Fear is not a word that can describe what we feel in Gaza
'If we die while sleeping… will it still hurt?'
I didn't know what to say.
How do you tell a child — who has seen more death than daylight — that dying in your sleep is a mercy?
So I told her: 'No. I don't think so. That's why we should fall asleep now.'
She nodded quietly, and turned her face to the wall.
She believed me. She closed her eyes.
I sat in the dark, listening to the bombs, wondering how many children were being buried alive just down the street.
I have 12 nieces and nephews. All are under the age of nine. They have been my solace and joy in these dark times.
But I, like their parents, struggle to help them make sense of what is going on around us. We have had to lie to them so many times. They would often believe us, but sometimes they would feel in our voices or our stares that something terrifying was happening. They would feel the horror in the air.
No child should ever have to endure such brutality. No parent should have to cower in despair, knowing they cannot protect their children.
Last month, the ceasefire ended, and with it, the illusion of a pause.
What followed wasn't just a resumption of war — it was a shift to something more brutal and relentless.
In the span of three weeks, Gaza has become a field of fire, where no one is safe. More than 1,400 men, women and children have been slaughtered.
Daily massacres have shattered what remained of our ability to hope.
Some of them have hit home.
Not just emotionally. Physically. Just yesterday, the air was filled with dust and the smell of blood from just a few streets away. The Israeli army targeted al-Nakheel Street in Gaza City, killing 11 people, including five children.
A few days earlier, at Dar al-Arqam School, a place that had sheltered displaced families, an Israeli air strike turned classrooms into ash. At least 30 people were killed in seconds—mostly women and children. They had come there seeking safety, believing the blue United Nations flag would protect them. It didn't. The school is less than 10 minutes away from my home.
The same day, the nearby Fahd School was also bombarded; three people were killed.
A day earlier, there was news of a horror scene in Jabalia.
An Israeli strike targeted a clinic run by the UNRWA, where civilians were sheltering.
Eyewitnesses described body parts strewn across the clinic. Children burned alive. An infant decapitated. The smell of burning flesh suffocating the survivors. It was a massacre in a place meant for healing.
Amid all this, parts of Gaza City received evacuation orders.
Evacuate. Now. But to where? Gaza has no safe zones. The north is levelled. The south is bombed.
The sea is a prison. The roads are death traps.
We stayed.
It is not because we are brave. It is because we have nowhere else to go.
Fear is not the right word to describe what we feel in Gaza. Fear is manageable. Fear can be named.
What we feel is a choking, silent terror that sits inside your chest and never leaves.
It is the moment between a missile's whistle and the impact, when you wonder if your heart has stopped.
It is the sound of children crying from under the rubble. The smell of blood spreading with the wind.
It is the question my niece asked.
Foreign governments and politicians call it a 'conflict'. A 'complex situation'. A 'tragedy'. But what we are living through is not complex.
It is a plain massacre. What we are living through is not a tragedy. It is a war crime.
I am a writer. A journalist. I've spent months writing, documenting, calling out to the world through my words. I have sent dispatches. I have told stories no one else could. And yet — so often — I feel like I am screaming into a void.
