USDA withdraws a plan to limit salmonella levels in raw poultry
The Agriculture Department will not require poultry companies to limit salmonella bacteria in their products, halting a Biden Administration effort to prevent food poisoning from contaminated meat.
The department on Thursday said it was withdrawing a rule proposed in August after three years of development. Officials with the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service cited feedback from more than 7,000 public comments and said they would 'evaluate whether it should update' current salmonella regulations.
The rule would have required poultry companies to keep levels of salmonella bacteria under a certain threshold and test for the presence of six strains most associated with illness, including three found in turkey and three in chicken. If the levels exceeded the standard or any of those strains were found, the poultry couldn't be sold and would be subject to recall, the proposal had said.
The plan aimed to reduce an estimated 125,000 salmonella infections from chicken and 43,000 from turkey each year, according to USDA. Overall, salmonella causes 1.35 million infections a year, most through food, and about 420 deaths, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The withdrawal drew praise from the National Chicken Council, an industry trade group, which said the proposed rule was legally unsound, misinterpreted science, would have increased costs and create more food waste, all 'with no meaningful impact on public health.'
'We remain committed to further reducing salmonella and fully support food safety regulations and policies that are based on sound science,' said Ashley Peterson, the group's senior vice president of science and regulatory affairs.
But the move drew swift criticism from food safety advocates, including Sandra Eskin, a former USDA official who helped draft the plan.
The withdrawal 'sends the clear message that the Make America Healthy Again initiative does not care about the thousands of people who get sick from preventable foodborne salmonella infections linked to poultry,' Eskin said in a statement.
The proposed rule had been regarded as a food safety victory similar to a 1994 decision to ban certain strains of dangerous E. coli bacteria from ground beef after deadly outbreaks, said Sarah Sorscher, of the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
'Make no mistake: Shipping more salmonella to restaurants and grocery stores is certain to make Americans sicker,' Sorscher said.
Earlier this month, the USDA said it would delay by six months the enforcement of a final rule regulating salmonella levels in certain breaded and stuffed raw chicken products. Enforcement, which was set for May 1, now begins Nov. 3.
That covers foods such as frozen chicken cordon bleu and chicken Kiev dishes that appear to be fully cooked but are only heat-treated to set the batter or coating. Such products have been linked to at least 14 salmonella outbreaks and at least 200 illnesses since 1998, according to the CDC.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
Medical experts warn 'Big Food' is fighting back against Ozempic with addictive items for sale
Ozempic and other weight-loss drugs may be cutting through "food noise," yet the junk food industry is only getting louder, some medical experts claim. "Ozempic is breaking the food addiction cycle – but Big Food isn't going down without a fight," Dr. Mark Hyman, an internationally recognized advocate for functional medicine, said in a recent Instagram post. "For decades, ultraprocessed foods have been engineered to hijack the brain's reward system – perfecting the 'bliss point' of sugar, salt and fat to keep people hooked," the physician also said. As Americans work to take hold of their health and wellness – and as the government cracks down on artificial food additives – the snack food industry appears to be evolving to outsmart both drugs and lifestyle changes, according to some observers. "Big Food isn't happy," Hyman continued, expressing his point of view. "Our food system is broken. It's built to create addictions, push ultraprocessed junk and profit off public health crises." Weight-loss and life coach Charles D'Angelo, based in St. Louis, Missouri, agreed with that assessment. "The food industry is one of many things evolving to outsmart our judgment sometimes," D'Angelo told Fox News Digital. "They are even outsmarting these medications and different health trends by engineering foods that bypass your hunger and can ultimately lead you to be more reactive than you otherwise would be." Fox News Digital reached out to Novo Nordisk, the manufacturer of Ozempic, for comment. Hyper-palatable foods (HPF) are designed with combinations of palatability-inducing ingredients, fat, sugar and carbohydrates that together enhance a food's deliciousness and produce an artificially rewarding eating experience, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The Consumer Brands Association, based in Arlington, Virginia, represents the interests of the consumer-packaged goods (CPG) industry. "The makers of America's trusted household brands deliver safe products to consumers and innovate to provide them with healthier options," Sarah Gallo, senior vice president of product policy for the Consumer Brands Association, told