
From Colonial Loot to Cultural Genocide at the British Museum
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Top Stories
From Colonial Loot to Cultural Genocide at the British Museum
Rachel Spence
8 minutes ago
The British museum secretly hosted a birthday party for the Israeli embassy earlier this month.
Israeli embassy event at the British Museum. Photo: X/@MooniTB
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
Last week, London's British Museum inaugurated 'Ancient India', a new show exploring the origins of Hindu, Buddhist and Jain sacred art. It should have been a moment to celebrate this rich confluence of artistic expression. Instead, there were calls to boycott.
One guest, British-Indian actor and author Jassa Ahluwalia, published his refusal on Instagram. Behind his withdrawal, he wrote, lay the museum's 'repugnant' decision to host a birthday party for the Israeli embassy some days earlier.
Held in secret – despite the museum's claim to run itself in an 'open and honest way' – the event was leaked by an insider to the activist organisation Energy Embargo for Palestine. The group was already focused on the museum for taking funds from BP, the fossil-fuel giant preparing to explore for gas in offshore Israel.
The party celebrated the 77th anniversary of Israel's founding in 1948 – an event coinciding with the Nakba, in which Israeli forces expelled 7,50,000 Palestinians from their homes and land.
The evening was hosted by Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely, who has called the Nakba 'a very strong and very popular Arab lie'. The museum's interior walls were lit in the blue and white colours of the Israeli flag, while Zionist guests made gleeful posts on X. Attendees included Maria Eagle, UK Defence Procurement minister who made a speech lauding Royal Air Force 'surveillance flights' over Gaza 'in support of hostage rescue efforts'.
The British Museum is arguably the UK's premier cultural institution, home to around 8 million objects including Egypt's Rosetta Stone and India's Amaravati Marbles. It drew 6.5 million visitors last year alone.
In an interview last year, its director, Nicholas Cullinan, condemned 'divisive discussions around nationalism' and claimed the museum had 'a role to play in giving people another way of thinking about the interconnected world, to be curious about each other.'
How then could he have permitted his institution to welcome a country so steeped in ongoing violence against civilians? The museum defended itself by saying that the party was held on a 'commercial basis', unlike events that the museum 'actively hosts'. Yet given our collective awareness of the world's first live-streamed genocide, the British Museum's decision to sell itself to the country responsible for that horror is shocking.
However it is far from the only western museum complicit in Israel's aggression. Last month, FreeMuse released their annual report monitoring international cultural censorship. As usual, they spotlighted a handful of countries with particularly oppressive records. Less usually, this year two western democracies were on the list. The USA and Germany found themselves alongside long-time offenders such as Cuba, Afghanistan, Russia and Iran, due to multiple museums' policies of cancelling and censoring pro-Palestinian art.
As I write this piece, reports come in that the Whitney Museum in New York has cancelled a performance about Palestinian mourning after concerns about certain phrases used by one of the artists in a previous presentation. When cultural institutions cannot find the imagination to negotiate differences of language and viewpoint without resorting to cancellation it begs questions about their authenticity.
Powerful art blossoms out of the darkest dilemmas. It is rarely elegant, polished, without rough edges. When the world beyond the museum is wracked with violence and injustice, it is inevitable that much artistic expression will reflect that raw, cruel turbulence.
Our cultural spaces should be the places where our eyes are most open.
Yet around Palestine, institutional western culture has suffered a willful blocking of vision. The result is a quenching of culture's ethical spotlight; a silencing of art's moral song.
If they continue to erase the Palestinian experience, western museums will not only lose their reputation as flag-bearers of free expression, but also betray that their vaunted efforts to decolonise their collections and staff hierarchies were merely window dressing.
Today, a growing number of culture-makers from the Global Majority doubt the intentions of western institutions. 'The sad realisation that our inclusion had probably been a form of tokenism and that the wider fraternity I genuinely believed in probably existed only in my mind leaves a bitter taste,' said Shahidul Alam, a photographer from Bangladesh, who in late 2023 found a German biennial he was curating suddenly cancelled, after he showed support for the Palestinian cause.
Asked to comment on Israel's event at the British Museum, Alam replied, 'The museum's website states its aim is to provide a safe, welcoming environment for all children and adults at risk. By hosting a birthday party for Israel, the museum supported the selective erasure of humanity. Its prioritisation of profit over principle reveals its mercenary nature.'
