Hubble Space Telescope spots rogue planet with a little help from Einstein: 'It was a lucky break'
Astronomers discovered a new rogue planet lurking in archival data gathered by the Hubble Space Telescope, and the find is thanks to a little serendipity — and a little help from the genius himself, Albert Einstein.
Rogue, or "free-floating," planets are worlds that don't orbit a star. They earn their rogue status when they are ejected from their home systems due to interactions with their sibling planets or via gravitational upheaval caused by passing stars.
The most successful way of detecting an extrasolar planet, or exoplanet, in general is waiting until it crosses, or "transits," the face of its parent star. Being cosmic orphans without a stellar parent, however, rogue planets can't be detected in this way. Fortunately, a phenomenon first predicted by Einstein in 1915 offers a way to spot these rogue worlds.
"Free-floating planets, unlike most known exoplanets, don't orbit any star. They drift alone through the galaxy, in complete darkness, with no sun to illuminate them. That makes them impossible to detect using traditional planet-detection techniques, which rely on light from a host star," Przemek Mroz, study team member and a professor at the University of Warsaw, told Space.com. "To find these elusive objects, we use a technique called gravitational microlensing."
How Einstein became a rogue planet hunter
Einstein's 1915 theory of gravity, general relativity, suggests that objects with mass cause the very fabric of space to "warp." The bigger the mass, the greater the warp and thus the stronger the gravity that arises from the warp.
Gravitational lensing arises when light from a background source passes by the warp. Its path gets curved. This can amplify that background source, an effect that astronomers use with Hubble and the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to study extremely distant galaxies that would usually be too faint to see.
"This phenomenon occurs when a massive object, the lens, passes in front of a distant star (the source), magnifying the star's light due to the lens's gravity," Mroz explained. "The beauty of microlensing is that it works even if the lensing object emits no light at all.
"During microlensing events, the source star gets temporarily magnified. We can estimate the mass of the lensing object by measuring the duration and other properties of the event."
Mroz added that when microlensing events are generated by passing rogue planets, they are usually very short, lasting less than a day.
The particular microlensing event the team studied to reveal this new rogue world is designated OGLE-2023-BLG-0524 and was observed by Hubble on May 22, 2023, remaining buried in data from the space telescope.
"It was discovered in the direction of the Galactic bulge by the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment [OGLE] survey, and independently observed by the Korea Microlensing Telescope Network [KMTNet]," Mroz said. "The Einstein timescale of the event was just eight hours, making it one of the shortest microlensing events on record."
Based on the microlensing event's properties, Mroz and colleagues were able to estimate that the lensing body object could be either a Neptune-mass planet located in the Milky Way's galactic disk, around 15,000 light-years away. Alternatively, the rogue world could be a larger but more distant Saturn-mass object in the Milky Way's galactic bulge, roughly 23,000 light-years away.
"Both scenarios are consistent with the microlensing signal we observed," Mroz said.
Hunting for planets in Hubble's archives
One of the most important tasks that faced the team upon the discovery of the microlensing event OGLE-2023-BLG-0524 was determining that this was indeed caused by a rogue planet, and not by a planet associated with a star but on a wide orbit far from its stellar parent.
They reasoned that if the planet had a nearby host star, within 10 times the distance between Earth and the sun (10 AU), they would have likely seen a second, longer-lasting microlensing signal from the star. The researchers saw no such signature, so they could rule out that the planet had a close stellar companion.
However, if the planet orbits a star at a much wider separation, greater than 10 AU, the odds of detecting the host star are much lower.
"This means we can't fully rule out the wide-orbit scenario, but here's where it gets interesting," Mroz said. "Because the lens and the background star are slowly moving relative to each other, they will eventually separate in the sky.
"If we detect light from the lensing object at that point, we'll know it's not completely free-floating."
Unfortunately, Mroz explained that the distance between the planet and the background star means their relative motion appears incredibly small, about 5 milliarcseconds per year.
"It will take at least a decade before we can hope to resolve them with current instruments, such as the Hubble Space Telescope or large ground-based telescopes," Mroz said.
Hubble was particularly useful in this rogue planet hunt because the region of the sky that hosts the microlensing event was observed by the long-serving space telescope way back in 1997. That's over 25 years before the microlensing event.
"That gave us a unique opportunity to test whether there might be a star associated with the lens," Mroz said. "According to our model, by 1997, the lens and source should have been separated by 0.13 arcseconds. That's tiny, but within Hubble's capabilities. If the lens were a bright star, we would have seen it in those old images. But we didn't."
The absence of detectable light at the expected lens position told the team that any potential host star would have to be very faint.
"Depending on the stellar population model we use, that rules out around 25% to 48% of possible companion stars," Mroz said. "That pushes us further toward the conclusion that this may truly be a free-floating planet."
Related Stories:
— The mystery of how strange cosmic objects called 'JuMBOs' went rogue
— These mysterious objects born in violent clashes between young star systems aren't stars or planets
— James Webb Space Telescope dives into the atmosphere of a mystery rogue planet or failed star
Mroz explained that OGLE-2023-BLG-0524 was discovered by team member Mateusz Kapusta by chance while the team was following up on microlensing events.
"This discovery was partly serendipity!" Mroz said. "It was a lucky break, but we believe there are many more such opportunities hidden in the data.
"Microlensing events occur all the time in dense stellar fields, and many of those fields have been observed by Hubble in the past. That means there could be more interesting events waiting to be discovered in the Hubble data."
