Legislative subpoena adds to SAHRC complaint against Emfuleni municipality
The Emfuleni municipality is being placed under increasing pressure by administrative forces.
A complaint against the municipality has been submitted to the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) and officials have also drawn the ire of the Gauteng provincial legislature (GPL).
Under phase two of Operation Vulindlela, Emfuleni is highlighted as one of the eight worst run municipalities in the country and is subject to national government intervention.
SAHRC complaint
The DA on Wednesday laid a complaint with the SAHRC, citing a violation of the right to access water and forcing residents to live in filth to due to regular sewerage spills.
Emfuleni racked up R562 million in wasteful expenditure spent on overtime pay for service delivery projects that yielded little results.
Additionally, the municipality returned R636 million of its municipal infrastructure grant despite its service delivery challenges.
'These failures reflect systemic corruption, mismanagement, and a disregard for residents' dignity,' stated the DA's SAHRC complaint lodged by Emfuleni North constituency head Kingsol Chabalala.
'The actions taken by the provincial government to place Emfuleni under administration, have not produced any significant advancements, and the residents still suffer due to poor governance at the provincial and local levels,' he said.
Emfuleni municipality and the SAHRC were contacted for comment by The Citizen but no response had been received at the time of publication.
GPL subpoena
Emfuleni officials have been criticised by the GPL for not attending to service delivery requests and proposals set out by residents.
The standing committee on petitions said that roughly only 12% of petitions submitted to the municipality received a formal response – some dating back to 2013.
'Alarmingly, no senior accountable officials from Emfuleni were present to respond to the remaining seven petitions or to account to the committee or the petitioners,' the GPL said on Thursday.
ALSO READ: Mashatile: How national government is aiming to reform local municipalities
Issues addressed in the unresolved petitions include the hijacking of properties, municipal rates disputes, relocation of informal settlement residents and a government housing project.
The lack of response by the municipality has prompted the GPL to take further steps to receive answers.
'As a result, the committee has taken a firm and decisive decision. Emfuleni municipality will be subpoenaed to appear before the committee in the coming weeks.
'This is to ensure full accountability and progress on the petitions which remain unresolved to this day. The residents of Emfuleni deserve answers – not continued neglect.
NOW READ: Emfuleni sewerage disaster continues despite multiple contractors being paid millions
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
24 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: New reform tracker helps answer the question, ‘Will SA be okay?'
Finally, we are getting a live report card to help us answer this question. Last week, I was asked to be MC at the two launches of the Business Leadership SA Reform Tracker. It has a rather grand title. But, unlike so many other names in the economic and political space, it does what it says on the tin. It is tracking our reforms. Not quite minute by minute, but not far off. As someone who identifies as a 'journalist' and watches everything that happens as much as I can, I'm often asked certain questions by people I bump into, or audiences I speak in front of. The questions are wide-ranging, from 'who should I vote for' to 'should I emigrate', to 'will our economy start to grow now that…' I could go on. But in reality, they're the same question. Everyone who asks me one of those questions is asking something much more fundamental. They're asking, really: 'Will South Africa be okay?' It was a question summed up incredibly well by my old journalistic colleague and friend, Jan-Jan Joubert. He wrote a very well-researched answer and published it as a book. There is something almost peculiar to the South African middle class about this question. I don't think people in New Zealand or, dare I say it this particular Monday, Australia ask themselves this. Or people in the UK or Spain — despite the fact that in both those countries there are serious economic and political problems. But, considering the era of State Capture we have come from, I think it's fully understandable. I mean, look around. In Johannesburg, the mayor blames the DA for the state of the city while he himself has not appointed a finance head, or someone to actually manage the roads. That pothole that you see twice a day? There is actually no one in charge of fixing that right now. Our economy is still growing incredibly slowly, and it seems that people are putting more energy into arguing about the definition of employment than actually making changes that will result in more jobs. Just this weekend we saw a liar, someone who was central to the Guptas, who has been able to use the Hawks to have his ex-wife