Latest news with #BidenAdministration
Arab News
40 minutes ago
- General
- Arab News
Global threat report reveals Trump's strategic priorities
The US Defense Intelligence Agency recently released its annual threat assessment report. While these official government documents are often bland and filled with bureaucratic language, this year's publication stands out — both for its substance and what it reveals about how the new administration views today's geopolitical challenges. This is the first threat assessment of President Donald Trump's second term, and it offers an early insight into the administration's strategic priorities. A few things jump out right away. This year's threat assessment is longer than last year's, and offers a more detailed and nuanced analysis across multiple sections. But two major changes in this year's report, when compared with the final assessment produced under the Biden administration, are particularly striking. The most notable difference is the inclusion of a dedicated section on US homeland defense and border security — placed not as an afterthought but as the first item in the report. This marks a sharp departure from last year's assessment, which focused almost exclusively on global threats and challenges. The placement and tone of the new homeland security section clearly bear Trump's personal stamp. One of his most effective political narratives has been that US policymakers focus too much on problems abroad, while neglecting the security of Americans at home. This report reflects that view. The homeland security section places particular emphasis on the national security implications of illegal immigration, transnational organized crime, and the influx of deadly narcotics by drug cartels into small American communities. These are not just political talking points; they represent real and growing threats to the safety and well-being of Americans. But the political savvy of the framing should not be overlooked. While the average American may not be deeply familiar with issues such as Taiwan's security or freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, they are certainly familiar with the devastating impact of fentanyl or cartel violence. Including homeland security at the top of the Defense Intelligence Agency's global threat assessment makes the report more relevant to the American public and highlights Trump's emphasis on border security as a matter of national defense. The second striking difference is the prominent section, entitled 'Growing Cooperation Among US Competitors and Adversaries,' which comes immediately after the homeland security section. For the first time, a US threat assessment explicitly links and highlights the emerging coordination among America's adversaries and competitors. The report states: 'Building on activities over the past two years, leaders in Beijing, Moscow, Tehran, and Pyongyang will strengthen their nations' ties in their drive to undermine the influence of the US and its allies.' This is an important — and overdue — acknowledgment of a multipolar and interconnected world. For years, much of the US foreign policy establishment has resisted the concept of multipolarity, preferring to see the world in unipolar or bipolar terms. This resistance is rooted in Cold War-era thinking, when power was viewed through a US-versus-Soviet lens. But a new generation of American strategists understands that multiple centers of power exist — and are increasingly coordinating with one another to challenge US interests around the globe. The coming months will be critical for the future of America's role in the world. Luke Coffey Recognizing the reality of this multipolar environment does not mean conceding that all powers are equal. It simply acknowledges the complexity of today's geopolitical landscape. The inclusion of this section in the threat assessment is a necessary step toward grappling with the way these regimes are learning from each other, cooperating diplomatically, militarily, and economically, and exploiting US vulnerabilities. To illustrate the shift, if you took a diplomat from 1980 and one from 1880 and brought them both to 2025, it might be the latter — accustomed to a world of competing empires and power centers — who would better recognize the dynamics at play today. Recognizing these trends is one thing, acting on them another. Within the new administration, there are competing schools of thought on how to respond. Some believe China is the primary threat and argue that all instruments of US power should be directed toward countering Beijing. Others, often aligned with more isolationist instincts, believe the US should focus exclusively on homeland security and reduce its global footprint. Then there are more traditional Republican voices who argue that the US must be able to address multiple threats simultaneously and maintain its global leadership role. Though the administration is still filling out its national security team, the contents of the Defense Intelligence Agency report suggest that the latter group is gaining the upper hand, at least for now. That could signal a more balanced approach in future, one that prioritizes US security at home, while maintaining engagement and vigilance abroad. In the coming months, the Department of Defense is expected to publish a new National Defense Strategy, which should provide additional clarity on how the US plans to counter the threats identified in the Defense Intelligence Agency assessment. Likewise, the National Security Council is likely to release a similar document outlining a more comprehensive, whole-of-government approach to these challenges. Importantly, all these strategies must be backed by resources. The White House will need to work with Congress to ensure that the budget aligns with these stated priorities. It is one thing to acknowledge that America's adversaries are coordinating their efforts, but quite another to craft a strategy — and appropriate the funds — to counter them effectively. Some in the Biden administration may have understood that this emerging coordination by America's competitors posed a threat, but were reluctant to spotlight it publicly for fear of being forced to act. The Trump administration, by contrast, has put these challenges front and center. But in doing so, it has also raised the stakes. Having declared that homeland defense is national security — and that America's adversaries are working together — the administration will now be judged on how it responds. The coming months will be critical, not only for America's national security and that of its allies, but also for the future of America's role in the world.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Business