Still, I keep writing. Because even if the world looks away, I will not let our truth remain unspoken. Because I believe someone is listening. Somewhere. I write because I believe in humanity, even when governments have turned their backs on it. I write so that when history is written, no one can say they didn't know.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
33 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Why the Global South needs a ‘Borrower's Club'
The United States did it again. Just a week before the United Nations Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, the Trump administration walked out, pulling out of negotiations and refusing to attend the world's most important conference for coordinating how countries finance sustainable development. It was a dramatic, if familiar, abdication of responsibility. And although the rest of the world adopted the Seville Commitment (Compromiso de Sevilla) outcome document by consensus, the result was far from bold. Wealthy creditor nations pushed back against a proposal to establish a meaningful UN-led process for addressing debt distress among lower-income countries. The document's most ambitious provisions on debt triggered formal objections from the European Union, the United Kingdom, Japan, and others. Their resistance made it painfully clear that transformational change in the global financial system will not come with wealthy countries in charge. If low and middle-income countries are to secure the resources and policies they need to invest in their futures, they should take a page from rich countries' playbook: organise into a club to protect their own interests. The global economy is held back by a destabilising disconnect between creditor-led promises and borrower realities. The poorest and most vulnerable countries paid a record $96.2bn to service their external debt in 2023, according to the World Bank, with interest costs surging to $34.6bn. More than half of low-income countries are in or near debt distress. Governments are being forced to shift limited public resources away from health, education, infrastructure and climate adaptation to repay debt taken on during periods of low interest rates and looser global financing. These countries may not yet be defaulting on their debt obligations, but they are defaulting on development. The question now is not whether the system must change, but who will lead that change. As UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed put it, it is time to 'flip the orthodoxy'. By pooling resources, sharing data and coordinating strategies, debtor countries could begin to shift the balance of power and negotiate from a position of collective strength. A Borrower's Club offers a path towards a more equitable and strategic approach to debt and development. Without it, governments will remain constrained by a system that drains public resources, weakens institutions, and limits progress on everything from healthcare to climate resilience. The mounting debt pressures facing the Global South reflect a financial system that consistently disadvantages borrower countries. According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), at least half of low- and middle-income countries spend more than 10 percent of their tax revenues on interest payments alone. More than 3.3 billion people live in countries where debt service outpaces health spending, and more than two billion people live in countries where education receives less funding than creditors. These pressures are worsening. Loans taken out during the era of ultra-low interest rates are now being refinanced at far higher costs, even as global growth slows and government revenues stagnate. With development assistance falling and financing conditions tightening, public budgets across the Global South are stretched to breaking point. This is not the first time the world has faced a debt crisis. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) spearheaded the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative and the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI), securing debt write-offs for dozens of low-income countries and enabling increased investment in poverty reduction. But those programmes were narrow in scope, slow to implement and left many struggling countries behind. More recently, the G20 introduced the Common Framework for Debt Treatments, intended to offer a coordinated process for restructuring debt. Yet only a few countries have used it, and none have completed it with a durable solution. The process remains opaque, creditor-dominated, and too sluggish to meet the urgency of the current crisis. In a recent report, economists Joseph Stiglitz and Martin Guzman outlined one of the most credible reform agendas yet proposed: a detailed framework for restructuring sovereign debt that includes longer loan maturities, lower interest rates, and, when necessary, reductions in principal. Their approach is designed for today's more complex creditor landscape, where commercial lenders and non-traditional actors like China play a major role. But even the best technical proposals need political backing. A Borrower's Club could help consolidate and amplify these ideas, enabling debtor countries to move in concert rather than in isolation. By aligning strategies, sharing information, and speaking with one voice, such a club could help shift the balance of power and turn sound reform proposals into actionable policies. It would mirror tactics long employed by wealthy creditors, who have historically coordinated through clubs of their own: the Paris Club, the G7, the G20. Even private lenders have the Institute of International Finance (IIF) to safeguard their interests. Borrowers rarely have comparable collective leverage. A club could begin to change that. To work, a Borrower's Club will need political champions, a shared strategy and a clear mandate. It must also confront real challenges. Some governments may hesitate to publicly align themselves with a coalition of heavily indebted countries, fearing market or political backlash. Finance ministers in distress may worry about signalling weakness. There are also complex questions about how to involve major creditors, including private bondholders and lenders such as China. Chinese loan contracts often include confidentiality clauses that prevent borrowers from disclosing their existence or terms, complicating transparency and coordination. What incentives could joint repayment arrangements offer? How would the club interact with the International Monetary Fund or World Bank, whose cooperation is helpful but never guaranteed? Answering these questions will take coordination and creativity. One option could be to establish a standing borrower-led secretariat to provide technical assistance, legal