logo
Where do we look for solace in these dark, anxious times? Sometimes, the answer is at the cinema

Where do we look for solace in these dark, anxious times? Sometimes, the answer is at the cinema

CBC28-01-2025

Dispatches from Dystopia is a monthly column by Peter Knegt that engages with culture and community even as the world appears to be crumbling around us. This is its first edition.
It has never felt like a more imperative time to take extra care of our poor brains. For me, just checking the news can feel like being pelted with grenades of anxiety-inducing information. Whenever I've picked my phone up over the past few weeks, it's felt like I'm handing my neurotransmitters a very legitimate reason to panic, and personally I'm finding it a bit of a challenge to keep myself from spiralling.
My mental-health game plan through last year's U.S. election cycle had originally been to moderate my news intake as much as possible. But in the weeks leading up to the election, I became a full-on junkie. I watched The View every day and MSNBC until 2 a.m. every night. I'd devour the seemingly hundreds of hours that Pod Save America released every week. I'd check for new polls every other minute, treating the information like gospel. And for a moment, I even let my coconut-pilled self indulge in a kind of precarious hope that is very dangerous for a nervous boy like me (or for any of us, really): that through "the system" things might just be OK after all.
Well, it's now extremely clear that things will not be OK after all, and I know I'm not alone when I say that I have not been taking it well. Being in a state of perpetual existential dread is certainly nothing new for most of us, but these last few months have felt pretty unprecedented. It doesn't just feel like the bad guys are winning; it feels like they've won. And considering everything from their dismantling of LGBTQ rights to their denial of climate change to whatever chaos their mishandlings of international politics and A.I. will bring, it is getting real hard not to succumb to the full-fledged dystopian pessimism of it all. I don't know about you, but this has really forced me to overhaul my strategy for (barely) getting through the day-to-day.
I am not a religious man. But in these dark times, it seems I have turned to the closest thing I have to a place of worship: the movie theatre. The night after the election last fall, I decided to resist the urge to down a magnum of wine at home while staying up watching unhinged panels debate how this all happened (and believe me, the urge was there). Instead, I found my way to an advance screening of the film Nickel Boys. Sitting still in the dark with my phone off while engaging with a challenging piece of cinema felt like the opposite of what my impulses desired (sending manic texts of doom while watching Rachel Maddow lose her mind), but I knew it was exactly the nourishment my rattled soul needed.
An adaptation of Colson Whitehead's Pulitzer Prize–winning novel, Nickel Boys follows two Black teenagers who are sent to a malevolent reform school in 1960s Florida. Director RaMell Ross has been rightfully lauded for the film's unique use of first-person point of view, which literally puts audiences in the perspective of the protagonist as he suffers through horrifying abuse. As one can imagine, this does not make for easy viewing. But it does embolden the viewer with some pretty profound empathy, particularly as a collective experience with a few hundred other people in a movie theatre. And collective empathy is perhaps the thing this world needs more of above all else.
Walking home from Nickel Boys that night, tears still streaming down my face from the film's harrowing final act, I committed myself to taking a path through the chaos ahead that was uncharacteristic of my past behaviour. After the 2016 U.S. election or at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, my tactics could generally be classified as either self-destruction or numbing out (or both at the same time), and I knew my aging brain and body simply weren't up for another round of that. What I needed instead was strength and renewal, and reminders that there still is good in this world. And while I certainly didn't think going to the movies was some overarching solution to all this, I did know it was going to be a part of it.
November is a horrible time for almost everything, but it's a great time to go to the movies. It's basically the beginning of a three-month period where 90 per cent of the films actually worth seeing get released, primarily because it's when they can capitalize on awards season. (Nickel Boys, for example, was just very deservedly nominated for an Oscar for best picture … and it's still in some theatres now, so do go see it if you can!) So instead of spending my nights spinning out to the dread of the news, I spent them at the movies — a place where, if you are behaving (which you should be), your phones are tucked away on "do not disturb" mode, unable to do any harm.
According to my Letterboxd (the only sane form of social media left!), I saw exactly 50 movies between election night and last week's inauguration, including some exceptional offerings of understanding and perspective: Mike Leigh's Hard Truths, a lacerating portrait of a deeply damaged woman struggling to simply exist; Pedro Almodóvar's The Room Next Door, a beautiful celebration of life despite being a story of a woman facing death; Walter Salles's I'm Still Here, which offers chilling insight into one woman's heroism during the military dictatorship of 1970s Brazil; Mohammad Rasoulof's The Seed of the Sacred Fig, a truly revolutionary rallying cry against the current Iranian regime that literally had to be made in secret.
There were also older movies. One of the many wonderful things about movies is that it is essentially impossible to run out of worthwhile viewing options, and one of the few wonderful things about living in the city of Toronto is that it has an incredible repertory cinema scene. I was very grateful to the TIFF Lightbox for closing out the last two months of 2024 with a retrospective of every single Pedro Almodóvar feature, allowing me to be transported to the warmth of a hyper-saturated Spain for several of early winter's darkest nights. And on the particularly grim night that followed the inauguration, I was gifted a reminder that America was, in many ways, as full of despair and hopelessness and horrible men 20 years ago as it is now when I took in the three-hour-plus extended cut of Kenneth Lonergan's staggering Margaret at the Paradise Theatre (be careful trying this at home though, because it truly is as bleak as they say).
But the most viscerally human experience I had in any cinema during these past few horrible months was a little unexpected. That's because it came via Flow: a dialogueless film about a cat. A riveting work of animation (which just became the first Latvian film to be nominated for an Academy Award) from director Gints Zilbalodis, Flow follows said cat as it assembles a chosen family of other animals so they can try and survive a giant flood together. And somehow, the wordless journey of these animals feels like it has more to say about what it means to be alive during these catastrophic times than anything I've seen recently starring actual humans.
Essentially, Flow is telling us something that I think we all need to make our guiding principle going forward: if we want to make it through all this, we must build community and we must take care of one another. And this is maybe the best thing movies can offer us. At times when things feel impossible, movies don't just comfort us with the reminder that we're not alone, but can reorient us to what really matters, recharge our belief in what's possible, inspire us to persevere. The heartbreak we feel for the world might not quite feel good in a place like this. But a few hours in a movie theatre can send us back out into the world a little less heartbroken and a little more ready to make it a better place.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EPA set to roll back rules that limit greenhouse gases and mercury from US power plants
EPA set to roll back rules that limit greenhouse gases and mercury from US power plants

