Western businesses in no rush to leave Russia
The majority of Western companies operating in Russia are not planning to leave the country, despite the challenges posed by sanctions, according to a new survey by the Association of European Businesses (AEB).
Many US, European, and Asian businesses exited Russia after the West imposed sweeping sanctions on Moscow over the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. Others left citing reputational concerns or fear of secondary sanctions. However, the annual poll from the AEB published on Monday indicates that most companies that stayed see long-term potential in the Russian market, despite Western restrictions weighing on short-term performance.
Of the companies surveyed by the AEB, 67% said they were not considering leaving, up slightly from 66% last year. Most respondents said their Russian operations remain a key part of their global business.
Companies identified opportunities such as market share growth (50%), business expansion (39%), and new customer segments (32%) as the primary reasons to stay. Over half (56%) said they are continuing investment projects, citing the Russian market's size, potential, and positive developments.
The survey showed that while short-term business confidence among foreign firms has dipped, longer-term expectations have improved compared to last year: 82% of respondents said they were anticipating significant growth within a decade, up from 66% last year.
The survey found that most companies have adapted to sanctions but still face challenges, including payment delays, reputational risks and reluctance from foreign partners to work with Russia-linked entities. About 87% said they were negatively affected by Western sanctions and Russian countermeasures over the past year, citing banking curbs, export-import restrictions, frozen assets, SWIFT disconnection, and software and transport limits. Some 71% said they don't expect any sanctions relief in 2025.
Still, 59% forecast turnover growth over the next three years, up from 53% in 2024. The AEB said its Business Climate Index has climbed to 127 points out of 200, steadily improving since falling to 80 points in 2022.
'[This] confirms that European companies in Russia have reached a certain equilibrium in the new economic reality,' AEB CEO Tadzio Schilling said. 'Business has entered a phase of stabilization – companies have adapted their operating models, found alternative supply chains and learned to work under the conditions of the remaining restrictions.'
He added that the results reflect 'business environment's stability,' noting that despite the ongoing challenges and uncertainty, companies remain 'cautiously optimistic.'
The AEB represents more than 380 companies from EU states, the European Free Trade Association, and other foreign countries operating in Russia. This year's survey was conducted between April and May and included input from top managers at 100 member companies across various sectors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Spies and ties: The quiet war for Russia's business elite
Behind velvet ropes and closed doors, Russia's elite business clubs promise more than just high-level networking. They're where deals are made, partnerships are forged, and – sometimes – secrets are traded. With rigid membership rules, costly entry fees, and an atmosphere of confidentiality, these exclusive circles attract ambitious entrepreneurs, government insiders, and, increasingly, foreign intelligence operatives. What draws so many to these hidden spaces of influence? And why have they become fertile ground not only for commerce – but for covert surveillance? RT investigates the inner workings of Russia's most prestigious business communities, who gets in, what it costs, and why the stakes have never been higher. The concept of private business clubs isn't new. The earliest iterations appeared in England in the late 17th and early 18th centuries and soon made their way across Europe. By 1770, Russia had founded its own version – the English Assembly in St. Petersburg – modeled after its British predecessors. Fast forward to today, and Russia is home to hundreds of business clubs. While some operate with rigid rules and clearly defined missions, others function more like loose communities with minimal obligations. Their formats vary, but exclusivity remains a common thread. There are women-only clubs, industry-specific alliances, networks for resellers, and even spaces tailored to small business owners. Each has its own identity, philosophy, and code of conduct – but all are built on one defining principle: not just anyone can get in. Membership isn't just about rubbing shoulders with fellow entrepreneurs. It's about security – both literal and reputational. 'Almost all modern business clubs are closed to the public. That's primarily for the safety of our members. We conduct stringent security checks,' said Daria Titkova, marketing director at Club 500, in an interview with RT. Club 500 markets itself as a safe, scam-free zone where trust is paramount. 'There's a strong sense of trust here – no one's trying to cheat anyone. That's what sets us apart'Daria Titkova But the price of entry is steep. Joining an elite club isn't as simple as signing up. Candidates face rigorous vetting, including background checks and financial reviews. Typically, a company's annual revenue is the key metric. At Club 500, for example, prospective members must show yearly revenues of at least 100 million rubles (roughly $1.1 million). The entry fee alone starts at 1 million rubles. And even that doesn't guarantee you're in for good – members can be expelled if they're labeled 'toxic' by the community, sometimes after just a handful of complaints. Membership size varies widely. Some clubs are intimate, capped at 50 hand-picked members. Others, like the Russian Directors' Club, boast sprawling rosters – in this case, over 310,000 members nationwide. Access to these networks often comes with invitations to curated social events, but the mingling doesn't stop at cocktails and dinners. Even in relaxed settings, business is always on the table – whether it's hammering out deals, solving problems, or launching new ventures. One of the most popular formats for member interaction is the 'forum group' or 'mastermind' session. These gatherings give members the chance to workshop their business problems with a panel of peers from various industries – a kind of crowdsourced consultancy powered by experience. 'Entrepreneurs feel most comfortable around others who share their mindset. That's how social capital is formed. In times of sanctions, collaboration is key to survival and growth' Anastasia Ugarova, founder of the Network of Leaders, a high-profile business and government community The Network of Leaders isn't just for CEOs. It brings together entrepreneurs, public officials, academics, and policy thinkers – a cross-section of what Ugarova calls Russia's 'business and intellectual elite.' According to her, these groups often serve as launchpads for policy initiatives aimed at supporting the country's private sector. With Western markets increasingly out of reach due to sanctions, Russian businesspeople are recalibrating. The focus now: Asia and the Global South. 