Calm reported along Indian and Pakistani border after days of fighting
Indian and Pakistani authorities have said there were no reported incidents of firing overnight along the heavily militarised region between their countries, the first time in recent days that the two nations were not shooting at each other.
On Saturday, India and Pakistan reached an understanding to stop all military actions on land, in the air and at the sea, in a US-brokered ceasefire to stop escalating hostilities between the two nuclear-armed rivals that threatened regional peace.
Advertisement
The Indian army said in a statement: 'The night remained largely peaceful across Jammu and Kashmir, and other areas along the international border,' adding that no incidents had been reported.
Military chiefs on both sides will hold talks later on Monday (AP)
Senior military officials from India and Pakistan are scheduled to speak later on Monday to assess if the ceasefire is holding. There were fears it would not hold after both sides accused each other of violations just hours after it was announced.
Local government officials in Pakistan-administered Kashmir reported no incidents of cross-border firing along the Line of Control and said that civilians displaced by recent skirmishes between Pakistani and Indian forces were returning to their homes.
Pakistan's military spokesperson, Lt Gen Ahmad Sharif, said on Sunday night that Pakistan remains committed to upholding the ceasefire and will not be the first to violate it.
Advertisement
He also confirmed that senior military officials from both nations would speak on by phone on Monday.
There are hopes the ceasefire will hold (AP)
The militaries of the two countries have been engaged in one of their most serious confrontations in decades since last Wednesday, when India struck targets inside Pakistan it said were affiliated with militants responsible for the massacre of 26 tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir.
The tourists, mostly Indian Hindu men, were brutally killed in front of their families in the meadow town of Pahalgam last month.
India accused Pakistan of backing the militants who carried out the massacre, a charge Islamabad denied.
Advertisement
The incident first led to a spat of tit-for-tat diplomatic measures by both the nations, sending their bilateral ties to a near historic low.
Many people were evacuated in border towns amid the fighting (AP)
The two expelled each other's diplomats, shut their airspace, land borders, and suspended a crucial water treaty.
After Wednesday's strikes in Pakistan, both sides exchanged heavy fires along their de facto border in the restive Kashmir region followed by missile and drone strikes into each other's territories, mainly targeting military installations and airbases.
Dozens of civilians were killed on both the sides in heavy shelling, the two countries said.
Advertisement
The Indian military on Sunday for the first time claimed its strikes into Pakistan-controlled Kashmir and Pakistan last week killed more than 100 militants, including prominent leaders.
Lt Gen Rajiv Ghai, the director general of India's military operations, who will be talking to his Pakistani counterpart on Monday, said India's armed forces struck nine militant infrastructure and training facilities, including sites of the Lashkar-e-Taiba group that India blames for carrying out major militant strikes in India and the disputed region of Kashmir.
India's military chief Lt Gen Rajiv Ghai will hold talks later (AP)
Lt Gen Ghai said at least 35 to 40 Pakistani soldiers were killed in clashes along the Line of Control, the de facto border that divides the disputed Kashmir region between India and Pakistan. Five Indian soldiers were also killed, he said.
Pakistan's Information Minister Attaullah Tarar on Thursday said his country's armed forces had killed 40 to 50 Indian soldiers along the Line of Control.
Advertisement
Pakistani military also claimed to have shot down five Indian fighter jets and inflected heavy losses on Indian military installations by targeting 26 locations in India.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
European leaders plan to ask Donald Trump to justify his confidence of Israel-Iran ceasefire
European leaders gathering for a G7 summit with Donald Trump in the Canadian Rockies plan to spend the opening day asking Donald Trump to justify his confidence that Israel and Iran will make a deal that will mean 'peace soon'. As the military exchanges worsen and the death toll mounts on both sides, European leaders are intending to pin the US president down on his whole Iran strategy, including getting a definitive response on whether he will use his influence over Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to call a ceasefire, or instead let the war run its course. Trump's largely unsubstantiated remarks about 'peace soon' suggest the US president surprisingly believes a ceasefire is imminent. This would allow the rescheduling of US talks with Iran on its civil nuclear programme that had been set for Sunday but were cancelled after Israel launched its assault on Thursday night. The Israel-Iran hostilities – and their potential to upend the world economy – have at least initially usurped the G7 summit agenda, which had been set to be dominated by disputes over the war in Ukraine and US tariffs. In a bid to avoid public conflict, Canada, the summit host, has dropped the idea of a joint communique, and wants the seven leaders to focus on critical mineral supply lines, artificial intelligence, China and energy security. A total of 15 world leaders are due to attend the two and a half-day gathering in Kananaskis, just south of the Canadian resort town of Banff. In a close echo of Europe's largely unavailing efforts to make Trump more resolute in demanding a ceasefire from Russia in Ukraine, European leaders want to see if Trump has a plan for de-escalation in Iran. So far they have found Washington's messages to be contradictory, possibly reflecting divisions inside the administration. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, the Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, and the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, are trying to converge on a common line on Iran that goes beyond broad calls for de-escalation and restraint. Only Macron has attended a G7 summit before. On the way to the summit, which formally starts on Monday, Merz called for diplomacy to be given space, but added Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, and urged the country to stop bombing civilian targets in Israel. France, Germany and the UK, previously closely involved in the talks on Iran's nuclear programme, have been left in the cold by Trump, who insisted on seeking a bilateral deal with Iran. With so many pressing issues on the agenda, Europe will be cautious in deciding how much political capital to expend on calls for a ceasefire. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has said Israel's attacks were intended to sabotage diplomacy and that Iran's counterattacks will cease as soon as Israel's barrage ends. 'If the aggression stops, our reaction will also end,' Araghchi briefed foreign diplomats in Tehran on Sunday. Tehran denied a Cypriot claim that it had been asked to send private messages to the US, or that it had told intermediaries that the talks due to have been held in Oman would have been productive. Trump, as he has in the past, has blown hot and cold, praising Israel's offensive as excellent while denying Iranian allegations that the US has taken part in the attacks – an assurance Iran does not find credible. He warned Tehran not to widen its retaliation to include US facilities or interests. Sign up to Headlines Europe A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day after newsletter promotion Speaking after a phone call with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, he said 'we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict.' He gave no details, but the sticking point in the talks had been whether the US would permit Iran to retain a residual domestic uranium enrichment program. Iran insisted that despite the rapid increase in its highly enriched uranium stockpile, its nuclear programme remains entirely civilian in purpose. Israel claims Iran had a covert programme that represented a threat to its existence, and might even have been on the verge of giving terrorist groups access to nuclear weapons. The 2015 Iran nuclear deal, to which Iran broadly wished to revert, allowed Iran to enrich at low purity levels and be subject to monitoring. Europe's fear is that the conflict is quickly spiralling out of control, and the Israeli government's agenda is not just to expunge any traces of Iran's nuclear sites, but also to attempt to trigger regime change in Tehran, including by assassinating not just its military but political leadership. Israel has formally denied this. Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6, said: 'I think regime change is on the cards. I think the Israelis will take out the supreme leader if they can, as they took out [Hezbollah leader] Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut.' There will be growing pressure on Iran's current leadership to conclude that only nuclear weapons can protect Iran, making it more likely that the west would support an attempt to engineer the fall of the theocratic regime. With its 'axis of resistance', or forward defence strategy, in disarray due to assaults on Hamas and Hezbollah, and with Israel enjoying near impunity in the skies above Iran, Tehran is left dependent on its missile supply stock holding out and the security of its Fordow nuclear plant buried deep underground in the mountains north-east of Qom.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's tariff ultimatum forces country to promise to buy more American goods
Taiwan has promised to buy more American goods after Trump threatened the island nation with a 32 percent tariff. Taiwan's president Lai Ching-te said last month that the country would buy more American natural gas and oil, weapons and agricultural goods. The self-governing island is looking to form closer ties with the US as it faces rising pressure from China, which has threatened to annex Taiwan by force if necessary. Lai said Taiwan's promises would help create 'more balanced bilateral trade' as well as boost its energy autonomy and resilience. Lai also told the US congressional delegation he was hosting that Taiwan would support America's efforts to reindustrialize and lead the world in AI. Taiwan had a trade deficit of $116.3 billion with the US last year, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. As a result Trump proposed a 32 percent tariff against the island, which is currently on hold except for a 10 percent baseline duty, while negotiations take place. It comes as Taiwan's exports jumped 87.4 percent to $15.5 billion in May, as companies fired off shipments before tariffs hit. Both figures are a record, the Ministry of Finance said in a statement on Monday. Taiwan enjoys bipartisan support from the US, which sees providing Taipei with the means to defend itself against China as being in America's interest. Many politicians have argued that as well as arming Taiwan, close economic and trade ties with the US leave the island less vulnerable to economic coercion from Beijing. Taiwan's semiconductor giant TSMC recently invested $165 billion into building advanced chip factories in Arizona. The US is now the number one country for Taiwan's foreign investment and the island is the seventh largest importer of American agricultural goods. Trump first unveiled his 'reciprocal tariffs' on April 2, so-called 'liberation day.' The aggressive policies sent stocks sliding and caused a crisis in the bond market. Trump then backed down, bringing tariffs for most countries down to 10 percent while trade negotiations took place. The President then put the EU in his sights, threatening the bloc with a 50 percent tariff. He has since also put that threat on ice until July 9, and has said negotiations are going in a 'positive' direction. It comes as Trump declared a trade deal between the US and China 'done' on Wednesday. He said new rare earth minerals would be coming into the US from its top trade competitor. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump posted on his social media site Truth Social on Wednesday morning. 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China.' Consumers are already beginning to feel the pinch from tariffs, with prices rising from grocery shelves to new cars. Toyota is the latest car manufacturer to warn that its popular products are about to become more expensive. Mark Templin, Toyota's chief operating officer for North America, said the company is planning price hikes in response to Trump's 25 percent tariff on imported vehicles and parts. Walmart has also confirmed that it will have to raise prices as a direct result of Trump's tariffs. The grocery giant — which imports 60 percent of its goods from China — said it is passing along the 'unprecedented' costs of Trump's trade war on to consumers.
