Ericsson to invests €200m in Athlone facility
Swedish communications technology company Ericsson is to invest €200 million over the next three years in a new Research, Development, and Innovation project at its Athlone facility.
The company said the investment aims to deliver next-generation open network management and automation capabilities with artificial intelligence, machine learning and advanced analytics.
Ericsson currently employs more than 1,300 people in Ireland, and the Athlone facility serves as its designated centre of excellence for intelligent network management.
The company said this latest investment underlines Ericsson's commitment to Ireland as a strategic hub for research and development.
"Ericsson has a long history and deep roots in Ireland spanning more than 50 years," said the Head of Ericsson's Athlone site and Network Management Engineering Unit, Denis Dullea.
"By delivering on this cutting-edge project, we're both investing in Ireland's future and empowering mobile operators worldwide," Mr Dullea said.
The project is supported by the Government through IDA Ireland.
"Ericsson's €200 million announcement at their Athlone facility is fantastic news," said Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke.
"Their innovative R&D project, which will span a duration of three years, will improve efficiency in 5G networks globally," he added.
CEO of IDA Ireland Michael Lohan said the investment strengthens the long-term legacy of Ericsson in Ireland.
"This RD&I project embodies cutting-edge innovation and exemplifies IDA's continued commitment to balanced regional development," Mr Lohan said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Borrow-ito: Concern as consumers take on debt for a takeaway
Economists and market watchers think the world may have a new recession indicator – the fact that more people can now take out a small loan to pay for their takeaway. This relates to a recently-announced partnership between Klarna and DoorDash – which is a big food delivery service in the US. Klarna has also partnered with Deliveroo Ireland (which was recently acquired by DoorDash). So we're not being left out in being able to borrow our way to a burger and chips. Let's take a step back - what is Klarna? Klarna is one of the main players offering what's called 'buy now, pay later' services. It's a Swedish company that's actually been around for 20 years, though it only launched in Ireland just under four years ago. And the way its BNPL business works is that you buy something from a retailer that partners with them – generally online. Then when you get to the checkout you're giving the option of either paying upfront as you normally would, or you can break the amount up and pay it in instalments over a number of weeks. That might mean breaking up a purchase price into four equal payments, spaced out over six weeks. So, for example if you buy a €500 TV, you'd pay €125 on the day, then another €125 in two weeks' time, another €125 in four weeks and then the last payment after six weeks. And when you do that there's no interest applied, no fee or charge or anything like that – you pay the same as you would have if you'd just bought it outright on day one. Instead, Klarna generally makes its money by charging a commission to the retailer for handling the payment. In a way it's very similar in spirit to the old-fashioned hire purchase option that a lot of appliance retailers here have offered for years. The big difference is that it's generally done over a shorter period of time - so it's a matter of weeks rather than months or years. And it's generally offered at a lower, or now cost altogether. And, it being a fintech, Klarna is designed to be easy to get set up on and use – so there's a much lower barrier to entry, and customers can get spending through it quite quickly. But while Klarna is the big player in this market, it's not the only one offering BNPL. Revolut offers it too – although it does charge a transaction fee, so it isn't entirely free. Retailers like Very have their own buy now, pay later option. Meanwhile there's Humm, which a lot of retailers here use. That's very much in the mould of the old fashioned hire purchase model mentioned before. Apple, meanwhile, also offer a BNPL option in some countries – but not in Ireland. Is there anything wrong with using BNPL? Not necessarily. Some people liken it to a credit card because, just like cards, BNPL is generally a relatively small, unsecured loan with minimal baggage attached. And, like a credit card, if you're smart in the way you use it, it won't cost you anything extra. In fact it can become simply another tool you have to manage your finances and expenses. But, like a credit card, BNPL does create an additional cost if you don't make your repayments in time. It could go from being free to very expensive, very quickly. And if you completely lose control of the debt, it could become a major problem for you. In the case of Klarna, it does warn customers that missed payments may incur a late fee – and it also reserves the right to pass on your bill to a debt collector, which obviously could get messy fast. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the company is more inclined to just write the debt off – certainly if it's small – and then block the user from being able to borrow anything else from them. But the risk remains that you could get pursued by what can often be an aggressive third party, which will apply fees and charges of their own beyond the money that you owe. But even without it getting to that extreme stage, not clearing a BNPL loan in time could become downright expensive. One of the other providers in Ireland offers interest free repayments for up to six months – but if you fail to clear what you owe by then, you get hit with a near 40% interest rate. That is approaching pay day lender territory. And bear in mind that this kind of lending generally isn't done with any kind of credit check behind it. That's part of what makes it so accessible to people, and so easy to get up and running. But it also means that the companies lending users the money don't have much information on their financial history, or on their repayment capacity, and so on. And one of the concerns expressed by the Money Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS) about this type of lending is that it could lead to a lot of customers doing what they call 'credit stacking'. This is where they have multiple, small loans spread across multiple providers. Maybe some are BNPL loans, and maybe they have a credit card or two as well. And each of them on their own might not be worth very much or particularly hard to manage - but combined they add up to a sizable ball of debt that is a burden to keep on top of. And the risk there is that, quite quickly, people can get overwhelmed by this, start missing payments, and start seeing the penalties and interest charges mount. Which just makes escaping the situation that much harder. Which is a big risk to take for a meal… Absolutely – and this is part of the concern that has been raised about this new dynamic. Because as cautious as you should be when borrowing for anything, big or small, when it's a purchase like an appliance, or even some clothes, there's a tangible benefit there. You would imagine that it's something the user will get value out of for a long time to come – long after they've actually covered the cost of it. But if they're borrowing money to pay for a coffee and a sandwich, it's going to be gone within an hour of them taking on the debt – and yet they'll still be expected to pay for it for weeks to come. Klarna, for its part, has defended these kinds of partnerships with food delivery apps and has made the argument that people have been using overdrafts and their credit cards to pay for coffees and takeaways for decades. The chances are, it says, that they were hit with hefty interest charges and fees when they did that. Which is true. Though personal finance professionals would urge people not to use credit cards or overdrafts for their food and drink; their advice isn't to replace one type of debt with another. So it may not be the strongest argument in favour of using Klarna. But what this move by Klarna and DoorDash – and Deliveroo here – to partner up is being seen as by some market watchers is one sign of the problems that are bubbling under the surface in the economy – particularly in the US. Just like Ireland, that country has obviously gone through a cost of living crisis over recent years –It was a major issue in the run up to the Presidential Election; and the price of eggs has remained a talking point in recent months. And now we're seeing the prospect of consumer prices there rising at a faster pace once again in the coming months, because of the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs. And that's led to this BNPL offer becoming attractive to enough consumers that Klarna and DoorDash think it's worth pursuing. Of course the internet has had great fun with this too – with tonnes of memes based around what people feel is the absurdity of the situation. There are lots of references to The Big Short and Wolf of Wall Street in there, talk about Taco Bell Credit Default Swaps, and one tweet saying 'it's 2026 and I have defaulted on my burrito debt' But all that aside, finance experts feel that - if borrowing money to pay for an everyday luxury like a coffee or a pizza, and maybe even groceries, is now attractive or necessary for a lot of consumers - then there is something fundamentally wrong with the system. And things are probably only going to get worse. Are Klarna even making money on all of this? No – not at the moment at least. In fact their losses have grown considerably recently. It posted quarterly results last month, which showed that its revenue and customer base was growing – but so too was the number of customers that were defaulting on their loans. It said $136m worth of loans were lost in the three month period – which was up 17% year on year. And if even some of that growth is coming from the likes of loans for food deliveries, it puts them in a bit of a bind. Because it's not like they can go and repossess a burrito – and they're probably going to even have a hard time getting a debt collection company interested in taking on such a tiny debt, especially not in a way that's going to be very financially beneficial. It should be said the rise in defaults wasn't the only thing that fed into their costs in the period – the cost of funding those loans got more expensive, while they also started offering staff share-based payments. But the fact that they were losing more of the money they were supposedly lending out did still feed into a more-than doubling in their losses for the period, with a net loss of $99m being 110% higher than its first quarter of 2024. And those figures represented the latest in a string of bad news stories for Klarna. It recently announced it was looking to hire 700 customer service workers, having previously tried to fill those rose with AI, only to find out that the quality of their service dipped as a result. And back in April the company also announced that it was pausing its plan to float shares on the stock exchange. It blamed the volatility created by Donald Trump's tariffs as the main reason for that, but there was a feeling within the market that the company wasn't quite ready to invite the level of scrutiny that would-be investors would require. And the big risk for them and businesses like them is that if there is to be an economic slowdown globally – which is is expected – consumers are likely going to be squeezed even more than they are at the moment. That might see people pull back from buying things that they don't already have the money for – meaning they won't need Klarna. Or it could mean they buy things through Klarna and then just refuse to pay them back. And either of those scenarios would mean that the fundamentals of the business would come under even greater pressure than is already the case.
