Inside downfall of iconic Sydney theme park
But by 2000, Sega World had pulled the plug.
Now, more than two decades on, former employees have reflected on the ambitious indoor theme park that opened with a bang but quietly fizzled out just a few years later.
Sega World Sydney was a short-lived icon of 90s optimism, housed inside Darling Harbour's Pavilion building with a rumoured price tag of over $80 million.
Its colourful corridors, virtual reality (VR) simulators, parades and under-18 dance parties were a far cry from Luna Park's rickety charm.
Instead, Sega was supposed to be a cutting-edge 'high-tech adventure playground' backed by Sega's global gaming empire.
Featuring nine rides and simulators, a bustling food court, live entertainment and over 200 arcade games, it seemed that Sega World had something for everyone – big or small.
It was officially launched on March 18 in 1997 by Michael Knight, the Minister at the time responsible for the Sydney Olympic Games and the bustling Darling Harbour precinct.
'They were anticipating huge crowds coming to Sydney and Sega World for the Olympics,' former staff member Andrew said in an interview with Sega fanatic DrScottnik.
'They didn't get they wanted and they weren't making any money,' he added.
A big bet that didn't pay off
The park was a joint venture between Japanese gaming giant Sega and Sydney Harbour casino developer Jacfun.
They poured millions into the project, banking on Olympic tourism and the growing popularity of video games.
Instead, ticket sales dwindled despite desperate initiatives such as free entry and free rides.
'We tried various schemes to make people come including free entry, buy passes as you go or buy a ticket at the gate which covered everything. We also tried making games completely free,' said ex-staffer Peter.
'But I guess ultimately, the interest wasn't there.'
By early 2000 – just months after the Olympics – Sega had quietly pulled out of the operation, leaving the theme park to gather dust.
Not even an auction to sell off the contents of the park in 2001 was able to draw a crowd, with a few hundred-odd punters gathering to pick up arcade games for bargain prices.
Jacfun managed to keep the lights on at the site for another three years but by 2003, the dream was officially over.
Today, there's little sign that Sega World ever existed at all.
Gone, but not forgotten
'I can vividly remember going into the control room and saying, 'Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls, Sega world is closed for this evening,' for the very last time,' former manager Jonathon recalled.
For many others, Sega World remains a brightly-coloured memory of their childhood.
'My favourite place was shut down for reasons as a kid for reasons that I just couldn't understand,' said ex-visitor Nick.
'It brought us all so much joy and memories. I always remember this as the beginning of the end for that area of the city. For me, the city has never been the same after that,' he said.
An online fandom of Sega Sydney lovers still exists, with X accounts dedicated to keeping the memory alive.
On eBay, you can even score the iconic Sonic swipe access pass for $277.
Many other nostalgic 90s babies weighed in on the clip, sharing their fond memories of the park.
'I went there on my first big Sydney trip. Monorail, aquarium, National Museum and Sega world! Was absolutely ecstatic!,' said one.
'What a nostalgia trip, I think I almost bankrupt my parents by begging to be taken there every school holidays back in the day,' said another.