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
China will soon once again be the primary civilisation of the world
In May I had the opportunity to spend a month travelling around China. Many things caught my attention while I was there. In general, I came away with some strong and clear impressions, from what I observed, from interactions with people there and from things guides and others said. The first is that the infrastructure that has been built in the last thirty years or less is simply amazing, not just impressive but jaw-dropping. Most spectacular is the network of high-speed railway lines built since roughly 2005. Currently there are 30,000 miles of such lines, all built in the last twenty years. The total railway network, which has also been massively expanded, stands at 96,000 miles including the HSR lines with the plan being to extend it to 170,000 miles by 2050. According to the best estimates by outside observers, the return on this investment is between six and eight per cent. Since the system has largely been built from scratch, it features enormous brand-new stations the size of airport terminals. The trains, which run at 200 mph, are comfortable and clean and the ride is so smooth that the speed is almost unnoticeable. It is not only trains. There is also a series of airports all over China, most as big as major international ones in Europe. Again, these are brand new. Alongside the railways is a dense network of both long-distance motorways and modernised provincial and local roads. There are 114,000 miles of expressways with the rest of the national highway system amounting to 1.3 million miles (1.9 million kilometres). As with the rail system, this is being constantly extended. The big caveat is that building the infrastructure is one thing (not that Western countries are doing that) but the real challenge is maintaining it. The other aspect of infrastructure that anyone visiting China notices is the urban development. China has seen a dramatic process of urban development in the last two decades, with new cities springing up everywhere and older ones adding millions of new housing units. This takes a distinctive form, which is high-rise and high-density. Chinese cities and towns have grown upwards as much as outwards. Cities feature forests of high-rise towers, typically of thirty to forty floors. The initial impression is of uniformity but on closer examination that changes. Most of the towers are not simple boxes but have decorative features as part of the design and what seems a single mass resolves into grouped clusters of towers with similar styles. At ground level it becomes clear that each cluster is fenced off and forms a single gated neighbourhood, with retail and other facilities on the lower floors of the towers. The new cities thus have a high-density modular structure. The other feature of Chinese urban development is how green the cities are. There are trees and green spaces everywhere with most of the trees clearly planted in the last thirty years. The expressways and major roads have ivy growing up the sides of supporting pillars and boxes of flowers and plants along their lengths, all maintained. The pattern is what is known as a 'sponge city' with threads and 'holes' of greenery and open space between the high-rise neighbourhoods and the older low-rise ones and the very high-rise commercial centres. This pattern is far less car-centric than its American equivalent and although there are many cars, they are not at present the primary means of transportation. That is the electric scooter with swarms of them zooming around all of the streets, supplemented by both public transport and walking. Another difference between Chinese cities and many Western ones is their orderliness. There are no homeless people or beggars and although the cities are lively and dynamic you do not see or find anti-social behaviour. Public spaces are spotlessly clean, partly because of a veritable army of street cleaners (most of them older people) but also because littering simply does not happen. One reason for this is a low-key but pervasive police presence: each small neighbourhood has its own attached police officer with photographs of them displayed along with that officer's mobile number for contacting them. Police are highly visible. However, the evidence suggests that the police are simply backing up strong social norms of public behaviour, which strongly disapprove of anti-social conduct. The darker side of the orderliness is the degree of control. There are security checks at all transport terminals and most major historical sites or public buildings. Visiting many places requires photo identification, passports for foreigners, ID cards for locals. There is an important qualification to this though: while the security checks and ID system are uniform and national, the well-known social credit system is not – it varies considerably from one province or locality to another. This reflects a major feature of the Chinese state which is its relative decentralisation. The Party is not uniform and monolithic. Although there are national strategies and policies, each provincial or even city level Party has a great deal of autonomy and can pursue its own strategy to a great extent. As a result there is considerable variation in details of policy and strategy from one part of China to another. This is not novel – it reflects a system of governance found throughout the history of the Chinese state all the way back to its formation in 221 BC. This reflects one of the most surprising observations I made, the persistence and even reassertion of older Chinese ways of thinking and living. Although the cities and infrastructure are impressive, the striking feature is the prosperity and success of the countryside. Across most of China, rural towns and villages have new, modern housing, often funded by private savings. Alongside the network of major roads is a dense system of smaller paved roads and paths that connect the countryside to the national system. This is coupled with both near-complete electrification and internet provision. The pattern