- Russia Today
Defeating Russia impossible
It has been clear from the very beginning of the Ukraine conflict that Russia cannot be defeated, particularly due to its nuclear status, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul has told the SZ newspaper. Kiev's Western backers, including top officials in Germany, France, and the UK, as well as the US under former President Joe Biden's administration, repeatedly stated the intent to inflict a 'strategic defeat' on Moscow in the Ukraine conflict, or at least to ensure that it does not emerge victorious. That justification has been used to support continued military assistance to Kiev. Wadephul admitted on Friday that it was obvious the conflict between Moscow and Kiev can only be resolved in a diplomatic way. 'It was clear from the beginning that this war would most likely end through a negotiated settlement,' Germany's top diplomat told SZ in a lengthy interview. 'One thing is true: a complete defeat in the sense of a capitulation by nuclear-armed Russia could not have been expected,' the minister stated, adding that 'we have now become a little more honest' in this regard. He still maintained that Kiev's troops have been 'successfully defending' against Moscow's forces, although the Ukrainian military has been losing ground along the entire front over the past several months. The foreign minister maintained it was important to help Kiev get a 'strong negotiating position' at peace talks and claimed that Russia was 'threatening' Germany as he justified a planned military buildup and increase in defense expenditures. He also said that relations between Moscow and Berlin could no longer be described as a 'clear peace situation.' Berlin has taken an even more hardline position on Russia under new Chancellor Friedrich Merz. In the weeks since taking office, Merz has lifted range restrictions on Ukrainian strikes with German-supplied missiles and hinted at the possibility of providing Kiev with Taurus missiles, which have a range of 500km and could reach Moscow. Germany has also announced a new military aid package for Kiev worth €5.2 billion ($5.6 billion), which Berlin says would be allocated mostly to long-range weaponry production inside Ukraine. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reacted to Merz's statements by saying that Berlin's 'direct involvement in the war is now obvious.' Germany already followed a similar 'slippery slope' a couple of times in the last century 'down toward its own collapse,' he added.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
US administration cancels $2.9bn loan guarantee for Sunnova Energy
The US administration has withdrawn a $2.92bn partial loan guarantee for Sunnova Energy, a residential solar panel installer, as reported by Bloomberg. The Department of Energy (DOE) has "de-obligated" the loan guarantee, meaning the federal government is no longer responsible for the financing. The move comes as Sunnova is restructuring its debt and has expressed concerns about its ability to continue operations. Sunnova stated in a regulatory filing in March 2025 that it did not plan to utilise the DoE facility, known as Project Hestia, in the foreseeable future. The previous administration under former President Joe Biden announced a partial loan guarantee in April 2023 to support financing for 100,000 rooftop solar installations, particularly for lower-income homeowners. Under Biden, the DoE's Loan Programs Office aimed to accelerate clean energy sector development by providing loans to companies that found it difficult to secure private funding. The Energy Department described Project Hestia as the largest US government commitment to solar power at that time. However, the residential solar sector has faced challenges due to increased interest rates, which have raised the cost of financing. Sunnova has issued $371m in bonds backed by the Project Hestia loan guarantee. These bonds are not part of the debt Sunnova is currently looking to restructure. Project Hestia became less appealing to Sunnova because the company could offer more affordable leased systems to homeowners, capitalising on tax credits from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act introduced by Biden. The tax credits for loans, which were the focus of Project Hestia, are considered less beneficial. The current administration, led by President Donald Trump, is prioritising oil and gas production and has indicated a review of DoE financing for alternative energy companies. The future of the loans office is uncertain, with job reductions implemented by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency and budget cuts proposed in the House budget bill. Since 2009, the office has issued $35bn in loans and loan guarantees, with repayments from companies including Tesla. However, it has faced criticism from Republicans since 2011 following a $535m loan to Solyndra, a solar company that later failed. The Department of Energy has not commented on the cancellation of Sunnova's loan guarantee. "US administration cancels $2.9bn loan guarantee for Sunnova Energy" was originally created and published by Power Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Health
- Yahoo
$1 billion in school mental health grants won't be renewed; PA organizations are worried
