logo
Your legal rights if you aren't offered an in-person GP appointment

Your legal rights if you aren't offered an in-person GP appointment

Daily Mirror2 days ago
GP surgeries can offer appointments with a range of health professionals, appointments may be face-to-face, over the phone or online.
A medical negligence expert has answered common questions many people in the UK have about seeing a GP, including explaining exactly what rights people have. The advice comes as the GP Patient Survey, released by NHS England, has highlighted the difficulties patients experience when wanting an in-person GP appointment.
The results showed that one in three (34.7%) of participants found it fairly difficult or very difficult to contact their GP on the phone. More than a quarter (27.7%) of patients had their GP appointment take place remotely. Over two in five (42.5%) never or almost never get to speak or see their preferred healthcare professional when they ask.

Commenting on the survey findings, Sophie McGarry, solicitor at Patient Claim Line, has shared your legal rights to an in-person GP appointment. She has also explained what you can do if you feel you have been misdiagnosed during a telephone or video GP appointment.

Do patients have the legal right to an in-person GP appointment?
GP patients must now be offered face-to-face appointments if that is their preference. NHS GP says: "According to new NHS guidance, practices in England must offer face-to-face appointments if requested. GPs who fail to make the necessary arrangements for patients to make an appointment without having to spend hours on the phone or who are not available for face-to-face appointments are, in the strictest terms, breaking the law."
NHS England has issued guidance to practices which says that GP practices must ensure they are offering face-to-face appointments and practices should respect preferences for face-to-face care unless there are good clinical reasons to the contrary, such as the patient is displaying COVID symptoms.

In England, NHS guidelines say that GP practices should provide face-to-face appointments if you ask for one, but there's no strict legal right to an in-person visit if the GP thinks a remote consultation is suitable. That said, you do have the right to see a healthcare professional within 48 hours if it's necessary. If you believe you need a face-to-face appointment, feel free to ask for it and share your reasons. If they turn down your request, you can take it up with the practice manager or file a formal complaint.
NHS England says: "While the expanded use of video, online and telephone consultations can be maintained where patients find benefit from them, this should be done alongside a clear offer of appointments in person." You can read more about the choices available to you in the NHS on its website.
What to do if an in-person appointment isn't offered?
In a letter to GP Practices, dated May 13, 2021, NHS England states, at a minimum, that clear advice should be provided and maintained on all practice websites regarding:

How to contact the GP and ask for help.
How face-to-face or walk-in services can be accessed.
Ms McGarry says, firstly, you could check your practice's website to see if there is any information about how to access face-to-face or walk-in services. If you are unable to locate this on the practice's website, you could ask the practice to provide you with this information.
She also says that if you encounter resistance from the practice, you could refer them to NHS England's letter, which states that this information should be available on its website at a minimum. Ask your GP Practice to arrange an in-person appointment for an assessment, examination, or testing and explain why you feel a face-to-face appointment is necessary.

Explain that it is your preference to have a face-to-face appointment, and you can quote from the NHS England guidance that GP Practices must all ensure they are offering face-to-face appointments, and practices should respect preferences for face-to-face care.
She added: "If the GPs or receptionists continue to refuse to examine you in person, you could escalate the matter to the Practice Manager and ask them to explain why your wish and request for a face-to-face examination are being refused." You can view what choices are currently available to NHS patients in the NHS Choice Framework.

How to book, change or cancel an appointment
If you think you need an appointment at your GP surgery, you can contact them:
using a form on your GP surgery's website (many surgeries also have a form you can access if you use the NHS App or log into your account on the NHS website)
by phone
in person, by going into the surgery and talking to the receptionist
Before booking an appointment, your GP surgery may ask what you need help with. This will help them decide how soon you need to be seen and help them choose the most suitable doctor, nurse or health professional to help you.