Palestinians are the victim of Israeli settler colonialism. That brutal system is dependent on the military support of countries such as the US and the UK, whose own wealth was built by stealing land, enslaving people of colour and exploiting labour.
For the British Museum, colonialism is a particularly raw nerve. Much of its collection was acquired thanks to Britain's imperial conquests.
Today the museum is assailed by repatriation demands, most famously by the Greek government for its Parthenon Marbles. Thousands of Egyptians have called for the return of their Rosetta Stone, which arrived in London with the tag 'Captured in Egypt by the British Army'.
From colonial-era India, the museum acquired the Amaravati Marbles, 121 sculptures taken from an ancient Buddhist stupa in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, by British civil servant Sir Walter Elliot in 1860. Calling for their return in 2016, writer Ruchika Sharma castigated Elliot for his reckless excavations, accusing him of the 'greatest robbery of all time'.
The museum says that an Act of Parliament prevents it from returning items. However, British Museum director Nicolas Cullinan has said he has no intention of lobbying to change the act.
That attitude is in keeping with the heartlessness that welcomed Israel as Palestinian children starve. What is the point of conserving objects so impeccably if you collude with those who damage nature and community outside the museum walls?
If the British Museum cannot find sympathy for Palestine, it might spare a thought for their heritage. Ottoman historian Dr Yakoob Ahme d has spoken of a 'cultural genocide' as dozens of historic sites, including the Great Omari Mosque, which dates back to the early seventh century, were flattened. Echoing the looting of their British colonial forebears, Israeli troops have been accused of thieving more than 3,000 objects from Gaza's Al-Isra University, then wrecking the site to hide their crime.
The economic anthropologist Jason Hickel recently declared that 'Palestine is the rock on which the West will break itself.' How devastating if the region's great museums, who claim to foster cultural dialogue and harmony, help to fulfil his prophecy.
Rachel Spence is a poet and arts writer. Her latest book is Venice Unclocked (2022, Ivory Press). Her work has appeared in the Financial Times, Hyperallergic and The Art Newspaper.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
'This Genocide Implicates Us All': 380 Writers, Organisations Call on Israel to Cease Fire in Gaza
'Kidnapped, Beaten': Three Punjab Men Missing in Iran After Taking 'Dunki' Route
'We've Killed So Many Children – It's Hard to Argue with That': Tel Aviv Protesters in Silent Vigil
Saving Gaza from Starvation
UP Deputy CM Backs Hindu Rashtra Call at Right-Wing Event in Lucknow
A Decade of Living Dangerously | Pressing Unmute in Naya Bharat – Celebrating 10 years of The Wire
For Your Own Sake, Please Care for Palestine
Israel Allows Limited Aid To Enter Gaza; France, UK, Canada Call Move 'Wholly Inadequate'
At 84, Bob Dylan is Still Celebrating his Rough and Rowdy Ways, All Over the World
View in Desktop Mode
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India, UK focus on enhancing cooperation in trade, defence, counter-terrorism
NEW DELHI: India and the UK on Tuesday discussed ways to strengthen cooperation in trade, investment, defence, counter-terrorism, green energy and health and focused on measures to address export controls for enabling greater technology cooperation in strategic sectors. In addition to holding the annual foreign office consultations in New Delhi, foreign secretary Vikram Misri and Britain's permanent under-secretary Oliver Robbins co-chaired the first Strategic Exports and Technology Cooperation Dialogue. During the foreign office consultations, the two sides reviewed and discussed the gamut of bilateral relations. They also welcomed the conclusion of the India-UK free trade agreement and double contribution convention last month, the external affairs ministry said in a statement. Misri and Robbins discussed ways to strengthen cooperation in trade, investment, financial sector, defence and security, counter-terrorism, technology, science, innovation, green energy, climate, health, education and people-to-people relations in order to diversify the bilateral comprehensive strategic partnership, the statement said. The first Strategic Exports and Technology Cooperation Dialogue focused on 'addressing export controls for enabling greater technology cooperation in strategic sectors'. This dialogue is aimed at building mutual understanding of systems and agreeing on areas for future cooperation in key sectors such as technology and defence. Misri conveyed India's appreciation for the British government's 'expression of solidarity and support to India in the fight against terrorism'. Misri and Robbins also exchanged views on regional and global issues, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the situation in West Asia and the Indo-Pacific. A readout from the British high commission said the two sides welcomed the 'significant breakthroughs' in the bilateral partnership since last year's foreign office consultations, including the announcement of the trade deal on May 6, which will strengthen trade links and increase bilateral trade already worth £43 billion by another £25.5 billion. 'Both agreed to work towards implementing the shared vision of the two prime ministers for an ambitious partnership between the UK and India over the next decade,' the readout said. Robbins said he is visiting India to 'help advance one of the UK's most vital partnerships in the world'. He added, 'In a more complex world, there is strong ambition from both governments to take this partnership to even greater heights.' During the visit, he is expected to meet a range of Indian officials, including on the G20 and home affairs. Both sides agreed to hold the next foreign office consultations in London in 2026.


