Second Harvest continues to feel federal cuts impact ahead of summer months
BLOUNT COUNTY, Tenn. (WATE) — It has been two months since federal cuts were announced, and Second Harvest Food Bank of East Tennessee continues to be impacted.
'In March we received 301,122 pounds of USDA product, and then in April we only received 198,171 pounds of product which was a decrease of 102,951 pounds of food from USDA,' said Kendra Lindsay with Second Harvest Food Bank of East Tennessee.
USDA inspects livestock for flesh-eating parasite in Strawberry Plains
The food bank has several programs including a mobile food pantry that travels across different East Tennessee counties. The mobile pantry uses USDA products.
'We've limited a little bit, and we have adapted a little bit. We are trying to make sure all of the agencies have access to the product,' Lindsay said. 'We are still going out to our mobile distributions. We're still giving out food. We're currently working on different ways to find funding to bring in more food to help those agencies that may be struggling budget wise.'
For instance, on Tuesday, the mobile pantry was in Cocke County. Cocke County Mayor Rob Mathis estimates that 600 families were served.
'We are doing our best, and we are going to work as hard as we can for our agency partners to make sure they can get the needs they have to meet their neighbors' needs,' Lindsay said.
As school is out, some are concerned the federal cuts could impact the Food for Kids program. Lindsay tells 6 News it will not be impacted.
At least one dead after crash on Pellissippi Parkway near Alcoa
'We do not use USDA products for our Summer Food for Kids program. Our program will be working as usual,' Lindsay said.
Second Harvest Food Bank of East Tennessee is taking in donations.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 items added to ‘Dirty Dozen' list of most pesticide-contaminated produce
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) added blackberries and potatoes to its 'Dirty Dozen' list of produce containing the most residue of potentially harmful pesticides. Blackberries and potatoes landed in spots No. 10 and No. 12, respectively, on the updated list released Wednesday. They were added based on new data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which tested blackberries for the first time in 2023. The USDA data found that 93 percent of blackberry samples had pesticide residues, with an average of four different pesticides per sample. More than half of blackberry samples contained residue of the pesticide cypermethrin — which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies as a possible human carcinogen. Potatoes landed on the list after USDA released new data showing 90 percent of samples contained chlorpropham, a chemical banned in the European Union because of health concerns. The legacy produce still topped the 'Dirty Dozen' list. Spinach ranked No. 1, with more pesticide residue by weight than any other type of produce, and strawberries followed at No. 2. 'Kale, Collard, and Mustard Greens' collectively placed No. 3 — and EWG noted that more than half of kale samples were 'tainted' by a 'possibly cancer-causing pesticide.' The 'Dirty Dozen' list ranked grapes as No. 4, peaches as No. 5, cherries as No. 6, nectarines as No. 7, pears as No. 8, apples as No. 9, blackberries as No. 10, blueberries as No. 11 and potatoes as No. 12. The guide analyzed pesticide residue data from USDA tests of more than 53,000 samples of 47 fruits and vegetables, EWG said in a press release. The tests are conducted after the produce samples are washed, scrubbed or peeled, 'as is typical for each type of produce.' EWG said the pesticide residue remained on the produce, but washing fruits and vegetables 'remains an important step to reduce pesticide levels, dirt, and possible bacterial contamination.' EWG encourages consumers to buy organic produce if they do not want to avoid the 'Dirty Dozen' produce items. EWG also publishes a 'Clean Fifteen' list of produce with overall lower levels of toxicity. Pineapples led that list this year, followed by sweet corn (fresh and frozen), avocados, papayas and onion as the top five produce items. Nos. 6-15 included sweet peas (frozen), asparagus, cabbage, watermelon, cauliflower, bananas, mangoes, carrots, mushrooms, and kiwi. EWG said nearly 60 percent of conventionally grown produce on the 'Clean Fifteen' list had 'no detectable pesticide residues,' while more than 9 in 10 samples of produce on the 'Dirty Dozen' list contained residues of potentially harmful pesticides. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
2 items added to ‘Dirty Dozen' list of most pesticide-contaminated produce
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) added blackberries and potatoes to its 'Dirty Dozen' list of produce containing the most residue of potentially harmful pesticides. Blackberries and potatoes landed in spots no. 10 and no. 12, respectively, on the updated list released Wednesday. They were added based on new data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which tested blackberries for the first time in 2023. The USDA data found that 93 percent of blackberry samples had pesticide residues, with an average of four different pesticides per sample. More than half of blackberry samples contained residue of the pesticide cypermethrin — which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies as a possible human carcinogen. Potatoes landed on the list after USDA released new data showing 90 percent of samples contained chlorpropham, a chemical banned in the European Union because of health concerns. The legacy produce still topped the 'Dirty Dozen' list. Spinach ranked no. 1, with more pesticide residue by weight than any other type of produce, and strawberries followed as no. 2. 