Are in-person appointments 'better'?
Ms McGarry says: "Telephone and remote assessments have their place for certain minor issues, but overall, I believe in-person appointments are safer, and you are less likely to be misdiagnosed than if you had a remote assessment.
"If a GP is assessing someone by telephone, there is no opportunity for them to conduct any tests or examinations. If a GP is assessing someone in person, even if they just want to perform the examinations as a precautionary measure, this is more likely to identify an abnormality than a telephone appointment.
"An in-person appointment also lends itself to any incidental findings which would not be spotted during a telephone assessment. During a remote assessment, a GP is completely reliant on asking the right questions and the patient providing the right answers."

She continued: "People are also discussing difficult and sensitive personal issues. It may be easier for them to open up to a GP in an in-person appointment, where they are receiving face-to-face, hands-on, human care, which is much more personable, rather than speaking to a voice asking questions on the phone.
"Remote appointments can leave patients feeling like there is a disconnect between them and their GP, and like there is less 'care'. In stressful and emotional situations, patients will find comfort in the GP's physical presence and human touch.

"During an in-person appointment, patients are in the room with their GP, solely focusing on the consultation and discussing their symptoms. Telephone GP appointments can catch patients whilst they are at work, driving, or doing the shopping, so the patient may not be able to give the appointment their full, undivided attention."
What are the potential pitfalls of remote assessments?
As outlined by NHS England, without adequate training, support, and process development, staff may struggle to optimise patient care through remote means. In these circumstances, remote consulting could result in:
delayed or missed diagnoses
over or under investigation of patients
increasing the burden on clinicians to make judgements remotely
reduction in the therapeutic relationship between patients and clinicians
increase in the transactional aspect of care over personalisation, where patients experience limited interactions remotely or feel they are unable to see their doctor face-to-face
missed opportunities to pick up on subtle cues during a face-to-face consultation
digital exclusion of certain patient groups
increasing complexity for reception staff when booking in patients to different consultation types
Barriers to technology or simple blockers, such as a poor phone signal, can become problematic for patients being asked to consult remotely

Are there any people who are more difficult to assess remotely?
The solicitor said: "Generally speaking, children, the elderly and those with mental health issues or communication difficulties, can be more difficult to assess remotely. Children can have difficulties expressing themselves and their symptoms so this may require more careful assessment.
"The elderly may be hard of hearing and struggle to hear on the phone, and therefore may be less likely or able to give a full account of their symptoms. They may also be less technologically skilled and be unable to share photographs to evidence issues.
"I believe older people value the face-to-face and human touch more. GPs may be more likely to find incidental findings, conditions and symptoms in older people during an in-person appointment.

"Some people do not feel comfortable speaking on the phone and may find it difficult to express themselves or may benefit from an in-person appointment to feel able to open up about their mental health symptoms. However, it's important to remember that every demographic is vulnerable to health issues, which can be difficult to assess remotely."
Did you know?
If a GP needs to refer you for a physical or mental health condition, in most cases, you have the legal right to choose the hospital or service you'd like to go to. This will include many private hospitals if they provide services to the NHS and it does not cost the NHS any more than a referral to a standard NHS hospital.

You can also choose a clinical team led by a consultant or named healthcare professional, as long as that team provides the treatment you require. Find out more about choosing a hospital or consultant and choosing a mental health service.
You can book your appointment via the NHS e-Referral service. It can be done while you're at the GP surgery, or online, using the shortlist of hospitals or services provided in your appointment request letter. The shortlist is selected by your GP, so make sure you tell them about your preferences during the appointment. You have the legal right to ask for your appointment to be moved to a different provider if you're likely to wait longer than the maximum waiting time specified for your treatment.
The hospital or integrated care board (ICB) will have to investigate and offer you a range of suitable alternative hospitals or clinics that would be able to see you sooner. Read the guide to waiting times for more information.

