Russians speak of nerves and hope for peace as they shelter in Kursk
Andrey Klimenko hiccups and shifts his weight from one leg to the other.
"It's nerves," he says at a temporary refuge for people displaced by the fighting in Russia's Kursk region.
Ukraine launched a shock ground assault into the border region last August, capturing swathes of territory and dozens of villages.
But in the past two weeks Kyiv has lost its grip in Kursk, ceding ground as Moscow prosecutes an intense counter offensive.
"Planes were dropping bombs near my vegetable patch. I nearly died because of bombs, mortar fire and drones," said 52-year-old Klimenko, a Russian sporting several gold teeth.
"God took pity on me and I survived by a miracle."
Klimenko left his home in the village of Zamostye near the Ukrainian border on Friday as Russian forces pushed to recapture land occupied by Ukraine since last year.
The Ukrainian offensive was a response to Russia's campaign against the country launched three years ago.
Hundreds of inhabitants have fled the fighting in recent days as Russian forces have re-taken a string of villages and the key town of Sudzha.
Several dozen displaced people are being housed in a sports complex in Fatezh, 50 kilometres (30 miles) north of Kursk, the regional capital.
- 'Probably dead' -
Russian President Vladimir Putin has called on Ukrainian soldiers fighting in the area to lay down their weapons, while his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky has denied his troops are surrounded.
Since Wednesday "371 people have been evacuated from liberated areas, including 14 children," according to the region's interim governor, Alexander Khinshtein.
At the Fatezh sports complex, Elena, her daughter Ekaterina and grandson Egor have also sought shelter.
Elena, 63, said she had been given a blood pressure monitor by the Russian Red Cross, which is helping displaced people in the Kursk region.
"I've got high blood pressure," she says, putting her index finger to her forehead as if pointing to the worries that are weighing her down.
The family arrived from Sudzha on Friday after being evacuated by the Russian army.
Elena's husband Nikolai is missing.
His family have had no news of him since the beginning of the Kursk offensive last summer when they were moving from point to point in the Ukrainian-controlled area.
"Maybe he got scared and crawled away to hide. He's probably dead," said Ekaterina, 35, his daughter.
Nikolai is one of many missing.
In mid-February, the International Committee of the Red Cross said it was working on some 50,000 cases of missing persons, both civilians and combatants, on both sides.
- 'Feel sorry' -
"I don't understand what the point of this war is," Ekaterina said.
The fighting has left hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and Russians dead or wounded in the biggest conflict in Europe since World War II.
She said the family had been "treated well" by Ukrainian soldiers.
"We're really looking forward to peace, because we feel sorry for the Russian soldiers, the Ukrainian soldiers and everyone else," she said.
Suddenly, a robotic voice from a loudspeaker nearby blasts an announcement for the village.
"The air raid alert is now over," it said -- even though no initial air raid alert had been given.
The military situation in the Kursk region is a key issue at a time of intensive international diplomacy to try and put an end to the conflict.
Putin, who is to hold talks with US counterpart Donald Trump on Tuesday, has said he is not opposed to the 30-day truce proposed by the United States and backed by Ukraine.
The next steps may well depend on the liberation of this Russian border region that was, during World War II, the scene of the largest tank battle in history.
That battle, on August 23, 1943, ended in a Soviet victory over Nazi troops.
