Father of six killed 'for piece of bread' during Gaza aid distribution
Cries of grief echoed across southern Gaza's Nasser Hospital Monday as dozens came to mourn Hossam Wafi, after the father of six was killed while attempting to get supplies to feed his family.
His mother, Nahla Wafi, sobbed uncontrollably over her son, who was among 31 people killed by Israeli fire while trying to reach a food distribution site the previous day, according to the Palestinian territory's civil defence agency.
"He went to get food for his daughters — and came back dead," said Nahla Wafi, who lost two sons and a nephew on Sunday.
Hossam Wafi had travelled with his brother and nephew to a newly established distribution centre in the southern city of Rafah.
"They were just trying to buy (flour). But the drone came down on them," his mother said, as she tried to comfort four of her granddaughters in the courtyard of Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis.
Israel has faced growing condemnation over the humanitarian crisis in the war-ravaged Gaza Strip, where the United Nations has warned the entire population faces the risk of famine.
'Go there and get bombed'
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said that its field hospital in Rafah received 179 cases on Sunday, including 21 pronounced dead on arrival.
The ICRC said that all those wounded "said they had been trying to reach an aid distribution site", and that "the majority suffered gunshot or shrapnel wounds".
Israeli authorities and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a US and Israeli-backed outfit that runs the distribution centres, denied any such incident took place.
The military instead said that troops fired "warning shots" at people who approached them one kilometre away from the Rafah distribution site before dawn.
A witness told AFP thousands of people gathered at the area, known locally as the Al-Alam junction, between 2am and 4am (2300 GMT and 0100 GMT) in the hopes of reaching the distribution centre.
At Nasser Hospital, Hossam Wafi's young daughters called out for their father, kissing his body wrapped in a white shroud, before it was taken away.
Outside the hospital, dozens of men stood in silence before the body, praying. Some cried as the remains were taken away, one of them holding the father's face until he was gently pulled away.
His uncle, Ali Wafi, told AFP he felt angry his nephew was killed while trying to get aid.
"They go there and get bombed — airstrikes, tanks, shelling — all for a piece of bread," he said.
"He went for a bite of bread, not for anything else. What was he supposed to do? He had to feed his little kids. And the result? He's getting buried today," he added.
Militarised aid
The deaths in Rafah were one of two deadly incidents reported by Gaza's civil defence agency on Sunday around the GHF centres, which the UN says contravene basic humanitarian principles and appear designed to cater to Israeli military objectives.
There have been several other reports of chaotic scenes and warning shots fired in connection with the distribution sites over the past week.
The UN's humanitarian agency (OCHA) published a video of one such distribution site in central Gaza's Netzarim corridor on Thursday.
A large crowd is seen gathered around four long corridors made from metal fences installed in the middle of an arid landscape, corralling men and women into files to receive flour.
The distribution site and its waiting area sit on a flattened piece of land surrounded by massive mounds of soil and sand.
It is manned by English-speaking security guards travelling in armoured vehicles.
Palestinians exiting the distribution area carry cardboard boxes sometimes bearing a "GHF" logo, as well as wooden pallets presumably to be repurposed as fuel or structures for shelter.
In the large crowd gathered outside the gated corridors, some men are seen shoving each other, and one woman complains that her food package was stolen.
Hossam Wafi's uncle Ali said he wished Gaza's people could safely get aid.