literally locked up in jail, still mouthing off about the state of the ANC? Malusi Gigaba should be in court. Not being given interview after interview as the chairperson of a portfolio committee in Parliament. But as we all know, there are virtually no Zondo prosecutions. And institutions such as Transnet are still battling to recover from State Capture. Progress However, it's important to note that there is progress. Finally, we are getting a live report card to help us answer the question: 'Will South Africa be okay?' Last week, I was asked to be MC at the two launches of the Business Leadership South Africa Reform Tracker. It has a rather grand title. But, unlike so many other names in the economic and political space, it does what it says on the tin. It is tracking our reforms. Not quite minute by minute, but not far off. Now, when I was at school, my reports were written in quite dry, dull text. They were very different from my tests, in which red was a prominent feature. Here, you get red, yellow and green. So at a glance, you can see how we are doing. But you can also click on each little tile and read what has been written about that sector. It might be that there is progress but still work to do; the story might be a lot more complicated than a single colour can indicate. And, wonderfully, there is also a way for you, perhaps as someone working in one of these sectors, to send some feedback. You might know that something has changed, or that in fact there has been more progress than the tracker is showing. Now, as a journalist, it's tempting to look for the red and start to get a little stroppy with a few politicians. Journalistic instincts But Dr Stuart Theobald, the founder and chairperson at Krutham who put the whole thing together, tells me that we should just wait a little before people like me go back to our journalistic instincts. He acknowledges that, yes, some reforms have stopped because of political problems, or opposition. And some have just failed. But some have been stopped deliberately, because the reform no longer makes sense. In other words, yes it's stopped — but for a good reason. So, if you are interested, it does make sense to actually go a little deeper into each sector, just to see how things really are. I know that one of the reasons you really read this is because you are searching for an answer to that question: 'Will South Africa be okay?' I mean, there is a lot to be worried about. Just as there is in the US, or China, or many, many other places right now. It might be worth just checking in with this tracker from time to time. Perhaps put it on your browser dashboard or something.
Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Two days left for Gayton McKenzie to respond to K-word allegations
Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy The South African Human Rights Commission ( The commission confirmed that it had received complaints from political parties and members of the public after the posts, published from 2011 to 2017, circulated on X earlier this month. The content drew public outrage and renewed calls for McKenzie's removal from the cabinet. In a statement, the SAHRC said the posts amounted to a prima facie violation of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act and that McKenzie's conduct was inconsistent with the ethical standards expected of a cabinet minister and member of parliament. 'After assessment of the contents, the commission is of the view that utterances made by Minister McKenzie are prima facie violations of the provisions of the Equality Act,' it said. The commission has issued McKenzie, who leads the Patriotic Alliance, with an allegation letter, setting out remedial measures and requiring a response. If he refuses to comply, the matter will be referred to the Equality Court under the SA Human Rights Commission Act read with the Equality Act. It has given the minister until 20 August to respond to the allegations. The proposed measures include deleting the offending posts, issuing a public apology in consultation with the commission, undergoing sensitivity training, and making a donation to a charity. SAHRC spokesperson Wisani Baloyi said the body had considered the wording of the posts, the circumstances under which they were made, and their potential effect on the dignity of others. 'We believe there is prima facie evidence of a violation of the Equality Act,' he said. The commission also used the opportunity to remind the public that the right to freedom of expression is not absolute. It warned against using hate speech under the guise of free speech protections, citing the Equality Act and the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Act. 'The commission calls on everyone in the country to uphold the principles enshrined in the constitution, including human dignity, equality and non-discrimination,' it said. McKenzie has rejected the allegations, insisting he has never used the K-word. Speaking to news channel 'I can't ask for forgiveness for something I didn't do. Why am I asking for forgiveness for some of the nonsense things I said about guys and swearing at some guys, not racism. I won't apologise,' he said. 