The Irish Sun
2 days ago
- The Irish Sun
Rob Cross wins first darts match since being banned as company director over £450k in unpaid tax
ROB CROSS won his first darts match since his financial woes were made public. The 2018 world champion has been Advertisement 1 Rob Cross has won his first darts match since his financial woes were made public Credit: PA The Insolvency Service found that the Premier League Darts star withdrew more than £300,000 from Rob Cross Darts Limited between March 2020 and November 2023 that should have gone to creditors, including to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). The world No.9 also took out more than £400,000 from In an attempt to repay part of his debts, Cross has entered into an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA), a legally binding agreement where he has committed to making regular payments to an insolvency practitioner. Monthly contributions to the IVA will vary depending on the income he receives through his performances at darts tournaments during this year and future years. Advertisement READ MORE IN DARTS There is £30,000 available for the winner of this weekend's Nordic Darts Masters in Copenhagen and he began the event by beating Swedish thrower Andreas Harrysson 6-4 in round one. The world No.9 – who plays fellow Premier League star Chris Dobey in the quarter-finals on Saturday – says he spent Thursday walking round the Danish capital for '14-and-a-half miles'. Probably a chance to clear his head and get away from the news that was released by The Insolvency Service while he was away. Cross, 34, said: 'I've not picked up the darts for a while. Advertisement Most read in Darts Nordic Darts Masters Prize Money Here is a full breakdown of the total prize pot on offer in Copenhagen... Winner (1) £30,000 Runner-up (1) £16,000 Semi-finalists (2) £10,000 Quarter-finalists (4) £5,000 First round (8) £1,750 CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS 'I have had two-and-a-half weeks off. I had been a little bit lazy. I'll be better 100% in my next match. 'I didn't know where my game was at – I could have gone out there and hit 120 or a 48. Rob Cross follows Luke Humphries with stunning nine-darter 'Andreas is very dangerous and has played great. I am happy to get over the line and keep pushing. Tomorrow it has to come together. Advertisement 'To win this would be fantastic. I have had time off and some difficulties. But it would mean a lot to win it this week. 'Tonight could have been tougher with a few boos and whistles, it could have swung the game in his favour. 'We all feel it when the darts are flowing and the crowd gets on your back. I'm very appreciative of that. Darts is tough. 'It has been nice to be here. The weather was better than I expected. I thought it was going to rain. It's a great place to go out and fill your lungs out with some air.' Advertisement Cross famously won the PDC World Darts Championship in 2018 – he trounced the retiring Phil Taylor 7-2 in the final – on his debut appearance in the competition. His management team have declined to comment on the story.
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Japanese lunar lander crashes while attempting touchdown on the Moon
A private lunar lander from Japan crashed while attempting a touchdown on Friday, the latest casualty in the commercial rush to the Moon. Tokyo-based company ispace declared the mission a failure several hours after communication was lost with the lander. Flight controllers scrambled to gain contact, but were met with only silence and said they were concluding the mission. Communications ceased less than two minutes before the spacecraft's scheduled landing on the Moon with a mini rover. Until then, the descent from lunar orbit seemed to be going well. People await the update on the private lunar lander's attempt to touch down on the Moon (Kyodo News via AP/PA) Takeshi Hakamada, ispace chief executive officer and founder, apologised to everyone who contributed to the mission, the second lunar strikeout for the company. Two years ago, the company's first moonshot ended in a crash landing, giving rise to the name Resilience for its successor lander. Resilience carried a rover with a shovel to gather lunar dirt as well as a Swedish artist's toy-size red house for placement on the Moon's dusty surface. Company officials said it was too soon to know whether the same problem doomed both missions. 'This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' Mr Hakamada told reporters. He stressed the company would press ahead with more lunar missions. A preliminary analysis indicates the laser system for measuring the altitude did not work as planned and the lander descended too fast, officials said. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' the company said in a written statement. Long the province of governments, the Moon became a target of private outfits in 2019, with more flops than successes along the way. Takeshi Hakamada apologised for the mission's failure (Kyodo News via AP/PA) Launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey, Resilience entered lunar orbit last month. It shared a SpaceX ride with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which reached the Moon faster and became the first private entity to successfully land there in March. Another US company, Intuitive Machines, arrived at the Moon a few days after Firefly. But the tall, spindly lander face-planted in a crater near the south pole and was declared dead within hours. Resilience was targeting the top of the Moon, a less treacherous place than the shadowy bottom. The ispace team chose a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a long and narrow region full of craters and ancient lava flows that stretches across the near side's northern tier. Plans had called for the 7.5ft Resilience to beam back pictures within hours and for the lander to lower the piggybacking rover onto the lunar surface this weekend. Made of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic with four wheels, ispace's European-built rover — named Tenacious — sported a high-definition camera to scout out the area and a shovel to scoop up some lunar dirt for Nasa. The rover was going to stick close to the lander, going in circles at a speed of less than one inch per second.
