As Trump celebrates military, Texans protest president's aggressive immigration enforcement
McALLEN — Hundreds of people lined up near this border city's federal courthouse Saturday, waving American flags and holding signs criticizing President Donald Trump and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
It was a loud scene as anti-Trump chants were often drowned out by drivers honking to show support for the protesters' cause. Protests, marches and rallies are happening across Texas and the country Saturday in condemnation of the Trump administration's policies, including its aggressive immigration enforcement, and what many participants consider to be authoritarian actions.
Angeline Garza, a 36-year-old elementary school teacher from Mission, said the protest was a way for her to advocate for the undocumented children and the kids of undocumented parents.
'Now more than ever, [deportations] are affecting a lot of people and they are seeing what the Trump administration wanted to do from the beginning, that it was not just about deporting criminals,' she said.
The 'No Kings' protests, expected to last throughout the night Saturday, coincide with the Trump administration's planned military parade in Washington, D.C., which falls on the president's birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary.
But the demonstrations also began hours after two Democratic Minnesota legislators and their spouses were shot at their respective homes Saturday. One of those legislators, Melissa Hortman, and her husband, Mark, were killed.
[Texas DPS makes arrest after warning state lawmakers of 'credible threats' tied to Capitol protest]
The Texas Department of Public Safety later Saturday warned Texas lawmakers and legislative staffers of 'credible threats' to legislators planning to attend the anti-Trump rally at the state Capitol in Austin. (DPS later announced it had made an arrest in relation to the threats.)
Despite the Department of Public Safety's warning that they knew of 'credible threats' against speakers at an Austin protest, thousands of people gathered on and around Capitol grounds in a playful but at times tense gathering.
The first hour of the protest was capped with a drag performance to a Rage Against the Machine song — encapsulating the protest's satirical tone. Organizers dressed as circus ringmasters blew bubbles, guided gatherers through a band-accompanied chicken dance and chanted in between speakers' remarks.
Austin resident Charlotte Lichtenheld, adorned in clown makeup and a frill collar, said the outfit had a twofold purpose: to bring levity in the face of continuous stress caused by the issues she's concerned about, and to manifest a peaceful conclusion to the protest.
'While some of my friends chose to dress more incognito and have their identities less visible in case things took a bad turn, I chose to do the opposite,' Lichtenheld said. 'I wanted to embrace the more lighthearted side of protests and remind people that things don't always have to be so serious, and hopefully don't necessarily get so serious in that sense.'
The fears of threats — and the politically motivated shooting of two Minnesota lawmakers earlier in the day — did not go unaddressed by speakers. State Rep. John Bucy III, D-Austin, pointed the blame at Trump for allegedly enabling those threats and the attack in Minnesota.
'I'm worried about my colleagues, I'm worried about their families, and I'm pissed off that we have a president whose rhetoric encourages acts of violence against elected officials across this country,' Bucy said during his speech on the Capitol's steps.
Among the speakers were state and federal elected officials, such as Bucy and U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, as well as drag queens and local advocates, all echoing a similar sentiment: Trump's actions were more aligned with a monarch than with an elected president.
In Midland, more than 100 protesters marched on a city park downtown, lambasting Trump's forceful immigration policies and the agents who enforce them. At the evening demonstration, which was largely peaceful, a small group of counterprotesters joined the crowd to mock the chants and engage other protesters.
Jorge Pando, a 47-year-old oil field worker and Midland resident, said he joined to protest Trump's deportation methods, hoping his voice will inspire reform of federal immigration policies.
'I want to change the country for immigrants,' Pando said.
Daina Patton, a 35-year-old Odessa resident, said her fiancé, Ramon, had been detained while fetching tools for his work. The 35-year-old roustabout worker, who had moved to West Texas as a teenager, was undocumented. His work in the oil field, Patton said, kept the family afloat.
Patton, who attended the protest with Ramon's brother and nephew, said Trump was targeting people who come to the country for work.
