logo
Emil Bove judge confirmation moves step closer despite Democratic walkout

Emil Bove judge confirmation moves step closer despite Democratic walkout

The Guardian4 days ago
Republican senators on Thursday advanced through the judiciary committee Emil Bove's nomination to serve as a judge on a federal appeals court, after Democrats walked out of the session in protest of the GOP's refusal to call a whistleblower who alleged the nominee advocated for ignoring court orders.
Donald Trump nominated Bove, his defense attorney who he appointed as a top justice department official in the early weeks of his new administration, for a seat on the third circuit court of appeals overseeing New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the US Virgin Islands. Bove's advancement through the judiciary committee clears the way for his confirmation to be voted on by the full Senate.
His nomination for the lifetime position has faced strident opposition from Democrats, after Erez Reuveni, a former justice department official who was fired from his post, alleged that during his time at the justice department, Bove told lawyers that they 'would need to consider telling the courts 'fuck you' and ignore any such court order' blocking efforts to remove immigrants to El Salvador. In testimony before the committee last month, Bove denied the accusation, and Reuveni later provided text messages that supported his claim.
At Thursday's hearing, the New Jersey senator Cory Booker attempted to formally delay the vote on confirming Bove, citing Reuveni's whistleblower complaint as well as letters from state and federal prosecutors opposing his nomination.
'There is no need to vote on this nominee today. It is a false urgency,' Booker said.
His request was rejected by the committee's Republican chair, Chuck Grassley, and Democratic senators then walked out as the committee voted on Bove's nomination.
'What are you afraid of about even debating this, putting things on the record, hearing from every senator? Dear God, that's what our obligations are,' said Booker, who remained in the committee's chambers and continued speaking as Republican senators called out their votes on Bove and other judicial nominees.
'This is outrageous that you're not allowing senators to have their fair say before a controversial nominee is being done. This is unbelievable. This is unjust. This is wrong. It is the further deterioration of this committee's integrity with a person like this. What are you afraid of?'
In addition to the whistleblower complaint, Democrats have criticized Bove for his role, while serving as acting justice department deputy attorney general, in the firings of prosecutors who worked on cases connected to the January 6 insurrection, as well as for requesting a list of FBI agents who investigated the attack. He also oversaw legal motions to drop charges against the New York City mayor, Eric Adams, which prompted the resignation of seven veteran prosecutors in New York who refused to cooperate.
Republicans showed little indication of sharing those concerns, and voted to advance Bove along with 11 other nominees to federal judgeships nationwide.
Thom Tillis, a retiring Republican senator who in May derailed Trump's nomination of Ed Martin as the top federal prosecutor in Washington DC over his defense of January 6 insurrectionists, said he did not find credible Democrats' assertions that Bove had similar views.
'Does anybody really believe that if I was convinced that Bove had made any statements condoning the violent acts against Capitol police officers, that I'd be voting for him? Just ask Ed Martin whether or not that's a red line,' Tillis said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Hampshire's new law protecting gunmakers faces first test in court over Sig Sauer lawsuit
New Hampshire's new law protecting gunmakers faces first test in court over Sig Sauer lawsuit

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

New Hampshire's new law protecting gunmakers faces first test in court over Sig Sauer lawsuit

A new state law in New Hampshire that makes it harder to take gunmaker Sig Sauer to court is getting its first test before a judge on Monday. The 2-month-old law was created by the Republican-led Legislature in response to mounting lawsuits faced by the Newington-based manufacturer over its popular P320 pistol. The lawsuits say that the gun can go off without the trigger being pulled, an allegation Sig Sauer denies. Sig Sauer, which employs over 2,000 people in New Hampshire, said the gun is safe and the problem is user error. Several large, multi-plaintiff cases filed since 2022 in New Hampshire's federal court representing nearly 80 people accuse Sig Sauer of defective product design, marketing, and negligence, in addition to lawsuits filed in other states. Many of the plaintiffs are current and former law enforcement officers who say they were wounded by the gun. They say the P320 design requires an external mechanical safety, a feature that is optional. The most recent New Hampshire case, representing 22 plaintiffs in 16 states, was filed in March. It's the focus of Monday's hearing. The new law on product liability claims against Sig Sauer and other gun manufacturers covers the 'absence or presence' of the external safety and several other optional features. Claims can still be filed over manufacturing defects. Attorneys for Sig Sauer argue it should apply to the March case, even though the law didn't exist at the time. 'New Hampshire has a clearly articulated position against such claims being cognizable in this state,' they argue in court documents for breaking up the cases and transferring them to court districts where the plaintiffs live. Lawyers from a Philadelphia-based firm representing the plaintiffs, disagree, saying the law 'has zero implication' on the case and only applies to future lawsuits. New Hampshire was the chosen location because federal rules allow lawsuits against a company in its home state, the plaintiff's attorneys say. Those lawsuits have been assigned to one federal judge in Concord. Sig Sauer is trying to decentralize the case, they say. Sig Sauer has prevailed in some cases. It has appealed two recent multimillion-dollar verdicts against it, in Pennsylvania and Georgia. A judge recently allowed the Pennsylvania verdict to stand, but vacated $10 million in punitive damages awarded to the plaintiff.

