Moto G06 key specs revealed ahead of launch
The upcoming Moto G06 appeared in several listings last week, which detailed its RAM/storage trims as well as EU pricing. The budget device has now passed several certifications, including the FCC, TUV Rheinland, UL Demko and Geekbench.
The device was spotted with the XT2535 model number in the certifications, and we now learn it will feature LTE, dual-band Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity.
Motorola G06 (XT2535) on Geekbench
The Geekbench listing revealed it will feature the lagos codename. G06 appears to be equipped with MediaTek's Helio G81 Extreme SoC alongside 4GB RAM. We also get confirmation that the device boots Android 15.
Motorola G06 (XT2535) listings
The UL Demko and TUV listings reveal the phone will feature a 5,100mAh battery (RL52) with 10W charging support. Moto G06 will be available in Pantone Tapestry, Arabesque, and Tendril colors and is expected to launch soon.
Via
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
a day ago
- Phone Arena
Apple's browser wall is crumbling, and Japan might be the first to break it
Should Apple finally allow real browser competition on iOS? Yes — I want real Chrome, Firefox, and more on iOS Absolutely — Apple's WebKit-only rule is anti-competitiv Maybe — but only if privacy and performance are protected No — Safari works fine, and I trust Apple's security mod I had no idea Apple blocked other browser engines! Yes — I want real Chrome, Firefox, and more on iOS 0% Absolutely — Apple's WebKit-only rule is anti-competitiv 0% Maybe — but only if privacy and performance are protected 0% No — Safari works fine, and I trust Apple's security mod 0% I had no idea Apple blocked other browser engines! 0% The EU is also preparing to act Receive the latest Apple news By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy A financial motive to lock the browser Recommended Stories What it means for users and what comes next The guidelines are specifically designed to prevent Apple from replicating what critics call 'malicious compliance' — a strategy the company has been accused of using in the European Union following the Digital Markets Act (DMA).According to a recent Reuters report, the EU is preparing to fine Apple for alleged DMA violations, likely tied to how it has handled browser engine access and in-app payments. Apple claims to have complied with the law, but companies like Spotify and Mozilla have argued that Apple's system is intentionally burdensome and designed to discourage has publicly called Apple's approach 'a burden' that 'fails to give consumers viable choices.' Meanwhile, OWA reports that Apple's restrictions force developers like Google and Mozilla to release entirely new apps if they want to bring true third-party browsers to iOS — a move that resets user counts to zero and doubles maintenance OWA points out, no major browser maker has released a WebKit-free iOS browser in the EU, even though it's been 16 months since the rules went into effect. That's because Apple continues to impose technical and financial obstacles, including poor developer tooling and legal hoops, that make such launches also highlighted what may be Apple's true motivation for protecting Safari's dominance. According to the group, Apple earns an estimated $20 billion per year from its search deal with Google — mostly via Safari. That accounts for 14–16% of Apple's annual operating profit, meaning that every 1% drop in Safari's browser share could cost Apple $200 million Apple has a vested interest in keeping Safari front and center — even if it means skating the edge of antitrust Apple complies with Japan's Smartphone Act, users in Japan could soon enjoy real Chrome, Firefox, Brave, or Opera — running on Blink, Gecko, or other engines — and not just reskinned versions of Safari. That could lead to better performance, broader web compatibility, and real competition on iOS for the first Japan and the EU, UK regulators are also turning up the heat. A recent investigation concluded that both Apple and Google were 'holding back' browser innovation on mobile by limiting access to rendering far, Apple has not commented publicly on Japan's new rules — but the deadline is looming. Whether Apple opens iOS browser access globally or keeps fighting change region by region, the WebKit wall is cracking, and real competition may finally be coming to the iPhone.
GSM Arena
a day ago
- GSM Arena
Honor Play 10C is official with big battery, low price
Today, Honor has made the Play 10C official. This phone comes with a 6.61-inch LCD screen with 720x1604 resolution, 120 Hz refresh rate, and 1,010-nit peak brightness. It's powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 SoC, and has a 13 MP rear camera with f/1.8 aperture, a 5 MP f/2.2 selfie snapper, and a 6,000 mAh battery with support for 15W wired charging. The Play 10C is IP64 rated for dust and water resistance, and comes in three RAM/storage combos: 4/128GB going for CNY 649 ($90), 6/128GB priced at CNY 699 ($97), and 8/256GB for CNY 899 ($125). It's offered in blue, white, and black, and runs Android 15 with Honor's MagicOS 9.0 on top. Honor Play 10C official images It measures 163.95 x 75.6 x 8.39 mm and weighs 197g. It's already available to buy in China from Honor's online store, with deliveries set to commence on August 12. Unfortunately, it's unclear whether the Honor Play 10C will ever be officially sold outside of China, but if it will, we'll let you know.
