JD Vance decried as extremist over attack on UK abortion clinic safe zones
The US vice-president's criticisms of UK and Scottish policies on safe access zones around abortion clinics -part of a wide-ranging tirade against Europe on Friday - were derided as inaccurate and misogynistic by a number of groups, politicians and governments.
Heidi Stewart, the chief executive of Bpas, the UK's leading provider of abortion services, said safe zones - buffer areas of 150 metres around abortion clinics designed to stop women being harassed with leaflets, shown pictures of foetuses, or having to pass by vigils - were vital to protect women's access to essential healthcare in an 'overwhelmingly pro-choice country'.
'Bpas ... will always remain proud to stand against misogynistic and anti-democratic interference with British women's reproductive rights by foreign extremists, whether they are the vice-president of the US or not,' she said.
The Labour MP Stella Creasy, who campaigned for the safe zones which were introduced last year, posted a picture of a scene from the dystopian television series The Handmaid's Tale alongside with the words: 'And so it begins … ' She accused Vance of calling 'for the right to harass women having an abortion' because 'our bodies are their battleground, our human rights their target'.
In Vance's speech at the Munich security conference, he said the UK had 'placed the basic liberties of religious Britons ... in the crosshairs', citing the prosecution of Adam Smith-Connor, a physiotherapist and army veteran. Vance said he had been charged with the 'heinous crime of standing 50 metres from an abortion clinic and silently praying for three minutes, not obstructing anyone, not interacting with anyone, just silently praying on his own'.
Smith-Connor, who is receiving legal support from Alliance Defending Freedom International, a conservative Christian legal advocacy group in the US - was convicted of breaching a safe zone in October last year after refusing repeated requests to move away from outside an abortion clinic in Bournemouth in November 2022.
A community officer spoke to him for an hour and 40 minutes and asked him to leave, but he refused. Smith-Connor was handed a two-year conditional discharge and ordered to pay more than £9,000 costs after the case brought by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole council.
Vance also claimed the Scottish government had distributed letters to citizens whose houses lay 'within so-called safe access zones, warning them that even private prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law'. Shortly after his statement, a Scottish government spokesperson said: 'The vice-president's claim is incorrect. Private prayer at home is not prohibited within safe access zones and no letter has ever suggested it was.'
The Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) act, introduced last year, banned 'silent prayer' to prevent mass silent vigils which have been used by large groups of US pro-life protesters such as 40 Days for Life. The law states that the actions are only banned if they are likely to cause alarm or distress to someone accessing abortion services.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
The Scottish Green MSP Gillian Mackay, who pushed for the introduction of safe zones, said Vance was spreading 'shocking and shameless misinformation'. She said: 'He is one of the most powerful people in the world but he is peddling total nonsense and dangerous scaremongering.'
The managing director for the Abortion Support Network, Camille Kumar, accused him of 'dog-whistle messaging' an an attack on 'fragile' women's rights. 'It is deeply concerning that within days of pardoning [protesters] in the US for their harassment of women and pregnant people outside abortion clinics, JD Vance is now trying to stir up anti-abortion rhetoric in the UK.'
The director of the End Violence, Andrea Simon, said: 'Safe access buffer zones were introduced to ensure that women can safely access abortion services without fear of harassment. That is vital, because abortion is a fundamental healthcare right for women in the UK, which must be protected.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
30 minutes ago
- Spectator
Top five lowlights from Sturgeon's memoir
They say good things come to those who wait, but Steerpike will let readers be the judge of that when it comes to Nicola Sturgeon's memoir Frankly. The 450-page account by Scotland's former first minister was supposed to be hitting bookshelves on Thursday, but some shops decided to release it ahead of time and Mr S has got his hands on an early copy, reading it so you don't have to. Here are the top lowlights from Sturgeon's new tome… Trans U-turn One of the controversies that, some suggest, prompted her resignation in 2023 was the gender reform bill – and the scandal of double rapist Isla Bryson being housed in a women's prison. The question of whether Bryson is a man or a woman proved rather difficult for the then-first minister to answer at the time – and Sturgeon still hasn't managed to square this circle, pointedly calling the rapist 'they' in an ITV interview last night. At the time, Sturgeon first voted down Tory MSP Russell Findlay's amendment to ban sex offenders from obtaining a gender recognition certificate and later voted against SNP MSP Michelle Thomson's amendment to pause applications by those charged with rape or sexual assault. While she dismissed concerns from the bill's critics then, now Sturgeon admits in her book: 'The question I ask myself most when I reflect on this period is whether I should have hit the pause button when I realised, sometime in 2022, just how polarised the issue was becoming. With hindsight I wish I had.' Too little, too late… Salmond fallout Sturgeon's infamous fallout with her political mentor and boss Alex Salmond has had books written about it – and so of course the ex-FM had to include at least a nod to it in her own. But she hasn't held back. She broke down in tears when her colleague Ian Blackford told her Salmond had passed away in October 2024 and confessed she wondered whether she should cut the chapter on him from her book. 'Would I just be stirring up pain for his wife and family (which I truly don't want to do)?' she pondered. Regardless, she went and published it anyway. Charming! Sturgeon claimed that the former SNP leader hadn't read the independence white paper, accused him of undermining John Swinney during the latter's first attempt at leading the SNP and alleged he had planted questions via opposition MSPs on the committee assessing the Scottish government's handling of harassment complaints. In short, despite her claims of grief on hearing of her former boss's passing, the SNP's Dear Leader decided to pull no punches. 