Columbus City Council discusses House Bill 581
COLUMBUS, Ga. (WRBL) — In Georgia, House Bill 581 passed overwhelmingly last year. This created a statewide floating homestead exemption. For the city of Columbus, this new exemption poses some uncertainty as the city already has a tax freeze on residential property taxes.
House bill 581 allows counties, consolidated governments, municipalities, and local school districts to opt- in or out based on what they believe is best for their communities.
The Muscogee County School district has already begun holding public meetings to discuss opting out. As for the City, it must hold three public meetings to discuss potentially opting out.
On Tuesday, a presentation about House Bill 581 was given by the city's tax assessor Suzanne Widenhouse. She explains this bill created a floating homestead that would adjust the base year value by an inflationary index, both up or down.
Columbus has a property tax freeze, which means the taxpayer would receive whichever is most beneficial. Widenhouse says this can be very complex.
'Particularly when you consider the fact that our homestead tops out at two acres and these is no acreage limit on this particular homestead,' Widenhouse explains. 'So, while we have what we call 'H' accounts which are properties that exceed two acres that are homestead, they get the freeze on the two acres and then anything over than is subject to fair market. Under this, they would potentially have the floating homestead for the full acreage.'
According to the Columbus Elections and Registrations Office, 61.5% of active voters in Columbus voted for House Bill 581.
However, District 2 Councilor Glenn Davis explains why he supports opting out.
'If the economic downturn comes, that means you're going to have a housing crisis and not only that, but this city is also built on pennies. People are not going to be able to spend this much and you're not going to be able to collect sales tax revenue, 'Davis explains.
'You have to have revenue to run the city. In order to do that, the taxpayer or the property owner may get a valuation decrease, but nobody's telling that property owner that you can increase valuations, you can increase the millage to get that revenue, you need to run the city,' Davis says. 'Nobody's telling them you can expand the urban service districts all the way out in Midland. Nobody's telling them the taxes and the other fees that would have to go up to run the operations of this city.'
Other cities in Georgia can opt- in as they have access to a local option sales tax that is used to pay operations. However, Columbus does not have that option.
' We don't have access to that because a consolidated governments are only allowed two local option sales taxes and one of ours was a commitment made to the community to have 70% go towards public safety, 30% towards infrastructure. So that's off the table,' explains Columbus Mayor Skip Henderson.
Based on opinions from firms in Atlanta and the attorney general's office, Columbus City Attorney Clifton Fay says House Bill 581 does not adversely affect our local constitutional homestead freeze whether the city chooses to opt- in or out.
Columbus will begin holding public meetings to discuss opting out the first week of February.
Those proposed meeting dates are the following:
Monday, February 10th at 9 a.m.
Monday, February 10th at 6 p.m.
Tuesday, February 11th during a city council meeting at 9 a.m.
