San Francisco protesters block entrance to unmarked building amid fears of ICE trap
Protesters in San Francisco spent the day blocking the entrance to an unmarked building in the South of Market area. Immigrants had been told to report there in what some believed was a trap by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to capture people for deportation.
Over the weekend, a number of undocumented immigrants were sent a mysterious text message telling them to report to an unmarked building on Tehama Street on Saturday or Sunday. It warned that not showing up would be considered an "infraction."
"And we don't know why," said attorney Nancy Hormachea with the National Lawyers Guild. "Some of them have been reporting regularly before, but there was some concern that people might be detained under some of the new administration's policies."
A group of protesters blocked the entrances to the street and marched in front of the door, and lawyers were present to warn immigrants about what could be waiting for them.
"We can't say for sure, but people here thought that they were being trapped because some of them have pending court cases," Hormachea said. "They have shown up for all of their hearings. Many have filed for political asylum and they showed up here with their children, as well, yesterday."
"In other cities, we've heard information about potential detainments or activity around ICE in these offices. So, we just shut down the office entirely from 7 a.m. yesterday until 4 p.m. when they close. And the same thing today," said protest organizer Luna Osleger Montañez.
The building at 478 Tehama St. houses a private subcontractor for the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program, or ISAP, which keeps tabs on people who have been previously detained and released by ICE.
The protesters thought the purpose of the weekend order, if not to arrest people, was to scare them into not appearing for future court hearings.
"Including new tactics like this, which really are unprecedented," said Osleger Montañez, "where on a weekend, community members are asked to go to an office that's not an ICE office for a check-in that they don't have a lot of information about, with fear of detainment if they don't go. That's really the reason we chose to shut it down all weekend from the beginning."
A man named Brian S. lives in the South of Market area and said he had no idea that the building was involved with immigration enforcement.
"You know, the cruelty is part of the purpose of what they're trying to do," he said. "So, it's terrifying, to be honest with you. It's terrifying."
Brian thought the administration may be intentionally targeting San Francisco as a way of picking a fight. He said the city supports its immigrant community and knows how to mobilize quickly in support of them.
"The response needs to be immediate," he said. "If this would have worked, they would have done more of it."
The organizers said ICE is frequently shifting its tactics and that the rapid response group has responded to six emergency actions in just the past week and a half. There was no indication that people were being called to the location after the weekend, but the activists promise that if they are, they'll be back.
CBS News Bay Area reached out to ICE for a comment on the text message and protest, and did not hear back before publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Minnesota Governor Praises Hoffman Family for ‘Heroic Actions'
Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota praised Hope Hoffman, the daughter of State Senator John A. Hoffman and his wife, saying her actions at the family home after a gunman wounded her parents were 'heroic' and saved countless lives. The suspected gunman, Vance Boelter, 57, was arrested on Sunday after a two-day manhunt, the largest in state history. Officials said the suspect entered the Hoffmans' home in suburban Minneapolis early Saturday by posing as a police officer. Hope Hoffman called 911, according to charging documents, prompting a law enforcement alert that led officers to also check the home of State Representative Melissa Hortman nearby. On arrival at the Hortmans' house, officers exchanged gunfire with the gunman before he escaped. Ms. Hortman and her husband, Mark, were killed in that attack. 'I'd like to say on behalf of the state of Minnesota, the heroic actions by the Hoffman family and their daughter, Hope, saved countless lives, and we are grateful,' Mr. Tim Walz said at a news conference late Sunday to announce the arrest of Mr. Boelter. Mr. Walz did not elaborate on the Hoffmans' actions. The couple's nephew, Mat Ollig, wrote in a Facebook post on Saturday that has since been deleted that Mr. Hoffman's wife, Yvette, 'threw herself onto her daughter, using her body as a shield to save her life.' Drew Evans, the head of the state's Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, said investigators had talked with the Hoffmans on Sunday but provided no new details about the events at their home. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
14 minutes ago
- CNN
Supreme Court to hear arguments over whether states may subpoena faith-based pregnancy centers
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to take up a First Amendment appeal from a faith-based nonprofit that runs five 'crisis pregnancy centers' in New Jersey and that is fighting a subpoena from the state's Democratic attorney general. First Choice Women's Resources Centers had urged the conservative court to throw out a decision from the Philadelphia-based 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals siding with the state. That decision required the nonprofit to continue litigating its objections to the subpoena in state court. New Jersey officials subpoenaed the center in 2023 as part of investigation into whether the organization violated consumer fraud laws. Pregnancy centers are opposed to abortion, but New Jersey officials said their marketing may have left some patients with the impression that they could receive abortions at the facilities. The subpoena was aimed at evaluating whether the center 'or its staff engaged in misrepresentations and other prohibited conduct,' according to the state. It sought advertisements, donor solicitations, and the identification of licensed medical personnel. The center framed the subpoena as a demand for donor names. If that view of the subpoena prevails, then New Jersey's actions may be in conflict with a 2021 Supreme Court decision in which a majority found unconstitutional a California law requiring the conservative Americans for Prosperity Foundation to disclose its donors. A divided 3rd Circuit ruled in December that the center's claims were not yet ripe because state courts had not yet enforced the subpoena against them.
Associated Press
15 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Supreme Court agrees to hear appeal from New Jersey faith-based pregnancy center
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear from a faith-based pregnancy center in New Jersey challenging a state investigation alleging it misled people into thinking its services included referrals for abortion. The justices agreed to consider an appeal from First Choice Women's Resource Centers, which wants to block a 2023 subpoena from New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin seeking information about donors, advertisements and medical personnel. It has not yet been served. Attorneys for First Choice Women's Resource Centers describe the organization as a 'faith-based, pro-life pregnancy center.' The organization generally seek to women facing an unwanted pregnancy away from choosing an abortion. The group challenged the subpoena in federal court, but a judge found that the case wasn't yet far enough along to weigh in. An appeals court agreed. First Choice Women's Resource Centers appealed to the Supreme Court, saying the push for donor information had chilled its First Amendment rights. 'State attorneys general on both sides of the political aisle have been accused of misusing this authority to issue demands against their ideological and political opponents,' its lawyers wrote. 'Even if these accusations turn out to be false, it is important that a federal forum exists for suits challenging those investigative demands.'. Meanwhile, Platkin has sought to enforce the subpoena in state court, but the judge there has so far refused the state's push to require the group to turn over documents and told the two sides to negotiate instead. The state asked the justices to pass on the case, saying the it doesn't present the kind of significant lower-court controversy that requires the justices to step in. 'The decision below is correct and does not have the impacts petitioner alleges,' state attorneys wrote.
