Similipal now national park, CM Majhi calls it a step towards Viksit Odisha
BHUBANESWAR: After decades of wait, Similipal was accorded national park status following a formal notification by the Odisha government on Thursday.
An area of 845.70 sq km spread across 11 ranges of Similipal south and Similipal north divisions was declared as national park, making Similipal the second protected area to be declared a national park after Bhitarkanika in the state. It's also the 107th national park of India.
Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi, who made an announcement to this effect on the day, said Similipal is now the 107th national park in the country. It is also the largest national park in Odisha at 845.70 sq km, he said.
Hailing it as a landmark step towards conservation and 'Viksit Bharat and Viksit Odisha's goal, Majhi said, 'This long-awaited declaration strengthens our ecological legacy, uplifts tribal aspirations and reaffirms Odisha's commitment to sustainable development.'
PCCF (wildlife) and chief wildlife warden (CWW) Prem Kumar Jha said the national park status to Similipal is a significant milestone in the conservation history of Odisha. 'The long-pending proposal, originally initiated in 1980 and realised now, will be a big push for the state's forest and wildlife conservation,' he said.
As per the notification of the Forest, Environment and Climate Change (FE&CC) department, the 845.70 sq km of Similipal National Park is spread over Pithabata north, Pithabata south, Nawana, Jenabil, Upper Barahkamuda national park, and Bhanjabasa ranges of Similipal south division and Barehipani, Chahala, Nawana North and Talabandha ranges of Similipal north division.
Similipal, the state's biggest tiger reserve (TR) with 55 species of mammals, 361 species of birds, 62 species of reptiles and 21 species of amphibians, is spread over 2,750 sq km, including around 2,306 sq km that forms Similipal wildife sanctuary. The state had notified 1,194.75 sq km of STR as the core critical tiger habitat in 2007.
However, acting on the criteria of the Centre, that an area to be accorded national park status must be completely inviolate and free from human habitation and movement of domestic animals, the Forest department notified an area of 845.70 sq km, mostly in Similipal south division, as the national park.
The core of Similipal that consisted of six villages - Jamunagada, Kabatghai, Bakua, Barahkamuda and Bahaghar - posed a bigger challenge for national park notification for decades. Though the government succeeded in shifting Jenabil, Kabatghai Barahakamuda, Bahaghar and Jamunagada villages, around 61 families continued to inhabit Bakua. Keeping this in view, Bakua has been kept out of the national park area of 845 sq km, sources said.
The notification issued by the department came after the statutory 60-day proclamation period issued by Mayurbhanj district administration was complied last year.
Deputy director of STR south Samrat Gowda said national park status is a major recognition for Similipal. 'Apart from empowering us to strongly enforce laws, it will also help seek more funds for strengthening protection measures in the tiger habitat,' he added.
Till now Bhitarkanika held the status of being the lone national park in the state. Established as a wildlife sanctuary in 1975, the mangrove ecosystem had been designated as a national park in 1998.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Beneficiaries await enhanced pension in Ganjam
1 2 3 Berhampur: Four months have passed since chief minister Mohan Charan Majhi launched the enhanced pension programme for people aged 80 and above and for those with 80% or more disability on Jan 16, but K. Kanta Rao, 45, of Bhaliagaga and J. Salema Reddy, 81, of Kotharsingh in Ganjam district's Rangeilunda block are yet to receive it. The monthly pension was increased from Rs 1,000 to Rs 3,500, as BJP promised in its election campaign. Kanta and Salema are pension holders under the social security scheme due to their disability and old age respectively. "Like them, several beneficiaries in the district have been left out possibly due to lack of coordination with panchayats," said N. Damburu Reddy, a former zilla parishad member. He urged the district administration to hold camps at the panchayat level to identify eligible beneficiaries in villages. District social security officer (DSSO) Krushna Chandra Behera said almost all eligible persons might receive the enhanced pension of Rs 3,500 from this month, as the govt identified 38,022 beneficiaries under the scheme. Of them, 28,167 are over 80 years old, and 9,855 are suffering from more than 80% disability, he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play Chess on Your PC, Free Play Classic Chess Install Now Undo He said 460,792 people in the district are benefiting under the national and state-level pension schemes, including Madhu Babu Pension Scheme (MBPS). While most of them are receiving Rs 1,000 per month, persons with more than 60% disability are receiving Rs 1,200 per month, sources said. The DSSO said around 64,000 people had applied to receive the pension under the social security scheme but 54,000 were found to be eligible. The district administration has written to the govt, and they will be included in the beneficiary list after receiving approval, he said. Eligible beneficiaries are also being included in phases after removing old beneficiaries after their deaths, he added. He said administration has given pension to some beneficiaries on basis of available funds. Others will get in the next round and no one will be left out, he added.