy and President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again threats of tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada are causing confusion for farmers and businesses. Government statistics show consumer spending is down and food prices are going up, all of which can make it harder to afford groceries.
'Buy less, eat less,' says Maria Martha De Leon, a 72-year-old grandmother on a fixed income, of her plans to cope. She arrived at 4:30 a.m. to stake her claim for free food.
Bundled up and sitting in a folding chair, De Leon's face is barely visible behind the scarf tightly wrapped around her head. In the back of her mind: the joy of cooking for her five grandchildren who love eating her soups and rice.
As day breaks, the line now wraps around the building. Many stand with coolers and grocery carts – hoping the bounty they'll receive is worth the wait.
More than 47 million people in the US, including 7.2 million children, lived in homes without enough food for a healthy life in 2023, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) says. More of these 'food insecure' households are in Texas than any other state.
The need for free food appears to be increasing. The Houston Food Bank says there was a 22% increase in distribution in January 2025 compared with the same month last year.
Brian Greene, Houston Food Bank CEO, fears it will get worse. An economic downturn would bring the 'possibility, if not the probability, of a significant increase in need and not having the resources to deal with that,' Greene tells CNN inside the group's 300,000-square foot warehouse filled with rows of food stacked several levels high.
'Food insecurity isn't really about food. Food insecurity is about people not having enough income to meet all their expenses,' explains Greene. 'It's just that food tends to be the most flexible expense.'
As beeping forklifts move pallets of fresh produce from cold storage to waiting 18-wheel trailers, Greene describes a possible nightmare scenario if there are cuts to SNAP, job losses, and disruptions to the USDA's emergency food assistance programs.
'We are getting a lot of concern, a lot of fear coming from neighbors asking us what's going to happen and how will we be able to respond,' says Greene. 'Unfortunately, we do not at this time have good answers.'
An increase in demand coupled with a food supply reduction could be devastating.
'There is no way we could make up the difference,' says Greene.
Greene remembers a time during Trump's first term when there was a US-Canada dairy dispute which resulted in food banks receiving a huge surplus of American-produced milk. It's one of the side effects of tariffs – if they are unable to be sold outside the US, harvests are more likely to be donated. But that's not the kind of boost Greene wants.
'We ended up distributing about 25 tractor trailer loads of milk per week for about a six-month period,' Greene says of a 2017 trade battle with Canada over dairy products. But it's not a windfall he hopes for. 'It's both temporary and again, the scale of it can sound huge until you consider how small it is compared to the overall economy.'
The Houston Food Bank says 49% of its distributed food comes from American farmers, either directly from farmers or through USDA programs. The remainder comes from retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers. We saw multiple one-ton sacks of Canadian-grown pinto beans and dozens of various Mexican-grown fruits and vegetables – a sign cross-border policies could impact supply.
'We actually do pull a lot of produce from Mexico,' says Greene. If there are interruptions in produce coming from south of the border, the organization's ability to serve could be impacted. But so far, the Houston Food Bank says, there's been no supply chain interruptions.
While inventory remains steady at the Houston Food Bank, demand has increased. Houston non-profit BakerRipley said there was a 13% increase in attendees from February to March in at least one of its food fairs.
'We hear they're not getting food stamps, they lost their job, they're ill, (and) they don't have transportation,' says Rosalva Hernandez, BakerRipley's manager of community development, standing in a room filled with people waiting for food.
During February's food fair, 912 adults and children received supplies, in March that number jumped to 1,030.
Hernandez wipes away tears as she watches volunteers hand out fresh produce and bread to familiar faces. She grew up in this community. Her parents live 5 minutes away.
'These are my people. They're my neighbors,' she says. 'This is my family.'
The organization has budgeted for 250 people to be served, but if more turn up Hernandez says she will ask them to wait to see what is left.
This day, the Houston Food Bank's 18-wheeler arrives with 1,910 heads of broccoli, 793 loaves of bread, 960 bananas, 924 heads of cabbage, 1,676 tomatoes, 1,200 onions, and 20 big sacks filled with 5-pound bags of potatoes. No proteins arrive this time, which sometimes includes peanut butter.
The sun is up when Panelosa's number is called. She circles the semitruck as volunteers hand her bag after bag of vegetables. She smiles as she realizes she can make mashed potatoes as requested by her son Andy.
She formulates the dinner menu in her mind as she drives away: fried fish, white rice, mashed potatoes, broccoli, carrots, bread, sliced tomatoes and banana-flavored water. She just needs to buy catfish at the grocery store.
At home, she opens her refrigerator and cupboards to show us all the items she receives from food banks she visits around the area. Cream cheese, mushrooms, butter, jelly, juice, tuna, canned chicken and salmon, beans, fruit cups, and eggs.
Worried about tariffs, she's stocking up food from food banks and consuming items based on their expiration dates – what's about to expire is eaten first. Her mantra: waste nothing. And she's grateful for her parents, her children, and her resiliency – which means getting creative when faced with adversity.
It's that creative spirit that has her thinking about turning old clothes into toilet paper and napkins if things get tougher. Bianca says there's no shame in being poor and caring for family.
'I'm not embarrassed,' she says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marjorie Taylor Greene Grilled Point-Blank Over Her 'Very Racist' Statue Of Liberty Post
Marjorie Taylor Greene Grilled Point-Blank Over Her 'Very Racist' Statue Of Liberty Post