Phone Arena
a day ago
- Phone Arena
Galaxy A17 vs Galaxy A16: Minor upgrades but welcome to the 120Hz party
The affordable Samsung Galaxy A16 has been a go-to backup Android phone for many people out there, and for a good reason. This sub-$200 device offers a great display, a decent camera system, and six years of software support, covering the most important smartphone pillars. Now, Samsung has quietly launched the successor, the Galaxy A17, and it's very interesting to see what upgrades the new model brings to the table. And there are some pretty substantial ones, such as the 120 Hz display refresh rate, which is crazy to see on such a budget phone when the iPhone 16 is still stuck at 60 Hz. But let's not get ahead of ourselves. Samsung Galaxy A17 vs Galaxy A16 differences: Table of Contents: Design Display Performance Camera Battery Specs Summary The last A-series phones took design cues from the Galaxy S lineup, offering a sleek and stylish look, with the same separate cutout for the cameras on the back pioneered by the Galaxy S Ultra some time the Galaxy A17 brings a change to the design, going back to an elongated, pill-shaped camera housing, similar to the one Sony has been using on Xperia phones for the past couple of generations. We don't find the change too appealing, as we were fond of the stylish look of the Galaxy A16, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The front of the two phones looks almost identical, with quite a substantial bezel around the screen, a hefty chin, and a teardrop cutout for the selfie camera. In terms of materials, there are some differences. The Galaxy A16 uses a plastic frame and back and Gorilla Glass Victus over the screen, while the Galaxy A17 is listed with a glass-fiber back material and the same plastic frame and Victus-protected dimensions are almost identical, but the A17 is 0.4 mm thinner and 8 grams heavier than its successor. This is almost imperceptible when holding the phone in your hand, so for all intents and purposes, these two feel almost exactly the same. The color options are pretty similar. The new Galaxy A17 is available in Black, Gray, and Blue, while the previous generation offers Light Green in place of the Blue option. Display Differences 120Hz for the masses It's crazy how a $200 phone can get you a 120 Hz refresh rate while Apple still rocks 60 Hz on its premium iPhone 16 . But that's the way it is, the Galaxy A17 comes with a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display that's able to go up to 120 Hz. The resolution is FHD+ (1080 x 2340 pixels) resulting in 358 PPI pixel density. Now, in terms of brightness, the Galaxy A17 still lists 800 nits support in HBM (high brightness mode) but we need some tests to verify this. The Galaxy A16, on the other hand, features a very similar display panel, rocking the same resolution and brightness figures and the same pixel density, and the only difference lies in the refresh rate—it can only go up to 90 Hz. In our display test, the A16 managed 733 nits maximum brightness at 100% APL and 1.6 nits minimum, which is admirable. Stay tuned for lab results soon. The one key area where we found the Galaxy A16 lacking was its chipset. The Exynos 1330 was and still is a very modest chip, and we say "still is" because the Galaxy A17 still features the same silicon. No upgrades in that department, we're afraid. This octa-core processor managed just below 1000 points in the Geekbench 6 single-core test and around 1900 points in multi-core performance. The 3DMark scores were also not very impressive—360 points. We don't expect the Galaxy A17 to perform radically better, given it uses the same chipset, but we have to run the tests to compare how this silicon performs inside the new phone. In terms of RAM, both phones mirror their respective configurations. We have a base 4GB/128GB version, and it goes up from there in 2GB steps. The highest variant features 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, bringing both phones into midrange territory. No one expects wonders from a $200 phone, especially when it comes to the camera. But the Galaxy A16 took us by surprise, scoring 124 out of 158 in our composite camera benchmark. The main 50MP camera scored 71 (out of 85), which, all things considered, is a pretty decent score. The selfie camera also performed admirably, with a score of 25 out of 30. The Galaxy A17 features the same camera system with the same 50MP main camera (this time around supported by optical image stabilization), the same 5MP ultrawide, and the same almost useless 2MP macro camera. It will be interesting to see whether or not Samsung has tweaked the image processing algorithms to improve the camera quality or left everything untouched on the Galaxy A17 compared to the previous model. We're doing the review as we type this, so stay tuned for a side-by-side sample comparison soon. In the battery department, there are no changes whatsoever. For all intents and purposes, the Galaxy A17 and its predecessor should be viewed as the same phone. At least when it comes to battery and charging. Now, the 5,000 mAh battery and the Exynos 1330 aren't the best pair when it comes to efficiency; the A16 was able to get 6 h 12 m on a single charge in our composite battery test, which ranks it 101st among phones tested in the past 2 years. Given the modest power and the beefy battery, we expected more. The test will tell us if Samsung has improved the situation on the Galaxy A17. The same goes for charging—both phones cap at 25W wired and don't support any wireless charging. It's a slow charging speed by any standard, and the A16 took 1 h 43 m to fully charge, which, in a world where a midrange Motorola can charge in half an hour, is just not fast enough. Here's how the Galaxy A17 vs Galaxy A16 compare. Head to the link for a detailed specs comparison. We're planning on doing a full review of the Galaxy A17, so this comparison will soon be populated by benchmarks, display tests, and camera samples. But even at this point we can draw some Galaxy A17 is largely the same phone as its predecessor, except for a few minor updates. The 6.7-inch screen can now refresh with up to 120 Hz, while the previous model was capped at 90 Hz. There's a slight design change concerning the camera housing, and the A17 is a tad lighter and a case to be made for the software situation. Both phones offer up to six years of major Android updates, which is amazing for this budget segment, but the Galaxy A17 will outlive its predecessor by one year, being if you're looking for a budget phone or a backup phone, the Galaxy A-series and both the A17 and A16 in particular are decent options. The phone is on pre-order for 239 euros right now (we expect US availability and pricing soon), and for that kind of money, it's a no need to upgrade if you already own the Galaxy A16, as the differences are miniscule. We'll update this comparison with all the benchmark results once we finish the review of the Galaxy A17.
