'We don't need your racist views' at National Dialogue, Panyaza tells AfriForum, Solidarity
AfriForum, Solidarity and Solidarity Movement withdrew from the National Dialogue accusing the African National Congress (ANC)-led government of hijacking the dialogue and degenerating it into a government-driven national monologue.
The decision also comes as other legacy foundations, including those bearing the names of Thabo Mbeki, Desmond Tutu, Oliver Tambo, and Chief Albert Luthuli, have formally withdrawn from the upcoming National Dialogue Convention, scheduled for Friday, 15 August.
In a joint statement released on Friday, 8 August, the legacy foundations cited serious concerns over breaches of key principles governing the National Dialogue process.
These include government overreach, a rushed timeline, lack of transparency, and financial instability – factors they say undermine the credibility and original citizen-driven spirit of the event.
Despite withdrawing from the 15 August event, the foundations emphasised that they are not abandoning the broader National Dialogue project.
On Tuesday, 12 August, AfriForum took to X (formerly Twitter) to confirm that they have also withdrawn from the dialogue.
AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel said the crisis the country is currently in is due to the ANC's failed policies, mismanagement and corruption.
Kriel said they are the cause of the problems and, therefore, they cannot be trusted to lead the process of finding solutions.
In response, Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi accused the lobby groups of being racist.
'Who's next? Thanks for not attending, we honestly don't need your racist views,' he posted on X.
Unsurprisingly, chairperson of the Solidarity Movement, Flip Buys, said national discussions are essential to find solutions to the country's pressing crises, but everything indicates that the National Dialogue at this stage will only result in more useless discussions, instead of action.
'The reason for this is that it appears that the ANC wants to hijack the intended the dialogue to try to win back lost support, rather than find answers to the crises.
'Therefore, the Solidarity Movement supports the various foundations that have decided not to attend the dialogue on Friday, and we will not be there either. There is no point in putting the party responsible for the decline in the country in charge of the National Dialogue,' he said.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
12 minutes ago
- The South African
Senzo Mchunu: ANC took voters for granted, urges reforms
ANC NEC member Senzo Mchunu warns the party is 'walking on the edge of a cliff' ahead of the 2026 elections. Image: File ANC NEC member Senzo Mchunu warned that the ANC faces collapse and will lose power if it fails to implement urgent reforms. Speaking at the tombstone unveiling of anti-apartheid activist Nokuhamba Nyawo in Machobeni, KwaZulu-Natal, over the weekend, Mchunu said the 2026 local government elections will be a decisive moment for the ANC's survival. Mchunu: ANC 'walking on the edge of a cliff' Mchunu likened the ANC to 'a person walking on the edge of a cliff,' urging leaders to regroup before it is too late. ADVERTISEMENT He cautioned that if the ANC fails to win next year's municipal elections, the party will risk losing power and may not survive the next national elections in its current state. 'We became big-headed and took the people for granted they punished us. But there's still time to mend our ways,' he admitted, acknowledging the party had alienated its base. His remarks come as the ANC grapples with internal divisions, declining public trust, and its worst electoral showing since 1994. Calls to Rebuild Trust According to IOL, KwaZulu-Natal ANC coordinator Mike Mabuyakhulu expressed confidence that the party is rebuilding its support base. 'We don't want coalitions. We want to lead alone again,' he said. The event also honoured Nyawo's legacy, recalling her role in sheltering Umkhonto weSizwe cadres during apartheid. ADVERTISEMENT Her memory was invoked as a reminder of how far the ANC has drifted from its revolutionary roots. Reform or Extinction With the 2026 elections drawing near, Mchunu's message was clear: the ANC must reform or face political extinction. Can the ANC regain the trust of voters before the 2026 elections, or is its era of dominance coming to an end? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
National Dialogue Exposed as a Talk Shop: No Roadmap, No Accountability, No Future
From the start, President Cyril Ramaphosa's weak and uninspired remarks set the tone for what became a complaints session masquerading as a national renewal project. Citizens once again listed the failures of the State, but this time, with no pathway to solutions, says the writer. Following ActionSA's decision not to participate in the National Dialogue Convention but to deploy observers, ActionSA has noted the outcomes of the Convention, which, instead of charting a clear way forward with a defined end state, quickly descended into a stage-managed talk shop that was heavy on rhetoric and empty on solutions. The lack of proper organisation was glaring from the outset. It soon became clear that Ramaphosa's Convention was nothing more than a venting session without answers, met with youth rejection and no plan to confront corruption. From the start, President Cyril Ramaphosa's weak and uninspired remarks set the tone for what became a complaints session masquerading as a national renewal project. Citizens once again listed the failures of the State, but this time, with no pathway to solutions.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
GIWUSA slams National Dialogue as elite 'talk shop'
GIWUSA criticises National Dialogue as an ineffective 'talk shop' amid Marikana Massacre anniversary Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Media The General Industries Workers Union of South Africa (GIWUSA) has dismissed the National Dialogue convened at Unisa on August 15 -16 as an illegitimate 'talk shop' that cannot resolve the country's more profound crisis. The union's statement comes in the wake of a gathering that drew a range of participants, from self-styled civic leaders to a chorus of critics and government officials. Mametlwe Sebei, President of General Industries Workers Union of SA said the National Dialogue cannot resolve the crisis of capitalism. He argued that the platform was 'masquerading as the assembly of the representatives of all sectors of South African Society' but in practice excluded core voices and was 'widely boycotted by all main opposition parties, in and out of the GNU, many trade unions, community civics, and youth movements.' He cast the event as 'an empty spectacle' designed to create the illusion of engagement while preserving the political elite's power over the process and the very system of monopoly capitalism that has brought our people to ruin. The union tied its critique to both historical grievance and contemporary policy, insisting that the country's problems are structural, not a matter of insufficient dialogue. 'The political contradictions and polarisation tearing South Africa apart are not the result of a lack of dialogue but are rooted in the objective class divisions of our society,' said Sebei. 'It contends that capitalism, defined here as private ownership of the economy and land concentrated in a wealthy minority, puts profit before people, pitting 'the interests of the wealthy elite' against 'the working class, who fight for survival, decent wages, and a dignified life.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ GIWUSA linked the country's most wrenching crises to four decades of neoliberal policy. 'Since the crisis of capitalism began in the 1970s, the ruling class has responded with privatisation, austerity, and attacks on workers-all to maintain their wealth while the majority suffer,' read the statement, laying responsibility at the feet of policy choices shaped by capital interests. The articulation of grievances is anchored in stark episodes that, according to GIWUSA, reveal the systemic nature of the problem. Sebei referenced Marikana incident where 34 mineworkers were gunned down by police, as a 'massacre' born from a choice of 'profits over workers' lives and extended that frame to issues like education funding and service delivery, noting protests such as #FeesMustFall and #OutsourcingMustFall as clashes arising from neoliberal policy rather than miscommunication. 'Today, even traditional support systems of the working-class communities and families are tearing apart because capitalism substitutes human relations with callous cash relations,' Sebei asserted that widening inequality is not a policy slip but a structural feature of the system. 'Reject dialogue that concedes to the existing order and pursue organised, collective action that can challenge capital and, eventually, alter the country's political economy.' The union contended that 'the working class needs struggle, not talk shops,' and insisted that lasting change will come through mass mobilisation, strikes, and direct action-combined with a political program aimed at 'the nationalisation of key industries under democratic worker control' and, ultimately, 'a socialist orientation' as the only durable antidote to exploitation and inequality.