'I went there as a kid and made friends with another kid after checking out the 3D/4D VR simulation. A few months later he ended up moving away. Fast forward 25 years, he was the best man at my wedding – I'll always have a huge soft spot for Sega World because of that,' shared a third.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
22 minutes ago
- ABC News
Identity of NSW man behind $19m 'ethical' internet scheme horrifies customers
It was pitched as the opposite of the dark web, an "ethical" version of the internet, raising as much as $19 million from backers sold on an Australian man's promise of the "Lightweb". But after 12 years and funds from up to 2,000 "mum and dad" investors from all over the world, the Equilux Lightweb still has not launched. Many customers are now pulling out of the ambitious scheme after learning the man behind it has not been using his legal name, and that he has previously been sanctioned by the corporate regulator, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). The ABC can reveal that Lightweb's founder — David Stryker — is really David Dayan Sevelle, a NSW man the financial watchdog sued in 2006 for running an unregistered investment scheme that left 70 "unsophisticated" investors out of pocket to the tune of $13 million. The financial watchdog shut down the scheme and imposed permanent bans on Mr Sevelle. ASIC confirmed to the ABC it was now making "preliminary inquiries" into the Lightweb scheme. It comes as Mr Sevelle, currently residing in Thailand, has been holding weekly "meritocratic" training over Zoom, teaching his followers how to behave morally for when the alternative internet launches, while preaching that "transparency is key". Do you know more about this or have a similar story? Email The Lightweb claims to be a superior, safer version of the internet through its requirement that users verify their identity to stamp out paedophiles and other online criminals. "It was going to be a platform that was effectively impervious to corruption," said Sydneysider David Coffey, who was won over by the premise and ended up putting $160,000 into the Lightweb project. But Mr Coffey desperately wanted out as he learned more about the company's founder in 2023. "He [Sevelle] moved to Thailand, which really raised a hell of a lot of eyebrows," he said. "Then we found out about the ASIC stuff and I started to get really uneasy." Mr Sevelle declined to be interviewed by the ABC because: "We are preparing for a Website Launch [sic] and will do press releases accordingly at that time." He did send lengthy responses to questions via email. Those involved in the Lightweb scheme have not been buying shares. They have been pre-purchasing advertising slots, called broadcast certificates, for when the platform goes live. It means the venture is technically not an investment scheme, and therefore does not require a financial services licence. It also does not receive as much scrutiny from regulators. The ABC has obtained one broadcast certificate where Mr Sevelle signed off under the name David Stryker. In his statement to the ABC, Mr Sevelle said he had not lied about his real identity and was simply using a "professional name" the same way actors, writers and influencers did. He said it was a "privacy barrier" to protect "unwanted commercial IP theft attempts" and also because the digital currency industry "can be very dangerous with nefarious and bad actors". "I have never hidden behind this name and still operate my own company and register domain names and trademarks and IP under my name," he said. "I wonder if you were interviewing Marilyn Monroe [if she was alive], P!NK, John Wayne [if he was alive], Nicholas Cage, Emilio Estevez and Katy Perry and many others that you would be accusing them of being deceptive "fake namers" like you did me." An information pack that a sales agency distributed in 2017 promised massive returns on these broadcast certificates, projecting they would sell for between eight and 25 times their original price. The internal document also stated the Lightweb platform would be worth $10 billion when it finally launched. Mr Sevelle told the ABC, "We never promise a fixed rate of return", and said this document was not "authorised marketing content". "When discovered, our management team pulled the document from circulation immediately, and this led to, in part, the triggering of formal dissolution of the sales agency," he said. He went on to say he was confident "we will exceed the 25 per cent product value increase" in the future. The Lightweb program has expanded its offering and announced plans to create its own virtual currency, including one called the StrykerCoin. To date, the platform still does not have an active website or a product and missed its own most recent deadline of a May launch. Mr Sevelle said there had been multiple delays due to "outside influences" such as "limited early development funding", the COVID pandemic, and the cost-of-living crisis. He said he expected the platform to launch within 