'They're attacking businesses, the working man, the people that actually came over here for opportunity,' Patton said.
A small group of counterprotesters attempted to provoke the pro-immigrant rally in Midland, but their chants were drowned out by the pro-immigrant rally's response, which included the slogan, 'We fight with love, we fight with peace.'
In McAllen, very few people in support of the president appeared, though one man waving two large black Trump flags paraded through the crowd. As he walked, about half a dozen people began following him and protesters chanted anti-Trump expletives at him. The man, who declined to give his name, eventually left the protest area without incident.
In Odessa, more than 150 people gathered on the northeast side of the booming oil field city. Families, veterans and oil field workers lined up in front of a main roadway on Saturday, facing a heavily trafficked part of town.
The protesters waved flags from the U.S., Mexico and El Salvador and recited the pledge of allegiance. They decried what they said was Trump's authoritarian and monarchical approach to the presidency. Protesters told The Texas Tribune that Trump and his Cabinet had abused legal proceedings and due process for immigrants and women.
Suzanne Pack, a 62-year-old retired dietitian, said the Saturday protest was the first time she had ever been part of such a demonstration. She said she decided to attend after seeing the event advertised on social media.
"I believe that the government is not taking seriously the importance of due process, and I also believe that women's rights are being tread upon, especially in Texas," Pack said. "I have a daughter of childbearing age. She's seven months pregnant today, and she's scared to death because of the challenges against fetal maternal health."
Texas' 'No Kings' protests were planned primarily by progressive groups 50501, Women's March and Indivisible. The national groups are supported by dozens of smaller grassroots organizations and volunteers.
This blitz of demonstrations throughout Texas and country are intentional, said 50501 San Antonio representative Alex Svehla, and highlight the movement's core message of 'executive overreach.'
'It's a whole wraparound regarding what Trump is doing,' Svehla said.
As planned demonstrations across the U.S. grew in number this week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were told to 'largely pause' enforcement in the agriculture and hospitality industries, The New York Times reported Saturday.
Earlier this month, Trump deployed 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against immigration enforcement sweeps there. That deployment came without permission from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat and frequent political foe of the Republican president.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced on Thursday he would be deploying over 5,000 Texas National Guard members across the state in anticipation of Saturday's protests. Roughly 2,500 of those are being diverted from Operation Lone Star border assignments, according to the Austin American-Statesman.
'It does not do any good to have the National Guard not deployed and have a city catch on fire, have crime and chaos break out, and take a day or two to get them there,' Abbott said in a Fox News interview on Thursday.
Abbott has acknowledged in several statements that peaceful protesting is a constitutional right, but that officials 'will not tolerate the lawlessness we have seen in Los Angeles.' Abbott's comments have drawn criticism from protest organizers, who have said a crucial element of their events is their nonviolent nature.
'I think that we have seen some very irresponsible comments from Greg Abbott, unfortunately, that are in line with his authoritarian tendencies and certainly Trump's, which is of course the very thing that people are protesting about,' said Rachel O'Leary Carmona, executive director for Women's March.
In Odessa on Saturday, the demonstrations were largely amicable, with many of the event's organizers communicating with law enforcement officials as the day progressed. The protest's organizers told the Tribune they had been in touch with local law enforcement officials for weeks before the event. Drivers honked their horns in support, but some of the marchers faced hecklers who shouted vulgarities at them.
Leon Fowler, an 82-year-old Navy reserve and Air Force veteran and retired teacher of history and government, said Trump undermined democracy with his actions in the oval office.
"I believe in following the law," Fowler said. "And what I've seen shows no respect for law and no respect for the Constitution."
Uriel J. García contributed to this report.
Disclosure: New York Times has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer.