of agriculture is very traditional and strikingly different from the Western model. The rural landscape (and much of the open space around and within cities) is one of very small fields, more like allotments. What is practised is traditional Chinese intensive permaculture with regular rotation of crops and mixed farming, a pattern of agriculture that is very efficient in terms of yields but which does not rely on high energy inputs. It is however still very labour intensive but this is changing with urbanisation. However, there are still very strong connections between countryside and city, with many who have moved to the city retaining a connection with and responsibility contract for portions of rural land, which they still farm. The farming is very intensive – not a square inch of land suitable for farming is left idle no matter where it is. Agriculture is only one of many ways in which old China persists and re-emerges. Traditional ideas, such as the polarity of Yin and Yang are as strong as ever. Among the young there is a clear revival of traditional religious belief and observance, notably of Buddhism, but also of Taoism and Confucianism. Buddhist temples are crowded with young people, particularly women, who come not as tourists but to pray. The Party is comfortable with this and in many regions actively encourages it, rebuilding Buddhist temples and even Confucian ones. (That is surprising because of Confucianism being the official philosophy of imperial China.) In fact, the impression gained is that the ideological basis of the state is slowly but steadily shifting, to a hybrid one that owes as much to the historic traditions of Confucianism and Legalism as modern thought. The cult of Mao, while officially as strong as ever, is slowly fading not so much because of ideological repudiation as the simple passage of time. Mao is becoming simply another major historical figure, similar in many ways to his own role model, the First Emperor Ch'in Shi Huang Ti. The current system still has strong legitimacy but the Cultural Revolution is regretted. For middle aged people the figure who is admired is Deng Xiaoping, credited with the opening of China to the rest of the world and the transformation of the economic system from a command economy to a dirigiste market one. Another revered figure is Sun Yat Sen, the founder of the Republic in the 1920s. Uniquely, he is venerated on both sides of the Taiwan Strait and the actual policy of the state owes as much to his 'Three Principles' as socialism (particularly 'Nationalism' or Minzu and Welfarism or Minsheng). There is a widespread popular interest in the historical past of China, and veneration of much of the history. One amusing aspect of this is younger people, particularly women, visiting historical sites while wearing historical period costume. This varies by region – in Beijing it is mainly Manchu court dress from the Qing dynasty, in Xi'An Tang era dress, while in the Yangtze Delta cities it is Song costumes. The past is not accepted uncritically but is generally admired and respected. Past figures who are widely admired are Ch'in Shi Huang Ti, the Hongwu and Yongle emperors from the Ming dynasty and Empress Wu and the Taizong emperor from the Tang. Generally, the Han, Tang, and Ming dynasties are admired, the Song and Qing less so. The common theme is that the figures and dynasties that are respected are ones seen as having promoted Chinese prosperity and power along with openness to the rest of the world, while the deprecated ones are those associated with Chinese weakness relative to the rest of the world and cultural decay. This all reflects another old idea that is reviving, that the crucial thing for state success is not so much institutions or policy but the quality of leadership. This is a very dynamic and innovative society that is also intensely competitive at an individual and familial level. It is highly futuristic and forward looking but also connected to its past, which is venerated in various ways. It has an authoritarian but effective and competent government. How long all this will survive is another matter but right now China is an advert for the idea of 'state capacity'. There is a strong cultural commitment to ideals of education and self-improvement, often very materialistic. One form this takes at a personal level is commitment to physical fitness and health, with public exercise classes being a major feature of urban life. This is coupled with a powerful work ethic. All of this faces challenges. It is not clear how long the ethical collectivism and work ethic will survive the impact of modern cellular communications and social media. There is concern, getting close to panic in official circles, about the below replacement birth-rate but, as elsewhere, there is no sign that the pro-natalist policies of the state are having any effect. The ageing population poses a massive challenge going forward but the current acute problem, as everywhere in the world, is housing costs in major cities – Shanghai has costs comparable to major metros in North America or Europe. That this coincides with massive and continuing supply suggests that it is not supply constraints that cause this but the financialisation of housing and the derangement of the global monetary system. One thing that many locals commented on was the continuing impact of the Covid pandemic – it has halved domestic air travel for example. For now, China is, on all of the evidence, a dynamic society with a functioning and effective state and economy that is comfortable with its past and its identity. There is a strong commitment to engagement with and openness to the rest of the world and a desire to see China recover the kind of position it had under the Tang, as the leading world civilisation. We are only starting to see the impact this model will have on the rest of the world. For a long time, China saw itself as the central or middle kingdom of the world and the rest of the world regarded it as the most powerful and most civilised state – this only changed after the 1770s. We are almost certainly going to revert to that.
