Vigil held for fallen sailors aboard Mexican Navy ship that crashed into Brooklyn Bridge
Some 200 people gathered Wednesday night at a heartbreaking vigil for the young sailors who died or were injured on the Mexican Navy ship Cuauhtémoc after its crash into the Brooklyn Bridge.
The solemn crowd — including Mexico and New York City officials, including Mayor Adams — gathered in the pouring rain at the iconic bridge to honor those lost in the crash. A Mariachi band sang Mexican folk songs, and portraits of America Yamilet Sanchez, 20, and Adal Jair Marcos, 23, were plastered on metal barricades along with the U.S. and Mexican flags.
'I understand the circle of life. But when I look at the faces of these young people, these young people who lost their lives in the military service that's important to their country, I don't have the logic,' Mayor Adams said. 'I don't have the words, but all I do know in moments like this, you trust God.'
As Adams arrived at the vigil, he bowed his head in front of each of the fallen sailor's portraits, then placed a bundle of white flowers in front of each portrait.
'These are moments when you realize how precious life is and I'm here today because the people of Mexico that live in this city have showed us how much you love your home country, and you love your adopted country, America,' Adams said.
The bodies of Sanchez, 20, and Jair Marcos, 23, have been repatriated to Mexico, where a vigil for Sanchez was held.
'We are grieving with the world and our brothers in Mexico,' said Bronx native Fabian Aguilar, 56, a dancer with Ballet Folklorico Mexicano of New York, who attended the vigil. 'We are very sad over this tragedy. We stand in the rain and mourn because we are all brothers.'
Madelin Martinez, 16, of Brooklyn said the vigil was 'really touching.'
'It came out of the blue, they were gone in minutes,' Martinez said. 'They were too young to die and they were not with their families. It was so important that they were here. With everything going on and (Immigration and Customs Enforcement), they represented our culture and now they are gone.'
According to the FDNY, at least 19 of those aboard were treated for injuries, with 11 initially listed in critical condition.
Most of the crew that was aboard Cuauhtémoc — including some who were initially treated for injuries — were announced on Wednesday to be safely back in Mexico, according to the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board.
Following an interagency meeting, discussions were held by the U.S. Coast Guard, NTSB, the ship's contractors and City Hall representatives focusing on the repair efforts on the ship, the crew's welfare and tow logistics, according to city Office of Emergency Management spokesman Aries Dela Cruz.
'USCG continues to support the vessel and crew of the ARM Cuauhtémoc. The US Navy is coordinating shoreside housing while repairs proceed. All injured crew have been discharged from the hospital and are now safely back in Mexico,' Dela Cruz said. 'Final plans for repairing the impacted masts are being prepared for submission to the Coast Guard. A tow plan for the vessel is also in development for USCG review. An underwater hull survey is anticipated for Saturday.'
Repairs are currently underway on the ship as officials wrapped up their damage assessment on Tuesday with marine surveyors and contractors accessing the vessel. The Cuauhtémoc hasn't sustained any damage to the hull, which would allow it to be moved from Pier 37, on Manhattan's Lower East Side, with tugboat assistance. The NTSB is also checking if there are any data recorders holding pivotal evidence of how the crash occurred.
The training ship is expected to be towed to the Brooklyn Navy Yard, where it will be dry-docked as the investigation continues, OEM officials said Tuesday. With wind and rain halting the process of towing the ship, The Cuauhtémoc is expected to move to a dry dock facility by Sunday.
The two fatalities occurred when the ship's masts crashed into the underside of the Brooklyn Bridge Saturday night. Multiple crew members aloft in the masts were left dangling in the air by their safety harnesses after the East River crash, but no one ended up in the water.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Identical twin veterans turn 95
(COLORADO SPRINGS) — A pair of twins turned 95 years young on Sunday, June 1 as family and friends gathered to celebrate nearly a century of love, adventure, and serving their country. It's the birthday of a lifetime–times two. It's one that many can only hope they live to see. Robert and Richard Gibbs have spent their entire lives together beginning in 1930–when the Great Depression was just beginning, and now living in an internet-driven world–the pair is celebrating the storied lives they've lived. 'As brothers, we were always supportive of each other no matter what,' said Richard Gibbs. They spent their birthday with loved ones, drinking wine, eating lots of food, and of course blowing out the candles. 'Stellar humans, you know, they're heroes, they're now national heroes and our family's heroes,' said Rusty Gibbs, the son of Richard Gibbs. The pair might be hard to tell apart, but they each have big personalities. During the celebration, they even bickered like most brothers do. 'We always, we have done a little internal family squabbling,' said Richard. They have lived together, loved together, lost together, and even fought together. 'I think that America is so lucky, Americans are so lucky to be born here,' said Richard. The two have been inseparable since day one, both serving in Korea and Vietnam side by side. 'Well, I went into flying and I became a fighter pilot in the Air Force for 20 years, and in the end, I went from second lieutenant to colonel,' said Richard. They were born in 1930 during the longest and deepest downturn in American history–the Great Depression. During their celebration, they told FOX21 News they remember living in poverty and experienced one of the darkest times in history. They even remember traveling by horse and carriage. 'It's almost impossible to believe the progress that has been made in the last 90 years in America. It's totally changed from the 1930s. You young people would never even believe it, a total difference between 1930s and 2025,' said Robert. They say the secret to staying young is to love, never give up, and of course have a little fun along the way. 'My advice? Have a great family. Family is the most important thing you ever encounter in your life; I don't care what your occupation is, what you do, what hobbies you have, your family is always there,' said Robert. The duo said their adventures are not done yet, and they are planning to visit Seven Falls to soak in mother nature later this month. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Perspective: Here's what got David Brooks angry last week