Winnipeg Free Press

time3 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

EPA set to roll back rules that limit greenhouse gases and mercury from US power plants

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency is poised to eliminate rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, part of a wide-ranging rollback of environmental regulations that Administrator Lee Zeldin has said would remove trillions of dollars in costs and 'unleash' American energy. The EPA also plans to weaken a regulation that requires power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults. The planned rollbacks, set to be announced Wednesday, are meant to fulfill President Donald Trump's repeated pledge to 'unleash American energy' and make it more affordable for Americans to power their homes and operate businesses. If approved and made final, the plans would reverse efforts by President Joe Biden's administration to address climate change and improve conditions in areas heavily burdened by industrial pollution, mostly in low-income and majority Black or Hispanic communities. The power plant rules are among about 30 environmental regulations that Zeldin targeted in March when he announced what he called the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' He said the actions would put a 'dagger through the heart of climate-change religion' and introduce a 'Golden Age' for the American economy. Environmental groups vowed to challenge the rules in court. 'Power plants are among the largest sources of dangerous pollution in the nation. We have modern technologies that allow these plants to reduce pollution with available and cost-effective solutions,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel of the Environmental Defense Fund. The clean-air standards targeted by the EPA under Trump, a Republican, 'are protecting people across America today and will safeguard future generations,' Patton said. 'Ignoring the immense harm to public health from power plant pollution is a clear violation of the law,' added Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'Our lawyers will be watching closely, and if EPA finalizes a slapdash effort to repeal those rules, we'll see them in court.' The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments and a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated — they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. Even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems, the AP analysis found. It would also mean higher emissions of the greenhouse gases driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. Biden, a Democrat, had made fighting climate change a hallmark of his presidency. Coal-fired power plants would be forced to capture smokestack emissions or shut down under a strict EPA rule issued last year. Then-EPA head Michael Regan said the power plant rules — the Biden administration's most ambitious effort to roll back planet-warming pollution from the power sector — would reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting a reliable, long-term supply of electricity. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The power sector is the nation's second-largest contributor to climate change, after transportation. In its proposed regulation, the Trump EPA argues that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel-fired power plants 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution' or to climate change and therefore do not meet a threshold under the Clean Air Act for regulatory action. A paper published earlier this year in the journal Science found the Biden-era rules could reduce U.S. power sector carbon emissions by 73% to 86% below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with a reduction of 60% to 83% without the rules. 'Our research shows that EPA's power plant rules make substantial strides to protect human health and the environment,' said Aaron Bergman, a fellow at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research institution and a co-author of the Science paper. 'Carbon emissions in the power sector drop at a faster rate with the (Biden-era) rules in place than without them,' Bergman said in an email. 'And we also would have seen significant reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, pollutants that harm human health.'

