Britain to buy 12 nuclear-carrying F-35A warplanes worth £700,000,000
Britain will buy a dozen F-35A warplanes – all capable of carrying nuclear weapons – from the US, following criticism from Donald Trump that Nato members are not spending enough on defence.
Today, Sir Keir Starmer will tell a summit of Nato allies in The Hague that the new squadron will join an alliance mission that can be armed with US nuclear weapons.
The prime minister is expected tp say: 'The UK's commitment to Nato is unquestionable, as is the alliance's contribution to keeping the UK safe and secure.
'But we must all step up to protect the Euro-Atlantic area for generations to come.'
Downing Street Biggest hailed the purchase as the 'biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation'.
All eyes are now on Russia and China who will undoubtedly see this as an escalatory move. More Trending
The jets, a variant of the F35Bs the UK already uses, can carry conventional weapons, but can also be equipped with nuclear bombs.
Each F-35A plane costs around £60 million for the latest production lots, so a dozen could set the UK back an estimated £700 million.
The full details of the deal with the US were not immediately clear.
Sir Keir said: 'Russia, not Ukraine, should pay the price for Putin's barbaric and illegal war, so it is only right we use the proceeds from seized Russian assets to ensure Ukraine has the air defence it needs.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Trump has a meltdown over 'failed' strikes on Iran that did not destroy nuclear sites
MORE: 'Living Nostradamus' issues chilling warning on Trump's Israel-Iran ceasefire
MORE: Experts reveal real risk of WW3 — and what's at stake for anywhere that gets dragged in
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: US exchanges, SEC in talks to ease public company regulations
NEW YORK, June 25 (Reuters) - U.S. exchange operators are in talks with the Securities and Exchanges Commission on easing regulatory burdens for public companies, as they seek to encourage more richly valued startups to list, according to four people familiar with the matter. These deliberations, the details of which are reported here for the first time, involve the SEC, Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange. The reforms under discussion range from reducing the quantum of disclosures and the costs of going public to making it harder for minority investors to agitate, the sources said, requesting anonymity as they were not authorized to speak publicly. The talks, which the sources said have been ongoing for several months, come amid a renewed push to ease regulations under President Donald Trump, whose administration has said, opens new tab it wants to do so to spur economic growth. Taken together, some market experts said these discussions could mark the most significant push to introduce regulatory reform for companies since the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act was signed into law by former President Barack Obama in 2012, and build on efforts seen during Trump's first term. "The numbers are very clear that companies are staying private longer," Nasdaq President Nelson Griggs told Reuters. Griggs said the exchange operator has discussed making public markets more attractive with regulators in Washington but did not specify which agencies. "We need to make the public markets attractive because that is really how you democratize access to these companies. So it's a big focus of ours," Griggs said. Nasdaq has publicly made the case, opens new tab for easing burdens by using remedies such as the modernization of the process for proxy filings. In a statement to Reuters, Jaime Klima, general counsel of NYSE Group, said the exchange will "continue to advocate for our listed companies with regulators and policymakers.' "We strongly believe that effective and efficient regulation is key to maintaining the attractiveness of our markets," Klima said, without specifying any specific discussions ongoing. The SEC, led by new chairman Paul Atkins, said it is looking to ease rules that can impede capital formation. "The SEC is considering addressing regulatory burdens that undermine capital formation, including (ensuring) that initial public offerings are again something companies are eager to do," a spokesperson for the agency said. The SEC did not comment on specific discussions it has held with exchanges and other stakeholders. However, relaxing rules around disclosure requirements and reducing costs of going public or remaining listed often come at the expense of investors, who face heightened risk of loss when regulations are cut, experts say. 'Historically, investors and issuers have viewed the U.S. capital markets as the best in the world. That's because of the regulatory system,' said Jill Fisch, a University of Pennsylvania professor of business law. 