90 days after dealing with a "trademark challenge". The Lightweb project operates under companies registered in Australia, New Zealand, the UK and the US, including Create2tech Pty Ltd, Stryker Design, StrykerFusion and Stryker Design International. Mr Sevelle's third wife, Noppakao Yingnok, a Thai and Australian citizen, is registered as the sole director of these businesses. When the ABC asked Ms Yingnok questions about the operations of her companies, she said to "talk to David". Mr Sevelle said he shared responsibilities between himself, the leadership team, the consulting team, and his wife in managing the businesses and was a "key decision maker". An internal report from 2023 showed Mr Sevelle was not the director of the Lightweb business but appeared to have been making a sizeable amount of money. A company called Elleves Pty Ltd, which is "Sevelle" spelt backwards, was paid $250,000 in "consulting fees" in 2020 and 2021. Mr Sevelle is listed as the sole director of Elleves. In his statement to the ABC, Mr Sevelle said he had originally loaned money to the Lightweb companies to get them off the ground and that the $500,000 payment to Elleves Pty Ltd was an "accumulation over years" of uncharged fees. He claimed there was no direct benefit paid to him and that he was paid a salary of $50,000. Concerns among Lightweb members mounted when Mr Sevelle and Ms Yingnok moved overseas to Thailand, permanently, in early 2023. Around the same time, news of Mr Sevelle's real identity broke among his supporters, and his past was laid bare. ASIC sued Mr Sevelle in the Federal Court in 2006 for running a property venture that "made statements to clients that were misleading or deceptive" and for "improperly assisting clients to obtain loans to invest in the scheme". Mr Sevelle ran a slew of property companies, trading under the name Mega Money, operating in the Central Coast, Newcastle, Hunter Valley, South Coast and Canberra regions, with the intention of pulling together enough mum-and-dad investors to pay for stamp duty and development approvals on blocks of land, and sell them at a profit to developers. But ASIC froze the Mega Money companies by court order, and eventually they were all forced into liquidation. In an affidavit filed with the Federal Court, the court-appointed liquidator, Justin Walsh of Ernst & Young, said Mr Sevelle spent "significant sums of money" from the company on "personal purposes". Those included an $86,000 antique "sloop" yacht, moored in the Toronto Yacht Club, and also "a large number of cash withdrawals" from ATMs. "Large sums of money" also went into Mr Sevelle and his then-wife's personal house and two investment units. He was not married to Ms Yingnok at that time. Two of these properties were sold before the liquidator could lodge a caveat to protect creditor interests at the site. "The [company] accounts were replete with inconsistent treatment of recurring transactions, unexplained transactions, and fundamental balancing errors," the liquidator added. The "majority" of investors had borrowed against their homes to invest in the scheme, and many had dipped into their superannuation as well, Mr Walsh's report noted. Mr Sevelle was banned permanently through court-ordered enforceable undertakings from providing financial advice, dealing in financial products, and carrying on a financial services business, including through the promotion and operation of any managed investment scheme. Separately, ASIC also permanently banned Mr Sevelle from financial services. "It definitely affected our retirement," said a Mega Money investor from Maitland, near Newcastle. Another couple from the local area, who lost $90,000 from the property scheme, said of Mr Sevelle: "He could probably sell coal to Newcastle [like] ice to Eskimos. We fell into that trap quite easily." Mr Sevelle told the ABC that "there was no impropriety" in the Mega Money collapse and that he was not fined or charged over anything. "ATM withdrawals, antiques, jewellery, any personal purchases made were from post-income tax paid earnings for those personal purchases," he added. As Lightweb customers learned the full extent of Mr Sevelle's past, he released a lengthy statement to explain the situation and his decision to change his name. He claimed ASIC found a "glitch" in the way he ran his property companies where he was treating all his businesses as one, which meant he was over the limit of investment funds and was running an unregistered managed scheme. "I had been treated like a pariah for no reason other than one technical accounting glitch," he wrote. "I apologise I did not disclose this to you at the initial outset of the business recruitment process, but I am sure you will appreciate my position and my actions to best nurture the project. "I do not wish my name to be associated to this project till we are secure, launched and commercially sound. "I hope you can understand this explanation … Transparency is key." He signed off as "David Sevelle AKA David Stryker (professional