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Marjorie Taylor Greene Grilled Point-Blank Over Her 'Very Racist' Statue Of Liberty Post

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) was challenged on Thursday to explain why she posted an image of the Statue of Liberty in a burqa following New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani's apparent victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. The far-right lawmaker, who has a history of anti-Islam remarks, captioned the picture: 'This hits hard.' The post was widely condemned as Islamophobic and interpreted as a dig at Mamdani, who will become New York City's first Muslim mayor if elected in November. Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) blasted the post as 'very racist' and 'so outside the mainstream.' Mamdani has been the subject of multiple Islamophobic attacks from the right since his win. On The Hill's 'Rising' show, co-host Niall Stanage brought up the image of the Statue of Liberty (which, ironically, was initially conceived of as being a Muslim woman in traditional Islamic dress) with Greene and asked: 'What did you mean by that?' Greene responded: 'Well, I'm an American woman and I have all the freedoms in the world to never have to bow to a religion that would force me to cover my body up and only see my eyes and my fingertips and that is a major threat for all American women, and I think that's something that hits hard for all women.' When Stanage asked whether the post was a specific response to Mamdani's win, Greene appeared not to hear the question and said: 'Oh, a Muslim takeover or possibly Shariah law. That is a great threat to every single American woman, and I think that's something all women should never want or allow to happen in America.' Stanage pushed back, noting, 'It's up to the voters of New York City to elect whoever they wish to elect, whether that person is Muslim or Christian or Jewish or anything else. So what is the evidence…' Greene interrupted: 'Well, of course voters have the right to elect that and I'll maintain my right to say that I think Shariah law and women being forced to wear burqas is the greatest threat to our freedoms as American women.' When asked directly whether she opposes Muslims holding elected office, Greene avoided answering and said instead: 'I am 100% opposed to Shariah law in America. 100% unapologetically opposed to Shariah law in America.' Watch the exchange here: The Statue Of Liberty Was Initially Designed To Be A Muslim Woman Dem Sen. Patty Murray Trolls Trump With Hilariously Brutal Taste Of His Own Medicine Karoline Leavitt's 'Have To Save Face' Jab Instantly Backfires Mary Trump Exposes Uncle's 'Grotesque Exploitation' Of Religion With Some Family History

