logo
Fighting for funds: A new era of HIV activism

Fighting for funds: A new era of HIV activism

Mail & Guardian22-04-2025

The Health and Human Rights Oral History Project's video testimonies that capture three decades of health activism from around the world, might provide a blueprint for the next wave of HIV activism. (Bhekisisa)
'So the US funding cuts happened and I was looking for the noise! I was asking the other day, 'Where are my people, why aren't they shouting?'' says Sisonke Msimang, a South African writer and political scientist.
Msimang was a vocal critic of the Aids denialism of the Mbeki era, supporting the health advocacy organisation Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) in what became a
She is also one of 29 health rights activists featured in the
[WATCH] LAUNCH OF THE ORAL HISTORY PROJECT
In South Africa, more than half of HIV and TB projects funded by the US government's Aids fund, Pepfar,
The health department commissioned a modelling study from Wits University's
The preprint of the study's results will be published this week.
'We need to see urgency from the government to reverse this. We're not seeing that,' warns Sasha Stevenson, who heads up the social justice organisation Section27.
The cost to contain those numbers? R2.82 billion.
Activists say getting the government to find the money might require a back-to-basics approach to HIV advocacy.
'I was thinking it's time for noise again,' says Msimang, who now lives in Perth, Australia. 'We must meet this moment, pushing for full funding of health by our own government.'
Looking back to move forward
The series of video testimonies that capture three decades of health activism from around the world might provide a blueprint for the next wave of activism.
The interviews are housed by the
'We saw that the projects represented so much that needed to be preserved, to be able to learn from and to be inspired,'
Jonathan Cohen, director of policy engagement at the Global Health Institute, told
Bhekisisa
.
Activism in South Africa takes prominent space in the archive, with testimonies from
Grants can be ended, speakers at the oral history project's
Making history
Stevenson said the archive gives unique insights into the back stories of the many layers of activism that eventually bring about change.
In the 'essential medicines' case in the late 1990s and early 2000s, public protests drew attention to the need for HIV treatment around the world. In South Africa, those protests took on the form of scientists, activists, lawyers and the news media coming together
That activism resulted in
Twenty years later, the Life Esidimeni
It was largely due to the activism of organisations such as Section27 and the
In her
But only if journalists, activists and researchers tap into it. That point, says Noor Nieftagodien, head of the history workshop at Wits University, is 'amplified by the current circumstances of Trumpism, where … there is an urgent need for more of this kind of human rights activism'.
The universal lesson from the archive, he says, is that results come from organising and mobilising people around a cause.
Holding the state accountable
'In 20 years, we'll look back to what happened in 2025 and people will want to know a fuller story about how people responded,' says Fatima Hassan, the founder and director of the
She says the oral histories give courage, but in some ways activism today is more complicated.
In South Africa, activists now have to deal with a government of national unity (GNU), instead of a single party with one ideology. The unity government is fragile, and Hassan says the Health Justice Initiative and other civil society organisations
So far, the health department says it has commissioned the modelling study previously mentioned, and
The department's deputy director general for the country's National Health Insurance scheme, who led the calculations, told
Bhekisisa
the department is in the process of applying for emergency funding from the treasury, via section 16 of the Public Finance Management Act, on 15 April.
But Hassan says the slow pace at which the department has been moving to get to this point is frustrating.
She says the business community should also have stepped forward by now to acknowledge the scale of the crisis. 'History will judge those with money and resources that didn't come forward and say they're trying to mitigate the impact.'
But, she argues, some of the 'noise' of activism was initially stifled; people speaking for organisations affected by cuts wouldn't go public — or did so anonymously — so as not to poke the bear (US President Donald Trump) and lose their contract.
Other things have changed, too.
Mark Heywood, a founding member of the TAC, now serving on its board, says activism is debased because activists get sucked into policy processes.
For example, he says, the
For Cohen, the close working relationship between activists and government in South Africa is a sign of activist success — it usually means that governments have started fulfilling their health obligations and need civil society to help them.
Back to basics?
The funding crisis is a reminder that the need to hold the state accountable never ends, activists say.
Msimang says working with the state is both essential and seductive. 'Where activists find themselves now is [that] we became friends with government, helping to expand the capacity of the state to reach out to communities.'
She says the shutdown of the US Agency for International Development, USAid, through which
Mluleki Zazini, the director of the
'I think we need to go back to the streets so that we can voice our needs,' says Zazini, who also chairs the civil society forum within Sanac. 'We criticise them in boardrooms … maybe they've forgotten that we used to mobilise people to get action.'
Bhekisisa
's Mia Malan was the moderator for the online
This story was produced by the
. Sign up for the
.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Peanut butter producer fined R500K for contaminated products
Peanut butter producer fined R500K for contaminated products