The decision to opt- out has to be completed by March 1st.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
See who is running for redistricted seats in MS Legislature this year
Thirty candidates have submitted documents with the Mississippi Secretary of State's Office to run in 14 court-ordered special legislative elections later this year. Of the 14 races, 10 appear to be contested, according to an MSOS document listing the candidates. A federal three-judge panel last year ordered the Legislature to redraw its House and Senate districts in three areas because some districts were found to dilute Black voting power. After the Legislature submitted a new map, the NAACP, which filed the lawsuit in 2022 that lead to the court order, challenged it. The panel later accepted an amended version of the map impacting the Desoto County area. Candidates had until Monday at 5 p.m. to complete and file paperwork to run. The state Democratic and Republican Parties have until Friday at the same time to verify those candidates with MSOS. Four of the 10 contested races will be decided via a primary that will take place on Aug. 5 because the candidates are all of the same party, and the rest will be decided after the Nov. 4 special election day. Here is a list of those running in the 14 legislative districts This district now encompasses Tate and Desoto counties. Jon Steverson- Republican Michael McLendon-Republican incumbent Chris Hannah-Democrat This district is now in Tunica and Desoto counties. SD 2's incumbent, Sen. David Parker, R-Olive Branch, announced last week he will not be running in the special election. Kelly Lisa Andress-Democrat Theresa Gillespie Isom-Democrat Robert J. Walker-Democrat This district is now in Tunica and Walls counties. Kendall Prewitt- Republican Reginald Jackson- Incumbent Democrat Abe Hudson, Jr.-Democrat This district is now in Marshall and Desoto counties. Kevin Blackwell-Incumbent Republican Dianne Dodson Black- Democrat The district is now in Convington, Jasper and Jones counties. Juan Barnett- Incumbent Democrat The district is now in Convington, Lamar, Marion and Walthall counties. Joey Fillingane- Incumbent Republican The district is now in Forrest, Greene, Jones and Wayne counties Robin Robinson- Republican RJ Robinson- Republican Don Hartness- Republican This district is now in Forrest, Lamar and Perry counties. Chris Johnson- Incumbent Republican Patrick Lott- Republican Shakita T. Taylor- Democrat The district is now in Forrest and Lamar counties Anna Rush- Republican Johnny L. DuPree- Democratic The district is now in Chickasaw, Lee, Monroe and Pontotoc counties. Brady Davis- Democrat Ricky Thompson- Incumbent Democrat The district is now in Chickasaw, Clay and Monroe counties. Jon Lancaster- Incumbent Republican Justin Crosby- Democrat This district is now in Clay, Lowndes, Monroe and Oktibbeha counties. Karl Gibbs- Incumbent Democrat This district is now in Lowndes and Monroe counties. Dana McLean- Incumbent Republican The district is in Lowndes County. Kabir Karriem- Incumbent Democrat Pierre Beard- Democrat To find more information about voting data regarding the redrawn House and Senate districts, people can visit the Mississippi Automated Resource Information System website. Grant McLaughlin covers the Legislature and state government for the Clarion Ledger. He can be reached at gmclaughlin@ or 972-571-2335. This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Who is running for redistricted seats in Mississippi Legislature
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cindy Holscher is first major Kansas Democrat to declare for 2026 governor race
The first major Democratic candidate has declared for the 2026 Kansas governor's race: state Sen. Cindy Holscher. Holscher, D-Overland Park, announced her candidacy June 12. "Like the majority of Kansans, I just want to take a common sense approach to government and making sure that we are serving the people and working in their best interest, not extremist agendas and not dark money groups," Holscher said in an interview with The Capital-Journal. "My desire is to listen to the people and work for their best interests." Holscher has served in the Senate since 2021 and before that spent four years in the House. While a handful of big-name and longshot Republicans have declared for the GOP field — most notably Secretary of State Scott Schwab and former Gov. Jeff Colyer — no major Democratic candidates had declared. The race to replace term-limited Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly is still taking shape and more announcements are expected. The filing deadline isn't until June 2026. Holscher said some party insiders had encouraged her to wait, telling her "if a Republican comes in and does all the damage that we think they'll do, then it'll be easier for a Democrat or the party to win in 2030." But Holscher said she believes the next election is critical. "We have to make sure we have some balance in the Statehouse in terms of having a Democratic governor again to provide a check on some of the horrible policies that likely will come forward from the extremists who have control," she said. She made the decision to run for governor after traveling across the state in recent months. "Not so much to explore running for governor," she said, "but really at the end of session, I started receiving phone calls from areas saying that sometimes the local legislators