Palestine Action ban: when does parliament vote take place?
Here's what you need to know.
Read More:
What is happening?
Following an act of vandalism by the group Palestine Action at RAF Brize Norton, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper wants to proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation.
Doing so would make it an offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to belong to or support the group.
She also cited an action by the group at the Thales factory in Glasgow which is said to have caused £1million of damage and frightened some staff.
She will put the proscription order before parliament today, with two far-right groups, the Maniacs Murder Cult (MMC) and the Russian Imperial Movement (RIM), also included.
The Georgian leader of the MMC, Michail Chkhikvishvili, was extradited to the US earlier this year on charges of soliciting hate crimes and acts of mass violence in New York City, including a plot for the mass poisoning of Jewish people.
The RIM is a white nationalist group which seeks to restore the Russian Empire and denies the holocaust took place.
Can MPs vote to ban some of the groups and not others?
No, they have to either back the proscription as a whole or reject it.
Palestine Action believes the fact two neo-Nazi groups have been included in the order is a deliberate move to ensure the order passes - an MP voting against could then be accused of having not voted to ban the Maniacs Murder Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement.
Protestors supporting Palestine Action When is the vote?
The vote is due to take place in the House of Commons on Wednesday afternoon, probably around 5.30pm.
If it passes, which it is expected to, it would then go before the House of Lords the following day.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper would then sign the ban into law on Friday, making it a criminal offence to support or be a member of Palestine Action from Saturday.
Is it being challenged?
Yes, Palestine Action has been granted an emergency hearing at the High Court on Friday.
If the group is granted interim relief, it would delay the order coming into effect.
PA is also seeking to have any potential decision overturned, with a provisional hearing at the High Court set for July 21.
What has the government said?
Ms Cooper said: "National security is the first duty of any government, we will always take the action needed to protect our democracy and national security against different threats.
"Maniacs Murder Cult, Palestine Action and the Russian Imperial Movement have each passed the threshold for proscription based on clear national security evidence and assessments.
"The right to protest and the right to free speech are the cornerstone of our democracy and there are countless campaign groups that freely exercise those rights. Violence and serious criminal damage has no place in legitimate protests."
What have other people said?
Many have pointed out that Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, once defended a man who had attempted to set a military jet on fire to prevent it from joining the aerial bombardment of Iraq.
Others have argued that none of the actions taken by Palestine Action should be classed as terrorism.
A group of United Nations experts said: "We are concerned at the unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as 'terrorist'.
"According to international standards, acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism.'
Amnesty International UK said in an open letter to MPs: "The question before parliament is not whether MPs think that Palestine Actions' approach is tasteful or distasteful, or even effective or ineffective.
"If Palestine Action is proscribed this week, by the weekend any MP's constituents wearing a Palestine Action sticker, badge or T-shirt could face a terrorism charge. Do MPs and peers really believe that Palestine Action's activities justify such a grave misuse of anti-terrorism powers?
'The proscription of Palestine Action would be wholly unnecessary, disproportionate, and in violation of the right to freedom of association and expression amongst other human rights at risk should this harmful and dangerous motion proceed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Al Jazeera journalists killed in Israeli air strike in Gaza
Heavy bombardment was reported in Gaza City late on Sunday evening and, shortly before midnight local time, Al Jazeera said correspondent Anas al-Sharif was killed in a strike along with four of his colleagues. Rami Mohanna, administrative director at the nearby Shifa Hospital, said the strike hit a tent for Al Jazeera journalists outside the hospital's walls. Seven people in total were killed in the attack, including al-Sharif, Al Jazeera correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa, according to Al Jazeera. READ MORE: Jewish staff at Scottish universities call for full divestment from Israel Israel's military confirmed killing al-Sharif, alleging he was with Hamas. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) last month said it was gravely concerned for al-Sharif's safety after Israeli IDF spokesperson Avichai Adraee accused him of being a member of Hamas. A UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression said al-Sharif was 'targeted by an Israeli military smear campaign' and that that he lived with the 'feeling that [he] could be bombed and martyred at any moment'. After the attack, the CPJ said it was 'appalled' to learn of the journalists' deaths. 'Israel's pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' said CPJ regional director Sara Qudah. 