bur/dt/rmb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House passes Republican-led bills to repeal D.C. laws on noncitizen voting and policing
WASHINGTON — The Republican-controlled House is poised to pass a trio of bills this week to repeal Washington, D.C., laws on immigration, voting and policing, even as it has yet to restore a painful $1 billion cut to the city's budget. The House passed two of the bills Tuesday. One would bar noncitizens from voting in local elections in the nation's capital, overturning a Washington law that was passed in 2022. It passed 266-148, with 56 Democrats joining Republicans in support. The other bill would restore collective bargaining rights and a statute of limitations for Washington police officers involved in disciplinary cases. It passed 235-178, with 30 Democrats voting for it and four Republicans voting against it. Then, on Thursday, the House is expected to pass a third bill, the District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act, which would require the Washington government to comply with requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security to share information and detain undocumented immigrants. Under current Washington law, local authorities do not work with federal immigration officials unless they have judicial warrants. Altogether, the bills represent House Republicans' attempt to assert authority over deep-blue Washington at a time when the GOP has unified control of the federal government. 'Home rule' — in which the Washington mayor and city council make their own laws but Congress has the ability to review them — has long been a point of contention. Democrats have pushed in recent years to grant full statehood to Washington, while Republicans have slammed decisions made by local leaders and sought to reverse them. 'D.C.'s City Council made radical decisions in our nation's capital under the Biden-Harris administration, passing local laws that are woefully inconsistent with national standards or constitutional principles,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, the chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee who authored the GOP voting bill, told NBC News in a statement. 'I'm proud that the House is taking action to overturn several of these reckless measures — including my legislation to prohibit noncitizens from voting in local D.C. elections,' he said. At the same time, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Republican leaders have been dragging their feet on a legislative fix for Washington's budget. A government funding bill that Congress passed in March to avert a shutdown included a provision requiring the city to revert to fiscal year 2024 funding levels, leaving it with a $1.1 billion shortfall. The move was quickly met with opposition from local leaders. The Senate voted by unanimous consent in March to undo it and restore Washington's authority to use local tax dollars as its leaders see fit. President Donald Trump endorsed the fix, calling on the House to 'immediately' pass the bill on social media on March 28. But months later, Johnson still hasn't held a vote on the bill, prompting criticism from Democrats and Mayor Muriel Bowser. 'It's absurd that the House hasn't taken it up. It's absolutely irresponsible, unfair and beneath the credibility of leadership,' said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., who represents a congressional district just outside Washington. 'It's not our money, it's D.C.'s money ... and I don't know why the speaker hasn't put the Senate bill on the floor. It'll pass overwhelmingly.' 'This is a particular egregious example of substituting their judgment for those who are locally elected to govern the District of Columbia,' Hoyer said. Last month, Johnson told reporters that he was in communication with Bowser and that the House would take up the funding fix 'as quickly as possible.' He said passing Trump's massive domestic policy package had taken up 'all of our energy' and insisted the delay was not for a 'political purpose.' 'We're working on it right now. It's not like we've closed the door to that,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., told NBC News on Tuesday. 'But obviously there are other problems we're trying to resolve along the way.' Bowser's office denounced the GOP bills to revoke Washington law and — while noting that Washington has mitigated the most 'catastrophic' impacts of the budget restrictions — urged Congress to pass the funding fix. 'Mayor Bowser continues to oppose all congressional interference in the lives and affairs of Washingtonians. DC will continue to fight to protect our home rule and self-determination,' a Bowser spokesperson said in an email. 'If Congress wants to be helpful, they should pass the District of Columbia Local Funds Act to fix their damage to DC's FY25 budget.' Johnson's office had no comment when it was asked Tuesday when — or whether — he still plans to hold a vote on the funding fix. Rep. Lisa McClain, R-Mich., who is No. 4 in Republican leadership, said, 'I honestly don't know; I haven't heard yes or no,' when she was asked whether the funding fix will come up for a vote. Other congressional Democrats said Republicans should stay out of Washington issues. 'It's bad enough, usually, when they're playing in D.C. local, home rule issues,' said Rep. Glenn Ivey, D-Md., whose district abuts Washington. 'But then to do it at a time when they haven't returned the $1.1 billion is especially egregious.' Immigration has dominated the national political debate this week, with protests erupting in Los Angeles in response to the Trump administration's mass deportation efforts. Republicans said the fight over immigration is a winning issue for the party, and they have continued to lean into it with the legislation on the floor this week. 'If D.C. wants illegals to vote, we've made it clear at the federal level people here illegally should not vote in any elections,' Scalise said. 'We're still the most generous nation in the world in terms of our legal immigration system,' he continued, 'but we have to fix our broken immigration system. And you could just see what's going on in L.A. to prove the point.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