The South African

time5 hours ago

  • The South African

Peanut butter producer fined R500K for contaminated products

House of Natural Butters has agreed to pay a R500 000 penalty after a product safety investigation found that several peanut butter products contained high levels of aflatoxin, a toxic substance produced by types of moulds. As reported by Cape Town Etc , the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT) recently confirmed that it had approved a settlement agreement made earlier this year between House of Natural Butters and the National Consumer Commission (NCC). The peanut butter manufacturer reportedly accepted the fine without contest. The peanut butter products were recalled in early February last year, when both Pick n Pay and Dis-Chem pulled certain peanut butter jars off shelves due to alarmingly high aflatoxin levels. Afloxin, a group of poisonous mycotoxins produced by certain moulds, can lead to nausea, vomiting and even long-term health damage when consumed in high doses. The recalled products included Dischem's Lifestyle 400 grams Smooth and Crunchy, Dischem's Lifestyle 800 grams Smooth and Crunchy, Wazoogles Superfoods (all sizes from 32g to 20kg), Pick n' Pay's No Name 1kg Smooth, and Eden All Natural. IOL also reported that the NCC investigation also found that between 11 May, 2023 and 6 November, 2023, House of Natural Butters had 'imported and supplied contaminated, decayed and impure peanuts, groundnuts and byproducts to South African consumers through various retailers.' Consumers have been urged to check their homes for affected products. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

South Africa's health advocacy groups: ‘Health failing to shield kids from HIV'
South Africa's health advocacy groups: ‘Health failing to shield kids from HIV'

The Citizen

time11 hours ago

  • The Citizen

South Africa's health advocacy groups: ‘Health failing to shield kids from HIV'

'This is unacceptable in a country with one of the largest HIV treatment programmes in the world,"- Treatment Action Campaign's Xabisa Qwabe South Africa's health advocacy groups have accused the department of health of failing to protect children. Picture: Westend61/Getty Images South Africa's health advocacy groups have accused the department of health of failing to protect children from contracting HIV from their mothers. According to statistics recently released by Thembisa Project, the leading mathematical model of HIV in South Africa showed that of approximately 7 200 babies who contracted HIV between 2023 and last year, only 2 500 contracted the virus before or during birth, while the rest were infected during breast-feeding. ALSO READ: Health minister defends nearly R10 million legal spend on NHI court battles Every child deserves access The study further revealed that 157 000 children were living with HIV, while one out of three were not on treatment. Treatment Action Campaign spokesperson Xabisa Qwabe said: 'This is unacceptable in a country with one of the largest HIV treatment programmes in the world.' 'Every child deserves access to life-saving antiretroviral therapy. We cannot accept a situation where children are left behind due to systemic failures or social barriers.' Qwabe said despite significant gains in the fight against HIV, ongoing mother-to-child transmission reflected critical breakdowns in the health care system. 'These include late or no antenatal care, failure to test and treat pregnant women in time, treatment interruptions and social stigma,' she said. 'When a person living with HIV adheres to treatment and achieves an undetectable viral load, the virus cannot be transmitted to others, including from mother to child. This is why adherence to antiretroviral therapy during and after pregnancy is essential.' Pregnant women needed to be taught about the importance of being on treatment consistently. She said while the department of health had important intervention programmes, they were not being delivered effectively in all areas. NOW READ: Men's health: Don't forget to check in your pants