9 Affordable Foods Safe From Trump's Tariff Hikes
9 Affordable Foods Safe From Trump's Tariff Hikes

Buzz Feed

time2 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

9 Affordable Foods Safe From Trump's Tariff Hikes

Trump's new reciprocal tariff plan has pushed the average US tariff rate to about 15.8% — the highest it's been in almost a hundred years, according to Yale's US economic research center. We haven't seen a rate with a percentage sign that high since the Great Depression. The fallout from Trump's widespread tariff announcement on April 2 (which he called 'Liberation Day') has left many Americans feeling the same way I like my eggs: soft scrambled. Soft, because we feel helpless against the tariff-powers-that-be. Scrambled, because we're spinning, trying to figure out how these massive import taxes are going to mess with our daily lives. Between the dramatic rise and fall of egg prices, the spikes in cost for items we love like potato chips and matcha, and the ever-changing news around global tariffs, grocery shopping in 2025 has us, to put it bluntly, crashing out. If you're staring at your cart wondering how your receipt says $86 when you just came in for 'a couple things,' same. And while we can't fix the economy, we can help you figure out what foods are still holding it down when everything else is going up. So, whether you're already feeling the recession vibes, inflation spirals, or just don't want to give up your particularly particular current fixation meal, here are some tariff-proof(ish), recession-resilient foods that are budget-friendly and, for now, drama-free: Dry legumes Bad news: Because of the recently announced tariff on imported steel and aluminum, there will likely be a spike in the cost of canned legumes (like chickpeas and lentils), but the good news is dried beans are more cost-effective anyway! Okay, because of the recently announced tariff on imported steel and aluminum, there will likely be a spike in the cost of canned legumes (like chickpeas and lentils), but the good news is dried beans are more cost-effective anyway! While cooking dried beans and lentils is time-consuming, it's pretty much entirely hands-off, and the money you save is so worth the pesky overnight soak. Eggs It was borderline traumatizing to check egg prices just six months ago, so I'm honestly in disbelief about this one. That said, a few caveats: avian flu still looms over egg production, and tariffs could impact imported egg products (like processed or powdered eggs used in packaged foods). Pork Some of us have straight up been bypassing the meat section of the grocery store because it's simply too expensive per serving. And while beef prices are high (and still rising), the USDA reports that pork prices are holding steady. So, swap those grilled steaks for pork chops on the grill this summer and bring on the baby back ribs! Fresh fruit and vegetables grown in the US, Canada, and Mexico Hold on, consulting my notes from 10th-grade social studies to confirm that NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) protects tariff-free trade of agricultural products between the US and bordering nations. It is. Phew. Peanuts (the American ones, at least) American PB&J lovers, rejoice — your sandos are safe. The US is one of the world's top producers of peanuts (shoutout to Georgia, Alabama, and Texas), and most of that peanut goodness stays right here at home. In fact, we export relatively few compared to how much we grow, which means the domestic supply is strong and less vulnerable to global price swings or import tariffs. American-made cheese It may be time to swap that French Roquefort for some Maytag blue cheese (made in Iowa), and trade your Irish cheddar cheese for Vermont cheddar! While fresh agricultural products from our bordering nations are protected from US tariffs, imported processed foods — like many of our favorite cheeses — are not. Cheese from Europe, for example, is subject to a 20% tariff, according to the USDA. And who pays the price? We do. Potatoes (Idaho's finest) While a bag of chips might be flirting with $6 these days, the humble potato itself is actually doing just fine. In fact, wholesale potato prices are lower now than they were just a few years ago. That's because potatoes are grown in huge quantities across the US — from Idaho to Maine — which makes them less vulnerable to the kind of global supply chain chaos or tariff drama that's affecting imported goods. Rice (except the imported kind) The average American eats a lot of rice, about 27 pounds per year, but US farmers grow a lot of it! US-grown rice is still affordable, tariff-resistant, and built for bulk meals. Short grain, long grain, basmati, arborio — it's economically stable as long as it's US-grown! Bread The US grows a ton of wheat, so your basic sandwich loaves are likely to stay consistently inexpensive and won't be subject to the wackadoodle market fluctuations hitting other groceries. Biggest takeaways: Stick to US-grown basics, keep an eye out for sneaky import drama, and follow the advice moms around the world have known for centuries: rice and beans is all you really need. Now that you've got the groceries decided, need help deciding on what to make? We've got you. Download the Tasty app for full access to over 7,500 recipes — no subscription required.

Senate referee greenlights GOP's updated SNAP proposal in ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate referee greenlights GOP's updated SNAP proposal in ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Senate referee greenlights GOP's updated SNAP proposal in ‘big, beautiful bill'

A Republican effort that would require states to cover a share of food benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for the first time can now move forward after recent decision from the Senate's rules referee. Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled a revised proposal from the Senate complied with the chamber's Byrd Rule, days after she rejected the GOP's previous 'state cost-share' proposal. As part of a sweeping plan to advance President Trump's tax agenda and reduce some federal spending, Republicans sought to require states to cover some of the cost of SNAP benefits — which are currently completely funded by the federal government — if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent. Under the updated blueprint approved by the parliamentarian, Republicans say states would be allowed to 'choose either the Fiscal Year 2025 or Fiscal Year 2026 payment error rate to calculate their state match requirement that begins in Fiscal Year 2028.' 'For Fiscal Year 2029 and following, the state match will be calculated using the payment error rate from three fiscal years prior,' the lawmakers added in a statement from the GOP-led Senate Agriculture Committee. 'A state must contribute a set percentage of the cost of its SNAP benefits if its payment error rate exceeds six percent. Republicans also noted that the proposal will help incentivize states to get their payment error rates down. 'This paves the way for important reforms that improve efficiency and management of SNAP while encouraging responsible use of taxpayer dollars,' Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-Ark.) said in a statement. 'In 2023 alone, over $10 billion was misspent when administering this program – underscoring the need for stronger accountability,' Boozman continued. 'Our commonsense approach encourages states to adopt better practices, reduce error rates, be better stewards of taxpayer dollars, and prioritize the resources for those who truly need it.' However, Democrats have leveled sharp criticism against the effort, which some argue could lead to states cutting benefits on their own by shifting billions of dollars in costs to states. 'Congressional Republicans have chosen to cut food assistance for millions of Americans to give tax breaks to billionaires,' Sen. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), the top Democrat on the agriculture committee, said in a statement on Friday. 'Instead of working with Democrats to lower costs for Americans, Congressional Republicans are doubling-down on shifting costs to states that they simply cannot bear,' she added. 'We'll keep fighting these proposals that raise grocery costs and take food away from millions of people, including seniors, children, and veterans.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store