logo
Resolution seeks study on impact of Bradford pear tree in Tennessee

Resolution seeks study on impact of Bradford pear tree in Tennessee

Yahoo25-02-2025
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — There is a new proposal to look at the effects of a well-known tree that some say should be banned in Tennessee, the Bradford pear.
Rep. Clay Doggett (R-Pulaski) is encouraging colleagues to support a statewide study of the impact of the Bradford pear. Experts believe many of the impacts are negative, including the crowding out native plants, the trees' rapid spread and the vulnerability of the tree to strong storms.
The resolution claims the Bradford Pear is now in more than half the counties in Tennessee.
Bradford Pear HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 150Download
Nashville hot chicken up for official state food in Tennessee legislature
'They just disrupt ecosystems, I definitely think they should not be planted in any capacity whatsoever, any outright ban would be a win for the state of Tennessee,' explained Jason Sprouls with the Nashville Tree Foundation.
South Carolina has just joined the list of states banning the Bradford pear tree, which includes Ohio and Pennsylvania. Other states are also considering bans.
The resolution will be discussed Tuesday by a state house committee, which would urge the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture to do a study looking at the effect the Bradford pear tree has on agriculture and forestry in the state.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Bring Kilmar home': Protesters gathered outside Nashville federal court for Kilmar Abrego Garcia
‘Bring Kilmar home': Protesters gathered outside Nashville federal court for Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Yahoo

time14-06-2025

  • Yahoo

‘Bring Kilmar home': Protesters gathered outside Nashville federal court for Kilmar Abrego Garcia

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — Tensions ran high outside a Nashville federal courthouse as dozens of protesters rallied to support Kilmar Abrego Garcia. While the hearing was taking place inside, protesters gathered outside the Fred D. Thompson Federal Building and Courthouse — holding signs, chanting and delivering emotional speeches to the crowd. They demanded three things: due process for Abrego Garcia, for the abolition of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and an end to what they called the weaponization of the U.S. Government. Wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia spoke before hearing 'The way this whole thing has been handled has been illegal and racist,' Rebecca Bornac, a resident in Nashville, said. 'I wanted Kilmar to know we support him, and we support his right to a fair trial.' Abrego Garcia was deported to an El Salvador prison in March. He's been accused of conspiring to bring undocumented immigrants to the U.S. from 2016 to 2025. 'As a citizen of the United States, I am deeply sorry and ashamed for the treatment that my country has visited upon Mr. Abrego Garcia, which violates our core principles as a people and his rights on U.S. soil,' Ian Montgomery, Organizer with United Volunteers and Organizers for Tennessee expressed. Speeches continued for almost three hours, and some participants went into the courtroom to listen in to the arraignment firsthand. 'He was in an orange jumpsuit, and everything was peaceful and fine,' Margaret Pitts, a resident in Nashville, explained. 'To be a part of it and witness it felt really important.' Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty in Nashville courtroom on federal charges The participants told News 2 that they would never stop fighting for Abrego's freedom. 'We are people, Nashvillians, Tennesseans, standing up for what is right, standing up for our constitution for our neighbors and due process,' a protester expressed. The protest wrapped up around 11:30 a.m. due to inclement weather, but event organizers told News 2 they will be back out again on Saturday for 'No Kings' at Bicentennial Capital Mall State Park. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Tennessee Republican pushes roadway blockade protest bill ahead of ‘No King' demonstrations
Tennessee Republican pushes roadway blockade protest bill ahead of ‘No King' demonstrations

Yahoo

time14-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Tennessee Republican pushes roadway blockade protest bill ahead of ‘No King' demonstrations

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — 'No King' protests are set to take place across the country, but in Tennessee, Republican lawmakers have tightened the reins, and they're asking demonstrators to obey the laws. The Republican supermajority has passed multiple measures related to protests, they say, to protect the public. 'I wouldn't classify it as trying to prevent protests and demonstrations,' Rep. Jody Barrett (R-Dickson) said. 'I would classify it as a public safety measure to try to prevent innocent bystanders from being caught up and put in danger as a result of these demonstrations.' 'This is not a monarchy': Nashville protest targets Trump, military parade For the last couple of years, Rep. Barrett has sponsored a bill to make intentionally blocking a roadway, bridge, highway, or other passageway a felony in Tennessee. However, his bill, which has a $241,000 fiscal impact according to the proposal's fiscal note, has yet to be included in the state's budget. 'What we're seeing and have seen over the last several years is this trend of intentionally blocking highways and roads and bridges and things and having sit ins on passages ways to put regular, ordinary citizens, who are just trying to get back and forth to work, or go to the airport, or deliver their load on time, or worse, get to the hospital, getting caught up in these demonstrations that are organized,' Rep. Barrett said. Intentionally blocking a passageway remains a misdemeanor in Tennessee, but people who are harmed, hurt, or otherwise negatively impacted as a result can sue the individuals responsible under a law, also sponsored by Barrett, that went into effect last year. 'If you're unable to get to the hospital and you have damages as a result of that, or you have contractual damages because you can't get your load to the delivery point on time, that bill, this new law would give you the right to sue those people that caused that, who intentionally blocked your access and your use of the passageways in this state,' Barrett said. Democrats called the measure 'harmful' and 'anti-democratic,' but Barrett argues that intentionally blocking the public from getting to their destination has a much greater negative impact. 'When you get these mass protests going and things get out of hand, innocent people get put in danger and they get hurt,' Rep. Barrett said. 'Not only do we have property damage, but we have physical injuries as a result of it, and we need to stop that and make sure that's not the case in Tennessee.' Barrett told News 2 he hopes his bill to make intentionally blocking a roadway a felony is included in next year's budget. ⏩ This year, Gov. Bill Lee signed the 'Protecting Everyone Against Crime and Extremism,' or 'PEACE Act,' into law, which criminalizes giving a fake identity to police, intentionally coming within 25 feet of an officer after being asked to back up, and hanging a banner or flyer on a bridge or overpass, among other provisions. The measure will go into effect July 1. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Smyrna revising open door policy for inclusion
Smyrna revising open door policy for inclusion

Yahoo

time13-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Smyrna revising open door policy for inclusion

SMYRNA, Tenn. (WKRN) — Members of the Smyrna Town Council are looking to improve how they resolve employee complaints and grievances in order to foster a more inclusive environment. During a meeting on Tuesday, the council discussed the approval of the terms of a revised open door policy. According to the current employee handbook, the director of human resources or town manager handles grievances. The new changes would only enhance that rule and provide further direction for the council and the mayor. Town Attorney Jeff Peach answered a question about the process from Smyrna Mayor Mary Esther Reed. She asked for clarification on how to address an employee who comes to her or a council member about a complaint. Spring Hill officials change regulations on food trucks, pave way for expansion 'If the complaint was against me, then you would have [Town Manager David] Santucci to go to, and vice versa, and you would hold us accountable for making sure that those next steps are in place,' Peach said. However, if the complaint was against both the town manager and town attorney, Peach said they would look for outside counsel to address the grievance. Several council members shared their thoughts about the changes, including Councilman Steve Sullivan, who wanted to make the policy more transparent for all members to receive notification of the complaint. 'No Kings' protest to be held in Gallatin Saturday afternoon 'I would like it to take a step further and maybe even have the language in here somewhere that if this form is used related to either one of your positions, the entire council needs to be made aware of it, not just one member,' Sullivan said. The Smyrna Town Council voted to defer the action so members can add new language to address their concerns. The matter will be brought back up at July's meeting. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store