Get tickets.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
7 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate Republicans' tax cuts now projected to cost $4.45T
Senate Republicans released updated megabill text late Friday that would make sharp cuts to the Inflation Reduction Act's solar and wind tax credits after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives. The text would require solar and wind generation projects seeking to qualify for the law's clean electricity production and investment tax credits to be placed in service by the end of 2027 — significantly more restrictive than an earlier proposal by the Senate Finance Committee that tied eligibility to when a project begins construction. The changes came after Trump urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to crack down on the wind and solar credits and align the measure more closely with reconciliation text, H.R.1, that passed the House, as POLITICO reported earlier on Friday. The changes are likely to put some moderate GOP senators, who have backed a slower schedule for sunsetting those incentives, in a tough position. They'll be forced to choose between rejecting Trump's agenda or allowing the gutting of tax credits that could lead to canceled projects and job losses in their states — something renewable energy advocates are also warning about. 'We are literally going to have not enough electricity because Trump is killing solar. It's that serious,' Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) responded on X early Saturday. 'We need a bunch of new power on the grid, and nothing is as available as solar. Everything else takes a while. Meantime, expect shortages and high prices. Stupid.' The revised text would retain the investment and production tax credits for baseload sources, such as nuclear, geothermal, hydropower or energy storage, as proposed in the Finance Committee's earlier proposal. But it would make other significant changes, including extending a tax credit for clean hydrogen production until 2028. The panel's earlier proposal would have eliminated the credit after this year. And despite vocal lobbying by the solar industry, the proposal would maintain an abrupt cut to the tax incentive supporting residential solar power. The committee's earlier proposal would have eliminated that credit six months after the enactment of the bill; now the updated draft proposes repealing it at the end of this year. It would also deny certain wind and solar leasing arrangements from accessing the climate law's clean electricity investment and production tax credits, but, in a notable change, removed earlier language specifically disallowing rooftop solar. And it would move up the timeline for certain rules barring foreign entities of concern from accessing those credits. The bill would move up the termination date for electric vehicle tax credits to Sept. 30, compared to six months after enactment in the earlier Finance text. The credit for EV chargers would extend through June 2026. The new text also provides a bonus incentive for advanced nuclear facilities built in communities with high levels of employment in the nuclear industry. And the bill makes metallurgical coal eligible for the advanced manufacturing production tax credit through 2029. Sam Ricketts, co-founder of S2 Strategies, a clean energy policy consulting group, said the new draft is going to 'screw' ratepayers, kill jobs and undermine U.S. economic competitiveness. 'All just to give fossil fuel executives more profits,' he said. 'Or to own the libs. Insanity.' Josh Siegel contributed to this report.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he wants interest rate cut to 1%, would 'love' if Powell resigned
By Trevor Hunnicutt and Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he would "love" if Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell were to resign, and the president also said he wanted interest rates cut to 1%. KEY QUOTES "I'd love him to resign if he wanted to, he's done a lousy job," Trump said, also labeling the Fed chair as "stupid." "I think we should be paying 1% right now, and we're paying more because we have a guy who suffers from, I think, Trump Derangement Syndrome," Trump added. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Trump has long attacked the Federal Reserve chair over interest rates that the U.S. president wants lowered. Fed chairs have long been seen as insulated from presidential dismissal for reasons other than malfeasance or misconduct, but Trump has threatened to test that legal premise with frequent threats to fire Powell. Powell's term ends in May 2026, and Trump is expected to nominate a successor in the coming months. CONTEXT Trump said he will name as successor to Powell someone who will lower rates. Last week, the Fed decided to leave short-term borrowing costs in the 4.25%-4.50% range.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate's ‘big, beautiful bill' faces serious headwinds in the House
The Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill' is facing serious headwinds in the House with The Hill learning that at least six House Republicans are currently a 'no' on the framework, a daunting sign for GOP leadership as the Senate races towards a vote. Those six House Republicans, some of whom requested anonymity, are enough opposition to tank the package, as GOP leaders grapple with a razor-thin majority. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who was one of two GOP lawmakers to oppose the House version of the bill last month, is also likely to oppose the Senate's edition, deepening the pocket of resistance in the lower chamber. Republicans can only afford to lose three votes and still clear the legislation, assuming full attendance and united Democratic opposition. 'I support the reasonable provisions in H.R. 1 that protect Medicaid's long-term viability and ensure the program continues to serve our most vulnerable, but I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding streams our hospitals rely on, including provider taxes and state directed payments, or any provisions that punish expansion states,' Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) wrote in a statement on Saturday. 'President Trump was clear when he said to root out our waste, fraud, and abuse without cutting Medicaid and I wholeheartedly agree,' he continued. 'I urge my Senate colleagues to stick to the Medicaid provisions in H.R. 1 — otherwise I will vote no.' Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) told The Hill that he is also opposed to the bill because of the Medicaid provider tax provision. Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.) is currently a 'no' on the measure because of the Medicaid language, rollback of solar energy credits and public lands provisions, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill. Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), meanwhile, told The Hill that he is against the current version of the package because of the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap proposal. The legislation would increase the currently $10,000 SALT cap to $40,000 for individuals making $500,000 or less for five years, then snap back to the original number. 'While I support the President's broader agenda, how could I support the same unfair $10k SALT cap I've spent years criticizing?' LaLota said. 'A permanent $40k deduction cap with income thresholds of $225k for single filers and $450k for joint filers would earn my vote.' It is not, however, just moderates who are signaling issues with the Senate bill: Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, posted an ominous message on X that suggested he was not pleased with the package. 'I will not negotiate via X. But it's important to know that jamming us with a bill before we've had any chance to review the implications of major changes & re-writes, fluid scores, a high likelihood of violating the house framework (deficits) , & tons of swamp buy-offs is bad,' he wrote. The opposition is rising to the surface as Senate Republicans inch closer to holding an initial vote on the 'big, beautiful bill,' which would officially kick off the consideration process and eventually tee up a final vote in the House. It remains unclear, however, if Senate GOP leaders have the votes to move forward. If the motion to proceed passes by a simple majority, the chamber would hold a series of unlimited amendment votes called a vote-a-rama, which could result in changes to the measure. Senate GOP leaders are also still talking to holdouts and could make changes to the bill as written. In the meantime, House Republicans — beginning to review the revised Senate text unveiled overnight — are expressing resistance to the measure, prompting serious questions about whether top GOP lawmakers will be able to enact the legislation by their self-imposed July 4 deadline. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) convened a call with the House Republican Conference Saturday afternoon and urged lawmakers to keep their concerns with the Senate bill private, and instead speak directly with their senators and the White House, two sources told The Hill. Senate Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) told members that it is unlikely they will have to return to Washington on Monday, the sources said. Tuesday or Wednesday is more realistic, he told lawmakers. One source told The Hill that the call was brief and leadership did not take questions. The main qualm among House Republicans appears to be the Medicaid language in the bill. The Senate's legislation includes a proposal that would effectively cap provider taxes at 3.5 percent by 2031, down from the current 6 percent, but only for the states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The decrease was initially supposed to begin in 2027, with a 0.5 percent phase down annually, but Senate Republicans overnight changed the text to delay the implementation to 2028. The upper chamber also inserted a provision to create a $25 billion rural hospital relief fund that would be distributed over five years to assuage those concerns. The changes, however, do not seem to be solving all of the GOP's problems, with House Republicans still voicing opposition to the language. Aside from Medicaid, the Senate bill's rollback of green-energy tax credits is an issue for some House Republicans. The revised legislation for the upper chamber slashes tax incentives for wind and solar energy and adds a new tax on future wind and solar projects. Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) would not say how he plans to vote on the bill, but signaled that he is not happy with the Medicaid provisions and green-energy tax credit language. 'Instead of improving the Medicaid and energy portions of [the] House bill it appears the Senate went backwards,' he told The Hill. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
