ChatGPT Projects just got smarter — here's how to use the new tools
OpenAI's new ChatGPT Projects feature just got a huge upgrade, and it's a game-changer for anyone using ChatGPT to manage complex workstreams.
Whether you're planning a major event or project, a busy professional or just trying to keep your thoughts organized, Projects gives you a centralized hub where your chats, files and instructions can all live in one focused workspace.I have found it extremely helpful for keeping Custom GPT instructions in one place in case there is another ChatGPT outage. I also use it to keep all my favorite prompts in one place.
Here's everything you need to know to get started, including how to create a Project, what it can (and can't) do, and why it just might become your favorite new productivity tool.
ChatGPT Projects are like folders for your chats. Each 'Project' lets you:
This makes Projects ideal for larger tasks that require ongoing iteration, deeper context or collaboration. I'm currently using it for all the polished images and edits for my current middle grade novel – it's a breeze having everything in one place.
To create a new Project:
In the left-hand sidebar, click New Project
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Give it a clear, goal-oriented name (e.g., 'College Applications,' 'Business Ideas' or 'Novel Outline')
Upload any relevant files and add custom instructions to guide ChatGPT's behavior. This is a great time to use the '3-word-rule' (e.g., 'Act like a UX expert giving me design advice')
Instructions you add here will only apply inside this Project — not to your general ChatGPT usage elsewhere.
You can drag and drop existing chats into a project or use the menu next to any chat to select Move to project or Create new project.
Once a chat is inside a project, it will take on that project's custom instructions and can reference any files you've uploaded. This creates a seamless thread of context that helps ChatGPT deliver smarter, more consistent responses.
To remove a chat from a project, just drag it out or choose Remove from the chat's menu.Here's something worth considering: although there is a separate Image Library, I like to use Projects to keep the images together for a specific project. That way everything stays organized and in one place.
Projects support a wide range of tools, making them a one-stop shop for research, planning, and execution.
Even better? Only the individual chat is shared — not your entire project or its files/instructions.Inside Projects you can:
Each user can create unlimited Projects (with up to 20 files each, subject to subscription rate limits). If you're done with a Project, you can delete it by clicking the three-dot menu next to the Project name.
This will permanently erase all chats, files and custom instructions inside. It's a good idea to delete unnecessary chats and files to ensure you never run out of space.
Once deleted, the content is purged within 30 days — so be sure to back up anything important.
If you have memory enabled on your ChatGPT account, Projects can reference past chats and uploaded files to provide more relevant, consistent answers. This is especially useful for long-term or multi-phase work, like writing a novel or managing a product launch.
Note: To enable full memory functionality in Projects, make sure both Saved Memories and Reference Chat History are turned on in your settings.
Use the Search chats bar to quickly pull up any conversation across your Projects.
You can remove files, merge documents, or break your work into multiple Projects if you hit your file limit.
For Pro, Team, Enterprise, and Edu users, ChatGPT does not use project data to train its models. If you're a free user or on a personal Plus/Pro plan, training can happen only if you've opted into model improvement.
For enterprise-level users, Projects inherit all your workspace's existing settings — including encryption, audit logs, feature availability and data residency. Admins can't yet disable Projects entirely, but they maintain full control over retention windows and tool access.
Whether you're managing a solo side hustle or leading a team initiative, ChatGPT Projects make it easier to keep everything aligned and all in one place.
The feature's mix of organization, chat tools and deep memory integration turns ChatGPT into something so much more than a chatbot. It becomes your creative, analytical, always-on partner.
It's completely changed the way I work and stay organized.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
The CEO of British telecom giant BT warns AI could lead to further job cuts at the firm
Executives warning of the potential impact of artificial intelligence on white-collar jobs is becoming an increasingly familiar tale. The latest is Allison Kirkby, the CEO of British telecommunications giant BT. In an interview with the Financial Times published Sunday, Kirkby said that advancements in AI technology could lead to further cuts at the firm. BT announced in 2023 plans to cut up to 55,000 jobs by 2030 as part of a push to reduce its cost base by the end of the decade. But Kirkby told the FT that this plan "did not reflect" AI's "full potential." "Depending on what we learn from AI ... there may be an opportunity for BT to be even smaller by the end of the decade," she said. BT has turned to AI in recent years to reinvent processes in areas like customer service. The company announced in 2024 that it was using generative AI to aid sales and support operations across BT and EE, its mobile network division. In December, the firm said that EE's virtual assistant, dubbed "Aimee," was handling up to 60,000 customer conversations a week. BT is not alone in its attempts to automate such tasks. Swedish payments company Klarna has been open about its efforts to use AI to run its customer service desks. In 2024, Klarna said its OpenAI-powered AI assistant was carrying out the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. The firm's CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, has been a strong advocate of AI but has since softened his position on the tech, saying in May that certain cost-cutting efforts had gone too far and that Klarna was now recruiting for its customer service operation, Bloomberg reported. But Siemiatkowski has remained confident that AI poses a major threat to white-collar jobs going forward. Speaking on The Times Tech podcast earlier this month, Siemiatkowski said that the technology had played a major role in "efficiency gains" at Klarna and that its workforce had reduced from about 5,500 to 3,000 people in the last two years as a result. "My suspicion again is that there will be an implication for white-collar jobs, and when that happens, that usually leads to at least a recession in the short term," he added. "Unfortunately, I don't see how we could avoid that, with what's happening from a technology perspective." AI companies themselves have sounded the alarm that their product could significantly impact the job market. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently warned that AI could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years. "We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," Amodei told Axios in May. "I don't think this is on people's radar.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Has AI started replacing junior software developers?
