Canadian community foundations rally to support local news, calling it essential to democracy
A couple of weeks ago, a neighbour mentioned our son's school might be moving. I couldn't find anything about this online.
But I did find plenty of news from down south. While the erosion of democracy in the United States is something to pay attention to, some news outlets appear to be capitalizing on its sensational aspects.
When Donald Trump and Elon Musk get into an online fistfight, local news can seem like the less glamorous cousin.
But there's really not much we can do about American democracy.
Still, U.S. media reports have contributed to news burnout. Many Canadians are tuning out from their regular news sources. Forty per cent of Canadians responding to a survey from the 2025 Reuters Digital News Report said they were sometimes or often avoiding the news, as compared to 28 per cent eight years earlier.
Hearing about problems we can't do much about is disempowering, according to a study on solutions journalism. Researchers found that readers who were treated as active civic participants rather than passive consumers felt more empowered.
The news about my kid's school is something that profoundly impacts my family. And I can do something about it, at least in theory. I can attend public meetings and organize my neighbours to take a stand, in hopes of affecting the outcome of the discussions.
Local news can help me do that. It's the very stuff that can help rebuild frayed community ties and mis- and disinformation. Without access to quality local news, malicious entities can more easily step into communities with misinformation designed to sway or mislead.
Voter turnout is higher in places with more newspapers. Local journalists act as news brokers, ensuring the flow of information, which is essential to fulfilling the information needs of communities. We know that when less local news is present, communities become more polarized, and that polarization leads to increased sharing of misinformation.
But local news is increasingly in trouble. Local news outlets are closing — 566 across Canada, to be precise, between 2008 and April 2025. That's compared to the 283 that opened and remain in operation in that same period, according to the Local News Research Project.
My recent report for The Canadian Philanthropy Partnership Research Network, 'In Defense of the Local: How Community Foundations Across Canada are Supporting Local News' describes an increasingly popular way to support these local news outlets.
Through case studies, I documented — along with my research assistant, Jessica Botelho-Urbanski, and supported by our research team at OCADU — the early signs of a growing movement of Canadian community foundations supporting local journalism.
Community foundations across Canada are becoming ever more aware that many of the issues they care about, like building just and sustainable communities, are connected to the availability of local journalism.
And some communities are starting to fund their local news outlets.
For example, the Toronto Foundation made a rare, 10-year commitment to support The Local, a non-profit news outlet founded in 2019 that describes itself as 'unabashedly Toronto, reporting from corners of the city that are too often ignored or misunderstood.'
Sharon Avery, Toronto Foundation's president and CEO, says the organization hadn't spent much time prioritizing journalism because 'the dots have not been connected …that a healthy local journalism equals a healthy community.' But she grew convinced of the essential links between local news and democracy, and realized local news is a powerful tool.
The Winnipeg Foundation has been interested in local news for a while. Most recently, it funded the salary for one reporter, shared between Winnipeg's The Free Press, a major local newspaper, and The Narwhal, an environmentally focused digital news startup that had been looking to expand its coverage in the Prairies.
This kind of collaboration can improve the quality of work produced while also increasing the attention garnered by the resulting journalism in a way that is truly a win-win for all partners.
All of this is happening alongside government support, delivered through solutions like the Local Journalism Initiative, which funds journalists to report on under-covered topics, and the Canadian Journalism Labour Tax Credit, which covers a portion of salaries of eligible journalists.
Our report also includes recommendations on how place-based foundations can turn these initiatives into a movement to support local journalism. Community foundations could start by getting to know their local news ecosystems. What news organizations exist? What audiences do they serve?
They should also consider policies to direct some of their ad spending to local media, following the lead of the provincial government in Ontario, which has its four largest agencies allocate at least one-quarter of their annual advertising budgets to Ontario publishers.
Perhaps the most powerful — and most challenging — of our recommendations includes working with other local players to set up a community news fund.
This would enable funders to pay into a pool allocated to local news. This approach has generated millions for local news ecosystems in the U.S., Europe and South America.
Community foundations have the power to promote journalistic collaboration, which can help to combat mis- and disinformation.