wouldn't show up for town halls, or federal officials, and so I started getting invitations to come do a legislative overview." During those events, she has heard from Kansans. "What I'm hearing from voters is that they're expressing fear, they're expressing anxiety over the cuts that have been made on the federal level, and they're worried about what can happen on the state level," she said. "We have an extremist Legislature, and the concern is that that agenda will be brought to the state level, and without a Democratic governor there, those things won't be stopped." So what issues is Holscher running on? "Voters are very focused on making sure they have a leader who will protect Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, veterans and farmers," she said. "They want to make sure that their schools are funded, that has been part of the key to the success of Kansas. ... In terms of cost of living, the concerns I'm hearing are access to affordable child care, access to affordable housing, just some of those basics kitchen table issues." Holscher grew up on a farm and comes from a family of veterans. "I come from very humble roots. ... I want to make sure that everybody out there has the same opportunity to be successful in life and to have a shot at the American dream," she said. She and her husband of 33 years have three children, and the youngest just graduated from high school. "All of them are products of excellent public schools here in Kansas," she said. The family had moved to the Kansas City area, where Holscher worked at Sprint as "the head of the department that developed budgets" for operations west of the Mississippi River. "Revenue-wise, we're talking about budgets larger than what we do at the state Capitol," she said. Holscher entered politics at the urging of her daughter. The family had moved to Kansas in part because "the school were great," Holscher said. But then, "about the time we had kids going into school, that's when the Brownback experiment was happening. Our schools were losing teachers because of the budget crisis and underfunding, we didn't have paras, we didn't have janitors, we didn't have supplies." Then one weekend during a trip to Target, her oldest daughter saw one of her teachers working there. "She asked me why her teacher was working at Target on a weekend after having worked a full-time job all week and she had a family, and I remember telling her we were in a budget crisis and our schools were underfunded and her teacher probably wasn't making enough money to pay the bills," Holscher said. "My daughter looked at me and said, 'You go fix that.'" Holscher said she has taken a collaborative approach to politics. "My first term (I) was a co-founder of the women's bipartisan caucus, and we worked to formulate the plan that ended the Brownback tax experiment," she said. "So obviously, when you're talking about a Legislature that has a majority of the other party, collaboration, reaching across the aisle, is going to be very important." Democrats have performed better in northeast Kansas communities like the Kansas City metro, Lawrence and Topeka. Appealing to voters in other parts of the state starts with "actually going to those places," she said. "I grew up in a rural area, so I enjoy going to those areas," she said. "And at the heart of it, a lot of our issues are the same. Sometimes we don't always see that, but a lot of our issues are the same. But I think it also helps too in respect that my district that I serve is Republican leaning. That obviously kind of makes a difference in having an understanding of who all you are serving. "I'm not here just to serve a certain segment. I'm here to serve all Kansans." Jason Alatidd is a Statehouse reporter for The Topeka Capital-Journal. He can be reached by email at jalatidd@ Follow him on X @Jason_Alatidd. This article originally appeared on Topeka Capital-Journal: Cindy Holscher is first major Kansas Democrat in 2026 governor's race
Miami Herald
31 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Senate Republicans want to trim some of Trump's populist tax cuts
WASHINGTON -- Even before the House passed the sweeping bill carrying President Donald Trump's domestic policy agenda, Senate Republicans made it clear that they hoped to make major changes to the legislation before the GOP was done muscling it through Congress. Several have wanted to pare back the cuts to Medicaid, the health care program for the poor, that House Republicans envisioned in the version of the legislation that they approved late last month. A handful have sought to salvage tax credits incentivizing clean energy projects that the House measure would repeal. Many have pushed to grant companies prized tax breaks for the long run, not just for a few years, as their colleagues across the Capitol opted to do. The problem senators face is that each of these changes would be expensive. At $2.4 trillion, the cost of the legislation that barely passed the House is already huge. So Senate Republicans are now hunting for ways to save money, a hazardous task that could involve shaving the ambitions of their colleagues in the House or the White House. On the chopping block are some of Trump's favorite parts of the bill, like not taxing overtime. Republican lawmakers have long been skeptical of some of the president's tax ideas, with the view that the populist policies will not spur the economy like traditional supply-side conservatism can. 