Trump pressing Ukraine for a quick deal after failed summit is a clear triumph for Putin
Ukraine
that Friday's
US
-
Russia
summit at an Alaskan airbase did not end with
Donald Trump
waving a piece of paper and proclaiming 'peace in our time', then it did not last for long.
Ukraine's biggest pre-summit fear was that Trump and Russian president
Vladimir Putin
would clinch a swift and sweeping agreement behind closed doors and present Kyiv and the world with a done deal to end the invasion on the Kremlin's terms.
For a very brief moment, the obvious failure of the summit to deliver a breakthrough would have raised Ukraine's hopes that, finally, Trump might make good on repeated threats to get tough on Putin for refusing to agree to an immediate ceasefire.
Instead, having looked weary, dispirited and even deferential to Putin as he traipsed out of a brief press conference behind him without answering questions, Trump set about trying to mask his failure by pressing Ukraine to accept a potentially catastrophic deal that would, if nothing else, help America's self-declared 'president of peace' save some face.
READ MORE
Trump not only backed down, yet again, from a pledge to impose 'severe' sanctions on Russia and key trading partners such as
China
if Putin defied him, but told Ukraine and European capitals that he now favoured the Kremlin's proposed solution – not a ceasefire but a rapid, overarching deal on Ukraine's future, with broader implications for European security, that should be concluded while Russia's invasion force continues to pound its neighbour.
The change of approach by the US is a clear triumph for Putin, the war crimes accused whom Trump welcomed with such warmth on the red carpet in Alaska, and threatens to place Ukraine in a double bind that could be crushing.
[
European leaders to join Zelenskiy in Washington for meeting with Trump over Ukraine
Opens in new window
]
If Putin and Trump get their way, Ukraine would have to negotiate a peace deal to the Kremlin's satisfaction while enduring intensified Russian attacks on the eastern battlefield, where Moscow enjoys a big quantitative advantage in terms of troops and weaponry.
At the same time, it would face pressure from the White House to do a deal as quickly as possible or face the wrath of Trump, whose desire for the
Nobel Peace Prize
is as notorious as his campaign-trail claim to be able to end Europe's biggest war since 1945 in a single day.
Trump has publicly urged Ukraine to make a deal, and reportedly told its president,
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
, that Putin wants full and permanent control the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions in exchange for freezing the front line in other areas. The Kremlin also wants Ukraine to accept other limits on its sovereignty, including a ban on ever joining Nato.
Yet any serious peace talks would have to tackle not only questions of territory, but also the return of all prisoners of war and thousands of Ukrainian children abducted by Russia, the fate of millions of displaced Ukrainians, reparations to be paid by the aggressor and a legal process to address war crimes committed by Russia's invasion force.
[
Nauseating charade as Putin comes out of international purgatory on Trump's red carpet
Opens in new window
]
[
Russian politicians hail Trump-Putin summit as a victory for Moscow and its narrative on Ukraine war
Opens in new window
]
These are issues of vital importance not only to Ukraine but for international law and relations between states. But they are complex and could take a very long time to resolve. Putin wants such matters to be brushed aside and knows that Trump is impatient.
The upshot is that resistance from Ukraine and Europe to a quick and dirty deal will be portrayed by the Kremlin as obstructionism, and probably taken as such by Trump, who has paused US arms supplies to Ukraine and intelligence sharing before, and could end them completely to get his way.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Eastern Ukraine mapped: Vladimir Putin's territory demands to end Russia's war
At the Alaska summit on Friday, Russian president Vladimir Putin demanded that Ukraine withdraw from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions as a condition for ending Russia's war. He also told US president Donald Trump that he could freeze the rest of the frontline if his core demands were met. The Financial Times has reported this, citing four people with direct knowledge of the talks. In exchange for Donetsk and Luhansk, Putin said he would freeze the frontline in the southern regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where his forces occupy large swathes of land, and not launch new attacks to take more territory. Russian forces control most of Donetsk, but its westernmost chain of cities remains under Ukraine's control and is critical to its military operation and defences along the eastern front. A sliver of the westernmost part of Luhansk is controlled by Ukraine's forces. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy has been clear about his red line: he has said he will not give Putin any territory still under Ukraine's control, but sources close to him have said he will discuss territory.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Oil prices await Zelenskiy-Trump meeting clues on peace deal
Oil prices held steady today as traders awaited clues from a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy as they attempt to come to a peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years. Brent crude futures stood at $65.87 a barrel this morning, while US West Texas Intermediate crude was up nine cents, or 0.14%, to $62.89 a barrel. Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Saturday and emerged more aligned with Moscow on seeking a peace deal instead of a ceasefire first. "Market focus now shifts to today's Washington meeting for signs of a deal that could eventually boost crude and gas supply. Meanwhile, in the week to August 12, speculators held the first-ever combined net short position in WTI (CME & ICE), leaving prices exposed to any upside surprises," said Saxo Bank's head of commodity strategy, Ole Hansen. "I don't believe the oil market has priced in a full peace dividend that potentially could see prices of crude and EU gas suffer further setbacks," Hansen added. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro's comments around India's purchases of Russian crude funding Moscow's war in Ukraine led to crude ticking up earlier in the session. "India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro said. "The US adviser's sharp words on India's Russian crude imports, paired with postponed trade talks, revive concerns that energy flows remain hostage to trade and diplomatic frictions, even as peace prospects in Ukraine brighten," said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at brokerage Phillip Nova. On Saturday, Trump said he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to "in two or three weeks", cooling initial concerns about a disruption in Russian supply. China, the world's biggest oil importer, is the largest buyer of Russian oil, followed by India. Investors are also watching for clues from Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's comments at this week's Jackson Hole meeting regarding the path of US interest rate cuts that could boost stocks to further records.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Lip-Bu Tan, Intel CEO with Silicon Valley's toughest turnaround job
At the top of the to-do list for many American business leaders is a simple priority: placate Donald Trump. Anyone doubting the need to keep the CEO-in-Chief happy has just been served a stark reminder by Lip-Bu Tan, boss of chipmaker Intel. A week ago, Tan had the dubious distinction of being the most prominent American business executive whose head Trump has demanded on a plate. The presidential call for his resignation appeared to stem not from Intel's struggles and recent threat to abandon cutting-edge chip manufacturing, but from Tan's former existence as a prolific start-up investor in Chinese semiconductor companies. A hastily arranged meeting at the White House on Monday turned the tide. Trump declared Tan's rise 'an amazing story' and hinted mysteriously at 'proposals' from the company that would soon follow. Days later, it emerged that the US has discussed taking a stake in Intel in return for investing in one of its manufacturing plants. READ MORE If Tan has won over the deal-besotted president with a tempting transaction, it is a fitting sign of the times. While the White House experiments with a new form of capitalism-by-fiat, extreme political volatility has descended on the US chip industry. For Tan, a widely-respected industry veteran who landed in the top job at Intel in March, the drama has complicated what was already one of the toughest turnaround jobs in the history of Silicon Valley. 'Semiconductor leaders have had to pivot from being an industry that was under-appreciated, not understood ... to now being in the bullseye,' says Jodi Shelton, chief executive of the Global Semiconductor Alliance, an industry group. The political warning signs should have been obvious. Intel was the biggest beneficiary of the Biden administration's move to pour $39bn into reviving chip manufacturing in the US. Trump has chafed at those grants, though he has so far stopped short of killing them outright. Through Walden International, a US venture capital firm he started more than 40 years ago with just $3 million put up by family friends, Tan has played a significant role as a start-up investor in China's tech industry – investing in China's state-backed chip manufacturers SMIC and Biren Technology, as well as Sina, creator of Weibo, China's answer to X. Those deals made him a natural target for Washington's China hawks. US senator Tom Cotton wrote to Intel's chair last week asking if Tan had a 'conflict of interest'. Tan, who dismissed the queries as 'misinformation', appeared to lack the political antenna to recognise the seriousness of the threat. 'It's taken too long for him to get to Washington. He should have got there sooner,' says Daniel Newman, an analyst at The Futurum Group. That marks Tan out from his predecessor. Pat Gelsinger, who was pushed out late last year after losing the confidence of his company's board nearly four years into an attempted turnaround, worked Washington hard and positioned Intel as a national champion. On Gelsinger's watch (and with Tan on the board until last year) Intel made some headway. But it failed to meet his habitually upbeat predictions and was caught out by the surge in demand for Nvidia's AI chips. 'Intel are losing share in almost every category they're in,' says Ben Bajarin, an analyst at Creative Strategies. Tan (65) is willing to challenge orthodoxy inside one of Silicon Valley's most hidebound cultures, bringing an investor's eye to an engineer-led company. His arrival has been welcomed both in the chip industry and on Wall Street (Intel's stock has risen by more than a fifth since his appointment), though he has taken on a position few envy. 'Intel is where good reputations go to die,' says Michael Marks, a veteran Silicon Valley executive who is partner in a venture capital firm with Tan. Tan has taken a circuitous route to the top of the US corporate world. Born in Malaysia, he obtained a degree in quantum physics in Singapore before moving to the US to study nuclear engineering. By his own account, he dropped out without completing his PhD at Massachusetts Institute of Technology after the Three Mile Island nuclear disaster and moved to Silicon Valley. He went on to build Walden, his VC firm, into a behemoth with $5 billion under management. That was followed by a surprise move in 2009 to become the head of Cadence, which sells software used to design chips. The role cemented Tan's relationships with many of the semiconductor industry's leading figures. In contrast to Gelsinger's optimistic rhetoric, Tan has emphasised the deep problems besetting Intel. According to a former colleague at Cadence, he is 'demanding but very fair, very clear'. Despite taking early action to slim Intel down, the company's finances are still under pressure. Nor has Tan ended uncertainty about its strategy. Last month, he threatened to drop its push into advanced manufacturing. With the future of the last US-headquartered manufacturer of cutting-edge chips in doubt, suspicions in Washington about Tan's role as longtime cheerleader for China's semiconductor industry have been harder to quell. Learning to play by the capital's new rules is now paramount. The fate of a struggling Silicon Valley icon depends on it. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