The day I encountered David Brooks in person, I was first struck, as we listened next to each other at a conference, at how short this larger-than-life columnist was. Later, at another gathering he organized, I saw for myself why he calls himself 'normally a mild guy' as he navigated with grace the loud protests from one angry attendee. But this week, something set Brooks off. Like other Americans, the journalist has been concerned about changes taking place in the country. He wrote with particular concern about the consequences of tariffs and illiberal impulses now emerging on the right. Yet I've never seen this mild-mannered journalist, followed by millions of Americans, so frustrated as he was in last week's column, which referenced the growing societal impact of a sentiment voiced by J.D. Vance in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention: 'People will not fight for abstractions, but they will fight for their home.' Brooks noted the similarity of Vance's remarks to an earlier Memorial Day essay from Notre Dame political scientist Patrick Deneen, who he called a 'popularizer of the closest thing the Trump administration has to a guiding philosophy.' Deneen wrote in 2009 that soldiers 'die not for abstractions — ideas, ideals, natural right, the American way of life, rights, or even their fellow citizens — so much as they are willing to brave all for the men and women of their unit.' Brooks pointed out that research by historian James M. McPherson rebuts this historical argument, with the majority of thousands of Civil War letters showing 'patriotic motivations' as one reason they went into combat. That includes a Union soldier writing his wife who had begged him to stop fighting and come home: 'Remember that thousands went forth and poured out their life's blood in the Revolution to establish this government; and 'twould be a disgrace to the whole American people if she had not noble sons enough who had the spirit of '76 in their hearts.' This historical debate isn't what got Brooks angry, though. It's how he believes this minimizing of 'abstractions' and 'ideals' appears to be shaping what this administration is currently doing. 'The Bible is built on abstractions,' the columnist notes. 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. The Sermon on the Mount contains a bunch of abstractions: blessed are the meek, blessed are the poor in spirit, blessed are the merciful. Believe it or not, down through the centuries, billions of people have dedicated their lives to these abstractions.' Of course, there are many great Americans who appreciate what President Trump is doing — and see Republican actions as realigning the country with its founding ideals. Brooks himself notes in his essay, 'I have no trouble simultaneously opposing Trump policies and maintaining friendship and love for friends and family who are Trump supporters. In my experience, a vast majority of people who support Trump do so for legitimate or at least defensible reasons.' Many of them rightly see a country that has strayed from Judeo-Christian morality. And they appreciate ways the Trump administration is trying to move the nation in a better direction. Along with pulling the country away from DEI mandates and biological men in women's sports, they cheer the cost-cutting attempts by DOGE as past due and the security of the American border that most people (on both the left and right) saw as problematic. As someone who has studied pharmaceutical companies in the past, I'm also among those who believe we're overdue in asking fundamental questions about incentives for our health care system — including the funding that shapes basic medical research we depend on to guide our treatment decisions. Heaven knows we can use more encouragement to improve our health as Americans, which is another focus of this administration. All this feels encouraging to many, and I can sincerely understand why. I wonder, do Trump supporters also understand the reasons others may be concerned? In our hyper-partisan discourse, it's become too easy to make knee-jerk references to 'far left radicals' and attribute any concern to 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Like in a fraying marriage, any hope of deeper reconciliation among Americans depends on at the very least understanding where different people are coming from. So, just like I've invited liberals for years to more deeply hear conservative concerns, I believe this latest column offers a window for Trump-supporters to understand more fully the sincerely-held concerns of his critics. Far from being a 'progressive,' this man is one of the most widely known conservative commentators in the world. I'll recap Brooks' concerns in simple form — centered around three differences in perspective the columnist proposes as fundamental: 1. Two forms of nationalism. On one hand, Brooks describes 'aspirational nationalism' reflected in people like Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan who saw America not only as a homeland, but also as 'founded to embody and spread the ideals expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address.' On the other hand, he describes a nationalism centered on ancestors and homeland, traditionally more common in Europe — reflecting 'the belief that America is just another collection of people whose job is to take care of our own.' 2. Two conceptions of society. Compared with a more 'universalist' conception of society centered on love of family and neighbor as foundational to larger love towards a nation or humankind, Brooks describes an 'identity politics conception of society' that shows up on both sides of the political spectrum now — namely, 'that life is a zero-sum struggle between racial, national, partisan and ethnic groups.' 