Tulane scientist resigns citing university censorship of pollution and racial disparity research
Tulane scientist resigns citing university censorship of pollution and racial disparity research

Winnipeg Free Press

time3 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Tulane scientist resigns citing university censorship of pollution and racial disparity research

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A Tulane University researcher resigned Wednesday, citing censorship from university leaders who had warned that her advocacy and research exposing the Louisiana petrochemical industry's health impacts and racial disparities in hiring had triggered blowback from donors and elected officials. In her resignation letter, Kimberly Terrell accused the university of sacrificing academic freedom to appease Louisiana's Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. Terrell, the director of community engagement at Tulane's environmental law clinic claimed the facility had been 'placed under a complete gag order' that barred her from making public statements about her research. A spokesperson for Landry said this was 'not accurate' but declined to comment further. According to emails obtained by The Associated Press, university leaders wrote that the work of the Tulane Environmental Law Clinic had become an 'impediment' to a Tulane redevelopment project reliant on support from state and private funders. The clinic represents communities fighting the petrochemical industry in court. 'I cannot remain silent as this university sacrifices academic integrity for political appeasement and pet projects,' Terrell wrote. 'Our work is too important, and the stakes are too high, to sit back and watch special interests replace scholarship with censorship.' Tulane spokesperson Michael Strecker said in an emailed statement that the university 'is fully committed to academic freedom' and declined to comment on 'personnel matters.' Elected officials concerned about environmental law clinic's work Many of the clinic's clients are located along the heavily industrialized 85-mile (137-kilometer) stretch of the Mississippi River between New Orleans and Baton Rouge commonly referred to by environmental groups as 'Cancer Alley.' In a May 4 email to clinic staff, Marcilynn Burke, dean of Tulane's law school, wrote that Tulane University President Michael Fitts worried the clinic's work threatened to tank support for the university's long-sought downtown expansion in collaboration with state agencies. 'Elected officials and major donors have cited the clinic as an impediment to them lending their support to the university generally and this project specifically,' Burke wrote. Burke did not respond to an emailed request for comment Wednesday. In her resignation letter, Terrell wrote that she had been told the governor 'threatened to veto' any state funding for the expansion project unless Tulane's president 'did something' about the clinic. Barred from media interviews A 2022 study Terrell co-authored found higher cancer rates in Black or impoverished communities in Louisiana. Another study she published last year linked toxic air pollution in Louisiana with premature births and lower weight in newborns. In April, Terrell published research showing that Black people received significantly less jobs in the petrochemical industry than white people in Louisiana despite having similar levels of training and education. Media coverage of the April study coincided with a visit by Tulane leaders to Louisiana's capitol to lobby elected officials in support of university projects. Shortly after, Burke, the law school's dean, told clinic staff in an email that 'all external communications' such as social media posts and media interviews 'must be pre-approved by me.' Emails from May show that Burke denied requests from Terrell to make comments in response to various media requests, correspondence and speaking engagements, saying they were not 'essential functions of the job.' On May 12, Terrell filed a complaint with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, claiming that her academic freedom had been violated. The agency, which accredits Tulane, did not immediately provide comment. University leaders concerned about clinic's advocacy In a May 21 audio recording obtained by The AP, Provost Robin Forman said that when Tulane leadership met with elected officials on April 16, they were pressed as to why ''Tulane has taken a stand on the chemical industry as harming communities',' and this 'left people feeling embarrassed and uncomfortable.' Burke said in an email that university leaders had misgivings about a press release in which a community activist represented by Terrell's clinic is quoted as saying that petrochemical companies 'prioritize profit over people.' In the email Burke noted that Fitts was concerned about the clinic's science-based advocacy program, and Terrell's work in particular which he worried had veered 'into lobbying.' Burke said Fitts required an explanation of 'how the study about racial disparities relates directly to client representation.' The clinic cites the study in a legal filing opposing a proposed chemical plant beside a predominantly Black neighborhood, arguing the community would be burdened with a disproportionate amount of the pollution and less than a fair share of the jobs. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. The clinic's annual report highlighted its representation of a group of residents in a historic Black community who halted a massive grain terminal that would have been built around 300 feet from their homes. The provost viewed the clinic's annual report 'as bragging that the clinic has shut down development and that its mission is to oppose all development,' Burke said in an email. In her resignation letter, Terrell warned colleagues that she felt Tulane's leaders 'have chosen to abandon the principles of knowledge, education, and the greater good in pursuit of their own narrow agenda.' ___ Brook is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Will the real Santa Ono please stand up?
Will the real Santa Ono please stand up?

Vancouver Sun

time4 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Will the real Santa Ono please stand up?

