This Government-Funded Snack From The '60s Was Originally Made For Astronauts
Pillsbury was tasked with creating the first space-safe solid food by none other than the Quartermaster Food and Container Institute of the United States Armed Forces in the early '60s. The company started with teeny condensed food cubes, which were chowed down by NASA astronaut Scott Carpenter on the Aurora 7 in the summer of 1962. A few years later, NASA had another assignment for Pillsbury: create an energizing snack that could fit through an astronaut's helmet.
The airtight suits didn't make it easy, but Pillsbury delivered with Space Food Sticks. The nutrient-packed snack was like a chewy chocolate power bar squeezed into a thin tube, which made it a hit for not just astronauts but growing kids everywhere. Before it was a popular lunchbox snack, Space Food Sticks accompanied Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong to the moon in 1969.
Read more: 15 Vintage Snacks No One Remembers Anymore
The energizing snack may have been made exclusively for astronauts, but it was a far bigger hit on Earth. Early advertisements for Space Food Sticks declared they were "developed by Pillsbury under a government contract, in support of the U.S. aerospace program" — but that language didn't last long. Into the next decade, Pillsbury began running ad campaigns for the astronaut-endorsed snack, but more geared towards Earthbound folks. The concept of Space Food Sticks integrated seamlessly with the other space-themed commercials of the time, making them an instant sensation. In later ads, Pillsbury kept it simple, labeling Space Food Sticks as a "balanced nutrition snack."
Buzz and Armstrong only got a taste of the original chocolate flavor, but Pillsbury introduced dozens of other varieties over the years. Each flavor seemed to hang onto the "chewy" descriptor, with added flavors like peanut butter, orange, caramel, and chocolate mint. There are dozens of vintage snacks that no one really remembers anymore, but Space Food Sticks should never be forgotten. Only a few years after they were introduced, Pillsbury dropped the word "space" from the label, shortening them to just Food Sticks, but the legacy lives on.
Read the original article on Tasting Table.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
3 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
The Real Nuclear Moonshot Is Here on Earth
In America in 2025 it's tough to know which we will see first, the Epstein files or a nuclear power plant on the Moon. The Trump administration certainly seems more committed to the latter. Transportation Secretary and acting head of NASA Sean Duffy has reportedly issued a directive aiming for a lunar-ready reactor by 2030. This is certainly one way of pushing more federal funding toward advanced reactor research. It also magnifies, through a fantastical lens, the broader hype around new nuclear power — and the daunting challenge of getting it deployed to meet our more immediate needs for carbon-free power back here at home.
Forbes
35 minutes ago
- Forbes
NASA Is Already Prepping To Build Trump A Nuclear Reactor On The Moon
T his week NASA administrator Sean Duffy declared the Trump Administration's intention to land a working nuclear fission reactor on the moon by the end of the decade. 'We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon,' Duffy said. Planting reactors is more effective than planting a flag in the lunar dust. Duffy referenced the idea of a 'keep-out zone' around a reactor that effectively lays claim to a desirable area, like a craters holding frozen water. Does Duffy's 5-year timetable seem too aggressive? Not particularly, when you consider that NASA and its many contractors have been relying on atomic power for a long time. Since the 1960s, NASA has powered Apollo missions, space probes and Martian landers using radioisotopic batteries that turn the heat emitted by Plutonium-238 and other decaying isotopes into electricity. The Apollo devices are still on the moon with those on Voyager and Pioneer probes were the first manmade objects to leave the solar system. But those devices only put out 100 watts or less. The nuclear fission reactors like what Duffy is talking about are far more complicated. They generate heat by splitting apart Uranium-d238, and would put out 100 kilowatts enough to power a couple dozen homes on Earth. Do we need nuclear on the moon? A decade ago, NASA decided the answer was yes. Nighttime lasts for 14 Earth days in many lunar locations, making solar panels unreliable. And you can't burn oil, coal or gas in a vacuum even if you could get it into orbit. Nasa first validated microreactor tech via the Kilopower project, then in 2022 gave $5 million grants to three consortia to perfect 40 kilowatt designs. The specifications of the Fission Surface Power Project called for a system that weighs just 6 tons, can fit into a cylinder 13 feet in diameter and 20 feet long, and can work for 10 years, self-regulated, with no maintenance or refuelling required. It's a tough remit, says Sebatian Corbisiero, the national technical director for space reactors at the Idaho National Lab, whose team selected the companies for the year-long Nasa study. 