Pink Villa
an hour ago
- Pink Villa
Will Prince Harry Change Family's Last Name to Spencer Amid Feud With Royals? Know About Secret Chat With Princess Diana's Brother
Prince Harry is allegedly planning on changing his family name to Spencer. The title was used by Princess Diana as her surname. The Duke of Sussex has reportedly discussed it with his uncle and the former Princess of Wales' brother, Charles. According to the Daily Mail reports, Harry taking his mother's last name would mean the abandonment of the Mountbatten-Windsor title, which has been used by the British Royal family for ages. Prince Harry' s suggestion of changing his last name comes almost five years after the Duke and the Duchess of Sussex took an exit from Buckingham Palace. Moreover, the former royal member has also locked horns with the Prince of Wales and the monarch since. As for his chat with Charles Spencer, Prince Harry met his uncle during one of his rare visits to his home country. However, Spencer asked the Duke not to take such a step, as it would invite new legal challenges. Charles Spencer's advice to Prince Harry Speaking about Prince Harry's conversation with his uncle Charles, a friend of the Duke's revealed to the media portal, "They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step." Meanwhile, Harry himself has used Wales as his last name, as both his parents were known as the Prince and Princess of Wales. As for his children, both Archie and Lilibet add Mountbatten-Windsor to their names. Previously opening up about her Sussex family name, Meghan Markle shared with People Magazine that she did not realise the deeper meaning attached to the name until she had children. The Duchess went on to explain, "It's our shared name as a family, and I guess I hadn't recognized how meaningful that would be to me until we had children." She further added, "I love that that is something that Archie, Lili, H, and I all have together. It means a lot to me." Prince Harry and Meghan Markle married each other in 2018 and left the royal family in 2020, following the birth of their son.


Pink Villa
an hour ago
- Pink Villa
Is Rajinikanth and Mani Ratnam reunion on cards? Here's what Thug Life director has to say
Rajinikanth and director Mani Ratnam had previously collaborated on the iconic film Thalapathi, which was released in 1991. Now, the filmmaker has spilled the tea on this and whether fans can expect a reunion from them. In an interaction with News18, the director said, 'I think you should ask Rajini sir. You should see… we never know. After Thug Life, I plan to take a break. I have four scripts in mind, but none of them are fully fleshed out yet. If nothing comes out of them, then that's the end of it.' For those unaware, the superstar and visionary director had previously worked together in Thalapathi. The film was based on the Hindu epic Mahabharata and the friendship shared between Karna and Duryodhana. It portrays Surya, an orphan who dwells in the slums and is known for his benevolent nature. After he scuffles with a goon, he gets acknowledged by a mighty gangster called Deva, and later they become friends. As things start to come under the joint guidance of Surya and Deva, things take a turn when a righteous district collector comes into play who also happens to be a kin of Surya. The rest of the film focuses on how Surya attempts to reconnect with his roots and how his friendship with Deva develops amid these events. Aside from the superstar, the movie also had actors Mammootty and Arvind Swamy as co-leads. Coming to Mani Ratnam 's upcoming venture, the director is slated to hit the big screen with a film starring Kamal Haasan and Silambarasan TR, titled Thug Life. The gangster actioner tells the tale of Rangaraaya Sakthivel Naicker, an aging Yakuza-like gangster who has raised his foster son, Amaran, to take over his place in the mafia. However, when Sakthivel is presumed dead, all suspicions lead to his adopted son. Now, with vengeance in mind, the former makes a return from his grave, eager to settle the scores for once and for all. Apart from Haasan and STR, the film has Trisha Krishnan, Abhirami, Aishwarya Lekshmi, Ashok Selvan, Joju George, and more in key roles. On the other hand, Rajinikanth will be hitting the big screens on August 14, 2025, with the Lokesh Kanagaraj directorial Coolie.