'It's because if there's full information markets function better. Securities are priced more accurately. That's good for everyone." The discussions zero in on regulations that make it harder for companies to list and then stay public, according to the sources. One area in focus is an overhaul of current proxy processes, which involves information that companies have to provide shareholders to allow them to vote on various matters. The reform would make it harder for activist shareholders with small stakes to launch proxy contests and curb repetitive proxy proposals from minority investors, the sources said. It would also lead to less onerous disclosure requirements in preliminary proxy filings, according to the sources. Another effort involves making it less expensive for companies to list on exchanges and remain public by reducing fees associated with listing, the sources said. The conversations also include making it easier for companies that went public through deals with special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) to raise capital, the sources said. In recent years, the SEC had cracked down on SPACs, in which a firm goes public by selling itself to a listed shell company, as a work around listing regulations. The rollbacks would also make it easier for public companies to raise capital by selling additional shares through follow-on offerings, they said. Public companies have witnessed a buildup in disclosure requirements since the landmark 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley law. Periods of market stress, such as the 2008 global financial crisis, the SPAC boom and meme stock trading in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, led to heightened regulatory oversight of corporate behavior. The SEC has over the years increased disclosure requirements on a variety of issues, including climate, cybersecurity, risk factors, and proxy reporting, according to capital markets experts. For instance, when Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab went public in 1980, its IPO prospectus was 47 pages, according to a copy of the prospectus. That compares with a current typical IPO prospectus of 250 pages, including significant generic language around risk factors, said Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida. There have been previous efforts to roll back regulation for public companies. The JOBS Act helped facilitate confidential IPO filings that allow companies to submit their registration paperwork privately to the SEC, away from the scrutiny of investors. Rollbacks also happened during President Trump's first term when then SEC chair Jay Clayton pushed for a lighter touch on regulation, including curbing some provisions of major laws such as the Dodd-Frank Act. Since 2000, the number of public companies listed on U.S. exchanges has declined 36% to 4,500, according to figures compiled by Nasdaq. The increase in regulations and decrease in public companies has been criticized by leading Wall Street executives such as JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, opens new tab and Citadel Securities founder Ken Griffin, opens new tab. Some companies have chosen to stay away from IPOs to avoid what they see as onerous disclosure requirements, additional regulatory scrutiny, and the costs associated with going public, said two people familiar with the matter, citing Elon Musk's SpaceX as being reluctant to list. SpaceX did not immediately respond to requests for comment. However, easing regulatory burdens may not result in an overnight change. "Do I think there's going to be a bull rush to the door for IPOs because of the rulemaking (from the SEC)? Probably not," said Dave Peinsipp, co-chair of the global capital markets group at law firm Cooley. He said it would be heavily dependent on returns and valuations companies can get.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Iran executes three men accused of spying for Israel
Iran has executed three men accused of spying for Israel, as it cracks down on suspected foreign interference. Since Israel started bombing the country, hundreds of people have also been arrested. The hangings on Wednesday mean that six people have now been executed on similar charges. The three men – Idris Aali, Azad Shojaei and Rasoul Ahmad Rasoul – were executed at dawn at Urmia prison on charges of 'corruption on Earth through cooperation with hostile foreign states in favour of Israel', according to state media. Iran's Revolutionary Guard-affiliated Fars news agency reported on Wednesday that authorities have arrested more than 700 people across the country on allegations of spying for Israel. Both the arrests and the executions suggest that the Islamic Republic is waging an extensive crackdown going forward as the regime works to regain power and legitimacy after the devastation. Iranian officials are likely more concerned than ever about the risk of espionage given that it has emerged that Israeli intelligence was able to operate from within Iran to launch its initial attack. The executions came one day after Iran accepted a US-brokered ceasefire ending 12 days of war with Israel. All three had been arrested in connection with the 2020 assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, a Iranian nuclear scientist. 