North Carolina GOP sending immigration crackdown bills to Democratic Gov. Stein
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Republicans at the North Carolina legislature gave final approval Tuesday two pieces of legislation that would compel state agencies to participate in President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown and would toughen a recent law that required sheriffs to help federal agents seeking criminal defendants. The series of House and Senate votes on the measures could mean an early showdown between the GOP-controlled General Assembly and new Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, who since taking office in January has tried to build rapport with lawmakers on consensus issues like Hurricane Helene aid. Stein has yet to a veto a bill, and pressure will build on him to use his stamp on one or both bills given overwhelming Democratic opposition to the measures during floor votes. The GOP's legislative maneuvers happened while National Guard troops have been deployed by Trump to Los Angeles to confront protesters angry with federal conducting sweeps that led to immigrant arrests. Should Stein issue vetoes, Republicans in the ninth-largest state could face challenges in overriding them, since the GOP is currently one seat shy of a veto-proof majority. Republican leaders would need at least one Democrat for their side during an override vote or hope some Democrats are absent. Dueling immigration philosophies Republicans say the measures are needed to assist the Trump administration's efforts to remove immigrants unlawfully in the country who are committing crimes and or accessing limited taxpayer resources that are needed for U.S. citizens or lawful immigrants. 'North Carolina is one step closer to increasing the safety of every citizen in the state,' said Senate Leader Phil Berger, a primary sponsor of one of the bills. 'The Republican-led General Assembly made it clear that harboring criminal illegal aliens will not be tolerated in our state." But Democrats and social justice advocates of immigrants say the bills vilify immigrants who work and pay taxes, leading residents to feel intimidated and fear law enforcement, which will ultimately make communities less safe. Demonstrators opposed to GOP action filled the Senate gallery during debate. Republicans are spending their time 'trying to sell a lie that immigrants are the source of our problems,' Democratic Sen. Sophia Chitlik of Durham County said, telling colleagues that their constituents 'didn't send us here to round up their neighbors. They sent us here to make their lives better.' Stein spokesperson Morgan Hopkins said late Tuesday that the governor "will continue to review the bills. He has made clear that if someone commits a crime and they are here illegally; they should be deported.' Breaking down the bills One measure receiving final approval in part would direct heads of several state law enforcement agencies, like the State Highway Patrol and State Bureau of Investigation, to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. That would include having to officially participate in the 287(g) program, which trains officers to interrogate defendants and determine their immigration status. A Trump executive order urged his administration to maximize the use of 287(g) agreements. The measure also would direct state agencies to ensure noncitizens don't access state-funded benefits and publicly funded housing benefits to which they are otherwise ineligible. The same applies to unemployment benefits for those aren't legally authorized to live in the U.S. And the bill also prohibits University of North Carolina system campus policies that prevent law enforcement agencies from accessing school information about a students' citizenship or immigration status. Thousands of international students attending college in the U.S. had their study permissions canceled this spring, only for ICE to later reverse decisions and restore their legal status. The other approved bill Tuesday builds on the 2024 law that lawmakers enacted over then-Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper's veto that directed jails hold temporarily certain defendants whom ICE believe are in the country illegally, allowing time for immigration agents to pick them up. The law was a response by Republicans unhappy with Democratic sheriffs in several counties who declined to help immigration agents with offenders subject to federal immigration detainers and administrative warrants. The proposed changes expands the list of crimes that a defendant is charged with that would require the jail administrator — expanding in the bill to magistrates — to attempt to determine the defendant's legal residency or citizenship. A defendant with an apparent detainer or administrative warrant would still have to go before a judicial official before a defendant could be released to agents. A jail also would have to tell ICE promptly that they are holding someone and essentially extends the time agents have to pick up the person.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
One killed, 23 injured in Russia's drone attack on Ukraine's Kharkiv, mayor says
(Reuters) -Russia's overnight drone attack on Kharkiv killed at least one person and injured another 23, the mayor of the northeastern Ukrainian city said on the Telegram messaging app on Wednesday.
