Government launches crackdown on ‘misleading' private parking firms
But motoring groups warned the proposals do not go far enough.
Analysis earlier this week by the PA news agency found Britain's drivers were handed a record 14.4 million parking tickets by private companies in the year to the end of March.
That was a 13% increase from the 12.8 million during the previous 12 months, and more than double the 6.8 million in 2018/2019.
Each ticket can be up to £100, meaning the total daily cost to drivers may be near £3.9 million at the current rate.
Local growth minister Alex Norris said: 'From shopping on your local high street to visiting a loved one in hospital, parking is part of everyday life.
'But too many people are being unfairly penalised.
'That's why our code will tackle misleading tactics and confusing processes, bringing vital oversight and transparency to raise standards across the board.
'This is another example of how we are fixing the things that really impact people's day-to-day lives.'
Companies chase vehicle owners for alleged infringements in private car parks, such as at shopping centres, leisure facilities and motorway service areas.
Some parking businesses have been accused of using misleading and confusing signs, aggressive debt collection and unreasonable fees.
It emerged in April that many drivers are being sent tickets they claim are unfair because of how some payment machines operate, with one campaigner claiming the devices are 'set up to trap people'.
Some machines which require users to input their vehicle registration accept payment after only one letter is entered.
This has led to multiple cases of drivers paying the required parking fee but still being sent a parking charge notice when their vehicle was detected by automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras.
AA head of roads policy Jack Cousens said the details of the consultation document 'will not please drivers' and suggests the Government is 'bending the knee' to the private parking industry.
He went on: 'A higher cap of £100 compared to the original plans of £50, the retention of debt recovery fees and the inclusion of a £20 so-called mitigation charge does little to offer protection for drivers.
'We urge all drivers to complete the consultation and submit their views and experiences when dealing with private parking firms.
'If Government can understand the depth of contempt drivers hold against some of these shark-like businesses, maybe it will do more to help innocent drivers.'
RAC head of policy Simon Williams said drivers 'desperately need' a government-backed private parking code of practice, but it must have 'sufficient teeth to make a real difference'.
He added: 'We urge every driver who has been issued a parking charge notice that they didn't feel was fair to share their views on the consultation.'
Industry body the British Parking Association said in a statement 'We believe parking systems must strike a balance: they should deter selfish and anti-social behaviour, but they must also be fair, proportionate and transparent.
'That's why we will continue to work closely with the Government throughout this consultation, to help deliver a code that works for everyone: drivers, communities and responsible operators.'
The consultation will run for eight weeks.
A Bill to enable the introduction of a legislation-backed code of conduct received royal assent in March 2019.
This code – scheduled to come into force across Britain by the end of 2023 – included halving the cap on tickets for most parking offences to £50, creating a fairer appeals system, and banning the use of aggressive language on tickets.
But it was withdrawn by the Conservative government in June 2022 after a legal challenge by parking companies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
A majority of people back the idea of new housing or developments where they live, new data has indicated. The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
China faces pivotal welfare reform test as court ruling hits jobs, small firms
BEIJING, Aug 21 (Reuters) - China's top court ruling that makes it illegal for businesses and employees to avoid social insurance payments is stoking fears about jobs and the survival of small firms, forcing Beijing to confront the risks of long-promised welfare reform. The ruling, analysts and one government adviser say, aims to replenish depleted pension coffers in ageing regions and lay the groundwork for more generous welfare, helping China transition to a growth model that relies more on consumer demand and less on debt-driven infrastructure and industrial investment. The Supreme People's Court said this month the levies have always been mandatory, but acknowledged patchy enforcement. In practice, millions of workers informally agree with factories, construction firms, delivery services, restaurants and other small businesses not to pay into the scheme so they can keep the money. Hit by higher U.S. trade tariffs this year, some factories have fired full-time staff and rehired them as day labour to save on pension, unemployment, medical and other insurance payments. Analysts say the court ruling, which is effective September 1, could bring Beijing closer to meeting its long-standing pledge to bolster the safety net in the world's second-largest economy, but it also poses a difficult test to the government's broader reform ambitions as it creates immediate risks to economic growth if businesses and workers have less to spend. Jia Kang, founding president of the China Academy of New Supply-Side Economics, told Reuters