IIT-G protest over fee hike ends for now
The administration had earlier issued a stern warning, stating that students who failed to pay by Tuesday would no longer be considered part of the institute. This prompted a rush to comply, with students reluctantly settling the revised fees. "We had no choice after receiving the email threatening our studentship," said one protester. Despite the end of the protest, the fee hike remains in place, with no rollback decision announced.
However, IIT-G has assured students that their grievances will be 'judged fairly."
The director, Prof. Devendra Jalihal, has urged faculty supervisors to dissuade students from engaging in activities that could disrupt the academic environment.
The fee increase, which saw PhD students' costs rise by Rs 10,900, has been justified by the institute as necessary for enhanced student welfare and activities. As the situation develops, students await further communication from the administration regarding their demands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Maharashtra farmers have grown cold to Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana
Maharashtra has seen a drastic dip in the enrolment for the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, which allows farmers to insure their crops against losses due to natural calamities. Enrolment has plummeted from last year's 76.31 lakh to 31,39.15 lakh, as of July 31, with farmers saying the scheme has become 'non-viable' owing to the rollback of the Rs 1 premium by the state government and stringent compensation rules. Why have many farmers decided not to insure their crops? This is the first year that Yuvraj Patil, who grows soyabeans over 16 acres in Shelgaon village in Nanded district's Ardhapur taluka, has decided not to insure his crops. His reason: the Rs 1,100/hectare premium is not viable given the stringent compensation norms. 'The scheme has not taken local natural calamities into consideration. The manner in which compensation is to be calculated is also faulty,' he said. The guidelines of the Fasal Bima Yojana talk about increased usage of technology and crop-cutting experiments. The first one, Patil said, was a red flag: 'Satellite images would be used to calculate losses'. 'But what is the guarantee that it would be able to get the correct picture? If it rains at night and the satellite picture is of the morning, then the losses will not be captured,' he said. What is crop insurance and how did it help farmers? Implemented across the country, the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana has the premium divided among the state government, central government, and farmers. The first two take up the lion's share of the premium to be paid, while the farmers' share is kept minimal so as to make the scheme affordable for them. As the vast majority of farmers in Maharashtra practise rain-fed agriculture, the scheme was a hit with them, given the cushion it provided in case of crop loss. The farmers now pay just 2 per cent of the premium, while the rest is taken care of by the central and state governments. In 2023, Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis announced that farmers would be able to opt for the insurance at Rs 1. This continued for the fiscal of 2023-24 and also the fiscal of 2024-25, leading to record enrollment by farmers. Thus, 78.82 lakh farmers insured their crop during the 2023 kharif season, 73.19 lakh farmers opted for the scheme in the 2024 kharif season, as per the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana's web portal. Many say the current dip in the enrolment is a result of the rollback of the Rs 1 premium. The state government has extended the scheme's deadline to August 14 after the initial deadline of July 31 lapsed. Why was the premium rolled back? On April 30, 2025, Fadnavis, now the chief minister, rolled back the Rs 1 premium that he had introduced as the deputy chief minister, and financial irregularities and bogus claims were supposed to be the reason. Officials said that scrutiny of the scheme had shown over five lakh bogus claims. Government land, barren land, and other types of land were found to have been insured under the scheme, with compensation being pocketed by middlemen. The rollback is estimated to help the Government save over Rs 5,000 crore. What do farm leaders and farmers have to say? Farmers like Patil know that by not insuring their crops, they are taking a major risk. But they are willing to take the risk. 'The cover provided might be good, but the manner in which the regulations are drawn is not conducive for us. Why should we invest in a scheme which is of no use to us,' he said. Before the state government introduced the Rs 1 premium, the scheme had witnessed a constant dip in enrolment, and political leaders across party lines had called for a rethink on the scheme. Anil Ghanwat, the leader of Shetkari Sanghatana, a farmer union founded by the late Sharad Joshi, said the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana has lost its utility for farmers. 'The scheme is not stacked heavily in favour of insurance companies. Hence the rollback,' he said.
Scroll.in
9 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Rush Hour: SC raps Rahul Gandhi for China incursion remark, Jharkhand ex-CM Shibu Soren dead & more
We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. The Supreme Court told Congress leader Rahul Gandhi that a 'true Indian' would not make remarks such as the ones he made in 2022 about alleged Chinese incursions into Indian territory. However, the court stayed the defamation proceedings against him for three weeks. The case pertains to comments made by Gandhi in December 16 about a clash between the Indian and Chinese armies along the Line of Actual Control in Arunachal Pradesh's Tawang. In response to the court's remark, Gandhi's counsel Abhishek Singhvi said that it was also possible for a 'true Indian' to express concern about the deaths of soldiers during clashes between India and China in eastern Ladakh's Galwan Valley in June 2020. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih, however, asked the Opposition leader how he had verified claims that 2,000 sq km of Indian territory had been occupied by China. Datta asked why the Congress leader had made the allegations on social media instead of raising questions in Parliament. Read more. Jharkhand's former Chief Minister Shibu Soren died on Monday. He was 81. Soren was admitted to a hospital in New Delhi for more than a month and was undergoing treatment for kidney-related ailments. Soren was the founder of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha and the party's chief for 38 years. He served as the chief minister for 10 days in March 2005, for five months between August 2008 and January 2009, and between December 2009 and May 2010. Read more. The Supreme Court questioned the 'tearing hurry' of the Uttar Pradesh government in passing an ordinance that allows it to take over the management of the Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi expressed disapproval of the 'clandestine manner' in which the government had secured permission to use temple funds for a Rs 500-crore corridor project. The permission was secured through a May 15 judgement of the Supreme Court, which allowed the state to acquire five acres of land with temple funds. The bench verbally proposed recalling the May 15 verdict and forming a committee, headed by a retired High Court judge, to oversee the temple's management while the validity of the ordinance was being decided. The Tamil Nadu government moved the Supreme Court challenging a Madras High Court order restraining it from naming welfare schemes after living politicians and using the photographs of former chief ministers, ideological leaders and political party symbols in advertisements of the schemes. On Thursday, the High Court passed the order on a plea filed by an All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam MP, who had sought directions to stop the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government from using Chief Minister MK Stalin's name in public outreach programmes such as Ungaludan Stalin. The petitioner had argued that the practice violated the Supreme Court's earlier directions and the 2014 Government Advertisement Content Regulation Guidelines. The High Court had referred to a Supreme Court ruling that allowed the use of the current chief minister's photo in government advertisements, but ruled that including former leaders or party icons could be seen as political misuse of public funds.
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
KCR responsible for ‘irregularities, bad planning and execution' of Kaleshwaram project: Inquiry commission
A commission of inquiry into the planning and execution of the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project in Telangana has held former chief minister of Telangana K Chandrashekar Rao responsible for what it said was 'rampant procedural and financial irregularities, lack of proper planning, design flaws, construction defects and a complete absence of effective operation and maintenance'. The one-man Justice P C Ghose commission, which pointed out that the decision to construct barrages at Medigadda, Annaram and Sudilla was the 'sole and individual decision' of KCR and then irrigation minister T Harish Rao. The commission has pointed out that, violating government business rules, the initial administrative approval for the construction of the three barrages was not placed before the Cabinet. The commission said in its report that KCR ignored an expert committee recommendation of January 21, 2015, which 'rejected' the proposal to construct a barrage at Medigadda. The committee had said that the Medigadda barrage should not be constructed because of 'prohibitive cost and time consumption'. 'The expert committee report was intentionally… not considered and kept in cold storage by the then chief minister and minister for irrigation,' the report said. The report was tabled before incumbent Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy's Cabinet on Monday. The P C Ghose commission was constituted after one of the pillars of the Medigadda barrage sank on October 21, 2023. This led to widespread flooding, and a team from the National Dam Safety Authority (NDSA) examined the sunken pillar — No 20 of block 7 — on October 25. On February 13, 2024, the Congress government in the state asked the NDSA to conduct a 'thorough inspection of the design and construction of the three barrages' of the project. According to the commission's report, the cost of the project was initially estimated to be Rs 71,436 crore. The costs went up due to a change in specification, design, drawings, and other reasons, the commission noted. This led to 'wrongful syphoning of funds from the public exchequer', the commission's report said. The scathing report further said that 'there was absolutely no operation and maintenance of whatsoever nature, including periodical checks or inspections, pre- and post monsoon inspections and reports etc, of these three barrages at any time'. The report also found design deficiencies in that the barrages that were designed as permeable foundations were 'utilised as storage structures', which is against standard practice. The barrages were also kept at full capacity throughout to lift water through pumps, even as the barrages 'were diversion structures and not storage structures'. Running the barrages at full capacity seemed to have caused the distress, the commission noted. The KCR government also issued a substantial construction completion certificate for Medigadda to the construction agency without proper checks and balances, the report said. 'The award of the certificate was wrong, illegal and tainted with malice to do undue favour to the agency,' the report read. Apart from indicting KCR, the report also said that T Harish Rao, the then minister for irrigation, 'intentionally did not consider the report of the expert committee'. It also said the then minister for finance Eatala Rajender demonstrated a 'lack of commitment and integrity in safeguarding the financial and economic health of the newly formed state'. The commission concluded that the project was characterised by 'rampant and brazen financial irregularities'.