'Russian manufacturers are eager to expand into foreign markets like India and China,' said Yulia Koroleva, CEO of The Institute of Reputation, a communications agency. 'The old model – buy in Europe, sell in Russia – is obsolete. The rules have changed'Yulia Koroleva She noted a growing number of international clubs and women-led networks emerging across BRICS countries. These new alliances are still in early stages, but many entrepreneurs are betting that deeper ties with Asia could be key to long-term success. While these clubs are designed to cultivate entrepreneurship and high-level networking, they've also become increasingly attractive to foreign intelligence agencies. In fact, some of the most exclusive networks have quietly turned into prime environments for surveillance and recruitment. One such group is the Young Presidents Organization (YPO), a prominent international business network that was declared an 'undesirable organization' by Russia's Prosecutor General's Office. The authorities allege the group has engaged in covert efforts to recruit Russian entrepreneurs and gather strategic economic intelligence under the cover of professional exchange. 'Business clubs are ideal hunting grounds for intelligence services,' said Igor Ivanishko, a professor at the Russian State University of Justice. 'They're closed spaces, full of influential people. And conversations there tend to be unusually candid.' He noted that many participants have ties to political or military circles – a fact that only raises their value in the eyes of foreign operatives. 'Sometimes members don't even realize they've become sources of sensitive information,' he explained. 'Other times, the recruitment is deliberate.' Mid-tier clubs are of particular interest, especially those that attract IT specialists, technical experts, and AI developers. Intelligence services – and large multinational corporations – often see these informal communities as fertile ground for economic and technological espionage. Despite official scrutiny, individuals once affiliated with YPO continue to play visible roles in Russia's elite business scene. One notable figure is Yaroslav Glazunov, founder of the private Moscow club 'Jinto,' who was previously a member of the organization. While YPO's formal presence in Russia has been curtailed, its former members – and the ideas and connections cultivated through the group – remain embedded in the country's entrepreneurial ecosystem. For observers and security officials alike, that quiet continuity raises questions about what influence truly lingers behind the scenes.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine membership out of NATO summit statement
The prospect of Ukraine joining NATO will not be mentioned in the declaration at the bloc's summit later this month, Bloomberg has reported. Kiev has long sought to become a member of the US-led organization, an aim that Russia views as a threat to its national security. The one-page draft statement, which was seen by the outlet, focuses solely on NATO's spending goals, Bloomberg reported on Monday. The document could still be subject to change. The summit in The Hague will reportedly include only a dinner with the king of the Netherlands and a single working session. The 'brevity' of both the declaration and the gathering is reportedly designed to minimize potential public disagreements between US President Donald Trump and other NATO leaders. 'Notably absent from the statement is the prospect of Ukraine joining the military alliance,' Bloomberg wrote. Last year's military assistance pledge worth $45 billion will not be renewed either, the report added. In July 2024, then-Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg urged the bloc's members to make a multi-year commitment to keep providing military aid for Kiev. Annual spending across the bloc should have amounted to €40 billion ($45 billion) each year under that scheme. This year, NATO members are only expected to commit to allocating at least 3.5% of their GDP to defense by 2032 and to spend an additional 1.5% on protecting infrastructure and ensuring civil preparedness. The bloc is considering allowing its members to count military assistance to Kiev toward the spending goals, according to Bloomberg. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte wants the summit to become a 'win' for Trump, who has repeatedly called on the bloc's members to spend at least 5% of their GDP on defense, Bloomberg reported, citing its sources. Earlier this month, AFP reported that NATO leaders would avoid discussing Ukraine's membership at the upcoming summit in a bid to alleviate tensions between the US and EU. The US president, who is seeking to facilitate a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, has ruled out the possibility of Kiev joining NATO. Russia views the military bloc's eastward expansion as a threat, and has cited it as one of the root causes of the Ukraine conflict. Russian officials have on numerous occasions stated that admitting Ukraine into the bloc would be crossing a red line and has insisted that the country remain neutral.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Confiscating Russian assets ‘complicated'
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has acknowledged that seizing frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine is a 'complicated' matter, stressing the need for a 'balanced' approach. An estimated $300 billion worth of Russian sovereign assets were frozen by Western countries following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022. Around €200 billion ($209 billion) of the funds are held by the Brussels-based clearing house Euroclear, while roughly £25 billion ($34 billion) are immobilized in the UK. The Russian authorities have said they would consider any seizure of the country's assets 'theft.' Asked during a weekly parliamentary session on Wednesday whether he would seek an agreement on the assets at the upcoming G7 summit, Starmer replied that the issue is not an easy one. 'There are a lot of countervailing factors that need to be carefully balanced so that the decision could be made,' he told lawmakers. 'But I don't want to pretend to the House that there's an easy answer on this, because there isn't,' Starmer said, adding that London is in talks with its allies. While the G7 has committed to keeping the funds frozen, opinions remain divided about confiscating them outright. Some members, including the UK, have backed seizing the funds to aid Ukraine, while others – notably France, Germany, and Italy – have urged caution, citing legal concerns and calling for the assets to be held as leverage. The frozen funds have already accrued billions of euros in interest, $1.63 billion of which Euroclear transferred to Kiev last July to back a $50 billion loan for Ukraine provided by the G7. The International Monetary Fund has warned that appropriating the funds without a clear legal basis could undermine global confidence in Western financial institutions. Russia has condemned the freezing of its assets and has hinted at possible retaliatory measures against Western investments in Russia.