'Journalists are civilians and must never be targeted. Those responsible for these killings must be held accountable.' A statement from Al Jazeera described the strike as a 'targeted assassination' and 'a desperate attempt to silence voices in anticipation of the occupation of Gaza'. It said: 'Al Jazeera Media Network condemns in the strongest terms the targeted assassination of its correspondents Anas Al Sharif and Mohammed Qraiqea, along with photographers Ibrahim Al Thaher, and Mohamed Nofal, by the Israeli occupation forces in yet another blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom.' Al-Sharif was one of Al Jazeera's most recognisable faces covering with the broadcaster calling him 'one of Gaza's bravest journalists'. In January, following the brief ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel, a clip of al-Sharif went viral after he removed his body armour while surrounded by dozens of Gaza residents overjoyed by the temporary halt in hostilities during a live broadcast. A few minutes before his death, al-Sharif posted on X: 'Breaking: Intense, concentrated Israeli bombardment using 'fire belts' is hitting the eastern and southern areas of Gaza City.' The 28-year-old leaves behind a wife and two small children. His father was reportedly killed by an Israeli strike on the family home in Jabalia refugee camp in Gaza City in December 2023. Al-Sharif said he would continue to report and refused to leave Gaza.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Jewish staff at Scottish universities call for full Israel divestment
The Scottish Universities Jewish Staff Network – a network that brings together Jewish staff and researchers in higher education across Scotland – also called on universities to reject the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. In an op-ed for The National, the group said the IHRA definition was being 'weaponised' to stifle criticism of Israel amid its genocide in Gaza. 'The Scottish Universities Jewish Staff Network have been advocating against the conflation of anti-Zionism with antisemitism, mindful of the risks to academic freedom and pluralism, the bread and butter of liberal civil society,' they wrote. READ MORE: Ross Greer says bullying within Scottish Greens left him hospitalised twice 'Right now, twenty-two months into the Gaza genocide, we can clearly see the disastrous harm of stifling criticism of Israel by the weaponization of the IHRA definition of antisemitism, at times without even adopting it as an official institutional policy.' The group added: 'Rather than tackling anti-Semitism as this quasi-legal instrument purports to do, it has created the false equivalence between Jews and Zionism, associating us all, including dissident Israelis, with the horrendous genocide that we unequivocably oppose.' It comes after the University of Edinburgh announced last month that it would be considering whether to de-adopt the definition and divest from Israeli companies after it published a report into its historical links to transatlantic slavery and empire. The report also recommended the university establish a Palestine Studies Centre to investigate the legacy of the Balfour declaration and offer scholarships to Palestinians. 'When one looks into Balfour's legacy, some of today's truisms fall apart. The one most concerning for us, as Jewish staff members in Scottish universities, is the conventional wisdom so deeply rooted in our public discourse and institutional frameworks that anti-Zionism is, by default, anti-Semitism,' the group wrote in the op-ed. They went on to say they endorse the report and 'reject the implication that Jewish safety is compromised by supporting Palestine'. 'Furthermore, many of us, including Israeli dissidents, vehemently criticise the Israeli occupation, oppression, and genocide of the Palestinian people. And for good reasons, as outlined in this excellent report,' the group added. 'We therefore call on our institutions for the following. First, to reject the IHRA definition and rely on existing EDI policies against racism to address anti-Semitism without separate measures. Second, to divest from all organisations which sustain or are linked to the Israeli State. Third, to actively engage with Palestinian scholars and institutions to rebuild Palestinian higher education in the wake of Israeli scholasticide in Gaza.'
Leader Live
5 hours ago
- Leader Live
Suspended Labour councillor on trial over inciting violent disorder at protest
Ricky Jones, 57, is alleged to have committed the offence while addressing a crowd at the demonstration in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year. It is alleged he described far-right protesters as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' and said 'we need to cut their throats and get rid of them', a previous court hearing was told. A video which appeared to show Jones calling for far-right protesters' throats to be 'cut' emerged on social media after the protest. The demonstration was organised in response to the nationwide violent disorder that occurred last summer following the fatal stabbings at a children's dance class in Southport, Merseyside. Jones will face one count of encouraging violent disorder at Snaresbrook Crown Court on Monday, having pleaded not guilty to the offence at the same court last September. Defence barrister Hossein Zahir KC previously said Jones accepted the words had been spoken but denied knowing the offence of violent disorder would be committed. Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident. In reference to the video, a Labour spokesperson said at the time: 'This behaviour is completely unacceptable and it will not be tolerated.'