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Drive to modernise farming resumes in Mizoram after rain disruptions
1 2 Aizawl: After days of disruption due to heavy monsoon rains, the Viksit Krishi Sankalp Abhiyan (VKSA) has resumed in Mizoram, covering over 700 villages across the state, joint director of state agriculture & farmers' welfare and VKSA nodal officer, B Ramnunsanga, said on Tuesday. VKSA is a nationwide campaign launched to modernise agriculture through scientific outreach, sustainable practices, and farmer empowerment. Originally scheduled from May 29 to June 12, during the pre-kharif season, the campaign faced delays due to intense rainfall, forcing officials to pause activities until June 5. Since then, authorities have reached 19,174 farmers, including 8,211 women, across 217 villages — with a possible extension of the campaign period under consideration. This flagship initiative seeks to bridge the gap between agricultural research and grassroots farming practices, directly connecting scientific advancements with farmers and contributing to the Viksit Bharat @2047 vision. Agricultural experts have been visiting farmers at their workplaces, offering technical guidance on enhancing rice and vegetable cultivation. Those engaged in pisciculture, sericulture, and animal husbandry are also receiving strategies to boost their yields. Additionally, experts are documenting challenges faced by those in agriculture and allied sectors, providing tailored verbal and written advice to help improve their practices.
Indian Express
4 days ago
- Indian Express
Vidarbha's ‘Zudpi' scrub lands are ‘forest' lands: how SC ruling has struck a balance between development and environment concerns
After several decades of litigation over about 86,000 hectares of Zudpi jungle (shrub forest) lands peculiar to Maharashtra's eastern Vidarbha region, the Supreme Court last month ruled that such lands should be considered as 'forest' lands. On May 22, the top court provided clarity on the usage of Zudpi lands, saying they cannot be converted without prior approval from the central government, and only after complying with the conditions laid down by the court. An official report referred to by the court says Zudpi is a Marathi word that literally translates to bushes or shrubs, and Zudpi land means an inferior type of unoccupied land with bushy growth. The term was used for all wastelands that were not occupied by individual farmers for cultivation and other purposes. According to the report, Zudpi jungle lands are peculiar to six districts of eastern Vidarbha (Nagpur division) – Nagpur, Chandrapur, Gadchiroli, Bhandara, Wardha, and Gondia – and have been used for non-forest purposes for the past several decades. These lands, traditionally used for grazing, were classified as Gairan under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. For decades, legal status uncertain Vidarbha's Zudpi lands remained in a legal limbo for decades due to administrative lapses, inconsistent government actions, and contrasting interpretations of India's forest laws. Initially vested with the Revenue Department, these lands were used for development, public amenities like schools, health centres, water pipelines, burial grounds, and for allotment to landless farmers. They were also used for infrastructure projects, including railways, defence, and irrigation. After the reorganisation of states in 1960, similar lands elsewhere in Maharashtra were recorded as Gairan or Gurcharan. However, in Vidarbha, they continued to be classified as 'Zudpi Jungle' due to bureaucratic inaction. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA) prohibited diversion of forest land without the Centre's approval. However, in November 1987, the Maharashtra government issued an order declaring Zudpi lands as 'scrub forests' that would not attract the provisions of FCA, and handed them to the Revenue Department for afforestation and grazing purposes. This 1987 Government Order was challenged by the Bombay Environmental Action Group (BEAG) before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. While this plea was pending, the Centre in February 1992 changed and relaxed its earlier position. It clarified that Zudpi Jungle would continue to be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA; however, for the part of Zudpi lands that were used for non-forest purposes, the state government shall make a proposal to the Centre seeking its approval under the FCA. Taking a cue from the Centre's decision, the Maharashtra government in 1994 withdrew its 1987 order. With these changing positions, ambiguity prevailed until the Supreme Court's December 12, 1996 judgment in the 'TN Godavarman Thirumulpad' case, which stated that Zudpi lands would also be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA. In 1998, a High-Powered Committee appointed by the state government recommended that 92,115 hectares should be declared protected forests and 86,409 hectares that were unfit for forest use should be de-notified. Eight years ago, the state government again pushed to denotify Zudpi jungle lands. In 2019, the Maharashtra government, through the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, filed an interim application and sought the SC's approval to exclude the latter category of land from the purview of FCA. The SC formed a Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which filed its first report after site visits. Since some issues were yet to be resolved, the SC last year sought another report from the CEC. This report formed the basis of the SC's May 22, 2025 verdict. GOVERNMENT: The Maharashtra government argued that Zudpi lands were never forest lands, and due to the reorganisation of states and the inaction of certain officials, the revenue records were never corrected. As such, these lands continued to be erroneously described as Zudpi lands in revenue records. The state argued that denying it relief would lead to 'grave and irreparable damage' to lakhs of citizens, and would stall several projects. INTERVENER: Environmentalist Prasad Khale, intervener in the case, however, argued that de-notifying these lands would degrade healthy forests and disrupt wildlife corridors. He submitted that the 2025 CEC report had ignored ecological concerns, including those of wildlife corridors and the protection of scrub forests, which should not be used for non-forest activities. SC directives strike a balance The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai and Justice Augustine Masih said that it could arrive at a solution to 'balance the rights of the citizens at large on one hand and the interest of the environment on the other hand' due to the efforts made by the CEC. The SC recognised that a large number of Zudpi lands in Nagpur city alone had public utilities such as the High Court building, defence buildings, state secretariat, graveyards, etc. It said citizens residing on these lands for years, or farmers could not be deprived of their residence or livelihood. Therefore, the Supreme Court held that Zudpi jungle lands would be treated as forests, but made exceptions for lands allotted for non-forest use before December 12, 1996. For such lands, where classification (purpose) hadn't changed, the state would be required to obtain the Centre's approval under Section 2 of the FCA for their deletion from the list of forest areas. The court said the Centre shall consider proposals without imposing compensatory afforestation conditions, and should not seek deposition of Net Present Value (NPV) levies. The court directed the Centre and the state to consult and finalise a proposal format within three months with prior approval of the CEC. For post-December 12, 1996 allotments of Zudpi lands, the Centre shall process proposals only after ascertaining reasons and ensuring action against the officers who took allotment decisions in violation of the SC's directions. Special Task Forces in each district will remove encroachments made after October 25, 1980, within two years. All commercial allotments post-October 25, 1989, are to be treated as encroachments. The court clarified no land may be diverted to non-government entities after scrutiny. The Revenue Department must transfer remaining Zudpi lands to the Forest Department within a year, which are to be used for compensatory afforestation. Other Zudpi lands will not be allowed for compensatory afforestation unless certified by the Chief Secretary. Benefitting the state's development plans The verdict has in some ways paved the way for infrastructure and other development works that the state government plans to undertake on certain tracts of lands, after obtaining approval from the central government. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis welcomed the ruling, calling it a boost to Vidarbha's stalled development. The CEC will monitor the transfer of forest land, as directed by the SC. States and Union Territories have been directed to reclaim possession of such lands from occupiers and hand them over to the Forest Department. The SC had said that if reclaiming possession is not in the public interest, the state/UTs shall recover land costs from occupiers and use them to develop forests.
