Bath v Bristol: Premiership rugby union semi-final
Update:
Date: 2025-06-06T17:30:41.000Z
Title: Teams
Content: Wholesale changes from Johan van Graan after he put out the reserves last week vs Saracens, his eyes firmly on this match.
Pat Lam makes three changes to the pack that secured the play-off berth vs Harlequins.
Bath: Tom de Glanville, Joe Cokanasiga, Max Ojomoh, Cameron Redpath, Will Muir, Finn Russell, Ben Spencer, Beno Obano, Tom Dunn, Will Stuart, Quinn Roux, Charlie Ewels, Ted Hill, Guy Pepper, Alfie Barbeary.Replacements: Niall Annett, Francois van Wyk, Thomas du Toit, Ross Molony, Miles Reid, Josh Bayliss, Tom Carr-Smith, Ciaran Donoghue.
Bristol: Noah Heward, Kalaveti Ravouvou, Benhard Janse van Rensburg, James Williams, Gabriel Ibitoye, AJ MacGinty, Harry Randall, Ellis Genge, Gabriel Oghre, George Kloska, James Dun, Joe Batley, Steven Luatua, Fitz Harding, Viliame Mata.Replacements: Harry Thacker, Jake Woolmore, Max Lahiff, Pedro Rubiolo, Santiago Grondona, Kieran Marmion, Harry Byrne, Jack Bates.
Update:
Date: 2025-06-06T17:30:41.000Z
Title: Preamble
Content: It's been a strange old season in Premiership Rugby. Each week has featured loads of tries, mostly optional defences, levels of consistency akin to starting a 12 year old Vauxhall Corsa on a winter morning – and it's all been enormous fun.
No two teams represent the sublime vs ridiculous nature of the year in English domestic rugby more than the two battling this opening semi-final at the Rec. Bath topped the league well clear of their nearest rivals and have largely laid down a template of sense (relatively speaking) throughout the season. Their near neighbours Bristol meanwhile have spent the year defending like a 15 dogs with the zoomies; conceding an average of 34 points a game, showing an allergic reaction to sense and yet somehow find themselves in the play-offs.
All the sensible money is on a comfortable home victory here, but Bristol did win the previous meeting between the sides a few weeks ago albeit vs a weaker Bath selection.
Whatever the outcome, if this season has taught us anything it's that it will be worth sticking around to watch it unfold.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘They looked bored' – Roy Keane slams England's ‘poor attitude' as Thomas Tuchel admits ‘I didn't like' Andorra effort
ROY KEANE blasted England's "poor" attitude in their limp 1-0 World Cup qualifying win over Andorra. The Republic of Ireland legend accused the Three Lions of "looking bored" in Barcelona on Saturday. 3 England made it three wins out of three for Thomas Tuchel, who hasn't conceded a goal yet, but their performance left a lot to be desired. After a dreary first half, which saw England booed off, Harry Kane found a breakthrough by tapping in Noni Madueke 's cross. That ended up as the only goal in the entire 93 minutes as Tuchel's players were accused of playing "walking football" by Keane's ITV co-panellist Karen Carney against the minnows. Keane, 53, was also critical of Kane's post-match assessment which included the captain saying, "We take the points and move on." The iconic Manchester United captain raged: "I don't like the message from your senior players is that the job was done, we'll take it, whatever. "You should be setting your standards higher than that. You should be saying they should have scored three or four more. "We defend the players, say it's the end of the season and talk about the hot conditions, and Kane looked shattered. "I worry when I see players getting bored. I felt some of the players got bored in the last half an hour and I don't like to see that. "It's when the goal went in, it was job done. It's Andorra - go and get some more goals! Tuchel has since seemingly agreed, saying that England "played with fire". Andorra v England match played in near empty stadium The German boss said: "I didn't like the attitude how we ended the game, not the whole game, it's a big difference. "I liked the attitude in the first 25 minutes, but I didn't like the last half an hour. We lacked the seriousness and urgency needed in a World Cup qualifier. "We played with fire and I didn't like the attitude at the end. I didn't like the body language, and I don't think it's what the occasion needed." Tuchel also told Three Lions fans their vile chants about Prime Minister Keir Starmer were "not acceptable." Some of the travelling supporters called Starmer a "c**t", "w**ker" and "nonce", as well as singing "no surrender" during the national anthem in a reference to the IRA. The RCDE stadium, home of Spanish side Espanyol, looked noticeably empty during the match. Sparse pockets of fans spread across the stands in Barcelona with just shy of 7,000 tickets sold to England fans for the match inside the 40,000-seat stadium. 3
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Furious Thomas Tuchel blasts his players' 'attitude and body language' in scathing verdict of England's dismal 1-0 win over Andorra... before sending clear message to booing fans
Thomas Tuchel hammered his England stars for 'playing with fire' in Saturday night's lifeless World Cup qualifying win over Andorra, saying they were fortunate they did not get burned in Barcelona. Harry Kane scored the second-half winner, though the Three Lions were booed at half-time and then again at full-time. England supporters also took aim at Keir Starmer, chanting that the prime minister was a 'c***' and a 'w*****' in between expressing their frustration with the football on show. While Tuchel said he did not hear those songs towards Starmer, he admitted he could not blame the fans for jeering the performance, likening it to the favourites in a cup competition arrogantly acting as if they had no reason to worry. 'I think in the end, we played with fire, honestly,' Tuchel said. 'I felt it almost like in a cup game where the favourite does not smell the danger. I didn't feel a team that was aware it was only 1-0 in a World Cup qualifier. Step by step the energy dropped when we needed exactly the opposite. 