(WHTM) – The Strong Minds, Bright Futures is a statewide partnership of over 60 organizations dedicated to improving youth mental health across Pennsylvania. They are strongly urging the Department of Education to reconsider the decision to cut $1 billion in federal grants supporting school-based mental health services. 'I think many of our kids, our families and even our teachers and principals don't yet understand the negative impact that this is going to have,' said CEO of Big Brothers Big Sisters, Marcus Allen. Advocates say if this decision is not reversed, it will leave more than 250,000 students across the Commonwealth without mental health support. Families will lose access to school counselors, social workers, and programs designed to support students' well-being and prevent youth suicide. 'The Trump administration taking a wrecking ball to this funding that provides these critical services for students who are experiencing behave, role and emotional challenges. It's incredibly shortsighted,' said Chris Lilienthal with the Pennsylvania State Education Association. This funding stems from a law passed in 2022 following the tragic shooting in Uvalde, Texas. The law is called the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. 'It was designed to help schools hire mental health professionals including counselors and social workers,' said Allen. 36 schools across Pennsylvania received funding, including four in the Midstate. Senator John Fetterman shared a statement with abc27: 'We're facing a mental health crisis in this country, and I don't know any Pennsylvanian who thinks our kids have the mental health support system they need in our classrooms. As a senator, but more importantly, as a parent, I'm working to improve access and increase the number of counselors in our schools. Instead, the Trump administration is gutting the very program that would make these improvements possible. It's a cruel move that will only hurt our kids. I'm calling on the administration to immediately reverse course.' Department of Education Deputy Assistant Secretary, Madi Biedermann said in a statement: 'The Department decided not to continue funding these grants beyond the initial award terms. These grants are intended to improve American students' mental health by funding additional mental health professionals in schools and on campuses. Instead, under the deeply flawed priorities of the Biden Administration, grant recipients used the funding to implement race-based actions like recruiting quotas in ways that have nothing to do with mental health and could hurt the very students the grants are supposed to help. We owe it to American families to ensure that tax-payer dollars are supporting evidence-based practices that are truly focused on improving students' mental health.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Biden's regulations worse than North Korea, Trump energy secretary says
SIMI VALLEY, CALIFORNIA – Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said that the Biden administration "strangled" the state of Alaska with restrictions and red tape that was beyond levels imposed on North Korea, Iran and Venezuela combined. "Alaska, a state that has had more sanctions, more restrictions on production of oil and gas in Alaska than everything we did to Iran and Venezuela and North Korea if they produced any combined. You know, the last administration just strangled Alaska. This awesome state of immense natural resources," Wright said from the Reagan National Economic Forum in Simi Valley, California. Wright joined the inaugural Reagan National Economic Forum on Friday at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library to celebrate President Donald Trump's executive orders "unleashing American energy" and how the administration is tackling regulations that have prevented the growth of coal and nuclear energy in recent history. Fox News' Maria Bartiromo moderated the energy-focused panel. He pointed to the Gulf of America and Alaska as two key areas for American energy growth, most notably in the Last Frontier State. Us Federal Agencies To 'Unleash' Coal Energy After Biden 'Stifled' It: 'Mine, Baby, Mine' "Alaska has been this great resource. It boomed and then it's been strangled. The idea is we export oil from the north slope of Alaska, comes by pipeline to southern Alaska, and then exported," he said. "We want to build a pipeline from the north slope of Alaska that brings natural gas, not just oil. And then an oil, a natural gas export terminal on the southern coast of Alaska that in six days can sail to Tokyo or Taiwan or Korea. And then down to our allies in East Asia. So they're getting energy from us. But it would be awesome and great from a geopolitical stance to have a very short supply chain between a huge industrial American facility and our allies in East Asia." Read On The Fox News App Chris Wright Confirmed To Serve As Trump's Secretary Of Energy Wright added that the Gulf of America is a key area of the country to build massive export terminals, where American energy can be exported to foreign nations. "The export terminals today are almost entirely on the Gulf of America, on the Texas and Louisiana coast. And they're there because you can build things there. The natural gas comes from Pennsylvania, Ohio or North Dakota or Texas or Oklahoma. The gas comes from all over. But that's where you can build these giant facilities to export it," he said. Trump Launches 'Decisive Counterstrike' On Dem States That 'Weaponized' Courts Against Coal: Experts Wright added that America was recently the largest importer of oil in the world, but has since become the largest exporter. "We were, not long ago, the largest importer of oil in the world and the largest importer of natural gas in the world. Today, we're the largest exporter of natural gas and a net exporter of oil," he continued. "Who's the biggest importer of oil in the world and the biggest importer of natural gas in the world? Both China. We have an incredible energy system advantage over China. But we should use it not just to the benefit of our country, but to bring security and tight alliances with our allies as well."Original article source: Biden's regulations worse than North Korea, Trump energy secretary says
