Yard sign condemning antisemitism on college campuses sparks free speech debate
The sign held a double meaning for the family. In addition to its message against antisemitism, the color pink resonated with the Lobmans, as they are passionate advocates for breast cancer research.
Lower Merion School District (LMSD) Board member Anna Shurak, who happens to be the Lobmans' next-door neighbor, took issue with the sign. According to the Lobmans, before Shurak reached out asking them to remove the sign, she blocked it with a wheelbarrow and dirt. In response, the Lobmans elevated the sign, but Shurak then used a Philadelphia Eagles flag to block it a second time.
13 American Universities Slapped With 'F' Grade On Campus Antisemitism
The Lobmans decided to reach out to local officials, as Shurak serves in an elected position, and they believed her blocking the sign was an act of censorship that violated their First Amendment rights. Jeff Lobman also expressed these frustrations to Fox News Digital, saying he was stunned that an elected official felt that she could censor free speech.
Shurak, who is also Jewish, eventually put up her own sign, one that read "We believe black lives matter, no human is illegal, love is love, women's rights are human rights, science is real, and water is life." However, Shurak claimed in a since-deleted Facebook post that she had the sign for eight years. The Lobmans were able to dispute her claim with images from her yard on Google Maps, one of which is from as recently as July 2024, in which there is clearly no sign.
Read On The Fox News App
Delegation Of Hostages Released By Hamas Traveling To Dc To Meet With Trump Admin Officials
The Lobmans reached out to local officials about the ongoing situation, one of whom was Lower Merion County Board of Commissioners member Gilda Kramer. Jeff Lobman later described the conversation with Kramer as "invasive and disturbing," saying that the commissioner asked them to modify the sign while speaking in her official capacity.
In February, the Lobmans presented their case during a meeting of the Board of Commissioners. In his presentation, Jeff Lobman told the board that "the net effect of Anna's actions was to diminish our free speech and convey that her message is worthwhile and ours is not, a similar theme to something we learned she advocated publicly about in her elected role."
However, the sign attracted attention from other neighbors, who began telling the Lobmans about what was happening in the local school district.
When they put up the sign, the Lobmans, who have a child in private school, did not realize that there was an ongoing battle in the local school district about the handling of antisemitism.
"A few weeks ago, there was a community meeting about Jewish children not feeling safe at Lower Merion schools that highlighted disturbing incidents of verbal and physical assaults," Jeff Lobman told the board. "We made the connection to our sign and realized how wrong it was for Anna to censor a current local issue in a political campaign."
Jeff and Rachel Lobman were not alone in their concerns about free speech. Steve Rosenberg, Jewish Community consultant serving as Philadelphia Regional Director for The North American Values Institute, agreed.
"The idea that an elected school board member would go to such lengths to obstruct a sign that simply states 'Jewish students deserve to be safe on campus' is beyond troubling—it's appalling. This incident is not just about a sign; it's about a growing and dangerous trend of silencing Jewish voices under the guise of 'keeping the peace.' We cannot allow this kind of blatant intimidation to stand, especially in a district where parents are already deeply concerned about antisemitism," Steve Rosenberg told Fox News Digital.
Shurak did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment.Original article source: Yard sign condemning antisemitism on college campuses sparks free speech debate
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
4 minutes ago
- USA Today
Press groups accuse LAPD of violating judge's ban on targeting journalists covering protests
Press groups are accusing Los Angeles and its police department of violating a court order by striking journalists with batons and arresting them as they reported on an Aug. 8 protest. The Aug. 13 complaint, filed by the First Amendment Coalition and attorneys representing the Los Angeles Press Club and the independent media outlet Status Coup, said the department's actions on Aug. 8 showed a 'blatant disregard for the First Amendment' and a restraining order the court issued in July. USA TODAY reached out to the city and the police department for comment and had not yet received a response by publication. The groups are suing the city and the LAPD over the treatment of journalists covering protests surrounding federal immigration enforcement. The restraining order, which was initially set for two weeks but later extended, said the department couldn't use less-lethal munitions against journalists who aren't posing a threat, bar a journalist from entering or remaining in closed areas, assault or obstruct journalists, or arrest journalists in a closed area for violating curfew orders, obstructing law enforcement officers or not dispersing while 'gathering, receiving or processing information.' The contempt motion alleges LAPD officers violated that order during what they described as a 'peaceful' immigration protest on Aug. 8. The officers formed a line and started moving toward the protesters around 9 p.m., the complaint said. 