Are conditions trickier to diagnose when appointments are remote?
Ms McGarry says any condition that requires visual assessment or physical touch is more difficult to assess and diagnose correctly when an appointment is carried out remotely. This can include infections, chest pain, and abdominal pain. It is important for a patient to be able to show the GP exactly where the pain is and for the GP to palpate the area to establish exactly where the pain is.
Assessment of a lump or changes to the skin
The solicitor says it is important to visualise and feel the lump to ascertain where it is located, its size, whether it is hard or soft, and whether it is painful when touched. Then, the solicitor says it is important to compare the visualisation and feel of the affected side of the body with the unaffected side of the body.
All guidance for early detection of cancers revolves around knowing your body, feeling your body and noticing changes, not to look at photographs. The GPs need to see and feel a lump to decipher whether or not it is suspicious and requires further investigation / onward referral, and on what basis that referral should be made, either routine or an urgent two-week suspected cancer pathway.

Visual or physical internal assessments
Ms McGarry said: "An example is a digital rectal examination to assist in diagnosing prostate cancer, or vaginal examinations with a speculum to visualise cervical abnormalities, assisting in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. GPs need to see and feel the prostate or cervix to decipher whether or not there are suspicious features which require further investigation / onward referral. They need to consider on what basis the referral should be made, either routine or an urgent two week suspected cancer pathway."
Do any conditions require intimate examinations?
NHS England says: "It is not advisable to encourage patients to send clinical images of intimate regions or reveal or self-examine intimate areas during a remote consultation. The GMC is clear that all patients should be offered a chaperone. Patients who require an intimate examination should, therefore, be encouraged to attend for a face-to-face assessment."

Limb ischaemia requires assessment of peripheral pulses to determine whether they are weak or absent. Limb ischemia refers to a reduced blood supply to the limbs, potentially affecting the arms or legs. Other conditions that require intimate examination can include:
Any condition requiring the assessment of temperature or blood pressure.
Visual assessment of eyes, ears or mouth.
Assessment of any orifice or skin abnormalities.
What if you feel you've been misdiagnosed over the phone or in a video consultation?
Ms McGarry adds: "If you believe that you have been misdiagnosed over the telephone or in a video consultation at the time of your assessment, you can ask your GP to arrange an in-person appointment for further assessment, examination or testing and explain why you feel a face-to-face appointment is necessary.
"If that particular GP will not arrange an in-person appointment with you, you can call the surgery to make a further appointment and request an in-person appointment for a second opinion and further assessment, examination or testing and explain why you feel a face-to-face appointment is necessary.
"For example, you could advise that you are very concerned that the lump you have located is suspicious and you feel a physical appointment is necessary so that the GP can see and feel a lump to decipher whether or not it is suspicious and requires further investigation / onward referral and on what basis that referral should be made. If the GPs continue to refuse to examine you in person, you could ask for the matter to be escalated to the Practice Manager."
If your condition is urgent or deteriorating after a telephone or video consultation, you should take appropriate action by attending a walk-in centre, urgent care centre or A&E, depending on the severity of your condition and your level of concern.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vet who claimed to cure dogs' cancers with herbal remedies fails to overturn ban
Vet who claimed to cure dogs' cancers with herbal remedies fails to overturn ban

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Vet who claimed to cure dogs' cancers with herbal remedies fails to overturn ban