The team's research is available as a preprint on the paper repository arXiv.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
38 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Trump moves to shut down NASA missions that measure carbon dioxide and plant health
The Trump administration is moving to shut down two NASA missions that monitor a potent greenhouse gas and plant health, potentially shutting off an important source of data for scientists, policymakers and farmers. President Donald Trump's budget request for fiscal year 2026 includes no money for the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, which can precisely show where carbon dioxide is being emitted and absorbed and how well crops are growing. NASA said in an emailed statement Wednesday that the missions were 'beyond their prime mission' and being terminated 'to align with the President's agenda and budget priorities.' But the missions — a free-flying satellite launched in 2014 and an instrument attached to the International Space Station in 2019 that include technology used in the Hubble Space Telescope — still are more sensitive and accurate than any other systems in the world, operating or planned, and a 'national asset' that should be saved, said David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who led their development. They helped scientists discover, for example, that the Amazon rain forest emits more carbon dioxide than it absorbs, while boreal forests in Canada, Russia and places where permafrost is melting absorb more than they emit, Crisp said. They also can detect the 'glow' of photosynthesis in plants, which helps monitor drought and predict food shortages that can lead to civil unrest and famine, he said. 'This is really critical,' Crisp said. 'We're learning so much about this rapidly changing planet.' The decision to end the missions is 'extremely shortsighted,' said Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist at the University of Michigan. 'The observations provided by these satellites ... (are) critical for managing growing climate change impacts around the planet, including in the U.S.,' he said. Looking to Congress Crisp and others hope Congress will vote to preserve funding for the missions, which are funded through the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30. A bill in the House closely aligns with the president's request and would eliminate the missions, while a Senate version preserves them. But with Congress in recess, it is unclear whether a budget will be adopted before the new fiscal year begins Oct. 1. If it doesn't, Congress could adopt a resolution to continue current funding until a budget is passed, though some lawmakers fear the Trump administration could try to delay or withhold that money. Congressional Democrats warned acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy last month that it would be illegal to terminate missions or impound funds already appropriated by Congress. Experts said the administration's move to eliminate funding aligns with other actions to cut or bury climate science. 'The principle seems to be that if we stop measuring climate change it will just disappear from the American consciousness,' said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann. Backup plan Crisp and others also are trying to put together a coalition of outside partners — including from Japan and Europe — that could fund and operate the instrument attached to the space station. NASA said it will accept outside proposals through Aug. 29. The free-flying satellite, though, is at risk of being brought down, meaning it would burn up in the atmosphere. National Public Radio first reported that NASA employees were making plans to end the missions. Crisp said advocates are hoping NASA also allows outside control of that satellite, which covers more of the globe, but there are legal hurdles to overcome because it would mean giving control of a U.S. satellite to a group that could include foreign partners. 'We're going out to billionaires. We're going out to foundations,' Crisp said. 'But ... it's a really, really bad idea to try and push it off onto private industry or private individuals or private donors. It just doesn't make sense.' ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Bloomberg
10 hours ago
- Bloomberg
The Texas Space Commission Wants Your Business
Howdy Earthlings, it's Loren Grush in Austin. The saying goes that everything's bigger in Texas, and that's starting to include grant funding for space companies. But first ... Three things you need to know today:
New York Times
15 hours ago
- New York Times
Mark Kelly: Don't Gut NASA
There's no country better at solving hard problems than the United States, and there's no better example of that than NASA. We put people on the moon in the 1960s with computers less powerful than the smartphone in your pocket. We built and launched a reusable rocket ship in the 1980s and used that to build a space station where astronauts can live and work in orbit. Just last week, we watched four astronauts launch an American-made rocket to the space station from American soil. NASA makes us proud to be Americans. And even more so, the agency is an engine of discovery and innovation that benefits all of us. I'm worried that President Trump is about to slow that engine down — and with it decades of American progress. That includes progress made during his own first term. Mr. Trump's ongoing attempts to slash NASA's work force and gut its budget send a message that America's leadership in space is optional. It isn't. For more than 50 years NASA primarily designed, owned and operated all of its spacecraft, from the first Mercury rocket launch in 1960 to the space shuttle I first piloted in 2001. When NASA announced it was changing all of that by contracting with commercial companies to bring crew and cargo to low Earth orbit, I thought the idea was pretty crazy. It was 2010, and I was training to be the commander of the final mission of the space shuttle Endeavour. I spent hundreds of hours in the simulator with my crew, preparing us to be ready for anything that came our way. I didn't trust that private companies could pull this off because they lacked the experience NASA engineers had. There's no margin for error when you're 250 miles above the Earth's surface. But I was wrong. Today, thanks to NASA's investments and guidance, commercial spaceflight isn't just working; it's cheaper, faster and more flexible than what the agency could provide on its own. The first Trump administration and the Obama and Biden administrations backed a model of awarding small, fixed-price contracts to multiple space companies to develop new spaceflight technologies. Using calculated risks and competition, that model is delivering big results. SpaceX, the rocket company run by Elon Musk, now takes astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station, and Northrop Grumman delivers cargo with its Cygnus spacecraft. NASA is working with private companies to build moon landers and deliver science experiments to the lunar surface. We're on the brink of returning American astronauts to the moon through the successor to the Apollo program, Artemis, which came together during Mr. Trump's first term and brings international partners into the fold. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
