IND vs ENG: Why Some Team India Players Stayed Back In London After Oval Test Win
After landing in Dubai on Tuesday evening, some team members took connecting flights home; Oval Test hero Mohammad Siraj is headed to Hyderabad from there
After levelling the series with a memorable win at the Oval, the Indian cricket team chose to skip celebrations and quietly dispersed. Less than 24 hours after the victory, several players, including Mohammad Siraj, Arshdeep Singh, and Shardul Thakur, boarded flights back to India on Tuesday morning.
The team members arrived in Dubai on Tuesday evening and then took connecting flights to their respective homes. Mohammad Siraj, the hero of the Oval Test, will travel to his home in Hyderabad after reaching Dubai.
Meanwhile, other players have decided to stay in London for some rest. Arshdeep and Prasidh Krishna were seen spending time with their families in the city, while Kuldeep Yadav, who did not play in the series, was spotted roaming with former Indian spinner Piyush Chawla. Jasprit Bumrah, who missed the deciding match due to workload management, was released by the BCCI and had already returned to India.
A BCCI source told PTI, 'There was no celebration last night. It has been a long and tiring series. The players spent time with their families or alone. Most of the players are returning to India, some are going elsewhere."
India's performance in the series showcased resilience. The team lost the first match of the 5-match Test series against England, then after a loss in Leeds, bounced back with a win in Birmingham to equalise the series. England secured a victory in the Lord's Test, taking a 2-1 lead. The result of the Manchester Test remained undecided, bringing the series down to the final match. In the Oval Test, India clinched a thrilling victory on the last day, thanks to Mohammad Siraj's lethal bowling, concluding the series in a 2-2 draw.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Graphics: How Bodhana Sivanandan became the youngest female to defeat a Grandmaster
Let's take a look at the journey of Bodhana Sivanandan, a 10-year-old British chess prodigy of Indian origin, who became the youngest female to defeat a Grandmaster. She also earned her Woman International Master title and first Woman Grandmaster norm in the same event. Bodhana Sivanandan, a 10-year-old British girl of Indian origin, has just etched her name in history books. She stunned the chess world by becoming the youngest female player ever to defeat a Grandmaster. The chess prodigy beat 60-year-old English GM Peter Wells in the final round of the 2025 British Chess Championship in Liverpool on Sunday, August 10. Bodhana also became the youngest Woman International Master (WIM) and secured her first Woman Grandmaster (WGM) norm in the same event. Her family is originally from Trichy, Tamil Nadu but Bodhana was born and brought up in Harrow, London. Her remarkable achievements at such a young age have made her one of the biggest rising players in world chess. Let's explore her journey so far through some creative graphics attached below. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
IND vs ENG: ‘Control' over ‘intent' — How change in approach reaped dividends after NZ debacle at home and disappointment in Australia
Accepting keyword 'accumulation' over 'aggression' may have come in the way of a series win for Shubman Gill's India on their recent England sojourn. But if one takes into account the backdrop of a 0-3 home whitewash against New Zealand and the batting shambles witnessed in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy series in Australia, the 2-2 stalemate may pass off as a win. A win on the 'execution' front for India's batting main cast manning the red-ball transition. A morale-booster for head coach Gautam Gambhir and a riposte to Bazball cultists. The result at Lord's will sting, but the Indian team management and the new batting order will take pride in ticking off fresh boxes, recalibrated post the 1-3 debacle in Australia. The visitors weren't always equipped to take 20 wickets on the UK tour, but the radical batting overhaul is a worthy uptick that Gill & Co will hope to build on before their next SENA trip in October 2026. The cornerstone for change was firmly placed on a base distinct from that of the Englishmen, not necessarily keen on emulating their rapid scoring bursts. England recorded 3,378 runs in nine innings in the series, their 4.17 run rate the third-highest ever in a five-match Test series. Trading run rate for sheer volume, India piled on 3,809 – the most runs ever in a five-match series – at a higher average (42.32). Striking the right balance between the several gears of five-day batting, India's 3.62 run rate in the series ranks as their best-ever in a series featuring at least five Tests. A cursory review of the series reflects the flip in the script. India's three 500-plus run-scorers – Shubman Gill, KL Rahul and Ravindra Jadeja – exuded effortless 'control' for the majority of the series, admittedly on pitches prepared to wear down seam-bowling packs. The comparison of India's batting in Australia and England reveals telling enhancements. India batted 2,371 deliveries more in England than Down Under in equal innings (10), propelling the 4.1 percent gain in control percentages (80% to 84.1%) as a monumental marker of consistent quality batting in the UK. Channelling the old-school instincts naturally benefited batters of the ilk of Rahul and Jadeja, run-accumulators in whites. The effects also rubbed off on Gill and Rishabh Pant; their sharpened 'timing' produced stronger results when juxtaposed against their returns on previous tours. Firming up control, formally measured as the number of balls middled, ensured that Gill, Pant, Rahul and Jadeja played key roles in the batting revival. The skipper marked the prominent surge, translating time in the middle into better results when pressing on the attack. According to Cricket-21 data, Gill was dismissed three times in only 32 deliveries (44 runs) against seamers while attacking in Australia, with false shots creeping up to 28 percent. Attacking 215 balls off pacers of the 1,150 deliveries he faced in England, Gill reduced his false shots to only 10.2 percent. The staggering gain in control meant only two dismissals to pace while recording 338 runs from deliveries he chose to attack. Pant left a similar imprint in England. Of the 89 attacking shots played, Pant made contact with the sweet spot of his bat on 76 occasions. Collectively, the Indian batting average on attacking shots against pace doubled from 30.3 to 60.5 between the two series, scoring 633 more runs with six fewer wickets lost in England. The new batting template eased the burden on Rahul and Jadeja, with both batters securing 500-plus run tallies for the first time in their long careers. The 2-2 scoreline may be a result of lack of assertiveness on the bowling front. But the approach of putting a price on their wicket on English soil may bind this Indian line-up together before spicier challenges ahead.