A disgraced vet who claims to have successfully treated his dogs ' cancer with herbal remedies has failed in his 12th attempt to be allowed back to the profession. Warwick Seymour-Hamilton, now 86, was struck off the register in 1994 for keeping animals in appalling unhygienic conditions at his surgery in Orpington, Kent. Rejecting his latest 'vexatious' attempt to rejoin the register, the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) urged the octogenarian to 'take time seriously to reflect' before trying again. A disciplinary committee held in central London heard that the inspector who visited Mr Seymour-Hamilton's premises in 1993 was 'appalled by the unhygienic conditions in the operating theatre' including the 'prevailing smell and slime under the mat'. He said there was 'nowhere to wash' with a pile of about '100 syringes' on a dresser. His practices showed a 'total disregard of basic hygiene and care for animals', the RCVS concluded at the time. Mr Seymour-Hamilton, who rejects the findings of the 1994 investigation, told the RCVS in April this year that he wanted to make his 12th application to be restored to the register. He provided detailed accounts of his extensive work 'to destroy lethal bacterial infections in man and animals'. The former vet said he had 'emailed 3,221 authorities' with his findings, including the 'Prime Minister 13 times and 220 NHS trusts', the RCVS heard. Mr Seymour-Hamilton, who said he studies veterinary medicine for at least two hours a day, has spent the last two decades travelling and 'carrying out cutting-edge research' in what he calls his 'totally secure research vehicle' with his dogs. 'He said he had been able to infect himself with all the diseases he wanted to and the herbal remedies he had devised had been fully effective with curing him and his dogs,' the committee heard. He has now finished travelling and wants 'recognition for his work'. Mr Seymour-Hamilton also claims to have successfully treated his dogs' cancers with his herbal remedies, the committee was told. Providing a character witness for the former vet, a friend of 30 years described him as 'dedicated and driven… although slightly eccentric'. Rejecting the application, the committee concluded Mr Seymour-Hamilton has shown 'no real insight' into his previous conduct. Committee chairman Paul Morris said: 'Mr Seymour-Hamilton still lacks an understanding as to why he has not been restored in the past. 'He relies passionately on his research, yet he does not support that research with any peer-reviewed publications, indeed all his attempts to gain recognition have been rebuffed. 'The committee is firmly of the view that after such a prolonged period of failing to be reinstated as a veterinary surgeon, Mr Seymour-Hamilton has to face the reality that his continued applications, taking up time, resources and expense (which is ultimately borne by all those veterinary surgeons who are on the register), are vexatious and ultimately unlikely to succeed. 'Whilst the college cannot prevent him from continuing to apply to be restored to the register, Mr Seymour-Hamilton should by now realise that this is not a good use of the college's finite resources. 'He is now 86 years old and has not practised for over 30 years and in fact has now been off the register for longer than he was on it. 'The committee hopes Mr Seymour-Hamilton will now take time seriously to reflect and take into account the impact to all concerned of his continued applications, before deciding to submit any more.'

Breast surgeons see problems from procedures abroad on weekly basis, MPs told
Breast surgeons see problems from procedures abroad on weekly basis, MPs told

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Breast surgeons see problems from procedures abroad on weekly basis, MPs told