Fox News Digital. "No industry is closer to the consumer than this one," she added. "For decades, food and beverage companies have taken their cues from consumers on what products they want in the marketplace to meet their dietary and health goals – whether it's options low in sugar, sodium and saturated fats, no artificial colors or low-carb, high-protein and high-fiber options." D'Angelo said that even without added ingredients, however, marketing campaigns often mislead consumers into purchasing and eating or drinking foods they think are healthful when they're not, D'Angelo said. "That's not nutrition. It's marketing." "They're not just selling junk food anymore," D'Angelo said. "How many things do you see when you go down the grocery store aisle that say high-protein or low-carb, but they're still ultraprocessed? And it's engineered to hook you. That's not nutrition. It's marketing." Gallo said her organization is aligned with the goal of radical transparency and aiding consumers in making informed choices. "The industry has been actively engaged in initiatives to improve nutritional information accessibility for over a decade," Gallo said. One initiative is Facts Up Front, a voluntary program that presents key nutritional information on the front of packaging, facilitating quick assessment by consumers. Additionally, the industry has introduced SmartLabel, allowing consumers to access detailed nutritional information via QR codes. For more Lifestyle articles, visit Gallo said the Consumer Brands Association "stands ready" to work with the federal government "to continue to ensure the analysis of safe ingredients and increase consumer transparency." She added, "It's also why we are working with Congress to ensure the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] is properly resourced to carry out this important work and moving to mandatory notifications for new ingredients." "We need clarity, awareness and a complete shift in mindset to take back ownership of our choices." Still, D'Angelo said, misleading labels can give people a false sense of confidence in their personal choices. "I see how people are being conditioned subtly and repeatedly to trust marketing over their own inner signals, their own inner judgment," he said. "That's why we need more than just willpower or medications. We need clarity, awareness and a complete shift in mindset to take back ownership of our choices."
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
North America Hair Care Market, Competition, and Forecasts 2025-2030: Rise of Scalp Care and Skinification of Hair
The North America Hair Care Market is poised for growth by focusing on personalized, natural products and eco-conscious solutions. Increased consumer awareness of hair health, bolstered by social media influence and e-commerce accessibility, offers opportunities in clean, innovative formulations despite market saturation challenges. North American Hair Care Market Dublin, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "North America Hair Care Market, By Country, Competition, Forecast and Opportunities, 2020-2030F" has been added to North America Hair Care Market was valued at USD 23.67 Billion in 2024, and is expected to reach USD 40.01 Billion by 2030, rising at a CAGR of 9.16%. Growth in this market is supported by increased awareness of hair health, rising demand for personalized and natural products, and a stronger focus on personal grooming. Consumers are seeking solutions that cater to specific hair needs influenced by factors such as lifestyle and environmental exposure. In response, brands are introducing advanced formulations with clean labels, sustainable packaging, and eco-conscious ingredients. Social media trends and celebrity endorsements continue to influence consumer behavior, with 46% of U.S. consumers reportedly increasing their beauty product spending due to social media in 2023. Additionally, the expansion of e-commerce has made premium and salon-quality hair care products more accessible, driving further market penetration across the region. Key Market Drivers: Rising Consumer Awareness and Focus on Hair Health An increasing focus on hair health and hygiene is a major driver of the North America hair care market. Consumers are shifting from basic cleansing and styling products toward solutions that offer added health benefits, such as strengthening, anti-hair fall, scalp care, and growth stimulation. Data from Advanced Dermatology shows that Americans spend around USD 897 annually on personal appearance, including an average of USD 277 on haircuts. This investment in grooming underscores the consumer priority for high-quality hair care. The trend is further fueled by digital platforms where influencers, dermatologists, and brands share educational content, reviews, and product insights. Consumers are also more informed about the effects of stress, diet, and environmental pollutants on hair, prompting demand for clean, sulfate- and paraben-free formulations. As a result, brands are developing dermatologist-tested and ingredient-transparent products to meet evolving health-conscious needs, contributing to robust market expansion. Key Market Challenges: High Market Saturation and Intense Competition The North American hair care market is marked by intense competition and high