'Then, with no warning and no dispersal order, the officers started shouting 'move back' as they quickly advanced, shoving the assembled group and striking them with batons,' it said. There was subsequently no place for journalists to work 'without being assaulted by the LAPD,' the groups argued in their new court filing. Those who insisted they had a right to be there were 'ignored' or 'told ... to wait,' the complaint said. Sean Beckner-Carmitchel, a freelance journalist who was also injured while covering an immigration protest in June, asked to talk to a department supervisor or spokesperson and was told to move back. Upon repeating his request, 'an LAPD officer shoved him and hit him in the ribs with a baton, causing bruising and pain,' according to the complaint. Beckner-Carmitchel continued to ask, in line with directions in the court's order, to speak to a supervisor. 'The response was blank stares except for one officer who responded: 'That's not important right now,'' the complaint said. After a dispersal order was issued, the department arrested the approximately 20 remaining protesters and journalists. Officers put the group in zip-ties and 'held them against the wall for more than an hour,' the complaint said. Photojournalist Nicholas Stern was also 'struck in the face' and independent journalist Tina Berg was hit with a baton in an incident that 'ripped open the distal phalanx" of her little finger, according to the complaint. Most journalists were released at the scene, but two – Nate Gowdy and Carrie Shreck – were taken to a jail near downtown Los Angeles, the complaint said. Among other requests, the complaint asks the judge to find the defendants to be in contempt of court and modify its previous orders to 'expressly encompass use of batons and any other type of force.' A group of press and civil liberties groups also sued the Department of Homeland Security and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in June over what they described as federal officers' unconstitutional actions against journalists in Los Angeles. A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for Aug. 25. BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment reporter at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@ USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
Boston Globe
4 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Representative Katherine Clark calls Israel-Hamas war in Gaza ‘genocide'
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The comments, first 'a nonpartisan Quaker organization that lobbies Congress and the administration to advance peace, justice, and environmental stewardship.' Clark made the comments in a discussion hosted by Bridget Moix, the organization's secretary general, at the Friends Meeting at Cambridge Meetinghouse. Advertisement Clark was responding to protestors at the event in her district, said Joy Lee, a spokesperson for her office, who denied that the comment amounted to a new position on the war. 'The Israeli and Palestinian people deserve security and peace. It can only be achieved through a permanent cease-fire, the immediate return of the remaining hostages, and a surge of humanitarian aid to Gaza,' Lee said. 'It should not be controversial to say that Israeli children did not deserve to be kidnapped and murdered by Hamas, nor should it be controversial to say that Palestinian children, who bear no responsibility for Hamas's atrocities, do not deserve to be killed by war or starvation. Advertisement But only a handful of congressional Democrats, and none in top leadership roles, have called the Gaza war a genocide despite mounting pressure from progressive activists as the situation there deteriorates. The death toll in the war, which began after the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel, The UN defines genocide as 'acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group' and there is a genocide case filed by South Africa against Israel pending at the International Court of Justice. Israel has denied it is committing genocide, arguing that it is in a war with Hamas provoked by the terrorist group's 2023 attack, in which about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, were killed and 250 people taken hostage. The term genocide weighs heavily over Israel's history because of the Holocaust, a genocide in which Nazi Germany murdered six million Jews during World War II. Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump, Putin meet in Alaska
President Trump made new demands for peace between Russia and Ukraine as he touched down in Alaska at 2:20 p.m. Eastern on Friday for a historic summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump said he's prepared to walk away from the negotiating table if he doesn't believe Putin is open to a deal that would end the three-year war. 'I think it's going to work out very well — and if it doesn't, I'm going to head back home real fast,' Trump told Fox News anchor Bret Baier aboard Air Force One. 'If it doesn't, you walk?' Baier asked. 'I would walk, yeah,' Trump said The president also drew a red line with Putin, who brought along several businesspeople on the trip. 'They're not doing business until the war is settled,' Trump said. And Trump put European leaders at ease, announcing that he has no intention of discussing potential concessions on Ukraine's behalf. 'I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine,' Trump said. Over the course of the trip from Washington to Anchorage, the previously planned one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin expanded and will now be a three-on-three meeting. Trump will be joined by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Trump arrived with a big crew that includes Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, chief of staff Susie Wiles, press secretary Karoline Leavitt, and others. Putin's plane landed a half-hour after Trump's. The Russian president endeavored on his own side quests while making the trip from Moscow to Anchorage. Putin participated in a wreath-laying ceremony in Eastern Russia at a monument dedicated to Soviet and American pilots who cooperated during World War II. He also met with local hockey players. Trump and Putin deplaned at 3:08 p.m. Eastern time. They walked down the red carpets between fighter jets to shake hands. Trump arrived