'Kale, Collard, and Mustard Greens' collectively placed no. 3 — and EWG noted that more than half of kale samples were 'tainted' by a 'possibly cancer-causing pesticide.' The 'Dirty Dozen' list ranked grapes as no. 4, peaches as no. 5, cherries as no. 6, nectarines as no. 7, pears as no. 8, apples as no. 9, blackberries as no. 10, blueberries as no. 11 and potatoes as no. 12. The guide analyzed pesticide residue data from USDA tests of more than 53,000 samples of 47 fruits and vegetables, EWG said in a press release. The tests are conducted after the produce samples are washed, scrubbed or peeled, 'as is typical for each types of produce.' EWG said the pesticide residue remained on the produce, but washing fruits and vegetables 'remains an important step to reduce pesticide levels, dirt, and possible bacterial contamination.' EWG encourages consumers to buy organic produce if they do not want to avoid the 'Dirty Dozen' produce items. EWG also publishes a 'Clean Fifteen' list of produce with overall lower levels of toxicity. Pineapples led that list this year, followed by sweet corn (fresh and frozen), avocados, papayas and onion — as the top five produce items. Nos. 6-15 included sweet peas (frozen), asparagus, cabbage, watermelon, cauliflower, bananas, mangoes, carrots, mushrooms, and kiwi. EWG said nearly 60 percent of conventionally grown produce on the Clean Fifteen list had 'no detectable pesticide residues,' while more than 9 in 10 samples of produce on the 'Dirty Dozen' list contained residues of potentially harmful pesticides.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers
It should be clear by now that, despite the assurances from President Donald Trump and his allies in government, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—which passed the U.S. House of Representatives last month—not only won't reduce the federal budget deficit but will in fact increase the nation's debt load by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Given that Trump came into office promising to cut federal spending, it's worth looking at how Trump's bill does the opposite of what he and other Republicans say it does. And one of the more egregious things it does is boost corporate welfare for wealthy farmers. "The government provides agricultural subsidies—monetary payments and other types of support—to farmers or agribusinesses," says the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). "While some subsidies are given to promote specific farming practices, others focus on research and development, conservation practices, disaster aid, marketing, nutrition assistance, risk mitigation, and more." "In reality, this support is highly skewed toward the five major 'program' commodities of corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice," according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), an environmental advocacy organization. "Despite the rhetoric of 'preserving the family farm,' the vast majority of farmers do not benefit from federal farm subsidy programs and most of the subsidies go to the largest and most financially secure farm operations." The new bill will only make the problem worse: According to an analysis by the American Farm Bureau Federation, the bill "would increase agriculture-facing programs spending by $56.6 billion over the next decade," of which "$52.3 billion is tied to enhancements in the farm safety net." That "farm safety net" comprises most agricultural subsidy spending in any given year. It includes price and revenue guarantees for certain crops, ensuring farmers earn a set minimum on staples like corn and soybeans, as well as crop insurance assistance, covering up to 60 percent of farmers' insurance premiums in the event of price declines or poor harvests. The programs are a bad deal for taxpayers—indeed, for anybody but the very wealthiest agribusinesses. "Just in the last 10 years, crop insurance agents and the 14 companies the USDA allows to sell and service crop insurance policies…received almost $33.3 billion from the federal Crop Insurance Program," EWG Midwest director Anne Schechinger wrote in 2023. "In some years, up to one-third of crop insurance payments are made to companies and agents, not farmers." The new bill would make the program even more generous, tying payouts to inflation and putting taxpayers on the hook for even more insurance company operating costs. The bill would also increase the price minimums for many staple crops, though the increases for those grown in southern U.S. states go up exponentially: While corn would go up by 18 percent, and wheat and soybeans by more than 70 percent each, minimum prices for seed cotton, peanuts, and rice—grown primarily in the southern states—would each more than double, with the minimum price of rice going up 185 percent. Price minimums inherently distort the market, causing farmers to prioritize favored crops even if others would be better suited to the growing conditions—after all, if you're guaranteed a minimum price for what you sell, and you're covered for what doesn't grow, what do you have to lose? At the same time, "subsidies increase land prices, which benefits wealthy landowners at the expense of the many farmers who rent," writes Nan Swift of the R Street Institute. "Young farmers can't afford to rent or buy land at inflated prices. Likewise, young farmers often have smaller farms that don't benefit from the primary federal subsidy programs." Not only does the "Big Beautiful Bill" keep these programs intact, it expands them; it even introduces an "insurance pilot program" for "poultry growers." "The farm subsidy increases in the reconciliation bill are brazen. The GOP lavished the biggest subsidy increases on GOP parts of the country," writes Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute. "More importantly, in a supposed spending reform bill, the GOP doesn't just spare millionaire farmers from cuts, they aggressively expand inefficient farm giveaways by $57 billion." The post Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers appeared first on