'But we couldn't deliver and so we got away with a win. I think we still deserved the win and we've got three wins and three clean sheets. We will not stop encouraging them and make clear after we have a proper look at the match what we want from them. 'I didn't like the attitude how we ended the game. I liked the attitude how we started, the first 25 minutes, but I didn't like the last 25. I think we lacked the seriousness and the urgency that is needed in a World Cup qualifier. I think we played with fire. I didn't like the attitude in the end. I didn't like the body language. It was not what the occasion needed.' England will face Senegal in a friendly at Nottingham Forest's City Ground on Tuesday next, and Tuchel added: 'The booing is OK. First of all, the support was amazing, unbelievable, it created a fantastic atmosphere for a match like this. When I came out, straightaway I was excited. 'They were underwhelmed and not happy with our performance, especially with how we ended the first half. I don't think we can blame them for that. We cannot even blame them for how we ended the match.' On the singing against Starmer, he added: 'I did not hear anything about abusive songs or chants. If it happened, it's of course not acceptable, but I did not hear it.' England captain Harry Kane added: 'It's not one that many will remember and we had good spells but we take the three points and move on. Noni (Madueke) was a constant threat and we need more of that. We have amazing players and we need players who are going to take on players and keep doing it. He played really well. We need to be better, for sure.'
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Five things we learnt from England's West Indies ODI series victory
Almost before England closed out their ODI series victory over the West Indies in Taunton, attention had already turned to the upcoming one against India. Charlotte Edwards' tenure as England head coach had got off to the perfect start, but it was an expected win against a side depleted of standout names, aside from Hayley Matthews. After a five-hour rain delay in Somerset, England secured the whitewash victory by nine wickets, chasing down the amended 106 runs to win inside 11 overs with an experimental batting line-up. Captain Nat Sciver-Brunt and Edwards have enjoyed a flawless start to their new England roles, and Telegraph Sport takes a look at what can be ascertained from the win. Amy Jones looks cut out to solve opening problem In the first two one-day internationals, Edwards decided to change things up in the England batting order, choosing wicketkeeper Amy Jones to open alongside Tammy Beaumont. Jones responded to being moved up the order for the first time since 2019 by hitting her first century in international cricket – albeit she was dropped on 43 – making scores of 122 and 129. Previously Jones had been used further down the order and after a disappointing Ashes with the bat, during which she misjudged how many balls had been bowled – a costly decision that played a key part in England's defeat in Melbourne. But opening against the West Indies she has looked more comfortable with the role. Jones was not needed to bat in the first two T20 matches as England eased to victory, but she and Beaumont looked to have cemented their places at the top of the order for the longer white-ball format. Rewarding domestic performances pay off Em Arlott was awarded player of the match in only her second T20 international, taking three wickets and two catches on her first national call-up since 2022. Having been called up twice before, for a Test in 2021 and another red-ball game in 2022, she did not take to the field until the start of the T20 series against the West Indies. Emma Lamb and Alice Davidson-Richards were also recalled for the ODI series, being rewarded for their performances in domestic cricket, something that had been lacking in the previous regime. Edwards' decision to call up those who have performed in the domestic game has resonated with those not in the international set-up as well as – in the case of Arlott – providing match-winners to the international side. Linsey Smith or Sophie Ecclestone? Linsey Smith was brought in for Sophie Ecclestone, who was left out mainly because of a knee injury, although she recovered to play her first game for Lancashire the day the squad was announced. Since coming into the side, Smith has been a strong fielder and even better bowler, taking a five-wicket haul on her one-day international debut in Derby. Smith has been in and out of the England side since coming in as an additional spin option for the T20 World Cup in the autumn, but has played a significant role under Edwards so far. The England and Wales Cricket Board has announced that Ecclestone will take a break from all cricket, including domestically, because of injury and to prioritise her 'well-being', but it remains to be seen, even if she is fit, whether her previous exploits and standings would warrant an immediate return to the side, given Smith's recent success. Nat Sciver-Brunt as captain Nat Sciver-Brunt has overseen 3-0 T20 and ODI wins for her first series as captain, but has not really been tested. The West Indies, as expected, have not provided the most difficult challenge, therefore any tactical tweaks have not been called for. However, Sciver-Brunt does play a role in selecting the side, who have proven more than enough to beat the West Indies without breaking sweat, and given chances to the likes of Arlott and Smith who have made match-winning contributions. The real test is to come Arguably, had England played the West Indies last summer under the previous head coach, the outcome would have been the same. Matthews was exceptional in the first T20, but none of the other players made convincing contributions, and that has largely stayed the same throughout. India, who arrive for their first T20 on June 28, will be a much sterner test.