'Why would I apologise for something I didn't do? Even if the president says I must apologise for racism, I will not, because I wasn't racist. Must I be so desperate for a job that I start apologising for stuff? No. I'm another type of guy.' McKenzie has also dismissed the controversy as politically motivated, accusing the 'I can never be guilty of racism. Try some other takedown, but never racism,' he said. 'What you see here, they fear me, they have been calling me ibhantinti [prisoner], I mustn't be here, then every time I beat them in the by-elections, where is Bhantinti and all? Now they found racism, what racism? How can I be racist my brother me?' said the convicted criminal turned politician. The resurfacing of the posts and the commission's decision to investigate have prompted sharp reactions across the political spectrum. ActionSA, which lodged a complaint with the SAHRC, welcomed the investigation. 'We maintain that South Africa cannot have a sitting cabinet minister who holds such views, whether past or present, without being held to account,' ActionSA MP Alan He said the SAHRC's action was appropriate. 'No cabinet minister can be allowed to casually use racial slurs and walk away without consequence.' Last week, the EFF called for McKenzie's immediate dismissal from the cabinet. 'A minister entrusted with national identity and cultural diversity cannot be tainted by such racist conduct,' the party said. The EFF argued that past incidents should serve as a benchmark for how such matters are handled, referencing the case of Renaldo Gouws, who was expelled from the Democratic Alliance and resigned from parliament after his racist remarks also resurfaced. 'The dismissal of Renaldo Gouws for his racist utterances set a firm precedent: individuals who demean black people should not occupy leadership roles, particularly in spaces that require engagement with diverse communities,' the EFF said in a statement. 'McKenzie's comments carry the same weight, if not more, as they come from a coloured man using the language of oppression against black people.' The party also accused McKenzie of inconsistency and hypocrisy after he recently slammed a podcast over derogatory comments against coloured people. 'It is also the height of hypocrisy for McKenzie to demand accountability from others. He himself harbours the same hateful attitudes. Recently, when podcasters on 'Open Chats' made offensive remarks about cColoured people, calling them 'incestuous' and 'crazy', McKenzie expressed outrage, opened a case against them, and demanded a public apology,' the EFF said.
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
Gayton McKenzie ‘intends' to meet with SAHRC over K-word tweets
The SAHRC sent an letter to Gayton McKenzie outlining the allegations against him after offensive social media posts resurfaced. Patriotic Alliance leader and Minister of Sport, Arts, Recreation and Culture Gayton McKenzie is prepared to meet with the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC). McKenzie faced a backlash last week after old social media posts resurfaced where he used the K-word multiple times. The resurfacing of the minister's social media posts came days after he chastised a group of podcasters for comments they made about South Africa's coloured community. Intentions to meet SAHRC The SAHRC announced on Friday that it's assessments concluded that there was sufficient evidence to take the matter of McKenzie's posts further. 'The commission has sent an allegation letter to Minister McKenzie. Thereafter, the commission will determine the best way forward, which may include instituting proceedings in the relevant Equality Court,' stated the SAHRC. McKenzie defended himself last week, where he attempted to provide context for his repeated use of the K-word. Patriotic Alliance spokesperson Steve Motale told The Citizen that McKenzie would be engaging with the SAHRC. 'We intend to take the SAHRC up on their offer of a meeting because there are numerous issues that we need to clarify to them, such as the fact that he was not even the author of many of the offensive tweets, which can easily be proven,' said Motale. 'After these points are clarified, we will have a better idea of what the way forward should be.' 'Hate speech is prohibited' McKenzie was referred to the SAHRC by ActionSA. There were also calls by some for President Cyril Ramaphosa to discipline the government of national unity signatory. 'Mr President, you appointed a minister who has publicly uttered deeply offensive and despicable words against black people,' stated African Transformation Movement leader Vuyo Zungula. The SAHRC asked South Africans to uphold the principles constitution and promote dignity and equality. 'The commission wishes to remind members of the public that the right to freedom of expression is not absolute. 'Hate speech is prohibited in terms of the Equality Act, and the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Act,' the SAHRC concluded. NOW READ: Gayton McKenzie racism row deepens as string of racist comments threaten national unity