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Parliament passes National Sports Bill after extensive discussion
The National Sports Governance Bill was on Tuesday passed by the Parliament with Rajya Sabha giving its nod a mere 24 hours after Lok Sabha, marking a historic first for India's sports administration that is now set to be regulated by a national board and have its own dispute resolution mechanism. The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, which reinforces NADA's autonomy as required by the World Anti-Doping Agency, was also passed by the Parliament. The two bills now await presidential assent to be notified as acts. Soon after Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports Mansukh Mandaviya moved the bills for consideration and passage in the Upper House at 3pm, there were vociferous opposition protests over revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. The opposition eventually staged a walkout led by Leader of Opposition and Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, who demanded a discussion on the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. 'In 20 countries, there is sports law. I request the Rajya Sabha to make India the 21st country with a sports law,' Mandaviya said in his address which was followed by a discussion that lasted over two hours. During the discussion, BJD MP Subhashish Khuntia raised concerns about the centralisation of sports governance due to the bill. He also felt that the bill did not have clarity on district and block level development of athletes. 'The bill should empower, not control,' he said. Mandaviya responded by saying that the government is only seeking to be a facilitator. 'In this bill, we are bringing transparency, not control, not interference. Government doesn't want to control. We are being the supporters and providers of a structure,' he asserted. Former All India Football Federation President and NCP leader Praful Patel and Indian Olympic Association President P T Usha, who is a nominated member, were among the prominent voices who lauded the bill. 'It was a long-standing legislation that was required. We have had a sports code, it's been a loose code and never stood any legal scrutiny. What is happening today is the need of the hour,' Patel said. 'We are hoping to win the 2036 bid of Olympics. That itself would be a redefining moment for Indian sports. This bill is absolutely in the right direction. We need this to achieve glory that is beyond cricket. It is imperative that this bill be passed with fullest support,' he added. Usha expressed similar sentiments and said, 'This bill will usher in transparency, accountability, and gender parity. It will empower athletes and build confidence among sponsors and federations. It is about justice and fair-play.' Mandaviya has described it as 'the single biggest reform in sports since independence.' The most striking aspect of the bill is the NSB to create a stringent system of accountability. The NSB will have the mandate to de-recognise a national body that fails to hold elections for its Executive Committee or has committed 'gross irregularities in the election procedures.' Failure to publish annual audited accounts or 'misused, misapplied or misappropriated public funds' would also be liable for action by the NSB but it would be required to consult the concerned global body before making its move. Another feature is the proposal for a National Sports Tribunal, which will have the powers of a civil court and decide disputes ranging from selection to election involving federations and athletes. Once instituted, Tribunal's decisions can only be challenged in the Supreme Court. The bill makes some concessions on the issue of age cap for administrators by allowing those in the bracket of 70 to 75 to contest elections if the concerned international bodies' statutes and bylaws allow for it. It is a departure from the national sports code that capped the age limit at 70. All recognised national sports bodies would also come under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, something that the BCCI has vehemently opposed since it is not dependent on government funding. However, the cricket board has got some leeway on that front with the government amending the bill to ensure that RTI would be applicable only on bodies that rely on government funding or support. Another significant amendment made to the draft is the mandatory term of two tenures in the EC to be eligible for fighting NSF elections. That mandatory tenure has been reduced to one term, clearing the decks for the likes of IOA President P T Usha to seek a re-election. The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill-2025 incorporates the changes sought by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which objected to 'government interference' in the functioning of the country's Anti-Doping Agency (NADA). The act was originally passed in 2022 but its implementation had to be put on hold due to objections raised by WADA. The world body objected to the institution of a National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports, which was empowered to make recommendations to the government on anti-doping regulations. The Board, which was to comprise a chairperson and two members appointed by the central government, was also authorised to oversee the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) and even issue directions to it. WADA rejected this provision as government interference in an autonomous body. In the amended bill, the Board has been retained but without the powers to oversee NADA or the advisory role it was previously assigned. The amended bill asserts NADA's 'operational independence'.