Red Meat Industry Services activates Operational Centre in response to Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak
Red Meat Industry Services activates Operational Centre in response to Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak

IOL News

time20 hours ago

  • IOL News

Red Meat Industry Services activates Operational Centre in response to Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak

Red Meat Industry Services (RMIS) said on Friday that it will activate a centralised Operational Centre (OC) at its headquarters on Monday, 9 June 2025, in response to the Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak. Red Meat Industry Services (RMIS) said on Friday that it will activate a centralised Operational Centre (OC) at its headquarters on Monday in response to the Foot and Mouth Disease outbreak. RMIS said the OC will be led by a designated RMIS veterinarian and will oversee a team of veterinary professionals and industry representatives, along with a specialist public relations and public affairs agency, forming the FMD Working Group. 'The FMD Working Group will be mandated to develop and implement a structured, time-bound response to the outbreak, with medium- to long-term goals, including a focus on vaccination among other key areas.' The primary objective of this plan is to guide RMIS in addressing the current FMD situation in South Africa, with a strong focus on protecting red meat role players to ensure the long-term sustainability and growth of the industry. 'This is critical not only for the red meat sector, but also for South Africa's broader agricultural economy, as the outbreak impacts the entire red meat value chain and poses a serious threat to the dairy industry and other sectors connected to red meat production,' it said. Another key aim is to establish public-private partnerships (PPPs) at various levels to support the understaffed public veterinary sector by leveraging private sector expertise and capacity. RMIS added that the immediate responsibilities of the OC are finalising a three-month response framework to address urgent risks and establish a platform for long-term management: The medium-term plan will include two key components: Expanding and supporting the capacity of veterinary services to enhance disease control. Establishing FMD-free livestock compartments supplying all South African red meat abattoirs. RMIS said that the OC's other responsibilities would include: Coordinating with the Joint Operations Centre (JOC) to align with government and industry stakeholders. Evaluating and enhancing the Government Contingency Plan. The Department has shared its contingency plan with the industry, which the FMD Working Group will review and provide feedback. Initiating a local vaccine production strategy, which includes assessing funding requirements, establishing an implementation timeline, and developing a financing model supported by industry funding. Centralising stakeholder communication through the appointed veterinarian, who will report directly to RMIS CEO Dewald Olivier. Implementing an electronic movement permit system: A basic, structured electronic Farmer Declaration system will be developed, communicated, and enforced. Dewald Olivier, the CEO of RMIS, said this is a defining moment for the red meat industry. 'RMIS was established precisely for a time like this - to provide coordinated leadership, technical expertise, and practical solutions in close collaboration with government and industry partners. Our unified efforts today will shape a more secure, sustainable, and competitive future for the industry,' Olivier said. Last week, Business Report reported that the KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) livestock farming community called on the government to declare KZN a disaster area due to the outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). In a joint statement, they called on the government to formally declare FMD a disaster as KZN grapples to contain the spread. 'In 2021, affected areas in the province were declared a Disease Management Area (DMA); the latest resurgence in 2023 has spread beyond this area and necessitated the expansion of the DMA; however, the spread continues outside of these areas.' In response, Dipepeneneng Serage, Deputy Director-General: Agricultural Production, Biosecurity and Natural Resources Management at the Department of Agriculture, said while they understand the seriousness of the FMD situation in KZN and in Gauteng, they don't think declaring a state of emergency is the solution. 'We have declared/gazetted the DMA which is in itself a state of emergency for livestock and farmers. We need farmers to work with the government to adhere to biosecurity regulations. Additionally, to the DMA, we will be issuing directives regarding the movement of animals in SA. BUSINESS REPORT Visit:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store