first, clapping as Putin approached. The leaders exchanged greetings, then walked to a riser, as a military fly-over was conducted overhead. They shook hands again and stepped off the riser. They rode together in the Beast — the presidential limo — to the summit location. A Kremlin spokesman said the summit, which will include an expanded bilateral meeting with additional Russian and American officials, could last six to seven hours. Trump and Putin are expected to conduct a press conference afterwards. BACK IN KYIV… Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is the odd man out on Friday, having not been invited to the bilateral summit. Trump has said he hopes a trilateral meeting between himself, Putin and Zelensky will come together quickly after Friday's meeting. Back in Kyiv, Zelensky told a small group of reporters, including NewsNation's Robert Sherman, that the summit will benefit Putin more than anyone, arguing that the Russian leader will be bolstered at home for appearing on equal footing with the U.S. president. 'What [Putin] is seeking frankly, is photographs,' Zelensky said. 'He needs a photo from a meeting with President Trump.' 'First, he will be meeting on U.S. soil, which I believe is his personal victory,' Zelensky added. 'Second, he is coming out of isolation … third, with this meeting, he has somehow postponed the sanctions policy. President Trump has serious sanctions. We will see what happens next.' Ukraine on Thursday launched drone attacks on cities in southern Russia, killing one person and injuring at least 16 more. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) accused Zelensky of seeking to 'sabotage' the peace talks with the military offensive. 'Zelensky doesn't want peace and obviously is trying to sabotage President Trump's heroic efforts to end the war in Ukraine,' Greene posted on X. Russian forces have been carrying out their own airstrikes across Ukraine's eastern and southern regions. 'There is not only no order but also no signals from Moscow about preparing to end this war,' Zelensky said. 'On the day of negotiations, they are also killing. And that says a lot.' • A federal appeals court panel overturned a judge's block on the Trump administration's dismantling of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, paving the way for mass layoffs to resume. Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor says that by the end of 2025, the Trump administration will have shed around 300,000 workers. • Trump says he's open to following through on former President Biden 's push to reschedule marijuana, a move that comes up short of legalization but would still provide a major boost for the cannabis industry. • PBS is cutting its budget by more than 20 percent after Congress eliminated roughly $500 million in federal funding from public TV and radio. • U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher blocked two memos issued by the Trump administration that threatened schools with funding cuts for diversity, equity and inclusion programs. 💡 Perspectives: • The Hill: The meeting in Alaska is already a success for Vladimir Putin. • New York Times: Putin should be careful what he wishes for. • CNN: How Trump and Putin's relationship has evolved. • Washington Post: How Putin will seek to sway Trump at Alaska summit. • The Telegraph: The most dangerous moment of the war for Zelensky. Read more: • GOP momentum for Ukraine aid package grows. • 5 questions ahead of the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska. • What do Putin, Trump and Zelensky want from Alaska summit? CATCH UP QUICK Retail sales rose a solid 0.5 percent last month and June spending was stronger than expected, according to a new Commerce Department report. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr said on Friday that he is not running for president in 2028, denying speculation amid attacks from right-wing activist Laura Loomer. NEWS THIS AFTERNOON Texas redistricting showdown nears the end Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) gaveled in the start of a second special session Friday afternoon, saying he expected there to be enough lawmakers present Monday for the GOP to vote on its new gerrymandered maps. 'I have been told, and I expect that we will reestablish quorum on Monday,' Burrows said. 'Although I have not seen any public statements directly from those who are not here, that seems to be what people have the expectation of.' Texas Democrats fled the state almost two weeks ago to deny a quorum and delay a vote on the new maps, which could help Republicans win an additional five House seats in next year's midterm elections. However, the missing Democrats signaled they're ready to return if a second special session is called and if California moves ahead with its own redistricting efforts. The first Texas special session ended Friday, and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) immediately gaveled in a second special session. The missing Democrats are being fined $500 a day, and Abbott has promised to keep calling new special sessions until enough Democrats return to the state to allow for a vote on the new maps. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) this week launched his own campaign to redraw the Golden State's maps, satisfying the second demand from Texas Democrats. At least one Texas Democrat that fled the state announced she'd return for the new special session. 'I am proud of what we accomplished,' state Rep. Ann Johnson (D) said in a statement. 'We ended a session that had nothing to do with helping Texans and everything to do with silencing them. And we exposed the truth behind the Governor's political agenda: to hijack the maps, erase opposition, and decide the next election before a single vote is cast. Now, with that session behind us, I'm returning to Texas to continue the fight — from the floor of the House.' MEANWHILE… California legislators are expected to release their proposed gerrymandered maps soon to counter the Texas GOP's moves. Still, a poll released this week indicates Newsom has his work cut out for him to sell voters on the idea of circumventing the independent redistricting commission, which at the moment has sole authority to draw the state's maps. 