To improve the quality of life and information for Canadians from coast to coast to coast, supporting local journalism is a must.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organisation bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Magda Konieczna, Concordia University
Read more:
The future of local news is one bound with our own
How Ottawa should spend its million to support local news
Instead of mourning local news, try paying for it
The contribution of the research assistant on the report described here was funded by a SSHRC grant obtained by the Canadian philanthropy partnership research network (PhiLab). The work was also supported by the Cultural Policy Hub at OCADU.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Ordered To Return Man Deported To El Salvador
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's administration has been ordered to return a Salvadoran man who was deported minutes after a federal appeals court blocked his removal. Jordin Melgar-Salmeron was deported to El Salvador on May 7 despite an order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, New York, blocking it. On Tuesday, the appeals court ordered the administration to "facilitate the return" of Melgar-Salmeron as soon as possible to "ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador." It also directed the government to return to court within one week to provide details on the current location of Melgar-Salmeron, and how it planned to return him to the U.S. This is a breaking news story, updates to follow.
Business Insider
30 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump is on edge about the Israel-Iran cease-fire, but markets are celebrating
Markets are cheering the cease-fire between Israel and Iran, even as Trump voices concern. The news is good enough for investors, who have spent the last week fretting over the conflict. But markets are on watch for signs that tensions could re-escalate, analysts say. President Donald Trump appears to still be on edge from the conflict that unfolded between Israel and Iran over the last several weeks, but the market appears eager to resume its rally toward record highs. Trump said Israel and Iran had agreed to a cease-fire on his Truth Social account Monday evening — news that was welcomed by investors, even as the president fired off a series of posts on Tuesday urging Israel to stick to the agreement he brokered. Still, after confronting the prospect of a much wider regional conflict, investors seemed ready to celebrate a win for the market. Here's where major indexes stood at 11:45 a.m. ET on Tuesday: S&P 500: 6,084.14, up 0.98% Dow Jones Industrial Average: 43,008.17, up 1% (+426.39 points) Nasdaq 100: 19,905.52, up 1.4% Investors have been fretting for more than a week over the economic implications if tensions in the Middle East were to escalate. But for now, the cease-fire appears to have lifted their spirits, according to David Morrison, a senior market analyst at Trade Nation. "So, with the immediate geopolitical tensions dialled down, investors are free to focus on President Trump's trade war and the first tariff deadline coming up in a couple of weeks," Morrison wrote in a note on Tuesday, adding that he believed stocks were still in a bull market. "This de-escalation is leading investors to be more comfortable engaging in risk-on trades in the equity market. Even if there is further escalation, it appears that Iran has limited abilities to retaliate, which is strengthening expectations that this conflict will calm down" Chirs Brigati, the chief investment officer at SWBC, said in a statement. "As far as investors are concerned, they've just stared down the prospect of World War Three, so they're not going to be fussed by a few percentage points on US imports," he added of tariff risks. Oil prices, which spiked as tensions in the Middle East escalated, dropped sharply from their recent highs. Brent crude, which spiked as much as 14% amid the 12-day conflict, traded 4% lower on Tuesday at around $65 a barrel. West Texas Intermediate crude, which spiked as much as 10% over the same period, also fell 4% to trade around $65 a barrel, below levels on the day the conflict started. The declines are signs that oil markets are no longer fretting over possible supply disruptions in the Middle East, according to Alex Kuptsikevich, the chief market analyst at FXPro. "Retreating to levels seen before the latest conflict, the price recouped the 'war premium,'" Kuptsikevich wrote in a note on Tuesday. Here are other important moves in the market: The US Dollar Index: 97.90 (-0.53%) Bitcoin: 105,662.80 (+0.21%) Gold: 3,319.60 (-2.22%) Investors, though, are still on watch for signs that conflict could re-escalate in the coming days. "Markets breathed a sigh of relief following Trump's ceasefire declaration, but the celebration could be short-lived. If tensions flare again or the ceasefire is violated, we could see a swift return to risk aversion — boosting safe havens like gold and pressuring global equities," Lukman Otunuga, a senior market analyst at FXTM, wrote in a note. "In our downside scenario, we assume ceasefire negotiations break down and Iran attempts to disrupt trade with mines and attacks on shipping," researchers at Oxford Economics wrote in a note.