'I have tried not to rewrite history,' she begins the chapter, later adding: '[Alex] was trying to rewrite history.' Talk about tit for tat! Cross-party politics Scotland's former FM has long been accused of creating a divisive political culture over both independence and the trans debate. Yet in her memoir she claims that her motivation for a deal with the Scottish Greens after falling short of a majority in the 2021 Holyrood election was down to her desire to 'champion a more constructive style of politics'. Er, right. She goes on: At the tail end of the last parliament, embroiled in the Salmond saga and worn down by Covid, I had become weary of the opportunism and perpetual game-playing of opposition parties. It was partly a result of electoral frustration, but they had become impervious to any attempts to build cross-party consensus. And this is the woman lauded for her high emotional intelligence?! Brexit The Queen of the Nats wouldn't ever exploit a democratic result for her own political gain, would she? Not according to her memoir, anyway, in which she writes that, after Britain voted to leave the EU: The established narrative now, though, is that I went hell for leather for a second referendum immediately after the Brexit vote. It isn't true. On the contrary, I spent the next nine months doing the precise opposite. I tried hard to persuade the UK government to pursue a compromise option… It was in good faith, therefore, that we published 'Scotland's Place in Europe' in December 2016, mapping out what a different outcome for Scotland might look like and how it could be achieved. I was explicit that this was a solution for Scotland within the UK; in other words, an alternative to independence. It seems rather odd, then, that in the aftermath of the Brexit vote, Sturgeon told a journalist that the chance of another independence referendum was 'highly likely'. And since then, the SNP has consistently stood on a platform that advocates for closer ties with the EU – if not rejoining the European Union altogether. How very interesting… London The SNP's Dear Leader has spent most of her life calling for Scotland's independence from the United Kingdom – but in a rather amusing revelation, it doesn't seem like she wants to practice what she preaches. In her book, she writes: 'I am determined to see more of the world. I might live outside of Scotland for a period.' In fact, she has since admitted to both the Sunday Times and the BBC that: 'I love London.' Just one of those nationalists who'll do anything for their country but live in it, eh?
South Wales Guardian
30 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Two thirds of Britons back removal of Duke of York's titles
Research by YouGov found that 67% of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, as well as his princely title. An unflattering biography of the disgraced duke by Andrew Lownie this month delved into the private life of the late Queen's son, depicting him as sex obsessed, a 'useful idiot' and easy prey for Jeffrey Epstein. Two thirds of Britons support stripping Prince Andrew of his remaining royal titles, a move Prince William is reportedly considering for when he becomes king Support: 67%Oppose: 13% Results link in following tweet — YouGov (@YouGov) August 11, 2025 Some 13% opposed the removal of his titles and 21% were unsure, the survey showed. Three years ago, 62% believed Andrew should have his York title removed, with the current 67% in-favour figure seeing a jump of five percentage points. Another YouGov survey found that just 5% have a positive view of the King's brother, with Andrew languishing at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, beneath the Duchess of Sussex who has a 20% positive rating and the Duke of Sussex at 28%. Legislation would be required for Parliament to prevent Andrew continuing as the Duke of York, while his birthright to be a prince, as the son of a monarch, could be changed if a Letters Patent were issued by the King. The duke stopped using his style of His Royal Highness following his disastrous Newsnight interview, but it could be removed entirely by a Letters Patent. Andrew stepped away from his public role in 2019 amid the furore over his friendship with convicted billionaire paedophile Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager and who Andrew claimed never to have met.
STV News
30 minutes ago
- STV News
Council awaiting guidance on whether to reassign mixed-sex facilities in schools
Perth and Kinross Council is still awaiting Scottish Government guidance as to whether it needs to reassign mixed-sex facilities in schools. The new £80m Perth High School – due to open next week – is one of nine PKC schools built with mixed-sex spaces and one of three which does not have separate male and female toilets. In April 2025, a Court of Session judge ruled Scottish state schools must provide single-sex toilets for pupils but the Scottish Government is still considering whether its guidance needs to be updated. The Court of Session judgement in April was made in a case brought against Scottish Borders Council by parents concerned about a new primary school built with only gender-neutral toilets. The Court of Session judge ruled mixed-sex schools must provide single-sex toilets for pupils, but could have gender neutral toilets as well. The Scottish ruling came after the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled a woman is defined by biological sex under equalities law. And – with Perth and Kinross pupils due to return to school next week for the new session – the Scottish Government is still deciding whether or not its guidance needs to be updated to reflect recent legal decisions. A PKC spokesperson said: 'As previously advised, the council has nine schools with mixed-sex facilities. Six of these also have separate male and female toilets while the remaining three have been designed with floor to ceiling cubicles in semi-open plan areas that allows schools to reassign their toilets. This arrangement is also in place at the new Perth High School. 'We await further guidance from the Scottish Government following the Supreme Court judgement and will respond to this guidance once provided.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Local authorities have statutory responsibility for the school estate, including provision of toilets. 'As with any significant legal or policy developments, we consider whether guidance requires to be updated to reflect recent legal decisions and this consideration is under way.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