'On Earth reactors are not designed to be low mass and small. In space you need as little mass as possible, to fit on a rocket,' he says. Corbisiero does believe a lunar reactor is an important and necessary first step to developing systems that could sustain a Martian colony. As his research group found in 2023, 'Surface nuclear power is required for a sustainable lunar presence.' The three consortia Corbisiero's group selected for the 2022 contract are Lockheed Martin, with BWXT, a team that had already been working for NASA on DRACO, a $500 million demonstration spacecraft powered by a nuclear reactor. Then there's veteran reactor builder Westinghouse, partnered with Aerojet Rocketdyne, which plans to adapt its existing eVinci microreactor. The third is startup X-Energy, teamed with Maxar and Boeing. X-Energy is working on microreactor projects for Dow Chemical and Amazon, but aims to use its own nonstandardized fuel source rather than the standardized HALEU fuel (high assay low enriched uranium) that Nasa directives call for. Corbisiero is diplomatic and won't speculate on which company approach he prefers. The final system is likely to use a Stirling engine to convert fission heat into electricity and feature meltdown-proof liquid sodium circulation. Can we get one on the moon in five years? 'Yes, in my opinion it is doable,' he says. It will depend however on continued development of the rest of the Artemis flight system (the first crewed mission Artemis II is scheduled for early 2026) and whether NASA can get the money. On Earth, microreactors cost billions. According to Duffy, the Trump Administration thinks America can't afford not to plant reactors on the moon as soon as possible. China is planning its Chang'e-8 mission in 2029 to test out methods for building a lunar base with robots and 3-d printers by the mid-2030s. Duffy says both China and the U.S. want to monopolize the best lunar real estate, near the poles, where the sun always shines; 'We have ice there, we have sunlight there. We want to get there first and claim that for America.' More from Forbes Forbes How This Billionaire Family Is Succeeding Despite The Collapse Of The American Shipping Industry By Christopher Helman Forbes Why Ramaco Says It Can Beat Its Government-Backed Rival For Rare Earth Supremacy By Christopher Helman Forbes How An Unassuming Geologist Cracked The Global Fertilizer Cartel By Christopher Helman Forbes Meet The Tiny Startup Building Stargate, OpenAI's $500 Billion Data Center Moonshot By Christopher Helman
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Could launching seeds into space breed hardier plants in Florida?
Something important for a Florida facing a hotter future was sent into space this week with NASA astronauts aboard a SpaceX rocket: Seeds. The hope is that when they return to Earth, they will produce hardier, more resilient plants. With Florida's agricultural and wild lands under increasing pressure from climate change, some scientists believe that sending seeds into space potentially could help strengthen them for what's ahead back on Florida terra firma. 'We know that the plants can adapt, be more resilient and continue growing in space,' said Wagner Vendrame, a horticulture professor at the University of Florida. 'In translating that back to Earth, our summers are getting very hot or even hotter. If those plants can handle stresses like heat, drought and floods back on Earth, it could be a major accomplishment – and a real benefit for farmers.' The mission sent 'representative crops' from several countries, including Argentina, Nigeria, Brazil, Costa Rica and the U.S., to the International Space Station laboratory. While the seeds won't experience heat, drought or flooding in space, they will be exposed to zero gravity and cosmic radiation. Scientists hope these conditions could trigger DNA changes that make the plants more resilient back on Earth. There's another long-term goal, too: exploring if plant seeds can adapt to microgravity to survive in space for long-term missions to Mars or the moon. 'We're going to the Moon…to stay! After that, we go to Mars!,' said NASA Administrator Sean Duffy in an Aug. 1 press release. Among the Florida plants sent were rare native orchid seeds, such as the night-scented orchid, which grows only in hammocks and swamps, and the Jingle Bell orchid, closely related to the ghost orchid. Other Florida species included a strawberry variety and a type of biograss used for cattle feed. Vendrame, whose research focuses on orchids, said many of Florida's native species are endangered. 'Whenever there is a flood, drought, or hurricane in the Everglades, a lot of the species fall from the trees and die,' he said. 'It will be interesting to see how these native orchids respond.' This space-growing method has already shown success in China. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency and BBC reporting, seeds of one of China's most popular wheat varieties sent to space produced an 11% higher yield than standard varieties, with improved drought tolerance and stronger resistance to pests. Vendrame said he has sent plant cell cultures to space in the past, but this will be the first time sending up Florida seeds. 'This is a new venture,' he said. Once the seeds return to Earth, scientists will examine their appearance, extract DNA to study genetic changes and test their physiology. 'We can measure seed respiration and compare space-grown seeds to those grown on the ground,' Vendrame said. 'It's really exciting. We'll have a lot of work to do.' Ashley Miznazi is a climate change reporter for the Miami Herald funded by the Lynn and Louis Wolfson II Family Foundation and MSC Cruises in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners.
