The CEO of British telecom giant BT warns AI could lead to further job cuts at the firm
The latest is Allison Kirkby, the CEO of British telecommunications giant BT. In an interview with the Financial Times published Sunday, Kirkby said that advancements in AI technology could lead to further cuts at the firm.
BT announced in 2023 plans to cut up to 55,000 jobs by 2030 as part of a push to reduce its cost base by the end of the decade.
But Kirkby told the FT that this plan "did not reflect" AI's "full potential."
"Depending on what we learn from AI ... there may be an opportunity for BT to be even smaller by the end of the decade," she said.
BT has turned to AI in recent years to reinvent processes in areas like customer service.
The company announced in 2024 that it was using generative AI to aid sales and support operations across BT and EE, its mobile network division. In December, the firm said that EE's virtual assistant, dubbed "Aimee," was handling up to 60,000 customer conversations a week.
BT is not alone in its attempts to automate such tasks. Swedish payments company Klarna has been open about its efforts to use AI to run its customer service desks.
In 2024, Klarna said its OpenAI-powered AI assistant was carrying out the work of 700 full-time customer service agents.
The firm's CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, has been a strong advocate of AI but has since softened his position on the tech, saying in May that certain cost-cutting efforts had gone too far and that Klarna was now recruiting for its customer service operation, Bloomberg reported.
But Siemiatkowski has remained confident that AI poses a major threat to white-collar jobs going forward.
Speaking on The Times Tech podcast earlier this month, Siemiatkowski said that the technology had played a major role in "efficiency gains" at Klarna and that its workforce had reduced from about 5,500 to 3,000 people in the last two years as a result.
"My suspicion again is that there will be an implication for white-collar jobs, and when that happens, that usually leads to at least a recession in the short term," he added. "Unfortunately, I don't see how we could avoid that, with what's happening from a technology perspective."
AI companies themselves have sounded the alarm that their product could significantly impact the job market.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently warned that AI could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years.
"We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," Amodei told Axios in May. "I don't think this is on people's radar.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia is the most underowned megacap stock, Morgan Stanley says
Nvidia (NVDA) may be the market's biggest AI stock, but institutional investors are still shying away. "NVDA is now the most under-owned large-cap tech stock," Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring wrote in a note. Though the chipmaker has grown into the world's most valuable company, investors don't hold it in line with its S&P 500 (^GSPC) weight. According to Woodring, Nvidia's market value accounts for 7.37% of the index, but its share in the average active institutional portfolio is 4.2%, an adjusted underweight of 2.41 percentage points. The gap is the largest of any of the 15 major tech companies Morgan Stanley's team tracks. The disconnect highlights Nvidia's unique position. Its stock has been one of the best-performing names — up nearly 1,300% in the past five years — thanks to the AI boom. But its rapid rise and ongoing risks tied to geopolitics and supply chains have made some investors hesitant to load up. History shows that underowned stocks often get pulled higher over time as investors gradually increase their holdings to match the stock's weight in the index. "There is a statistically significant relationship between low active ownership ... and future stock performance," Morgan Stanley wrote. By comparison, Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), and Amazon (AMZN) are also underowned, but not to Nvidia's extent. Microsoft was underweight by 2.39%, Apple by 1.66%, and Amazon by 1.40%. In contrast, the most overowned tech stocks include Intuit (INTU) at +0.83%, Oracle (ORCL) at +0.32%, and Dell (DELL) at +0.25%. Despite the underweighting, Nvidia's fundamentals remain solid. "Leading indicators of compute demand remain exceptionally strong with no signs of slowing," the firm's analysts wrote. "As supply chain constraints around rack-scale solutions ease and the U.S. government advances export license approvals for China, we continue to view Nvidia as a premier asset in the current era of AI dominance." Nvidia's stock has been up 33% in 2025, outperforming the S&P 500's 10% advance. Much of the optimism stems from demand for its graphics processing units (GPUs), used for AI and cloud-based enterprise applications. Still, not everyone is on board with the bullish sentiment surrounding megacap stocks. Torsten Sløk, Apollo Management's chief economist, previously told Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid that the current valuations in megacap tech stocks, and the index as a whole, may not be sustainable. (Disclosure: Yahoo Finance is owned by Apollo Global Management.) At the time, he pointed to internal data showing that the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios of the 10 largest S&P 500 companies, including AI stocks like Meta (META) and Nvidia, had surpassed levels seen during the dot-com bubble in 1999. Francisco Velasquez is a Reporter at Yahoo Finance. He can be reached on LinkedIn and X, or via email at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Gizmodo
6 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The Moment the AI Hype Cycle Really Kicked In
Does it feel like news about artificial intelligence is inescapable? You're not just imagining it. Zach Perkel, the Principal and Director of Applied AI at enterprise AI firm Fractal, tracked the number of AI-related posts that managed to crack the top 10 stories on Y Combinator's Hacker News, and found that we are experiencing peak AI (so far). Perkel analyzed 24,910 articles and posts that managed to crack the Hacker News top 10 from January 1st, 2019, to August 15th, 2025, to determine just how much momentum the hype train has gained. He found that interest in AI has seemingly 10x-ed from the first quarter of 2019, when just 39 AI-related posts managed to crack the list. By contrast, the third quarter of 2025, which is just barely halfway through its calendar period, has already seen 337 bits of AI content at the top of Hacker News. It's no surprise that we're talking about AI significantly more now than we were in a pre-ChatGPT, pre-AI everywhere world. But what is a bit shocking is just how much the conversation has accelerated recently. Per Perkel's data, a huge spike in AI interest happened between the fourth quarter of 2022—which encompasses the public release of ChatGPT on November 30, 2022—and the first quarter of 2023, when conversation about the implications of the tool really started to heat up. That period saw a leap from 89 AI-related stories in the top 10 for Q4 2022 to 174 stories in Q1 2023. But that leap—the one that captures the moment we went from the public-facing chatbot not existing to being the dominant way in which people interact with AI—is the only one that is larger than the leap experienced between Q2 2025 and Q3 2025. Given that we're not even through this quarter, it's safe to assume that this will become the biggest spike in interest in AI yet. That's interesting, because Hacker News is not exactly for the uninitiated. It's not like that audience is just waking up to the accessibility or ramifications of widespread AI tools. It also makes Perkel's sentiment analysis of the posts a noteworthy indicator. He found that in the A.C. (After ChatGPT) era, no period has seen a larger percentage of negative posts about AI than the current quarter, which has seen 42% of posts critical of the topic. It also happens to be a new peak of a short-term trend, which has seen the sentiment on AI shift. In the first quarter of 2025, just 27% of top Hacker News posts on AI were negative. That jumped to 36% in the second quarter, which marked the highest percentage at the time since ChatGPT's introduction in late 2022—only to get topped again by the Q3 figures. There is almost certainly an AI bubble, though it's unclear if it's about to burst (OpenAI is on the verge of a $500 billion valuation). But there definitely appears to be an AI vibe shift.
CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
This 'picks-and-shovels' AI play is breaking out of resistance after seven years, the charts show
After seven years of trying to break through resistance, Bloom Energy (BE) has finally done it. Bloom Energy is known as a "picks-and-shovels" infrastructure play for the booming artificial intelligence build-out. Prior to the AI-boom, BE was focused on being a clean distributed power provider for businesses that needed reliability and lower emissions. Now, BE provides on-site power generation boxes (sometimes called Bloom Boxes) that supply always-on electricity with lower carbon emissions than the grid, that can also run on hydrogen with zero emissions, to hospitals, factories, utilities, and — you guessed it — also to data centers. In fact, Bloom just signed a deal with Oracle to supply power to their data centers. AI data centers are power hogs. Training and running large AI models requires a ton of electricity. Bloom's solid oxide fuel cells can sit next to the data centers and generate clean, reliable power around the clock and independent of the grid. Again, Bloom is not a chips / GPU play like Nvidia, but it helps solve the energy bottleneck that AI power demand is creating. Looking at the weekly chart, you can see the seven-year resistance (price ceiling level) that's been tested three times. Just last month, price finally closed above the $38 level creating a breakout. Thus far in August, we're holding above the newly formed support level and, as a result, we've begun building positions in our Active Opps model at Inside Edge Capital . Notice the cumulative shares traded in July of 240 million, the second-largest on record. The massive volume done in July and November 24 is certainly investors discounting the massive expected swing into profitability in 2026 to 53 cents GAAP earnings per share following a loss of 5 cents per share in 2025 as shown at the bottom of the weekly chart. Not shown is non-GAAP earnings that swung into profitability in 2024 with 28 cents per share earned compared to 10 cents per share lost in 2023 and a loss of 41 cents per share in 2022. Turning to the daily chart, we get a closer look at the seven-year $36-$38 resistance zone that was heavily traded in late July and early this month before finally pushing higher. That big volume spike on July 24 was the date the Oracle deal was announced . The prior three quarters showed a solid swing into profitability and consistent top line growth (red rectangle). The next three quarters look to be quiet in terms of growth, but again I believe investors are building positions ahead of the 2026 swing into more defined profitability. Turning back to entry tactics, the stock is down about 7% as a type of news that Vanguard trimmed its holding by about 0.3% but still owns approximately 19 million shares. The company is also showing about 9% short interest with an expected three days required to cover that short based on average daily trading activity. In our Active Opps portfolio, we just established a 3% allocation and will look to increase the stake to 5% or more if the key $38-$36 newly formed support zone holds. -Todd Gordon, Founder of Inside Edge Capital, LLC We offer active portfolio management and regular subscriber updates like the idea presented above. DISCLOSURES: Gordon owns BE personally and in his wealth management company Inside Edge Capital. All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer.