support and shared data infrastructure for joint negotiations. Participation in the club could be conditional on adopting a transparency commitment, long demanded by civil society. To bring in new lenders, the club could offer pooled repayment mechanisms or third-party trustees, reducing risk for creditors while protecting the fiscal space of borrower nations. Multilateral institutions may not welcome a shift in bargaining power, but they cannot afford to ignore it either. The idea is not new. In the 1980s, Latin American countries launched an early initiative to coordinate as debtors and increase their collective bargaining power. That effort quickly fell apart as creditors isolated key countries and weakened their unity. Today, however, the context is different. Borrowing countries face shared global shocks, more diffuse creditors, and a fractured international financial order. Efforts by Global South coalitions such as the Organisation of Southern Cooperation and economists like Grieve Chelwa show that momentum is building for borrower coordination. With more data, more cooperation, and more experience, a Borrower's Club formed today could avoid past missteps and build real influence. Coordination is never easy, and some governments will be cautious. But with debt burdens rising, budgets under pressure and global financial governance stuck in gridlock, the greater risk is doing nothing. Creditors have had their clubs for decades. It is time borrowers had one, too. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
18 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Haiti names new head of transitional council ahead of scheduled elections
Haiti has appointed businessman Laurent Saint-Cyr as the head of its transitional presidential council as the country continues to battle rampant gang violence, corruption and economic insecurity. Saint-Cyr's inauguration ceremony took place on Thursday at the Villa d'Accueil, a colonial-style mansion in a suburb of the capital, Port-au-Prince. 'We must restore state authority,' Saint-Cyr said at the ceremony. 'The challenges we face are certainly linked to insecurity, but they also are the result of our lack of courage, a lack of vision and our irresponsibility.' But even the location of Saint-Cyr's inauguration was a sign of the instability Haiti faced. The federal government has been largely displaced from downtown Port-au-Prince, where gangs control nearly 90 percent of the city. On Thursday morning, one prominent gang leader, Jimmy 'Barbecue' Cherizier, even pledged to disrupt Saint-Cyr's inauguration. 'We have decided to march on the premier's office and the Villa d'Accueil to end it all,' Cherizier said in a video posted online. He called on Port-au-Prince's residents to assist him and his fighters in their approach of the mansion: 'People of Haiti, take care of yourselves and help us.' But Cherizier was ultimately not successful. A security mission backed by the United Nations and led by Kenya issued a statement explaining that police officers had increased their patrols in the area. 'Armed gangs had plotted to disrupt national stability and render the country ungovernable,' the statement said, asserting that law enforcement had successfully deterred those efforts. Saint-Cyr's appointment, however, has drawn scrutiny for what it symbolises in the conflict-torn country. Both Saint-Cyr and Haiti's prime minister, Alix-Didier Fils-Aime, are light-skinned, mixed-race businessmen who made their fortunes in the private sector. Saint-Cyr worked in the insurance industry, while Fils-Aime led an internet company. The majority of Haitians, however, are Black, with only 5 percent of the population identifying as mixed race. The country itself is the poorest in Latin America. Some critics fear the leadership of figures like Saint-Cyr could herald a slide backwards for Haiti's government, where power has long been concentrated among the rich and lighter-skinned. The country has not held a presidential election since 2016, and turmoil in the country increased following the 2021 assassination of Jovenel Moise. Criminal networks have exploited the power vacuum to expand their own influence, while denouncing the remaining government leadership as inefficient and corrupt. Though the presidential council was only formed in April 2024, by the end of that year, three of its members had been accused of corruption, though they denied wrongdoing. The transitional presidential council is considered to be widely unpopular, and its nine members have been rotating into the leadership position. Saint-Cyr is meant to be the final head of the council before it completes its task of holding a presidential election on February 7, 2026. At that point, Saint-Cyr and the council are expected to hand off power to the election's victor. Elections for roles in the federal government are expected to unfold in three stages, starting in November and ending with February's presidential race. But critics warn gang violence could thwart those plans. The United Nations estimates that 4,864 people in Haiti were killed from October 2024 to June of this year. Threats of violence have forced essential services to shut down, including hospitals and roadways, and nearly 1.3 million people have been displaced from their homes. The humanitarian situation in Haiti is considered among the most dire in the world, and Saint-Cyr called on the international community to respond with further resources. 'I invite all international partners to increase their support, send more soldiers, provide more training,' Saint-Cyr said at Thursday's ceremony. 'I am asking the security forces to intensify their operations.' Ambassadors from several foreign countries were in attendance. He directed some of his remarks at them. 'Our country is going through one of the greatest crises in all its history,' Saint-Cyr said. 'It's not the time for beautiful speeches. It's time to act.'
Qatar Tribune
19 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Netanyahu appears to confirm plan for full capture of Gaza
Tel Aviv/Gaza: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday appeared to confirm that Israel wants to take control of the entire Gaza Strip, ahead of a key meeting of the country's Security Cabinet. 'We intend to, in order to ensure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza and to pass it to civilian governance that is not Hamas and not anyone advocating the destruction of Israel,' Netanyahu told US broadcaster Fox News. 'That's what we want to do,' Netanyahu said in an excerpt of the interview. 'We want to liberate ourselves and liberate the people of Gaza from the awful terror of Hamas.' Reports of Netanyahu's support for a full occupation of the territory have circulated in recent days, despite opposition from military leaders. (dpa)