'I think it all comes down to what we've got to pay for,' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said. 'At the end of the day, we've got to pay for pro-growth policies.' The debate is in some ways a classic one on Capitol Hill, where throughout history and without regard to political party, senators have been reluctant to defer to their colleagues in the House, and vice versa. 'It's the Senate, so the Senate is going to do what it damn well wants to do, and that's a good process,' Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said at a Punchbowl News event Wednesday, where he warned that his chamber would pass a bill 'markedly different' from the House measure, pushing enactment of the package well past his party's July 4 deadline. To top Senate Republicans, the most economically powerful tax cuts incentivize companies to make new investments and conduct research. Accelerated depreciation schedules, though, do not grab political attention the way Trump's promises for 'no tax on tips' did, so the House version of the bill only included the business tax breaks through 2029. Senate Republicans want to make the business write-offs a permanent feature of the tax code, a change that they and some economists believe would help encourage more companies to expand. As one way to cover that cost, Senate Republicans are looking at ways to further curb eligibility for a tax cut for overtime pay, including by setting a lower income ceiling for the break and by more strictly defining what counts as overtime, lawmakers said. 'Obviously, there's a lot of dials, whether you're talking about no tax on tips, overtime, any of those,' said Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. 'How many years did they go? At what level do they stop?' Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, a former car dealer, wants to tighten the House plan for allowing Americans to deduct up to $10,000 in interest on car loans, which would apply to vehicles made in the United States, including used and new cars, as well as all-terrain vehicles and recreational vehicles. Moreno is proposing to limit the tax break, one of Trump's campaign promises, just to loans for new cars. 'We save a lot of money. An RV? Motorcycles? ATVs?' he said. 'That's not the idea; the idea is to help working Americans be able to afford a car.' Senate Republicans are searching for cuts because of growing concern among some conservatives, as well as on Wall Street, about the bill's impact on the country's fiscal situation. While paring back some of Trump's campaign promises could help keep the cost of the legislation near what it was in the House, some lawmakers are calling for much deeper spending cuts. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has been loudly calling for the legislation, which already includes roughly $1.8 trillion in spending reductions, to slash trillions more. His complaints won him a meeting with top White House officials, including Vice President JD Vance, at the Capitol this week. Johnson's pitch is to remove all of Trump's new tax priorities from the bill and instead focus the legislation exclusively on extending expiring tax cuts from 2017, cutting spending and raising the debt ceiling. Republicans could then tackle White House priorities, and further spending cuts, in a second piece of legislation, Johnson argues. 'You can't do it in one fell swoop. I don't want to criticize what has been done; I want to support what's been done,' he said. 'But I absolutely -- I can't accept that this is the new norm. We need another bite of the apple in this Congress.' Of course, jettisoning much of the president's agenda from the legislation is a tall order, and White House officials have been making the case for the House measures to cut taxes on tips and overtime and for older Americans. 'No Tax on Overtime and No Tax on Tips are presidential priorities that 80 million Americans voted for in November,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement. 'They will remain in this historic piece of legislation in order to deliver the largest tax cut in history.' There are other sources of money tempting Senate Republicans. Some are considering cuts to Medicare, though changes to the health care program for older Americans comes with substantial political risks. Then there is the state and local tax deduction, often called SALT. In the House, a small group of Republicans from New York, New Jersey and California demanded that the legislation include an increase to the $10,000 cap on the deduction. They ultimately won an agreement to set the new limit at $40,000, an expensive change that would largely benefit homeowners in areas with high taxes. While the change was necessary to win the support of blue-state Republicans in the House, senators are less committed to the policy. Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., the majority leader, recently remarked at the White House that 'there really isn't a single Republican senator who cares much about the SALT issue.' At the same time, House Republicans committed to more SALT relief have warned that changing the House agreement could scuttle the entire package. But some Republican senators cannot help but think that money earmarked for a higher SALT cap could have a better use. 'There's a lot of things we could do with that,' said Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