"People take the risk (to reach the distribution site), just so they can survive."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Starmer is running out of road
Most people in Britain think that Keir Starmer has outlived any use he might have had as Labour leader, according to YouGov's bimonthly poll of the prime minister's popularity. Some 40 percent think he should resign as leader, and only 37 percent think he should stay on, according to the May survey. The same thing happened in January, with only a blip in between. In another YouGov poll, Starmer is disliked by 51 percent of the population and only popular with 22 percent. It hasn't always been this way. Before this year, you had to go back to autumn 2021, long before he was prime minister, to find statistics that showed most people thought Starmer should resign. And Starmer is dragging the whole government down with him. Labour's drop in the opinion polls in its first 10 months of power is the largest of any newly elected UK government in 40 years, according to a Guardian analysis. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The drop in approval is comparable to former Prime Minister Boris Johnson's fall from grace in February 2022, when Partygate was at its peak. The areas where voters think the government is least capable of solving problems are health, housing and the economy. As the Guardian reported, the proportion of the public who think Labour can handle these problems the best has dropped since the party took power. "The biggest drops were recorded in health, housing and the economy." This is terrible news for Labour, since they are precisely the problems that the government has pledged to solve. Power struggle The recent Runcorn by-election result and the council election results on the same day crystallised all these concerns in the minds of Labour MPs, especially those who are more worried about staying in office than about their constituents' welfare. After all, Runcorn was the 49th safest Labour seat in the country, and it was lost to Reform. Soft left MPs are now urging Angela Rayner, Labour's ineffective deputy leader, to challenge Starmer. Ignore Starmer's theatrics. Gaza's trail of blood leads straight to his door Read More » Those on the traditional left, the remains of Corbynism in the parliamentary Labour Party, don't want to be left out of a post-Starmer struggle for the leadership. Consequently, MP John McDonnell called for a rank-and-file challenge to Starmer within days of the rumours about Rayner's possible challenge becoming public. McDonnell painted a devastating picture of the party leadership, asserting that a power struggle was taking place already: 'What we are now witnessing is a panicked, half-hearted policy retreat, while the backroom boys - Morgan McSweeney in the leader's office and Nick Parrott in the deputy leader's office - fight between themselves.' Starmer is already reacting to this pressure. The rhetorical U-turn over Gaza is the most obvious concession to critics, although it is also a response to signs that the US administration is finding Israel's genocidal policy in Gaza to be more of a hindrance than a help in its overall plan to revive the Abraham Accords. But Starmer's partial retreat on winter fuel allowance is also meant to take the sting out of his critics' case. The problem for Starmer is that this kind of 'messy reset', as the New Statesman described it, will further deepen the crisis in Labour. Indeed, Starmer may be about to learn the truth of historian Alexis de Tocqueville's adage that 'the most dangerous moment for a bad government is generally that in which it sets about reform'. Petulant mantra Starmer has shown that he is only really good at one thing: attacking the left. He is a classic Thermidorian figure, seemingly from the left but transmuting into the nemesis of Corbynism. What is equally obvious is that these factional skills are of little use in running a government. Starmer's frequently issued mantra of 'I won't stand for it' - whatever today's 'it' might be - may sound authoritative in internal party debates, but simply comes across as petulant amid recalcitrant economic realities. The more he gives ground, the more hollow and inconsistent he sounds The more he gives ground, the more hollow and inconsistent he sounds. It is very unlikely that his rigidity and sense of entitlement will allow him to find another model of leadership, not least because of the utter conventionality of his economic and social programme. More seriously, just as he is attempting to placate the left, he is also making gross adaptations to Reform leader Nigel Farage's racist rhetoric. This is making an already threadbare ideology look positively self-contradictory at best, and openly racist at worst. So it very much looks as if the wheels are coming off the Starmer wagon. But does this mean he will be replaced before the next election? He still has some reserves, including a whopping Commons majority, which will insulate him from opposition attacks and backbench rebellions - unless they are of tsunami proportions. Writing on the wall Starmer is also blessed with his Tory opponent, Kemi Badenoch, who is even more unpopular than Starmer, and seems even less effective as a leader. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey is more popular than Starmer with a negative rating of minus 8, compared to Starmer's negative rating of minus 46, but it's hard to say whether - given that his every public appearance is an ill-conceived stunt - Davey is a politician or a personality who has escaped from BBC light entertainment. But these are advantages of limited value when the real challenge that Starmer faces is from Farage's Reform. UK local elections: Starmer's betrayal of voters is handing England to Reform Read More » Farage is more popular than Starmer, and Reform has effectively replaced the Tories as the main right-wing opposition to Labour. Starmer is building Reform support through his economic attacks on the welfare state, fuelling discontent within Labour, and by mimicking Farage's hostility towards refugees. Rayner supporters are talking of the council and other elections in 2026 as a watershed moment for Starmer's leadership. But it could be sooner. One or two more by-election losses could push already-nervous Labour MPs to don the white coats and head over to 10 Downing Street. Reform is the most obvious beneficiary. But Labour is so low in the polls that in some constituencies, it could lose to the SNP in Scotland or to the Liberal Democrats in other places. A left alliance of independents, rumoured to be the project that former leader Jeremy Corbyn is working on, would also threaten Labour's arrogant assumption that progressives have no one else to support. The writing is on the wall for Starmer, and time may be much shorter than he imagines. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Gaza: US-backed aid group suspends food distribution for a second day
The controversial US-backed initiative to distribute aid in Gaza, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), has said it will not hand out any food to starving Palestinians for a second day, saying operations will only restart when maintenance and repair work at its distribution sites are complete. In a statement posted on its Facebook page late on Wednesday, the GHF said its "distribution sites will not open as early as" Thursday morning and that it would "share information on opening times as soon as work is complete." The GHF also strongly urged aid seekers travelling to its locations to "follow the routes" set by the Israeli military to "ensure safe passage." On Wednesday, Israeli forces warned Palestinians against approaching GHF sites whilst "reorganisation work" was under way, saying access to roads near those locations would be "considered combat zones." The Israeli military did not appear to have issued any new directives on early on Thursday, suggesting areas near the sites were still "considered combat zones." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The suspension of the GHF's aid distribution system comes after more than 100 Palestinians were gunned down near its sites in less than a week. Earlier this week, eyewitnesses and local officials told Middle East Eye that Israeli troops opened fire directly on civilians, with many of the fatalities receiving gunshot wounds to their head or chest. A spokesperson for the GHF lamented the killings, telling the Associated Press on Wednesday that the group "was saddened to learn that a number of civilians were injured and killed after moving beyond the designated safe corridor." The UN human rights chief, Volker Turk, has slammed the "deadly attacks" and suggested they were a war crime. "Deadly attacks on distraught civilians trying to access the paltry amounts of food aid in Gaza are unconscionable," Turk said. "Attacks directed against civilians constitute a grave breach of international law and a war crime." Since launching operations last Tuesday, the GHF has claimed - without providing any evidence - to have handed out more than 87,000 food boxes to needy Palestinians - a fraction of what aid agencies say is needed to address the mass starvation unfolding in the strip. Gaza's Government Media Office has also slammed the aid distribution system and on Wednesday said the sites "situated in exposed and perilous red zones controlled by the occupying forces, have become bloodbaths." "Starving civilians are lured there due to the crippling famine and tight siege," the media office said in a statement. "They are then deliberately and coldly shot, a scene that exposes the true malice of the operation and its real objectives." War on Gaza: How Israel is replicating Nazi starvation tactics Read More » The office described these actions as genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, calling for immediate global action and an investigation into the latest Israeli assaults. "The continuation of these crimes, amid shameful international silence, is a stain on humanity and proves that the occupation continues to perpetrate the most heinous forms of genocide under the world's gaze, without deterrence or accountability," the statement added. Earlier this week, the GHF appointed evangelical leader Johnnie Moore, a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, as its new chief. Moore, a former member of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom, has dismissed reports of mass killings at the GHF aid sites as "fictional massacres." He was appointed after the initiative's former head, Jake Wood, resigned hours before its launch. Moore has emerged as a vocal advocate for the scandal-plagued initiative, claiming that reports of the killings were "lies… spread by terrorists," contradicting eyewitness accounts, footage, and reports by hospital directors and medical staff.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Even as Trump's focus wavers, Ukraine needs the world's support