3. Two kinds of morality. Compared with a morality based on universal ideals, Brooks also references an openly 'tribal morality.' In this, he references the President's own Memorial Day message on social media, which opened with this line: 'Happy Memorial Day to all, including the scum that spent the last four years trying to destroy our country.' Laying aside wearisome debates over the President's use of language, Brooks often presses readers to ask what language like this is doing inside us — shaping how we see and relate to others around us. Brooks goes on to argue here that the philosophies behind this administration (often called 'Trumpism') are gradually nudging our nation as a whole towards a morality, a society and a nationalism based less on universal ideals — and reflecting more of a zero-sum, tribal motivation that centers primarily on taking care of our own. This can be seen, Brooks says, as 'giant effort to narrow the circle of concern to people just like us.' He raises concern that the ultimate effect on our country is to 'amputate the highest aspirations of the human spirit and to reduce us to our most primitive, atavistic tendencies.' On this basis, he says, increasing numbers of Americans have been persuaded to turn away from Ukraine, from the recipients of aid programs in Africa, and to turn against immigrants as a whole. Yet 'if America is an idea,' Brooks appeals, 'then Black and brown people from all over the world can become Americans by coming here and believing that idea. If America is an idea, then Americans have a responsibility to promote democracy. We can't betray democratic Ukraine.' Brooks acknowledges that Vance himself referred to America as partly a set of ideas in his Republican National Convention acceptance speech, but notes the Vice President emphasized mostly the idea of a homeland where his ancestors were buried for generations. I agree with Brooks that our gaze must go deeper than policy level details to the moral and spiritual realm if we want to understand what's taking place in America right now. But I disagree with him that Trump and Vance are somehow intentionally causing harm — 'trying to degrade America's moral character to a level more closely resembling their own.' Yet there's something important in what Brooks is saying that's worth considering, especially his contention that we're continuing to separate ourselves as a country from some of the higher ideals that motivated our founders. Once again, many see President Trump as helping return America to these foundations. But in Brooks' view, the effort to advance a more isolationist, internally-focused America ethos 'stain(s) the memory' of those who gave their lives in the early revolution and who fought to preserve the Union — including 'the men who froze at Valley Forge' and 'who stormed the beaches at Normandy and Guadalcanal,' motivated by something far loftier than survival, conquest, or power alone.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bill Clinton Says Trump Is Paying ‘a Price' for His Actions
Former President Bill Clinton says President Donald Trump is paying a price for his bullying. 'We've never seen anything like this before in my lifetime,' Clinton said of the Trump administration in an interview on CBS News Sunday Morning. 'Somebody that says, 'Whatever I want should be the law of the land. It's my way or the highway.' And most Americans don't agree with that,' Clinton said. 'But I like to think that he's paid a price for this, you know, name-calling and throwing his weight around. I think it's made him less popular.' Trump has led a MAGAworld feud against the judiciary, labeling judges 'radical leftists' in numerous rants for issuing rulings that block the implementation of his divisive policies. A poll earlier found that about 6 in 10 American adults believe Trump has 'gone too far' in using his presidential power to enact his sweeping agenda. Clinton also said Democrats should focus on gubernatorial races and winning back the House of Representatives to counter the Trump agenda. 'Look, only elections are going to change this,' Clinton said. 'Someone needs to stand up and say, 'Damn it, what we have in common matters more. We cannot throw the legacy of this country away. We cannot destroy other people's trust in us.'' Clinton said the court system was the most effective method of stopping Trump, even as Trump has taken a battering ram to the judiciary. 'He is looking for ways to basically defy all these court orders,' Clinton said. 'But I think he'll have a hard time doing that. And if he does, I think it will hurt him in America.' 'I do think the courts are getting their dander up. I think that him shutting law firms out of representing their clients before federal agencies and in federal buildings because he doesn't agree with their position—that ain't America," he added. 'We've never done that. The whole purpose of having a legal system is to have both sides be heard.' Clinton also came to the defense of Joe Biden amid widespread concerns about the state of his mental fitness following the release of Original Sin, a book by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson that delved into Biden's cognitive decline. Clinton said he had no interest in reading the bombshell book because Biden was 'in good shape' the last time they saw each other. 'The book didn't register with me because I never saw him that way,' he said. 'He's not president anymore, and I think he did a good job, and I think we are facing challenges today without precedent in our history, and some people are trying to use this as a way to blame him for the fact that Trump was reelected.' Biden earlier touted that he could take on Tapper and Thompson in a fight after their book triggered bipartisan criticism of his mental capabilities. 'You can see that I'm mentally incompetent, and I can't walk, and I can beat the hell out of both of them,' he said, seemingly referring to Tapper and Thompson.