saturation. Major players such as L'Oreal, Procter & Gamble, Unilever, and Johnson & Johnson dominate the space with extensive product lines, established brand loyalty, and large-scale distribution. Simultaneously, niche and digitally native brands are entering the market, offering unique products aimed at specific needs such as clean beauty or textured hair care. This saturation creates challenges for new entrants to gain visibility and for existing players to sustain customer loyalty. Companies are compelled to invest heavily in R&D, digital marketing, and continuous innovation to remain competitive. Price wars and promotional tactics further impact profit margins, particularly for smaller brands. In such a crowded marketplace, achieving differentiation and long-term viability poses a significant hurdle. Key Market Trends: Rise of Scalp Care and Skinification of Hair A notable trend in the North America hair care market is the growing emphasis on scalp care, a movement often referred to as the "skinification" of hair. Consumers are increasingly treating the scalp with the same care and attention as facial skin, seeking ingredients and product formats commonly associated with skincare. This includes scalp exfoliants, detox treatments, hydrating serums, and microbiome-balancing solutions. Popular skincare ingredients like salicylic acid, niacinamide, hyaluronic acid, and ceramides are now integrated into shampoos and conditioners to address concerns such as dryness, oil imbalance, and inflammation. Personalized scalp diagnostics, available both online and in salons, are also helping consumers select tailored hair care routines. This trend reflects a broader shift toward precise, skincare-inspired hair routines, and continues to drive innovation and product development across the category. Key Market Players: Kanebo Cosmetics Inc. Unilever plc Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. Shiseido Americas Corporation The Estee Lauder Companies Inc L'Oreal S.A. Beiersdorf, Inc. Amorepacific Corporation Revlon Inc. Kao USA Inc. Report Scope: In this report, the North America Hair Care Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below: North America Hair Care Market, By Product Type: Hair Spray Conditioner Shampoo Hair Oil Others North America Hair Care Market, By Sales Channel: Hypermarket/Supermarket Departmental Stores Specialty Stores Online Others North America Hair Care Market, By Country: United States Canada Mexico Key Attributes: Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 131 Forecast Period 2024 - 2030 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2024 $23.67 Billion Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2030 $40.01 Billion Compound Annual Growth Rate 9.1% Regions Covered North America For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Attachment North American Hair Care Market CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Virus spreading mite blamed for 60% loss of bee colonies needed to pollinate food crops
A catastrophic loss of bee colonies over the winter has been blamed on a mite that injects a virus into the bees and spreads the deadly pathogen throughout their colonies. Between 60% to 70% of the bees used to pollinate crops, including almonds in California, apples in New York and blueberries and watermelons in Central Florida have been lost, according to Robbie Bell, a beekeeper who runs an apiary at the Honey Bell Bee Co. in Fort Meade. 'We kind of figured it was a virus,' he said of a recent USDA confirmation of the cause. 'This year was a bad year' compared to the usual 30% to 40% casualty rate among the pollinators. The U.S. Agricultural Department issued a news release on June 3 saying its research has linked 'early 2025 honeybee losses to high viral loads and mite resistance.' 'The findings point to alarmingly high levels of viral infections — vectored by Varroa destructor (Varroa) mites with resistant genes to a common treatment — as key drivers of colony collapse,' the USDA said. It turns out the trips across the United States for bees to pollenate the crops can be very hazardous for bees. They encounter agricultural fungicides, pesticides and often drink water from farm ponds laden with runoff from the application of such chemicals. 'That's another layer to the puzzle,' said Bell of several potential factors weakening the pollinators. The USDA echoed such factors in its release. Factors such as pesticide exposure, poor nutrition and environmental conditions may have exacerbated the losses, the USDA said. Bell estimates that about 80% of agricultural crops in the United States are pollenated by bees, as butterflies, bumblebees and other pollinator insects that once occurred naturally have declined in population in the past 10 to 20 years. Regarding almonds, Bell said 100% of the crop is pollinated by bees. The demand for bees to pollinate has Bell's bees booked up years in advance. But smaller beekeepers may have fared much better, according to Jan Betters at Pat's Apiaries, which has some hives in the Wahneta and other areas of Polk County. The Auburndale-based operation takes about 100 hives to an Alturas blueberry farm every year and sells honey locally at farmers markets. 