-- In a note this week, Barclays analysts told investors that, using job posting data, it has investigated whether the introduction of AI has begun to impact junior software developer roles. Their analysis, spanning the S&P 500, the broader Tech sector, and the Magnificent Seven companies (excluding Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN)), reveals diverging trends. Barclays defines a "Jr. Software Developer (Jr. SDE) role as the one requiring less than three years of experience and a job title that includes the string 'software develop.'" The bank calculated the ratio of junior SDE roles to total job postings monthly, stating that "the ratio of Jr. SDE roles to total job postings has declined in the S&P 500 and Tech sector since 2022," while it "peaked in early 2025 for the Magnificent Seven companies (excluding Amazon)." To assess the impact of AI, Barclays conducted a regression analysis, correlating the junior SDE-to-total job posting ratio with the "number of months since ChatGPT's release." For the S&P 500, they "observe a significant negative relationship between the number of months since ChatGPT's release and the ratio of Jr. SDE roles to total job postings." The bank says this trend is also present in the broader tech sector, though not statistically significant. In contrast, "the Magnificent Seven companies show a significant positive relationship – suggesting that as time since ChatGPT increases, so does the share of Jr. SDE roles in their job postings." Barclays notes that "Several factors could explain these differences," such as job postings not perfectly reflecting hiring activity, or large tech firms, as primary AI developers, "most actively reshaping junior developer roles." Related articles Has AI started replacing junior software developers? 2025 Global Technology Conference: What did we learn? Rare earth supply risks: Is Tesla the real target by China? Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump must stop the AI bloodbath before it's too late
A white-collar bloodbath is coming. Not in theory. Not in ten years. It's already begun. Tens of millions of entry-level jobs — gone. Mid-level coders, paralegals, junior analysts, HR coordinators, customer service agents, entire rungs of the labor force about to be vaporized by artificial intelligence — not because it's more ethical or more productive, but because it's cheaper, quieter and doesn't complain. Unless President Trump acts fast, America's economic foundation — work itself — will be hollowed out and handed over to a class of unelected engineers and Silicon Valley kingmakers who believe your relevance should be determined by a model's capabilities. This is not paranoia. It's happening now. And the architects aren't hiding it. The people building this technology — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google — aren't sugarcoating the situation. They've run the simulations, watched the user metrics and tested the capabilities. AI is about to gut entire sectors of the economy from the inside out, beginning with those least able to absorb the blow: young Americans trying to get a foothold in a career, middle-class parents working clerical jobs to keep food on the table, veterans retraining to survive in a digital economy that shifts faster than policy can blink. This is where the president must make a choice that actually matters: Will he defend the American worker, or will he let Silicon Valley redraw the economic order while the middle class is shoved silently off the map? Trump built his MAGA movement on a promise — not just to revive the economy but to restore dignity through work. To bring back jobs. To make labor meaningful again. To tell the forgotten men and women of this country that they matter, because what they do matters. That mission now faces a threat unlike any we've seen. Not foreign competition. Not global offshoring. But extinction-by-algorithm. And as bleak as it looks, it isn't too late. Not yet. The federal government still has tools, and the presidency still has teeth. But it will take nerve. It will take a president willing to do something rare in this moment: to say no. No to unchecked automation, no to the idea that human labor is an inefficiency to be optimized away, no to the lie that faster always means better, and cheaper always means smarter. Trump doesn't need to burn Silicon Valley to the ground. He just needs to remind it who owns the rails. If a company takes money from the federal government through contracts, grants, subsidies or loans, it should not be allowed to quietly fire American workers and replace them with bots. No taxpayer should fund their own obsolescence. If these companies want the benefits of public money, then they answer to the public. And the public has a right to know who's getting replaced, when and why. Every company automating away jobs should be forced to disclose it, openly and in real time. Let the American people see which corporations are killing jobs while posting record profits. If they're proud of their efficiency, let them stand by it. If they're going to replace workers, let them say it with their chest. Enough with the silent rollbacks and euphemisms. Enough with the term 'augmented' when what you mean is 'deleted.' And if they insist on automating, fine. But they can pay for the damage. Every AI transaction, every commercial model use that replaces a real person's job, should be taxed. Not to fund some utopian universal income experiment, but to pay for something real: job retraining, trade schools, small-business grants for human-led enterprises. America isn't a testbed. It's a country. And it deserves policy that defends people, not models. And then there's the future. Not the tech future but the human one. We need a Federal Job Corps that actually builds futures again. Not a holding tank for the unemployed, but a launchpad for Americans ready to work in sectors AI can't touch: critical trades, skilled manufacturing, energy, health care, logistics, infrastructure. Real jobs. Real training. Real ladders. We cannot TikTok our way out of structural collapse. We cannot freelance our way into a middle class. If Trump wants to lead this nation through the next decade, he must be more than a fighter. He must be a builder of new ground. A president who understands that the battle ahead isn't just about borders or budgets, it's about value. What we value. Who we value. And whether the average American has any place left in the economy being written for them behind closed doors. AI is not evil. But the hands controlling it aren't neutral. They're interested in profit, in scale, in optimization. Not patriotism, stability or sovereignty. Trump can put a stop to this. But he has to act now. Because if MAGA doesn't mean standing between the American worker and extinction-by-code, then it doesn't mean anything at all. John Mac Ghlionn is a writer and researcher who explores culture, society and the impact of technology on daily life.