The video that essentially scuttled Santa Ono's chances of landing a US $3-million-a-year president's job at the University of Florida concludes with the former head of the University of B.C. telling viewers he is 'speaking to you from the traditional, ancestral and unceded territory of the Musqueam people.' In the video clip from Canada, Ono repeats his Indigenous land acknowledgment in French. Other portions of the video feature him lamenting 'colonial funding of the university' and 'dispossession' of Indigenous lands. The 12-minute video was put together by Seattle conservative activist Christopher Rufo, and has been viewed more than 730,000 times on X. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. While it was effective in building opposition to what many had thought was Ono's shoe-in candidacy for president of the University of Florida, the video consists of little more than a series of filmed pledges Ono has made in the past decade in which he tells his audiences how committed he is to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). One segment spotlights Ono saying there is 'systemic racism at the University of B.C.,' where he was president from 2016 to 2022. A dual citizen who was born in Vancouver in 1962 while his American father was teaching mathematics for a few years at UBC, Ono then adds: 'Systemic racism exists at every university.' In another video Ono vows to create more 'intentional Black spaces' on campus, while recruiting more Black students and professors and designing more awards for Black people. Ono goes on to say: 'The climate crisis is the existential crisis of our time,' and promises to stop his university investing in companies that produce greenhouse-gas emissions. He also declares the importance of 'Pink Shirt Day' (devoted to anti-bullying) and vows to protect people who are 'two-spirit' and 'gender nonbinary.' After Ono became president of the University of Michigan in 2022, he continued to champion anti-racism, gender inclusiveness, the 'climate emergency' and affirmative action. 'Racism,' he said, 'is one of America's original sins.' Under Ono the University of Michigan's DEI department ballooned to 240 employees and an annual budget of US$30 million. He became the continent's poster boy for the movement. But this year Ono appeared to turn his back on some of his once outspoken progressive values. The conversion happened about the same time that U.S. President Donald Trump was elected in November and began attacking DEI programs everywhere, especially in taxpayer-funded institutions. In March, Ono virtually dismantled the University of Michigan's DEI department. Next week, the Florida Board of Governors will vote for or against Santa Ono as president of the University of Florida. If the board wants Florida to remain the place "where woke goes to die," it must reject Ono and his left-wing radicalism. He then wrote an opinion piece for Inside Higher Ed , stating he initially supported DEI initiatives because he thought their aim was 'equal opportunity and fairness for every student.' 'But over time, I saw how DEI became something else — more about ideology, division and bureaucracy, not student success.' He wants to re-emphasize the value of merit. In large part because of his change of philosophy, Ono, who had much earlier served as president of the University of Cincinnati, was touted on May 4 as the 'sole finalist' for president of the University of Florida. It's America's third largest university. At the time, Ono's candidacy had been unanimously approved by the board of trustees of the University of Florida. That's even though Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis had earlier declared his state is 'where woke goes to die.' People began taking notice, though. Following the release of Rufo's May 28 video and subsequent complaints, Florida's board of governors, which oversees all state universities, voted 10-6 against Ono. Board of governors member Paul Renner, who was against Ono's confirmation, said he didn't believe Ono was sincere in distancing himself from his earlier DEI efforts: 'The public record completely contradicted what the nominee was telling us.' At the University of Michigan, a group representing graduate employees also chastised Ono for lacking principles in what appeared to be a flip-flop. Some commentators tagged him a 'chameleon.' It's impossible for the rest of us to know what is truly going on in Ono's heart. But his dilemma echoes the puzzle posed in the longtime TV panel show To Tell the Truth, in which three challengers all claim to be the same person. The truth is only revealed when the host finally asks them: 'Will the real (person's name) please stand up?' It goes without saying being a university president in recent years has been like navigating a mass attack of ideology-packed drones, whether to do with Israel-Gaza, Black Lives Matter, migration policy or transgender rights. And a combative Trump has done everything he can to up the stakes, repealing affirmative action programs, cancelling government grants to Ivy League universities and deporting activist foreign students. In many ways, it's Ono's six years at UBC that most came back to haunt him. That's where he made most of the DEI promises Rufo aired in his video. Ono was filming his DEI announcements even while some of the things being most noted about his time at UBC, which former president Stephen Toope once described as 'ruthlessly secular,' had been his open commitment to evangelical Christianity. He was a lay preacher and gave active support to Vancouver's Tenth Church, including support to establish a branch on campus. To show his commitment to supporting mental health, the former immunology researcher made a point of revealing he has suffered from depression and as a teenager considered suicide. Even some of his critics acknowledge Ono sometimes tried to stand up for free speech and to protect Jewish students on campus. But they also complain he failed to truly protect conservative voices. A few days before the final vote on the University of Florida posting, Rufo, who is with the Manhattan Institute, published a letter by the young man who was head of UBC's free speech club when Ono was president. In it, Noah Alter charges that Ono's administration threw multiple roadblocks in the way of speaking engagements by conservative journalist Ben Shapiro and former Muslim Yasmine Mohammed. It also cancelled a talk by author Andy Ngo, a critic of the left-wing militant movement known as Antifa. In May, Ono was replaced at the University of Michigan by an interim president. As a result, he's between jobs. Since crashing into his career nightmare in Florida, he hasn't spoken publicly. dtodd@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store