logo
Dollar decline accelerates as Moody's downgrade fuels selloff and ‘Brand USA' falls out of favour

Dollar decline accelerates as Moody's downgrade fuels selloff and ‘Brand USA' falls out of favour

Malay Mail20-05-2025

Investors still see dollar as overvalued even after recent fall
Further rebalancing of global portfolios away from USD assets poses risk to the buck
Rise in FX hedge ratios could add selling pressure
Some investors looking to sell dollar rallies
NEW YORK, May 20 — Trade-related uncertainties, ballooning fiscal debt and weakened confidence about enduring US exceptionalism have weighed on US assets, with the dollar one casualty. Investors see the currency losing more of its lustre as the greenback comes back to earth from lofty valuations. The Trump administration's tariffs salvo this year prompted investors to cut exposure to US assets after a long period of overperformance. While the US currency steadied somewhat in recent sessions as investors took heart from a truce in the ongoing US-China trade war, it came under renewed selling pressure after ratings agency Moody's cut the United States' pristine sovereign credit rating by one notch.
'There's plenty of room for further depreciation, purely from a valuation perspective,' said George Vessey, lead FX and macro strategist at payments firm Convera. The 'sell America' trade was back in focus after Moody's US credit downgrade, he said.
The US dollar index has tumbled as much as 10.6 per cent from its January highs, one of the sharpest retreats for a three-month period, leaving speculators net short the dollar to the tune of US$17.32 billion (RM74.2 billion), close to the most bearish position on the buck since July 2023, according to CFTC data.
Part of the bearishness around the dollar has been due to the currency trading at a relatively rich valuation — in January trading as high as 22 per cent above its 20-year average of 90.1 on the dollar index. Currently, the index is hovering about 10 per cent above its 20-year average level. There is room for it to weaken significantly further, for example another 10 per cent slide would take it to the lows touched during President Donald Trump's first term.
Long-term concerns
Investors and strategists have viewed the dollar as overvalued for years but betting against the currency has proved painful time and again, as the US economy powered on. That could be about to change.
Steve Englander, head of global G10 FX Research at Standard Chartered in New York, said that while recent trade arrangements might calm markets some, they do not address long-term confidence issues facing the US
'The dollar weakness story is not over,' said Englander. Investors are also concerned about the long-term fiscal picture for the United States. Analysts say Trump's sweeping tax-cut bill would add US$3 trillion to US$5 trillion to the nation's US$36.2 trillion in debt over the next decade.
'The combination of diminished appetite to buy US assets and the rigidity of a US fiscal process that locks in very high deficits is what is making the market very nervous,' George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, said in a note.
The Trump administration has said it backs a strong-dollar policy.
'President Trump has been unequivocally clear about maintaining the strength and power of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency,' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said.
Foreign holdings
Despite recent foreign selling, years of US asset appreciation mean the world still holds trillions in US equities and Treasuries.
Such selling pressure could come from various corners of the globe as more people zero in on the dollar's recent failure to act as a haven, investors said.
'That's really what gave people a jolt... and say 'Well, if the dollar is no longer acting as a safe-haven currency, if it's not diversifying us any longer, should we really be holding this much of it?'' said Peter Vassallo, FX portfolio manager at BNP Paribas Asset Management.
Colin Graham, head of multi-asset strategies at Robeco in London, however, said that while there had been a rebalancing of portfolios where people wanted to cut risk, 'it hasn't turned into people selling dollars, assets or equities or Treasuries to repatriate yet.' That could still follow, he said.
Unhedged risk
The dollar's strength over the last decade had let market participants hold US assets without worrying too much about currency risk.
With foreign holdings of US assets in trillions of dollars, per estimates from banks, including Deutsche Bank, even a modest rise in hedge ratios — the portion of foreign currency exposure that is protected — could spell significant selling.
Increased hedging by investors means less direct demand for the dollar and more dollar selling pressure in the forward markets. Asian economies including China, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan have accumulated massive USD exposure as a result of a decades-long trend of investing big trade surpluses in US assets. An unprecedented two-day surge in Taiwan's currency in early May showed investors how a scramble out of the US dollar could roil markets.
Eurizon SLJ Capital's Stephen Jen and Joana Freire said in a note in early May that USD hoardings of about US$2.5 trillion by Asian exporters and institutional investors 'pose sharp downside risks to the dollar vis-à-vis these Asian currencies.'
One counter-argument to the bearish dollar story, however, is the resilience of the US economy.
Should economic growth surprise on the upside, it could keep the US Federal Reserve on hold for longer and support the buck.
Jack McIntyre, portfolio manager at Brandywine Global, noted that US consumers have remained resilient so far in the face of bets on weakness. Still, he and others were more inclined to sell rallies in the dollar than bet on a rebound.
'The story is more kind of looking for opportunities to sell dollars on strength right now,' McIntyre said. — Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Clash of the Titans:' allies fear fallout in Trump-Musk split
'Clash of the Titans:' allies fear fallout in Trump-Musk split