Some breast surgeons are seeing patients suffering from complications of cosmetic surgery abroad on a weekly basis, health chiefs have told MPs. It comes amid warnings that the NHS is 'taking the impact' of unregulated enhancements on the high street, which have become 'widespread' and 'normalised' in the last couple of years. Health officials appeared in front of the Women and Equalities Committee on Wednesday as part of its inquiry into the health impacts of breast implants and other cosmetic procedures. The panel included Professor Aidan Fowler, national director of patient safety at NHS England and deputy chief medical officer at the Department of Health and Social Care, Dr Alison Cave, chief safety officer at the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and Andy Morling, deputy director of criminal enforcement at the MHRA. They were pressed on untrained and unregulated people administering fillers and Botox on the high street for aesthetic purposes, such as liquid Brazilian butt lifts (BBLs) and anti-wrinkle injections. When asked by committee chair Sarah Owen what would be helpful to the NHS to stop this practice, Prof Fowler said: 'Well, I think from the point of view of the NHS, we deal with the complications of that and are concerned about it. 'We recognise the Government's consulting on regulation around this, and we're very supportive of them doing that, and recognise their concerns and share them.' When asked about how much rectifying problems from cosmetic procedures abroad costs the health service, Prof Fowler said a figure is 'very difficult' to calculate as patients will record a complication but will not necessarily disclose where the surgery happened. 'My wife's a breast surgeon, and she would say that she's seeing on a weekly basis people with the complications of surgery abroad, for example, coming in and requiring supportive treatment,' he added. 'But that's not recorded as a specific thing, and I think there is ongoing discussion on whether it should be recorded. 'But of course, then it comes to, how do we get back that money? 'And that's very difficult, because we exist to support those people who are suffering and give them care, and it is a very complex business to then turn to them and say, 'well, actually now you have to pay for it', it's a complicated landscape around insurance and so on.' On harsher regulation for aesthetic treatments performed on the high street, Ms Owen said: 'You cannot walk past, every hairdressers, every nail salon will offer Botox or will offer fillers, all for aesthetic purposes. 'But you're saying the things that they're actually injecting, don't have to meet any of the regulations because they're not being used for medical purpose?' Dr Cave told MPs measures to bring some products under regulation are currently being consulted on. 'I would emphasise that that doesn't then necessarily regulate who administers them, and that's, I think, what you're alluding to,' she said. 'And I think the Government consulted on that particular issue a couple of years ago, and will shortly respond to that consultation. So that may be a way forward.' Ms Owen said: 'And you can see how long in those two years, how much more widespread this has become, how much more normalised this has become. 'We heard about the psychological impacts, the mental health impacts… Young girls are particularly targeted, advertising on social media for cosmetic enhancements, that there are things such as a 'lunchtime boob job', for example, that there is a real slowness for the agencies that should be protecting people and making people aware of the consequences of this, and the NHS is taking the impact of it.' Mr Morling was also asked what the MHRA is doing regarding 'evidence that there's widespread administration of Botox without prescription'. He replied it would be difficult to put a figure on how prevalent an illegal trade is, but added: 'I don't think it's quite as big as one might think.' However, he stressed the organisation takes a 'multi-dimensional approach' on the issue: 'We do go out and arrest people, we do prosecute people. 'Because these are criminals and should be treated like criminals.' Mr Morling added the MHRA also carries out 'preventative activity', such as talks to raise public awareness. 'I firmly believe there are a number of practitioners out there who just don't know what they're doing is illegal, so their behaviour can be changed,' he said.

Honorary degree for Lindsey Burrow, who supported late husband Rob through MND
Honorary degree for Lindsey Burrow, who supported late husband Rob through MND

Western Telegraph

time40 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Honorary degree for Lindsey Burrow, who supported late husband Rob through MND

The honour has been made in tribute to her public and voluntary service as she continues to fundraise and spread awareness of the disease which killed the rugby league star. Throughout Rob Burrow's battle against MND, the couple raised funds, conducted media interviews and filmed a BBC documentary about their lives. This was while Lindsey Burrow continued to work as an NHS physiotherapist and brought up their three young children. Just two weeks after the former Leeds Rhinos star's death in June 2024, she climbed the highest of Yorkshire's Three Peaks for charity. With Rob's best friend, former teammate and fellow Leeds Beckett alumnus Kevin Sinfield, she has raised more than £20 million for charity. She said: 'I am deeply honoured to receive this honorary doctorate in health. 'This recognition means so much, not just to me, but to everyone affected by MND. 'Raising awareness and funds for the MND community is something I'm incredibly passionate about, and I feel privileged to be able to use my voice to continue Rob's legacy. 'As an NHS physiotherapist, I've seen first-hand the power of compassion and care – and I'll continue to champion both in everything I do.' Rob Burrow with wife Lindsey Burrow ahead of Mr Burrow receiving the Freedom of the City of Leeds at Leeds Civic Hall in recognition of his campaigning and fundraising work for all those affected by motor neurone disease in 2023 (Danny Lawson/PA) Professor Peter Slee, Leeds Beckett University vice chancellor, said: 'Lindsey's story is one of love, bravery and selflessness. 'It is a great pleasure to congratulate Lindsey on behalf of all students, colleagues and governors here at Leeds Beckett University. 'It is vital that we recognise the person behind Rob Burrow's legacy and the woman who not only was instrumental in raising awareness and money but also supporting her children at an extremely difficult time and continuing to support her patients in her role as an NHS physiotherapist. 'Lindsey is the perfect example of a resilient role model, and she will be an amazing advocate for our university.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store