'Trump's election rigging comes to an end now,' Newsom posted on X. 'California won't stand by and watch Trump burn it all down — we are calling a special election to redraw our Congressional maps and defend fair representation. This is a five alarm fire for Democracy. Vote YES November 4.' Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) has been a vocal opponent of California's redistricting efforts, teasing a fight with Newsom over social media Friday. 'I'm getting ready for the gerrymandering battle,' Schwarzenegger wrote above a photo of him lifting weights. Republicans in Florida, Ohio and Indiana are also eyeing potential mid-decade redistricting efforts. The Hill's Mike Lillis and Caroline Vakil report that California's move is putting pressure on other blue states to follow suit. 'The Democrats don't want to stop [with California], pressing party leaders in Illinois, New York and even Maryland to take a page from Newsom's playbook to help the party flip control of the House — and establish a check on President Trump — in next year's elections.' 💡 Perspectives: • American Prospect: Newsom's defining moment for the party. • The Hill: DeSantis is diminished as 2028 GOP nominee. • The Liberal Patriot: Why populism could dominate both parties. • Whole Hog Politics: Checking in on Election Day 2025. ON TAP IN OTHER NEWS DC attorney general sues Trump over police takeover Washington, D.C., Attorney General Brian Schwalb (D) sued President Trump on Friday, seeking to end the federal takeover of the District's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). The 33-page lawsuit alleges that Trump exceeded his emergency authorities by appointing Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Administrator Terry Cole as temporary police commissioner. The lawsuit seeks to reinstall Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) and Police Chief Pamela Smith at the head of the MPD. 'There is no greater risk to public safety in a large, professional police force like MPD than to not know who is in command,' the lawsuit reads. The federal takeover of the MPD can only last for 30 days, at which point Congress would have to vote to authorize an extension. In addition to taking over the MPD, Trump dispatched more than 800 National Guard troops to join agents from other federal departments in patrolling the nation's capital to crack down on crime. FBI Director Kash Patel said Friday that federal authorities made 18 additional arrests Thursday night. 'We're now over 120 arrests since President Trump's initiative began,' Patel said. 'The good cops are getting the job done.' The raids are also targeting homeless encampments, clearing them off of federal property. In addition, Attorney General Pam Bondi ordered the end to a number of Washington, D.C., policing policies on immigration, declaring 'DC's sanctuary policies no longer apply.' Bondi said the MPD would begin cooperating with federal authorities on immigration matters, although the local police force will not be allowed to make arrests based solely on a person's immigration status. Trump's border czar Tom Homan said the administration is not asking MPD officers to directly enforce immigration laws, which are the responsibility of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers. 'Law enforcement needs to work with law enforcement,' Homan told NewsNation, The Hill's sister network. 'We're not asking Metro PD to be immigration officers, but when you're enforcing criminal law and when you find an illegal alien not only in violation of immigration law here illegally but involved with criminal activity, they absolutely should call us. Separately, Bondi said she sent letters to 32 mayors and governors of sanctuary cities, warning them 'we're going to come after you' if they don't comply with 'our federal policies and with our federal law enforcement.' 'They have, I think, a week to respond to me, so let's see who responds and how they respond,' Bondi told a Fox News reporter. Federal agents have been met by protests and hecklers in Washington, which is one of the most heavily concentrated regions of Democratic voters in the country. 'Donald Trump wants to impose police ice checkpoints all over D.C., and the freedom-loving people of Washington are not going to put up with that,' Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said on MSNBC's 'All In.' 'The whole thing is absurd, and he wants to use it as the basis for taking these police state tactics across the country and the people of America,' Raskin added. 'The majority is not going to stand for it.' Bowser, the Democratic mayor, was briefly under fire Thursday when it was revealed she'd left town for Martha's Vineyard. Bowser explained over social media that she was picking her 7-year old daughter up from camp, saying she'd return Friday. The mayor said she canceled a previously scheduled family vacation 'to lead our city's crisis management efforts.' 'I am in constant contact with my senior team and have been in constant consultation with our partners throughout a short swing out of the District,' Bowser said. 💡 Perspectives: • MSNBC: Trump exerts control over Kennedy Center Honors. • City Journal: Trump is right to send National Guard to Washington. • The Nation: Mamdani's victory over fear. • UnHerd: DC and LA failures play into Trump's hands. • Racket: Russiagate releases lift veil on surveillance state abuses. Read more: • National Guard ramps up DC presence amid signs of tension. • Democrats introduce bill to block Trump DC police takeover. • GOP relishes forcing Dem votes on extending Trump DC police power. • Judge temporarily blocks Medicaid data sharing with ICE officials.