'Imported assassination equipment' Aali and Shojaei were cross-border porters, known as kolbars, initially detained on alcohol smuggling charges who later confessed under interrogation to importing 'equipment for assassinating nuclear figures', according to authorities. Iran's judiciary-affiliated Mizan news agency claimed that the men had 'imported assassination equipment under the cover of alcohol shipments'. The killings follow Iran's recent execution of Ismail Fekri and Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh on espionage charges. The Norway-based Iran Human Rights Organisation said Fekri was 'sentenced to death in a brief 10-minute trial based on confessions made during interrogation' without access to a lawyer in Branch 26 of Tehran's Revolutionary Court. Iran has been cracking down on citizens since the war began, claiming that Israeli agents have deeply infiltrated the country. The 700 arrests happened over 12 days and spanned provinces including Kermanshah, Isfahan, Khuzestan, Fars and Lorestan. No arrest figures were provided for Tehran. Security officials accused the detained individuals of 'directing suicide drones', 'making homemade bombs', 'photographing sensitive military sites' and 'sending information to Israel'. Authorities also claimed to have confiscated more than 10,000 'micro-drones' in Tehran alone. Iranian officials have not provided independent verification of the detainees' identities or case details, and no photographic evidence of alleged confiscated materials has been released. Iran's judiciary announced that it would immediately revise the legal definition of espionage 'to free the hands of the judiciary and security institutions to deal with infiltrators and spies'. Limitations of espionage law Asghar Jahangir, the spokesman for the judiciary, said on Tuesday: 'The current espionage law is general and may not cover many instances of today's events.' He said that if Iran had attempted to prosecute individuals arrested during the war with Israel under existing espionage definitions, authorities would have faced 'limitations and restrictions'. Meanwhile, citizens across Iran reported receiving threatening text messages from the judiciary warning them not to follow social media accounts affiliated with the Israeli government. The messages warned of prosecution under Iran's 'law against hostile actions of the Zionist regime'. Iranian lawyers dismissed the messages as having 'no judicial or legal value' and said they were intended to 'create fear and terror'. Iran Human Rights Organisation has warned that Iran might accelerate executions of prisoners accused of espionage following recent tensions with Israel. Concerns are mounting over the possible execution of Ahmad Reza Jalali, an Iranian-Swedish researcher who was transferred from Evin prison to an undisclosed location after Israel's Monday attack on the detention centre. The fragile ceasefire appeared to hold on Tuesday night after both sides blamed each other for violations. It went into effect after the US bombed Iran's three main nuclear sites over the weekend and the Islamic Republic retaliated by firing missiles at an American base in Qatar.
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Rupee ends a tad lower, month-end importer dollar bids weigh
MUMBAI, June 25 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee closed slightly weaker on Wednesday, weighed down by month-end importer dollar demand, while gains in local equities and a revival in risk appetite after a fragile truce between Iran and Israel cushioned the pressure. The rupee closed at 86.0775 against the U.S. dollar, down 0.1% from its close of 85.9750 in the previous session. The currency touched a peak of 85.8075 earlier in the day but reversed course on the back of corporate dollar demand, traders said. Slight weakness in the offshore Chinese yuan was also a dampener for the rupee, a trader at a private bank said. Risk sentiment remained upbeat with most Asian stocks logging gains after the truce between Iran and Israel appeared to hold. The Iran-Israel ceasefire is going well, U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday. Each side claimed victory on Tuesday after 12 days of war, which the U.S. joined with airstrikes in support of Israel to take out Iran's uranium enrichment facilities. The dollar index was up 0.1% at 98.1 while Asian currencies were trading mixed. Brent crude oil futures rose about 1% to $67.8 per barrel. "We believe that the negative impact of the reduced geopolitical risk on the dollar has largely played out," ING Bank said in a note. The dollar could see some stabilisation at these levels but risks remain tilted to the downside, the bank added. Meanwhile, dollar-rupee forward premiums ticked up on the back of the Indian central bank's announcement of a measure to withdraw excess banking system liquidity that lifted near forwards, with the impact spilling over to far tenors as well. The 1-year dollar rupee implied yield rose 7 bps to 1.96%.