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump heads to NATO summit fuming over Israel, Iran
President Trump is on his way to the NATO summit, emerging from the White House early Tuesday enraged over the continued fighting between Israel and Iran in the wake of parameters of a ceasefire he announced a day before. What comes next in the nearly two-week old conflict will likely dominate a host of bilateral meetings and informal pull-asides with world leaders Trump has lined up at the two-day summit in the Netherlands. NATO's defense spending levels will also take center stage as world leaders prepare to back a goal of spending 5 percent of gross domestic product to increase security. That will likely be related to talks involving the Russia-Ukraine war, another major topic at hand, as well as Trump's tariffs on trading partners. Here's what to watch for. Trump is set to arrive in the Netherlands after a whirlwind few days of activity in the Middle East. He left Washington, D.C. early on Tuesday fuming at both Israel and Iran for continued fighting overnight despite his announcement that the parameters of a ceasefire deal had been agreed upon. He declared that both sides 'don't know what the f— they're doing.' 'I think they both violated it. I don't think, I'm not sure they did it intentionally. They couldn't rein people back,' Trump told reporters as he departed the White House. 'I don't like the fact that Israel went out this morning at all, and I'm going to see if I can stop it. So as soon as I get away from you, I'm going to see if I can stop it.' Before he announced the ceasefire to bring the nearly two-week conflict to an end, the U.S. military struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. Iran retaliated with missiles targeting an American base in Qatar that resulted in no casualties. It was a remarkable sequence of events, particularly for Trump, who had faced lingering questions and some criticism from his own base about the prospect of engaging in a foreign conflict despite his 'America first' foreign policy pledge. The fragile ceasefire and how to approach Iran and its nuclear ambitions moving forward are likely to be a subject of discussion among world leaders at the NATO summit. The president pushed the idea to require all NATO members to spend 5 percent of their GDP on defense, as opposed to 2 percent, after railing against allies for not paying their fair share. The summit in The Hague is seen as a deadline for members to meet the spending threshold as the demands will be confirmed on Wednesday. The U.S would also be increasing its spending from 3 percent to 5 percent and in 2024, 23 out of 32 countries in the alliance had met the 2 percent threshold. Spain, however, is expected to be an outlier after it made a deal with NATO to be excluded from the 5 percent and instead spend just over 2 percent of its GDP on defense needs. Spain received the exemption from NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, after Trump said on Friday that the country 'has to pay what everybody else has to pay.' Trump has also suggested the U.S. may not defend NATO allies who do not contribute enough to defense spending, despite the core pillar of the alliance that an attack on one is an attack on all. Asked about the United States' Article 5 obligations while en route to the summit, Trump suggested there were different definitions of what it meant. 'Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. 'But I'm committed to being their friends. You know, I've become friends with many of those leaders, and I'm committed to helping them.' 'I said, 'If you're not going to pay, we're not going to defend.' I said that seven years ago, and because of that, they paid hundreds of billions of dollars,' the president said in April. The only time Article 5 of NATO has been invoked was after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on U.S. soil. Trump on the campaign trail said that he thinks NATO allies treat the U.S. unfairly and that the U.S. takes on a heavier burden than other members. Rutte stressed in his preview of the summit that the alliance has to continue to be consistent with its support for Ukraine. 'We must continue to make sure Ukraine has what it needs to defend today and deter in the future. Our support for Ukraine is unwavering and will persist' Rutte said. Ukraine and Russia's war is a particularly challenging spot for Trump, after he vowed on the 2024 campaign trail to end the ongoing war within 24 hours of taking office but has made little apparent headway. Trump is expected to meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the summit. Russia has so far refused U.S. proposals for a 30-day ceasefire and Trump has expressed increasing frustration with Putin, while also placing blame on Ukraine for not making a deal to end the fighting. Meanwhile, Russia condemned the U.S. strikes on the Iranian nuclear sites and vowed to support Iran on Monday, telling Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, 'for our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people.' 'The completely unprovoked act of aggression against Iran has no foundation or justification,' the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. Trump on Monday had blasted former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev over remarks suggesting Iran's allies could supply it with nuclear warheads and boasted about the U.S. nuclear arsenal. Trump's 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs on all trading partners expires on July 8 with only agreements with China and the United Kingdom having been announced. Multiple key trading partners, including Canada, France and Italy, will be at the NATO summit and eager for discussions over its trading relationship with the U.S. The administration had ambitious goals for their negotiations, aiming for 90 deals in 90 days and, while they have teased that deals with trading partners like India, Japan and Vietnam are close to being finalized, but haven't announced anything concrete. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who stayed back at the G-7 meeting after Trump left early, floated that there could be some wiggle room beyond the July 8 deadline to strike deals. At the G-7, the president and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer detailed the trade deal between the two nations, which was in the works before Trump imposed his reciprocal tariffs on trading partners. Trump at the time said he thinks there will be 'many, many other ones coming' when it comes to trade deals with countries. But, the administration has not announced any progress in talks with other nations.