'We are very careful to take out bees to farms that only spray when bees are in the hives,' she said. The practice keeps their bees away from potential environmental hazards but in large scale agricultural setting in miles long groves, such practices are more difficult to coordinate. Their die off rate is about 10% to 20% per year, a loss much less than the rates at commercial beekeepers. According to the USDA, after reports from beekeepers about the die off, a study analyzed samples from six major commercial beekeeping operations affected by the losses. The samples provided 'the most detailed evidence to date of the biological factors behind the widespread die-offs.' 'Collectively, these operations managed nearly 184,000 colonies — roughly 7% of all U.S. hives — and reported losses averaging over 60%, just as bees were being staged for California's almond pollination season," the USDA said. 'The beekeeping and bee health community appreciates the work of the USDA-ARS bee research laboratories. They quickly took samples of lost colonies and now that they've released the analysis, beekeepers can better understand what happened and take action,' said Matt Mulica, senior project director at Keystone Policy Center, which facilitates the Honey Bee Health Coalition. 'We understand more analysis is occurring and we look forward to learning more about the other potential causes of these significant colony losses,' he said in the release. Researchers found high levels of Deformed Wing Virus (DWV-A and DWV-B) and Acute Bee Paralysis Virus in both pooled colony samples and individual bees showing shaking and other signs of morbidity, the USDA said. Experimental inoculation further confirmed these viruses as the likely cause of mortality in collapsing colonies. Crucially, all Varroa mites collected from affected colonies tested positive for a genetic marker linked to resistance to amitraz, the most commonly used miticide in commercial beekeeping, the USDA said. This finding underscores the need for new tools and pest management strategies. 'This is a critical moment for honey bee health,' said Patty Sundberg, president of the American Beekeeping Federation. 'We can't continue relying on a single line of defense against Varroa. These mites are evolving quickly, and our management tools must evolve just as fast. We also need to find treatments for these viruses and we await the release of how pesticide exposure and poor nutrition amplify the impacts from these viruses.' Steven Coy, president of the American Honey Producers Association, added, 'The findings released today are a crucial first step in providing beekeepers actionable information. It highlights the necessity for additional miticides and methods of controlling varroa and the associated viruses. Agricultural Center: Polk County OKs initial contracts for long-sought facility south of Bartow We urge the USDA to provide the results of the impacts of nutritional, chemical and environmental stress as soon as possible. Beekeepers need a complete picture of what happened in order to make sound decisions regarding the health of our colonies.' In 2021, the Honey Bee Health Coalition published "Guide to Varroa Mite Controls for Commercial Beekeeping Operations," which laid out a vision that addresses the risks of amitraz resistance created by off-label use. The continuous use of off-label amitraz, with increasing dosages (as it becomes less effective), is likely to cause amitraz to lose its effectiveness, just as other products like coumaphos and tau-fluvalinate have become largely ineffective for controlling Varroa mites. The Honey Bee Health Coalition continues to support innovation in honey bee health, including research, tool development and education aimed at helping beekeepers and farmers manage evolving threats. The coalition will release an updated version of its "Tools for Varroa Management" guide later this year. The guide is a key resource for beekeepers, providing science-based strategies for monitoring and controlling Varroa populations. According to Noah Wilson-Rich, founder and chief scientific officer at the Urban Bee Lab, for the first time, commercial beehive losses have surpassed those of hobbyist and backyard beekeepers.' The Boston-based lab found that two of every three beehives used for crop pollination have been lost. 'Last year marked the first time the U.S. surpassed the 50% threshold of beehive deaths, and this year is the first in which commercial beehive losses outpaced residential ones. In 2014, the U.S. government set a loss threshold of 15%. 'We have well surpassed that, with losses now exceeding 60%, and a jump of around 10% in just the last year alone,' Wilson-Rich said. In response, beekeepers have been rapidly replacing dead beehives by splitting one beehive into two or more, he said. Yet, these losses only take into account honeybees and ignore the 4,000 other species of native bees in North America, with populations going unmonitored without intervention. His lab confirmed the mite responsible for the commercial bee die offs. Meanwhile, he said, 'My research team and collaborators around the world focus on AI sensors and blockchain technology to cure bees of diseases caused by mites, as well as to recover from pesticide exposure, as a next-generation approach to improving bee health.' This article originally appeared on The Ledger: Mite blamed for 60% loss of bee colonies that pollinate food crops