name)." Despite the explanations, a 2023 company document showed 90 people demanded refunds from the Lightweb scheme. Customers had been promised full refunds, but Mr Coffey, the Sydneysider who put $160,000 into the Lightweb project, alleged the company was "putting up walls everywhere", including placing a limit on how much he would receive monthly. He ended up having to engage lawyers, and it took until the end of last year to get all his money back. "Our client is understandably concerned about the legitimacy of your business and ability to refund his investment pursuant to your agreement with him," the legal letter, addressed to Noppakao Yingnok and David Stryker, read. "Our client has since been advised that you will now be paying the remainder of the refund by way of $10,000 payments over 10 months. "Your company has no standing to set these repayment terms with our client. Your contract with our client provides that a full refund is available upon request." Mr Sevelle told the ABC that, for cashflow reasons, refunds of more than $10,000 could not be paid in a lump sum. "It is not prudent to do so, as we are not a bank," he said. "No-one was ever boxed into staying. No startups or scale-ups have ever refunded pre-launch that we are aware of." Mr Sevelle has previously told his customers on a video call that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has audited the business numerous times due to the number of self-managed super funds in the scheme. The ATO told the ABC it would not comment on specific cases or confirm if an investigation was underway. In a statement, a spokesperson said: "The ATO encourages anyone setting up an SMSF [self-managed super fund] to ensure they understand what is involved in running their own super fund, and that they are ready and able to meet these obligations." The ABC has spoken to multiple people, who did not want to be identified, who said the company's most recent sales rhetoric involved encouraging investors to mortgage their homes to obtain more money. Morgan, 26, from Newcastle, said her father was so taken with the Lightweb idea he was considering retiring early so he could put his long service leave into the scheme. His family convinced him not to, but he is now looking into mortgaging the family home. He has already put $40,000 into the scheme. "It's definitely caused a lot of tension, especially because I feel like Mum and Dad have worked so hard for everything they have, and to have someone convince my dad to hand that over, it's just mind-boggling, like it's insane," Morgan said. Barry Urquhart, 66, from Newcastle, bought $7,000 worth of broadcast certificates several years ago. When he tried to put in more money through his superannuation, he said his accountant would not authorise it. "He said it [the Lightweb] was nothing; it was just a dream," Mr Urquhart said. Mr Urquhart has since gotten his money back and reported the company to ASIC. Mr Sevelle said in his statement to the ABC that: "The truth is that if they [customers] are no longer in our organisation and they have been refunded what they were entitled to, they of course will not want us to succeed, as our success will then be their failure." "I am sorry for both you and I, that you did not see this as a bigger story of innovation, empowerment, job creation and unlimited opportunities," he said. Mr Sevelle "will dance you around like you're on Dancing with the Stars," said one Lightweb customer who did not want to speak on the record. "He likes to use so much financial technical jargon and acronyms to confuse the hell out of people," they said. Others have described Mr Sevelle as having the "gift of the gab" and went as far as saying it felt like a cult of personality. Mr Sevelle has been holding hours-long "moral" training sessions every week over Zoom for years, where he teaches his followers how to behave like "meritocrats" for when the Lightweb finally launches. Some of these sessions involve movie nights, such as watching The Big Short and Eat the Rich. "There were so many people who drank the Kool-Aid and were calling him the Messiah," said Mr Coffey, the Sydney customer who had taken his money out. "It was constantly reinforced how blessed we were to be in the company at this time of imminent launch … so we had better buy more of the upcoming new investments before it's too late," said another customer, on condition of anonymity. ASIC said it was "aware of concerns related to these entities and is making preliminary inquiries". The financial regulator added: "Speaking generally, super-switching misconduct is an increasing concern for ASIC." "We are seeing more and more reports of people being targeted by pushy, high-pressure sales tactics into switching their super into high-risk, complex schemes," a spokesperson said. "Other red flags include high-pressure sales tactics, poor or even non-existent product disclosure, and promises of unrealistically high returns." Mr Sevelle said he welcomed both ASIC and the ATO looking into the Lightweb businesses.