Late last month, ballistic missiles from Russia along with a hail of drones attacked Ukraine's capital, Kyiv. It was a heavy night; the sky lighting with dramatic shadows of Ukrainian anti-aircraft weapons doing their best to intercept Russia's weapons. It was the first night in a few years that I went down to the bomb shelter to sleep. At about 3am, the noise was too close to where I am staying, so I descended the stairs to the underworld. It's a place most Ukrainians have learnt to live with for the past three years. The terrible irony is that the attack on the capital happened hours after the largest prisoner exchange between Russia and Ukraine. Nearly 1,000 prisoners of war were released from captivity and came home, reunited with family. For a brief moment, there was hope. In Kyiv, once people came out of the shelters (and many – so used to attacks – stay in bed, hoping for the best), there was much talk of an upscale to the war, with Moscow putting maximum pressure ahead of the ongoing negotiations. There were projections of heavy bombing to come in Kyiv, Kharkiv, Kherson and other parts of Ukraine. Indeed, Russia launched one of its largest air attacks on the country about a week ago. Following the initial round of failed peace talks in Istanbul, the Russian leadership wanted to send a strong message before the current round of negotiations. The Kremlin also sought to demonstrate its drone capacity – fibre optic drones that are even deadlier than the earlier generation, which could creepily chase soldiers in their cars and through doors. This week, however, Kyiv launched a surprise drone attack on several Russian air bases hosting nuclear-capable strategic bombers. Several experts say that Ukraine has delivered a heavy blow to the Russian military. This dangerous escalation to the war has made serious negotiations even more urgent. While the two sides did meet in Istanbul this week, there was sadly no breakthrough other than a deal to swap more prisoners. The war has cost so many lives. According to the Kyiv Independent, it is now estimated that Russia has lost more than 900,000 troops. According to the report, it has also lost 10,852 tanks, 22,622 armoured fighting vehicles, 49,639 vehicles and fuel tanks, 28,201 artillery systems, 1,395 multiple launch rocket systems, 1,169 air defence systems, 372 air planes, 336 helicopters, 37,177 drones, 28 ships and boats, and one submarine. This is not including the losses following Ukraine's recent drone strikes. Meanwhile, the Russian economy is in tatters. There is no doubt Ukraine has made enormous sacrifices for the western world – with loss of life and territory, as well as economic and humanitarian hardship. But all wars must end justly; and negotiations must be fair. What Moscow has so far proposed will never be accepted by Ukraine's embattled leadership – or its people. Russia's requests have not changed from the start of the war: no Nato membership for Ukraine; a 'Kremlin-friendly' government in Kyiv; complete ownership of Crimea; and control of the four provinces presently under its occupation. Ukraine, having lost an estimated 300,000 people fighting against all of the above, will never give in to those demands. 'Too much has been lost to even consider giving up the [Temporarily Occupied Territories of Donbas],' one Ukrainian friend told me last week. 'Even suggesting it means you are something like a traitor.' 'Too many young men and women have died to accept negotiations that only fuel Moscow's colonialism,' said another. A walk through Maidan Square, the site of the 2014 Revolution for Dignity in Kyiv, shows exactly how painful Ukraine's sacrifice has been. Hundreds of blue and yellow flags sit next to photos of some of the fallen – men, women, most very young. There are sections for foreign fighters – French, American British and others – and families wander, placing flowers near the flags. It's a sombre place and a reminder of what Ukraine has at stake. Ukrainians are weary. They see negotiations largely as a joke – a chance for US President Donald Trump to exercise his 'art of the deal' – in this case, getting enormous financial payback in Russia. He posted on Truth Social after speaking with Russian President Vladimir Putin last month, saying: 'Russia wants to do largescale [sic] TRADE with the United States when this catastrophic 'bloodbath' is over, and I agree. There is a tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth. Its potential is UNLIMITED.' Meanwhile, key European powers – who are terrified of what they see as Russia's expansion goals – are looking at fresh sanctions on Moscow. Suggestions that negotiations be held in the Vatican and mediated by Pope Leo XIV have been called 'a bit vulgar' by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Mr Lavrov apparently is more focused on continuing 'technical' talks in Istanbul this week. I would like to say there is hope that the war will end soon, but everything I see from the ground tells me that is not going to happen. In Kharkiv last week, I spent time with the police who in addition to their normal duties, are now tasked with investigating war crimes – nearly 183,000 incidents in Ukraine, according to the Office of the Prosecutor General. Kharkiv is only 40 kilometres from the Russian border, and it has been hit badly. Half of the pre-war population of 2 million people have fled; and Moscow is said to want to take both Kharkiv and Sumy regions quickly. Seeing the police work in their basement bomb shelters, identifying victims in mass graves using mobile DNA units, made me see the tenacity and the courage of the Ukrainian people. Every day at 9am, in the western city of Lviv, people stop in their tracks to pause in remembrance of those who have fallen in this war. Cars halt; even on the trains, people pause and rise, silent for one minute. It's a moving moment and a reminder of how war destroys society at every level; how decent diplomacy must prevail to sit and negotiate how they will end. Even if the Trump administration is losing patience with the war, and is now focused on the Middle East, the rest of the world should not. Ukraine deserves all the help it can get to bring this terrible war to an end.
