
Reclaiming the US Flag for ‘No Kings Day'
Tribune News Service
Will marchers carry flags on "No Kings Day"? On June 14, more than 1,000 local demonstrations will challenge President Donald Trump's North Korean-style military parade for his birthday with our defense of democracy. The 14th is also Flag Day and the 250th anniversary of the US Army. The flag can't replace protest signs. But it complements and amplifies them. The demonstrations send a message that even as Trump and his allies wrap themselves in their flags, they are betraying the best of America. They highlight a culture of corruption where the only Americans who matter are allies of Trump at the top and persons or institutions who would challenge this become subjects of attacks.
Our flags make clear, in contrast, that we are defending Americans' fundamental right to speak out, without which all other rights become meaningless. They're a message to all who agree with us but also to all those Americans who voted for Trump or stayed home, rejecting both candidates. Because to change the direction of our country, the support of at least some of these people will be essential. As "No Kings Day" reminds us, 'The flag doesn't belong to Donald Trump. It belongs to us.' But at most anti-Trump protests, flags have been absent or marginal. I counted one when several thousand people marched in Seattle this past May Day, plus scattered Uncle Sam and Statue of Liberty images. That may be because carrying the flag feels uncomfortable, a false embrace for many who've marched to challenge American wars, call out racial injustice, or push back against corporate power. But the flag also stands for legacies of courage and sacrifice that should give us all hope and strength, like the classic World War II image of GIs raising it over Iwo Jima.
The flag represents the imperfect but essential mechanisms of democracy that Trump's regime so profoundly threatens, ones that allow us to keep working for justice. In defending these mechanisms and the rule of law, Thomas Jefferson condemned the very Alien and Sedition Acts whose remnants Trump is now abusing. These acts created the power of kings, Jefferson warned, writing of threats to the 'constitutional rights and liberties of the States and people...marked by the suspicions of the President, or be thought dangerous to his or their election, or other interests, public or personal.' These acts first targeted 'the friendless alien,' Jefferson wrote, but 'the citizen will soon follow.'
Flags have long been part of the protest tradition and may have even more impact when those speaking out are being marginalized or attacked. American labor activists from the radical IWW union carried them at the Lawrence Textile 'Bread and Roses' Strike. They fly next to Martin Luther King Jr. in photos from the 1963 March on Washington and his talks at anti-war rallies. This year, demonstrators who helped defeat South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol's dictatorial power grab waved South Korean flags along with their signs. Some recent anti-Trump rallies have featured them. But they need to become protest staples to help take the flag back.
A recent Vietnam trip reminded me of the power of national pride. Americans are welcomed now, even as museums, statues, and street names commemorate heroes in what they call 'the American war,' and the related fights against the Japanese and French occupations. But Vietnam also honors 13th, 15th, and 16th-century kings who resisted and eventually defeated repeated invasions by the Chinese and Mongols. The country's leadership could have dismissed them as the embodiment of now-discarded feudalism. Instead, they present their stories as part of a continuing story of resistance, a history they highlighted during the war as Ho Chi Minh and other leaders talked of fighting for their country, not communism. Whatever the limits of Vietnam's current regime in terms of democracy, this worked because the roots of national patriotism ran deeper than any particular ideology.
The threat to American democracy that those of us marching address is internal, of course (with help from white South African billionaires Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and David Sacks). But the lesson of patriotism and national pride as a wellspring of resistance still holds true. I've learned to appreciate those who bring flags to social justice protests. And I finally bought my own the other week at my local hardware store to complement a 'Don't Putinize America' sign I plan to carry. The young woman at the counter's initial look seemed to mark me, an older white man, as a likely Trump supporter. When I said I was buying it for the Trump protest, 'No Kings Day,' she broke into a grin. No matter our anger or disappointment for America failing to achieve much of what it should be, we need to defend what we have had and the possibility of what could be. Making the flag our own helps us do that.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US-Palestinian advocacy group condemns Trump administration's sanctions on ICC officials
A US-Palestinian advoacy group has condemned the Trump administration's decision to sanction ICC judges and prosecutors as a "disgrace." "When the US punishes judges for daring to pursue justice for Palestinian victims, it confirms what so many of us already fear — that international law doesn't apply to the powerful, regardless of the gravity of their crimes," Sandra Tamari, Executive Director of Adalah Justice Project, told Middle East Eye. 'Palestinians turned to the ICC because every other door was slammed in our faces. And now, even that door is being torched. These sanctions are not just political; they are moral failure. If genocide and apartheid can't even be investigated without retaliation, then what justice is left for our people?' she added.


Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Majority of Americans believe US should act to help starving Palestinians in Gaza
Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe the US should take action to help Palestinians facing starvation in Gaza, according to the results of a new poll released on Wednesday. The vast majority of respondents, 65 percent, believed that the US should help Palestinians, in contrast to 28 percent who disagreed in the Reuters/Ipsos poll. Republican voters made up almost half (41 percent) of the 28 percent polled who did not think the US should help people in Gaza. Palestinians are currently facing a famine due to Israel's blockade which only allows limited quantities of food, water and fuel into the Strip, in what has been widely condemned as a genocide by human rights organisations, including the United Nations. An Amnesty International report released on Monday said that Israel is carrying out a deliberate campaign of starvation in Gaza, systematically destroying the health, well-being and social fabric of Palestinian life. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The poll was conducted within a few weeks of France, Malta, Australia, Canada and the UK announcing that they planned to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. When asked about the recognition of a Palestinian state, more than half of Americans, 58 percent, believe that every country in the United Nations should recognise Palestine as a nation. A third of respondents, 33 percent, did not believe that UN members should recognise a Palestinian state. Nine percent opted not to respond to the question. Israel deliberately starving Gaza, Amnesty International says Read More » The UK's recognition of a Palestinian state has been made contingent on whether a ceasefire is achieved in Gaza. Hamas has accepted the latest proposal set out by mediators, but Israel has not yet submitted an official response. The proposal is essentially the same as the one Hamas accepted on 1 June before US negotiators pulled out. Israel is said to be reviewing Hamas's response to the deal, which would include a 60-day truce and the release of half of the Israeli captives still alive in Gaza. A majority of Americans, 59 percent, also believe that Israel's military response in Gaza has been excessive, while 33 percent of respondents disagreed with this assessment. The numbers show a steady increase in the number of people who believe that Israel's military response has been disproportionately violent in response to the October 7 attacks since the beginning of the year. In a similar Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in February 2024, 53 percent of respondents believed that Israel's response had been excessive, compared to 42 percent who disagreed. Israel's war on Gaza has killed well over 62,000 Palestinians, while just under 270 have died from starvation. The Reuters/Ipsos survey gathered responses from 4,446 US adults online across the country over six days. Reuters/ Ipsos said the poll had a margin of error of around two percentage points.


Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Lawsuit demands Trump administration reveal Gaza Humanitarian Foundation funding
The New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) said on Wednesday that it filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its failure to comply with a Freedom of Information Act (Foia) request demanding the financial records of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). " Today's lawsuit seeks records that could shed light on not only the decision-making process... but also on the creation of GHF, its funding and how it plans to use" a US government grant, CCR said. "The Center for Constitutional Rights is particularly interested in information that could reveal whether the administration's distribution of funds has any link to President Trump's 'Gaza Riviera' plan, which would cleanse the area of Palestinians and redevelop it for investors," the statement said. Since GHF began its food parcel distribution operations in southern Gaza in May, its funding sources have been shrouded in mystery. The scandal-plagued aid scheme saw its first CEO resign because of human rights concerns, before over 1,000 Palestinians were killed by Israeli soldiers at its now four locations in the enclave. US military contractors who staff the GHF have also been seen in videos shooting at aid seekers - something former US special forces soldier Anthony Aguilar confirmed after leaving the organisation. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Operating in close coordination with the Israeli government and US for-profit private military contractors, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites have become synonymous with scenes of chaos and carnage," CCR said in a statement announcing its lawsuit. "GHF, far from alleviating suffering in Gaza, is contributing to the forced displacement, killing and furtherance of genocide of Palestinians." War on Gaza: GHF aid scheme is 'orchestrated killing,' says MSF Read More » The US State Department had earlier this summer approved $30m in funding for the GHF, despite insisting for weeks that it was an independent entity. The agency exempted it from the audit usually required for new aid grantees, and also overrode vetting mechanisms, including 58 internal objections to GHF's funding application. Reporters were told at a briefing last week that "roughly half" of the $30m amount had already been delivered. But where GHF drew its initial tens of millions of dollars, to pay the salaries and the travel expenses of what critics have described as "mercenaries", remains unknown. Chapin Fay, a new GHF spokesperson, told the UK's Channel 4 last week that western European nations have invested in GHF, but that he would not reveal which ones. CCR said it was also demanding an investigation into the legality of GHF's charter in the US state of Delaware, where the organisation is registered as a charitable nonprofit. CCR called on Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings to "investigate GHF and sue to revoke its charter on grounds that it is illegally abusing its privileges with its complicity in war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide".