
Texas flood survivors decry lack of aid, ‘toxic pit' conditions in special session
With no resources to drain Lake Ingram, it 'has become a toxic pit,' resident Ann Carr told the legislators.
'We've talked to divers that have been out there. They have found vehicles. We have asked them direct questions, 'Are there bodies in the water?' Their answers are yes,' Carr said.
Now, the city of Kerrville is refusing to drain the lake, which bubbles with oil from submerged automobiles, Carr said. With $28 billion in the state rainy day fund, she added, 'I think the state of Texas can help us clean our lake out.'
Others pointed to the consequences of the catastrophic flood damages, which hit a region where about 99 percent of residents didn't have flood insurance.
With as much as $25 billion in uninsured losses, 'many landowners are at high risk of losing their land,' said Terri Hall, a Kerrville resident who runs an anti-property tax group.
Hall said landowners lost outbuildings that neither insurance nor FEMA will pay for, leaving them easy pickings for private equity. The affected areas, she said, 'have a high vulnerability to having big corporations like Blackrock swoop in and buy up our beautiful riverfront and turn Kerr County into something that we won't recognize.'
State leaders mostly listened and murmured their support to survivors. But earlier in the hearing, they were unsparing in their criticism of local officials on the subject of training and warnings.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) told County Judge Rob Kelly that he didn't 'know where you were on Day One, on July 4, but you should have been here. You should have been here directing that response. That is your responsibility.'
'Everyone was here that day working their ass off, and you were nowhere to be found,' Patrick added.
'The three guys in Kerr County who were responsible for sounding the alarm were effectively unavailable. Am I hearing that right?' Houston-area state Rep. Ann Johnson (D) demanded of local officials. 'Is there a protocol that needs to be put in place? That, if the three folks who are responsible at this moment are not available for whatever reason, what should we do?'
When Kelly told legislators that it wouldn't be hard to institute a better program of training, state Sen. Charles Perry (R) said that fact, while true, was 'sad.'
'I don't know how you can be good at what you do if you haven't practiced what you're supposed to,' Perry said.
In addition to the need for state and federal aid, residents and survivors coalesced around a few consistent themes, including a muddled and chaotic official disaster response, which survivors testified sometimes featured state resources showing up too late or not at all — or sometimes being sent away by locals.
'We had an entire pallet of chainsaws that were donated to disappear overnight,' one Austin-area volunteer told the panel. Another said that officials had stopped giving out aid to those whose houses had been swept away because a truck from beloved state grocery store HEB had showed up.
'Well, HEB, at that point, was giving out small little bags of groceries to people — just enough for an evening,' they said.
In Travis County, the state was almost entirely absent, said Timothy Mabry, who said he took trailers from the disaster site in Kerrville to Leander, just north of Austin, where local churches were running out of food, water and formula.
In that region, Mabry said, 'It was not the state doing the cleanup. It was not the government helping. It was the citizens. It was Texans helping Texans who are doing the work, and they're still doing the majority of the work. It was only after many cries and pleas for help and coordination with myself and many others of why resources in the state finally acknowledged what was going on there.'
'Nobody came,' Leander resident Aubrey Gallagher told the committee. 'There were no resources.
Other testimony focused on evacuation routes and warnings — or the lack thereof. Survivors described being trapped in deadly bottlenecks as they raced to escape the floodwaters, with steep ravines and fenced-off private land on one side and a rising river on the other — a direct consequence of the short notice that disaster was coming.
'Our home was 35 to 40 feet above the normal river water level, and by 3 a.m., the water was already at the house — and we had no warning,' one woman told the committee.
She and her family raced to their cars and out onto Highway 39, but 'there was nowhere to get out, and the water was rising too quickly to make it to higher ground, so we climbed onto our cars and into the trees.'
Perched there, she said, they watched 'other cars shoot down the river and massive trees, and prayed and planned for what we would do if our trees fell down.'
They were lucky, she said — other friends and neighbors drowned that night.
Many residents missed cell warnings, which went out late, because they didn't have cell service. Others who did found they didn't matter.
Alicia Baker, whose parents and 11-year old daughter died in the floods, was in a cabin on stilts when the floodwaters hit. They had signal, but 'the alert said seek higher ground. We're on stilts. Where were we supposed to go?'
Pulling at the shoulders of her blouse as she fought back tears, Baker urged the installation of smart flood meters — something the county had voted against in the past.
'We should actually have sensors in our water that would then alert sirens to go off,' she said. 'If I got an alert that said six to seven inches, I've been like, cool, that's the dock. It wouldn't have made that much of a difference. Now, when you're talking 30 feet, that's a whole other story.'
There was a bigger elephant in the room, one Kerr County man argued: that Texas development codes haven't kept up with the rise in extreme weather, and permits construction in the path of floods.
'Who is going to talk honestly about land use? I'm not asking necessarily for zoning mandates, but people should be informed when they build in flood areas.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Texas State House Panel Advances Gerrymandered Congressional Map
A Republican-led committee of the Texas House voted on Saturday to advance a new congressional map drawn to flip five Democratic House districts in favor of Republican candidates, setting up a showdown over redistricting next week. The vote came after a marathon 15-hour hearing on Friday in which the committee heard public testimony, almost all of it firmly against the aggressive changes that affect districts in Houston, Dallas and Austin, and along the U.S.-Mexico border. Several Democratic members of Congress came to Austin to testify, arguing that the proposed map would diminish the power of Black and Hispanic communities across Texas and violate the federal Voting Rights Act. Al Green, a congressman from Houston, said the map was 'racist.' Jasmine Crockett, a congresswoman from Dallas, vowed to immediately challenge it in court. But in the end, the Republicans on the committee voted to deliver the map that had been called for by President Trump, who said last month that he hoped to get five more Republicans in the House. Republicans currently hold 25 of Texas's 38 congressional seats. Todd Hunter, a Republican state representative of Corpus Christi who sponsored the legislation for the map, said the new lines had been drawn 'for partisan purposes,' not based on race, and that the resulting map was 'completely transparent, and it's lawful.' The map now must be considered in a committee on calendars, which was set to meet on Sunday. A first vote by the full Texas House could come as early as Monday or Tuesday. The State Senate must also approve the new map, or propose its own. Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has indicated support for redistricting, though he has not commented on the new map, which he can sign into law or veto. Texas Democrats could prevent the House from approving the map by failing to show up, denying the quorum needed for any legislative action. But doing so comes with political and practical risks: Republican leaders in the Texas House fast-tracked the redistricting legislation before introducing any bills responding to the deadly floods in the Texas Hill Country — putting Democrats in the position of potentially walking out on legislation that addresses needs caused by the flooding. And the Texas House adopted rules that call for fines of $500 per day for any member who is absent with out approval, a measure adopted after Democratic members broke quorum during a 2021 legislative fight over voting and redistricting. Nationally, Republicans have looked at redistricting in Texas — and potentially in other states where the party has control of the government, such as Missouri and Indiana — as a means to preserve a slim Republican majority in the U.S. House after next year's midterm elections, which have historically gone against the party holding the presidency. In response, Democratic leaders in California, Illinois and New York have said they were considering redrawing their states' maps to create additional seats for Democrats to win, and offset any Republican gains in Texas. Last month, Democratic members of the Texas House traveled to California and Illinois to meet with Gov. Gavin Newsom and Gov. JB Pritzker and discuss those possibilities.


CNN
12 hours ago
- CNN
FEMA plans to release nearly $1 billion in security funding after CNN report on proposal to slash it
The Federal Emergency Management Agency is making nearly $1 billion in disaster preparedness and homeland security funding available to communities nationwide, just one week after CNN reported on the agency's proposed plan to slash the programs at the direction of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA. In a notice sent to states Friday, which CNN obtained from one of the states, FEMA announced it is now taking applications for more than a dozen grant programs 'making nearly $1 billion available to communities across the country.' Just days ago, those grants were on the verge of being cut, according to internal memos signed by acting FEMA administrator David Richardson and approved by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, CNN reported last week. 'This announcement comes after a critical evaluation of all grant programs and recipients to root out waste, fraud, and abuse and deliver accountability for the American taxpayer,' the notice states. 'Unlike the previous administration, recipients of grants will no longer be permitted to use federal funds to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects, or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people.' In a statement to CNN, DHS confirmed the plans to release the funding but called the notion that it reversed course 'a load of hogwash.' The funds are being released following a thorough review of grant programs, it said, and 'will enable states to manage their preparation for disasters like fires, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, hurricanes, as well as incidents like terrorist attacks or massive cyber disruptions.' It remains unclear why FEMA decided to release the funds this week after issuing internal memos last week stating that it was seeking to eliminate the programs — a move that would have required approval from the White House budget office and Congress. However, those memos acknowledged in stark terms the potential risks of cutting the programs. The loss of one program that helps communities plan and train for disasters would 'leave state and local governments more vulnerable to catastrophic incidents,' one memo stated. Ending another that bolsters transportation infrastructure and terrorism protections would 'contradict the administration's commitment to a safer and more secure country,' the memo said. The reversal effectively preserves the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) – the largest of the programs previously at risk – which provides more than $500 million to help major cities prepare for catastrophic emergencies. FEMA's own memo warned that axing the program would create 'a less secure nation, especially at the border and in some of the nation's most targeted cities, including Miami, Washington DC, and Dallas,' CNN reported last week. According to Friday's notice, releasing the funds aligns with Noem's revised priorities, which include protecting locations that have a lower level of security, known as soft targets, and crowded places; supporting Homeland Security Task Forces; enhancing cybersecurity; securing elections, including verifying that poll workers are US citizens; and bolstering border response and enforcement. 'FEMA is committed to using these federal funds to empower states to take charge of their own disaster preparedness, response, and recovery,' FEMA said in its notice to states. 'This will strengthen the security and resilience of the entire nation.' The grants listed in Friday's notice include the vast majority of funding that had been marked for potential elimination last week. States can now apply for the grants. FEMA has until the end of September, which is the end of the fiscal year, to allocate the funds. The disaster relief agency is in the midst of an overhaul at the hands of the Trump administration, which is seeking to drastically shrink FEMA's footprint and shift more responsibility for disaster preparedness, response and recovery onto states. At the direction of DHS, FEMA had largely halted its process of selecting new grant recipients in recent months so it could review the programs. Last week, in response to CNN's reporting, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said the department was looking to cut 'unaccountable programs,' and did not dispute that the grant programs were on the chopping block. 'Secretary Noem and this Administration are focused on ending waste, fraud, and abuse across the federal government - and FEMA is no exception,' the spokesperson said at the time. 'For years, taxpayer dollars have flowed to bloated grants, political pet projects, and groups with questionable ties. That ends now.' In a Friday message, the spokesperson said, 'CNN is relying on a supposed leaked internal memo, claiming certain programs were under review, to assert a reversal in course by FEMA.'


CNN
13 hours ago
- CNN
FEMA plans to release nearly $1 billion in security funding after CNN report on proposal to slash it
The Federal Emergency Management Agency is making nearly $1 billion in disaster preparedness and homeland security funding available to communities nationwide, just one week after CNN reported on the agency's proposed plan to slash the programs at the direction of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA. In a notice sent to states Friday, which CNN obtained from one of the states, FEMA announced it is now taking applications for more than a dozen grant programs 'making nearly $1 billion available to communities across the country.' Just days ago, those grants were on the verge of being cut, according to internal memos signed by acting FEMA administrator David Richardson and approved by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, CNN reported last week. 'This announcement comes after a critical evaluation of all grant programs and recipients to root out waste, fraud, and abuse and deliver accountability for the American taxpayer,' the notice states. 'Unlike the previous administration, recipients of grants will no longer be permitted to use federal funds to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects, or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people.' In a statement to CNN, DHS confirmed the plans to release the funding but called the notion that it reversed course 'a load of hogwash.' The funds are being released following a thorough review of grant programs, it said, and 'will enable states to manage their preparation for disasters like fires, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, hurricanes, as well as incidents like terrorist attacks or massive cyber disruptions.' It remains unclear why FEMA decided to release the funds this week after issuing internal memos last week stating that it was seeking to eliminate the programs — a move that would have required approval from the White House budget office and Congress. However, those memos acknowledged in stark terms the potential risks of cutting the programs. The loss of one program that helps communities plan and train for disasters would 'leave state and local governments more vulnerable to catastrophic incidents,' one memo stated. Ending another that bolsters transportation infrastructure and terrorism protections would 'contradict the administration's commitment to a safer and more secure country,' the memo said. The reversal effectively preserves the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) – the largest of the programs previously at risk – which provides more than $500 million to help major cities prepare for catastrophic emergencies. FEMA's own memo warned that axing the program would create 'a less secure nation, especially at the border and in some of the nation's most targeted cities, including Miami, Washington DC, and Dallas,' CNN reported last week. According to Friday's notice, releasing the funds aligns with Noem's revised priorities, which include protecting locations that have a lower level of security, known as soft targets, and crowded places; supporting Homeland Security Task Forces; enhancing cybersecurity; securing elections, including verifying that poll workers are US citizens; and bolstering border response and enforcement. 'FEMA is committed to using these federal funds to empower states to take charge of their own disaster preparedness, response, and recovery,' FEMA said in its notice to states. 'This will strengthen the security and resilience of the entire nation.' The grants listed in Friday's notice include the vast majority of funding that had been marked for potential elimination last week. States can now apply for the grants. FEMA has until the end of September, which is the end of the fiscal year, to allocate the funds. The disaster relief agency is in the midst of an overhaul at the hands of the Trump administration, which is seeking to drastically shrink FEMA's footprint and shift more responsibility for disaster preparedness, response and recovery onto states. At the direction of DHS, FEMA had largely halted its process of selecting new grant recipients in recent months so it could review the programs. Last week, in response to CNN's reporting, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said the department was looking to cut 'unaccountable programs,' and did not dispute that the grant programs were on the chopping block. 'Secretary Noem and this Administration are focused on ending waste, fraud, and abuse across the federal government - and FEMA is no exception,' the spokesperson said at the time. 'For years, taxpayer dollars have flowed to bloated grants, political pet projects, and groups with questionable ties. That ends now.' In a Friday message, the spokesperson said, 'CNN is relying on a supposed leaked internal memo, claiming certain programs were under review, to assert a reversal in course by FEMA.'