ABC News
22 minutes ago
- ABC News
Bass Coast locals camping in the bush due to high rents and scarce social housing
Former nurse Veronica has lived in public housing at Wonthaggi on Victoria's Bass Coast for the past eight years. It is a picturesque part of the state, where rental properties are almost impossible to find. Veronica, whose surname has been withheld to protect her privacy, lives in public housing in the region. She said she was lucky, as more than 500 people in Bass Coast were waiting for some form of public or social housing. Veronica is not shy about telling people where she lives. It is part of her own effort to dismantle stigma around public housing and to call for improved funding for the sector. Veronica said security of tenure was a basic right that should be afforded to all people. "It really is a beautiful concept, that nobody is denied a place to live," she said. "People say to me, 'Why should we pay? Why should this be public housing? Why should we pay for these people?' "One day, you never know your circumstances … people who live in public housing are human beings, and they have a right to be accepted. "They're good people, you know." There are 388 social housing dwellings in Bass Coast, according to the Bass Coast Shire Council. According to the Victorian government, social housing is made up of public housing and community housing. A Victorian Housing Peaks Alliance report shows the Bass Coast local government area needs close to 2,500 social housing properties by 2051 to meet growing demand in the area. Data from the Victorian Housing Register shows there are 535 applications for social housing in Wonthaggi, accounting for about 10 per cent of the town's 5,000-strong population. Applications for public housing in other Gippsland areas, such as Morwell and Traralgon, are also strong. About 6.24 per cent of Traralgon's 26,907 population has their name down for some form of social or public housing. A winter shelter providing meals and accommodation on Phillip Island was due to open in early June, but was delayed until late July. Twelve one-bedroom units in Wonthaggi will provide supported mental health care when construction is complete. Founder of Housing Matters advocacy group Jessica Harrison said she had heard stories of people doubling their cooking to provide warm meals to people sleeping rough in the area, while others had resorted to camping in nearby bushland to avoid spending the majority of their pay on rent. Ms Harrison said "chronic underfunding" meant the region was unable to cope with the increasing number of people experiencing homelessness. Carol Maygar is a Wonthaggi-based volunteer spearheading the Owl Ute Pantry, a resource for people to stock up on food and basic necessities. Ms Maygar said she had noted an uptick in people coming to collect food from the pantry in recent months. "We don't ask [why], we only ask if people want a bag. You don't know what someone's situation is," she said. The number of people accessing homelessness services in Australia each month has increased by 10 per cent since May 2022. Homelessness Australia chief executive Kate Colvin said the problem just kept getting worse. "If I just look at one region, like Gippsland, we have had rents go up by 7 per cent a year for the last seven years," she said. Ms Colvin said the longer people were stuck in homelessness, the more it negatively impacted their lives. "People who are homeless have a much higher risk of early death … often suicide is the leading cause of early death for people who are rough sleeping," she said. "People just end up in despair for their future, and we see the awful consequences of that." Ms Colvin said turning the tide would require sustained investment in social housing, stronger income support, and more frontline homelessness services — especially in regional areas where support could be thinly spread. "Right now, homelessness services are turning away 72,000 people a year, just not able to provide support to them, and a further 48,000 people, we've estimated, not even getting through the door [to seek help]," she said. "What we're seeing across the country is local government responding to spikes in rough sleeping with punitive responses and moving people on. In a background statement provided to the ABC, the office of Housing Minister Harriet Shing said further funded projects would be announced in the future. A state government spokesperson said the government had invested more than $19 million in the Bass Coast to build 37 homes. Only 11 have been completed, with further projects to be announced. A Bass Coast Shire Council spokesperson said the council adopted an affordable housing strategy in 2023, and it would continue to advocate for more social and affordable housing for the region.
News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Severe': Blaze rips through cafe, factory at Guildford, Sydney
A blaze has ripped through a cafe and neighbouring factory in Sydney's west overnight. More than 20 firefighters were called to the scene on Byron Rd at Guildford at about 1.40am on Thursday. A NSW Fire and Rescue spokesman said the fire spread from the cafe to an adjoining building, causing 'severe damage'. The spokesman said one firefighter had been transported to hospital as a precaution because he had 'a bit of a fall' while battling the blaze. The owner of the cafe reportedly tried to bring the first fire under control before it spread to the neighbouring factory, as per Today. A woman in her 40s - believed to be the cafe owner - and the firefighter were both transported to Westmead Hospital. It has also been reported people were seen getting in the way of emergency services at the scene. NSWFR has said the fire is not being treated as suspicious.