New Straits Times

time32 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

'Clash of the Titans:' allies fear fallout in Trump-Musk split

HE is almost certainly off the guest list for White House galas, but Elon Musk's astonishing spat with Donald Trump could inflict damage for both men that goes far beyond catchy headlines and an incinerated friendship. On one side, there's the US president – a man who has already shown unprecedented appetite for using the levers of power to go after opponents. On the other: the world's richest man, with a business empire entwined deep into the heart of the US economy and space industry. "Get your popcorn," Chaim Siegel, an analyst at financial services company Elazar Advisors told AFP. "I've never seen two people this big go at it this nasty in all my time in the business. Can't be good for either side." Trump allies worry that the messy breakup could have ramifications for his legacy and Republicans' election prospects, as well as damaging the administration's ties with Silicon Valley donors. Musk is also in jeopardy. Trump has threatened to scrap the tech mogul's lucrative subsidies and federal contracts, potentially devastating Tesla and risking some $22 billion of SpaceX's government income – even if it remains unclear how the US government itself would manage the fallout. The catalyst for the split was Trump's sprawling domestic policy bill, a package that Musk has complained in increasingly apocalyptic terms will swell the budget deficit, undermining the president's agenda. But the issue quickly has become extraordinarily bitter. Musk called Thursday for Trump's impeachment, implying that the Republican was linked to the crimes of financier Jeffrey Epstein, who died by suicide after being charged with sex-trafficking to elite, international clients. The dust-up has rocked to the core the fragile coalition between the populists in Trump's "MAGA" movement and the Musk-friendly "tech bros" whose podcasts and cash helped secure the Republican's second term. Influential figures on the populist side hit back with calls for investigations into South African-born Musk's immigration status, security clearance and alleged drug use. Meanwhile in Congress, Republicans are calling for a ceasefire, worried that the world's richest man will use his deep pockets to exact revenge in the 2026 midterm congressional election. Trump and Musk were never obvious allies, but the flamboyant entrepreneur turned into the Republican's surprise wingman – and mega-donor – during the 2024 election. Musk ended up spending US$290 million to help the campaigns of Trump and other Republicans. He was then rewarded with overseeing the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which embarked on ruthless and, critics say, ideologically driven slashing of the State Department and other bodies. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," Musk posted on his social platform X at the height of a dust-up that US media labelled the "Clash of the Titans." As president, Trump is arguably the most powerful person in the world. But Musk's megaphone – X – is much bigger than Trump's Truth Social and he is a prolific trash talker, instantly reaching many millions of people. Musk's portfolio of almost 100 contracts with 17 government agencies also gives him enormous power over the federal bureaucracy, including the US space programme. Trump, on the other hand, has ultimate say over those contracts. If Trump heeds his supporters' calls for investigations he could tie Musk down for years, revoking his security clearances and issuing executive orders to gum up his business. Trump, 78, may need to walk a delicate line given the risk that Musk will lobby Congress to scuttle his budget plans. Republican lawmakers – most of whom are fighting elections next year – have welcomed Musk with open arms, nodding approvingly at his calls for federal cuts and grateful for his campaign cash. But when it comes to picking sides, most Republicans who have spoken out on the spat are sticking with Trump. The president has a long history of forcing wavering lawmakers to step back into line. "Every tweet that goes out, people are more in lockstep behind President Trump, and (Musk's) losing favour," Congressman Kevin Hern told political website NOTUS. Musk, who dreams of colonising Mars, responded with a longer view of the situation. "Some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President," Musk posted, "but I will be around for 40+ years."

US-China trade talks to resume in seven days: White House
US-China trade talks to resume in seven days: White House

New Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

US-China trade talks to resume in seven days: White House

WASHINGTON: Trade negotiations between US and Chinese officials are expected to resume within seven days, following a phone call between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping. The discussions will place particular emphasis on rare earth minerals, White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro confirmed on Friday. "We expect that a meeting will take place within seven days," Navarro told reporters at the White House, commenting on the timeline of the next round of trade talks. Navarro stated that Trump has been clear that "the rare earth issue will be key to that negotiation", as reported by Sputnik/RIA Novosti. The US delegation will include Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, according to Navarro. The advisor also mentioned that Thursday's call between Trump and Xi lasted approximately 90 minutes, during which both leaders demonstrated "a very clear understanding" of the expected outcomes of the upcoming discussions. Trump later shared on Truth Social that he had discussed "some of the intricacies" of the US-China trade deal with President Xi. He also announced that he had accepted Xi's invitation to visit China and extended a reciprocal invitation. Following high-level trade and economic talks in Geneva earlier in May, Washington and Beijing agreed to lower reciprocal tariffs by 115 percentage points each for 90 days. The US has reduced tariffs on Chinese goods from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, while China has cut tariffs on American imports from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. Later that month, Trump accused China of "totally violating" the Geneva agreement and remarked that "it is extremely hard" to reach a deal with Beijing.–BERNAMA

US, China officials clash at Shanghai business event
US, China officials clash at Shanghai business event

New Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

US, China officials clash at Shanghai business event

SHANGHAI: US and Chinese officials traded barbs at a celebration held by a US business chamber in Shanghai on Friday, as the chamber appealed to both countries to provide more certainty to American businesses operating in China. Scott Walker, consul general of US consulate in Shanghai, told a gathering of US businesses aimed at celebrating the 110th anniversary of the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) in Shanghai that the US-China economic relationship had been unbalanced and non-reciprocal "for far too long." "We want an end to discriminatory actions and retaliation against US companies in China," he said. In a speech that directly followed Walker's, Chen Jing, a Shanghai Communist Party official who is also the president of the Shanghai People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, countered Walker's view. "I believe the consul general's view is prejudiced, ungrounded and not aligning with the phone call of our heads of states last night," he said. The interaction reflects the continued strained relationship between both countries as the trade war continues to simmer. US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke over a long anticipated call on Thursday, confronting weeks of brewing trade tensions and a battle over critical minerals. Trump later said they agreed to further talks. It came in the middle of a dispute between Washington and Beijing in recent weeks over "rare earths" minerals that threatened to tear up a fragile truce in the trade war between the two biggest economies. The countries struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's January inauguration but the deal has not addressed broader concerns that strain the relationship and Trump has accused China of violating the agreement. Eric Zheng, president of AmCham Shanghai which counts over 1,000 companies among its membership, told reporters on the sidelines of the event that many companies had put their decision-making on pause due to the uncertainty. "People are looking for some more definitive, durable statements on both sides that enable businesses to feel more secure," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store