BREAKING NEWS Kristi Noem gives harrowing update on 'scum of the earth' illegal migrant who shot border agent in the face
BREAKING NEWS Kristi Noem gives harrowing update on 'scum of the earth' illegal migrant who shot border agent in the face

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS Kristi Noem gives harrowing update on 'scum of the earth' illegal migrant who shot border agent in the face

The illegal immigrant who shot an off-duty border agent in the face over the weekend was detained Monday morning. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem gave the update during a press conference where she said she visited with the agent who was shot and his family. The agent who was shot was able to use his sidearm to strike one of his two attackers – both of whom have a criminal record and are in the U.S. illegally. 'There's absolutely zero reason that someone who is scum of the earth like this should be running loose on the streets of New York City,' Noem said. President Donald Trump 's immigration team vowed to flood sanctuary cities with agents to arrest and deport criminal migrants in the wake of a shooting of a Customs and Enforcement officer. 'What we'll do in a city like this is we'll double down,' Noem said in her briefing alongside border czar Tom Homan and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner Rodney Scott. 'We'll put more agents here, we'll put more personnel here, we'll give them more equipment, more training for situations where they might have to go into a dangerous neighborhood where local law enforcement won't be there to have their backs.' This story is breaking and will be updated.

Trump ramps up rage at WSJ airing fresh grievances over another claim of 'untruthful' story amid Epstein letter scandal
Trump ramps up rage at WSJ airing fresh grievances over another claim of 'untruthful' story amid Epstein letter scandal

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump ramps up rage at WSJ airing fresh grievances over another claim of 'untruthful' story amid Epstein letter scandal

President Donald Trump launched a fresh attack on the Wall Street Journal, slamming the publication over another story amid his ongoing fury about its article tying him to Jeffrey Epstein 's 50th birthday celebration. Trump's latest attack was on a Journal report that said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent persuaded the president not to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell citing, among other reasons, 'the possible effects on the economy and market.' The president blasted the story as 'typically untruthful' and saying 'nobody' had to explain to him that firing Powell 'would be bad for the market.' 'I know better than anybody what's good for the Market, and what's good for the U.S.A. If it weren't for me, the Market wouldn't be at Record Highs right now, it probably would have CRASHED! So, get your information CORRECT. People don't explain to me, I explain to them!,' he wrote Sunday on Truth Social. Powell has been a repeated target of Trump's fury and the president has mulled firing the head of country's central bank. He wants the Fed to lower interest rates. Bessent has been silent on the reporting thus far but he told Bloomberg Television this past week that whoever serves as Fed Chair is 'President Trump's decision and it will move at his speed.' Trump's anger at Powell has been eclipsed by his anger at the Journal, after it published an article alleging Trump sent a lewd birthday card to Epstein for his 50th birthday. The president denied sending the card. He sued the Journal and owner Rupert Murdoch for defamation, asking to be awarded damages 'not to be less than $10 billion.' A bombshell report in the Wall Street Journal on Thursday claimed Trump wrote a 'bawdy' 50th birthday card to Epstein which concluded: 'Happy Birthday - and may every day be another wonderful secret '. The newspaper said it had reviewed a typewritten letter bearing Trump´s signature, framed by the seemingly hand-drawn outline of a naked woman, that Ghislaine Maxwell included in a 2003 birthday album. Trump has denied writing the letter or drawing the picture, calling it 'false, malicious, and defamatory.' The Journal and its parent company Dow Jones stand by the story. The president has successfully sued other media outlets including ABC News and CBS News' 60 Minutes. He was awarded a $16 million settlement with Paramount this month. Last year, ABC News agreed to settle a defamation suit for $15 million, plus $1 million for Trump's legal fees. The Journal reports the birthday message included an X-rated drawing of a naked woman, with Trump's famous signature squiggle written across her genitals to mimic pubic hair. According to the Journal, the naked woman appeared to have been hand-drawn with a marker, with a pair of arcs indicating the woman's breasts and a squiggly signature reading 'Donald' appearing in her pubic region, mimicking hair. 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' Trump told the WSJ. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.' But it once again raises questions about the friendship between Trump and Epstein. The two men knew each other and were pictured together at social events. But Trump said they had a falling out in 2004 and he banned Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Fla. Epstein, however, continues to haunt the Trump administration. The president has tried to move on from the disgraced financier who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges related to sex trafficking minors. He called for a federal judge to release grand jury testimony related to the Epstein case as he tries to calm the fury from his MAGA supporters over a lack of new information released about the case. The MAGA faithful were counting on Trump to release a cache of new information on Epstein, who is subject to a rash of conspiracy theories, including unproven ones that he did not commit suicide while awaiting trial. But Attorney General Pam Bondi crushed MAGA hopes when her department released the two-page memo saying it found no evidence that the convicted sex offender blackmailed powerful people or kept a 'client list' and reiterated that he died by suicide in his prison cell in 2019. The memo also said that no more people would be arrested, charged or convicted in the Epstein child sex trafficking case. Trump supporters were deeply disappointed. FBI director Kash Patel and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino - two men who have pushed Epstein conspiracy theories - have clashed privately with the attorney general on the matter. Some MAGA influencers have said Bondi should be fired after promising to release all files relating to Epstein and his high-profile male friends only to apparently renege on that promise.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store