the decision could be "a matter of life or death for many small firms." Societe Generale estimates the costs to firms and consumers at about 1% of GDP if the ruling is enforced. "China is confronting the core question of who pays for reform," said Joe Peissel, an analyst at research firm Trivium. As things stand, workers and businesses bear the burden, which undermines employment and consumption and may not be sustainable, he said. This calls for new policies to make more state resources available to the welfare system. "The long-term success of these reforms will hinge on whether the government is willing to shoulder more of the cost," said Peissel. The human resources ministry, and the State Council Information Office, which answers media queries for the government, did not immediately respond to a comment request. Social insurance contributions differ by city but typically equal about a tenth of gross income for employees and roughly a quarter for employers. That's high by global standards and incentivises informal workarounds, economists say. A complex system of paybands also makes social insurance payments highly regressive, with low-income workers bearing a heavier burden than top earners, discouraging them from paying, a 2024 report by China's top legislature found. A survey of more than 6,000 firms by human resources firm Zhonghe Group last year found only 28.4% of them were fully compliant with social insurance rules. Official data shows 387 million employees contribute to China's urban pension scheme, roughly half of the workforce. Mary Dai, 23, a waitress in the eastern city of Jinhua, said her boss asked her to accept a salary cut to 2,500 yuan from 4,000 yuan per month if they both had to pay contributions. "It's like one sweeping blow killing everyone" said Dai, adding such income would not cover her basic needs and she would return to her village to live with her parents. Qin Sinian, a restaurant owner in the southwestern city of Mianyang, said he fired six of his 12 workers to be able to afford paying social insurance from next month. His restaurant makes 700,000 yuan annually, of which 500,000 goes on rent, labour and ingredients. Social insurance will add 120,000 yuan, leaving just 80,000 yuan ($11,140) before taxes. "It feels like being crushed beneath a mountain," Qin said. Social media users have also expressed a lack of trust in how their contributions are managed. A 2024 cabinet report found 13 provinces had diverted 40.6 billion yuan from pension funds to other expenditures. Xiao Qiang, founder of U.S.-based censorship tracker China Digital Times, said some posts on this topic have been taken down, including views that the ruling disproportionately hurts the most vulnerable. A construction worker from the central Hubei province, giving only her surname Li for privacy, said neither she nor her employer can afford social insurance on her 3,500 yuan wage. "When they roll out these policies, do they even consider the struggles of people at the bottom?" Li said. Waiving social insurance payments has fed China's economic imbalances at home and abroad. It lowers factory labour costs and improves China's export competitiveness. It makes public infrastructure works cheaper, which in turn lowers logistics costs for manufacturers and brings supply chains closer together. But as China ages, missed payments pose risks to the pension system - predicted to run out of money by 2035. It also worsens industrial overcapacity by freeing resources for factory expansion. And it forces workers to save for rainy days on their own, a key drag on consumer spending. "A core flaw in China's overall economic development has been relying on suppressed labour costs to compete, generating large trade surpluses, especially with the United States and Europe," said a policy adviser, requesting anonymity due to the topic's sensitivity. "This is not a viable long-term path," the adviser said, citing trade tensions. "If you can't afford to pay wages, what kind of business are you running?" The adviser suggested Beijing should increase unemployment benefits before tightening enforcement to cushion the blow of business closures. Societe Generale analysts expect the government will either delay implementation or roll out more stimulus to offset the impact. "Another shock to the labour market is the last thing policymakers would like to see," they wrote in a note. ($1 = 7.1813 Chinese yuan)
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
German tax revenues grow at slower pace in July
BERLIN, Aug 21 (Reuters) - German federal and state tax revenues rose 3% year-on-year in July, a slower rate of increase than the previous month, due in part to a decline in earnings from sales tax, the finance ministry said on Thursday. The total tax take in Europe's biggest economy came to 65.74 billion euros ($76.60 billion) in July, with increases in taxes on income, wages and inheritance, said the ministry in its monthly report. In June, tax revenues had risen more than 7%. In the first seven months of the year, Germany collected some 513.3 billion euros in tax, up 7.4% from the same period in the previous year. Germany's economy contracted in 2024 for the second consecutive year and shrank slightly in the second quarter. Economists expect the export-driven economy to suffer further from U.S. tariffs and mostly predict stagnation for this year. The ministry played down any likely impulses that would boost tax revenues. "Leading indicators do not point to a short-term acceleration of economic activity," said the ministry. ($1 = 0.8582 euros)
