logo
Danny Boyle: Cillian Murphy's return to 28 Years Later is worth the wait

Danny Boyle: Cillian Murphy's return to 28 Years Later is worth the wait

Times3 hours ago

Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘You don't brag about wiping out 60‑70,000 people': the men who dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
‘You don't brag about wiping out 60‑70,000 people': the men who dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

‘You don't brag about wiping out 60‑70,000 people': the men who dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

'It was a beautiful morning. The sun was shining on the buildings. Everything down there was bright – very, very bright. You could see the city from 50 miles away, the rivers bisecting it, the aiming point. It was clear as a bell. It was perfect. The perfect mission.' I'm sitting in a Chinese restaurant in San Francisco opposite the navigator of the Enola Gay, the B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima on 6 August 1945. The year is 2004, and Theodore 'Dutch' Van Kirk, aged 83, has agreed to be interviewed for a book I'm writing for the 60th anniversary of that fateful mission. Van Kirk informs me, with the trace of a smile, that this will probably be the last interview in his life. We have spent the afternoon looking through wartime logbooks from his 58 overseas combat missions. Now, between servings of dim sum, he is telling me about the 59th, the one that wiped out a city, along with well over 100,000 people. 'The instant the bomb left the bomb bay, we screamed into a steep diving turn to escape the shockwave. There were two – the first, like a very, very, very close burst of flak. Then we turned back to see Hiroshima. But you couldn't see it. It was covered in smoke, dust, debris. And coming out of it was that mushroom cloud.' He stops a moment, awe visibly registering on his face. 'The city was gone. It was only three minutes since we'd dropped the bomb.' Van Kirk died in 2014. In the years since we met, all the other crew members who flew on the missions to Hiroshima, and to Nagasaki three days later on 9 August, have also died. Meanwhile, the numbers of hibakusha, those who survived the attacks, are rapidly dwindling. We are passing into a twilight of history. As we approach the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings, this biological fact seems disturbingly relevant. Twenty years ago, the world was a dangerous place. Today, it's more so. More nations are developing nuclear weapons with few, if any, effective international controls. Tactical nuclear strikes have been explicitly threatened by Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un. And, just in the last week, war has broken out in the Middle East over fears that Iran may be very close to having a bomb. In such times, perspective matters. The shocked testimony of those like Van Kirk needs to be heard. History has lessons to teach us. It was this thought that prompted me to reopen my files, to reread the transcripts of interviews with some of the crew members of both attacks. Much of this material was untouched for two decades; nothing relating to the Nagasaki mission was published. Here were some of the last testimonies of those who did the unthinkable. They were in their 80s or 90s, nearing the end of their lives. How did they remember it? On 4 August 1945, Charles 'Don' Albury, a 24-year-old B-29 pilot, was summoned to a secret briefing on Tinian, a Pacific island 1,500 miles south of Japan. Then the biggest bomber base in the world, Tinian was a jump-off point for a conveyor belt of the almost daily destruction of Japan. About 300,000 people had already died and 9 million were now homeless. But Albury's outfit had yet to take part in the attacks. Known as the 509th Composite Group, they occupied a secret compound on a far corner of the base. 'Security was very, very tight,' Albury told me when I met him at his home in Orlando, Florida. Then aged 83, he grinned mischievously. 'I remember one time the base commander got too near one of our planes. A guard nearly shot him.' Even the 509th's crews knew nothing about their ultimate missions. And they had been training for almost a year. First in Utah, later on Tinian: 'We kept dropping practice bombs and flying these crazy steep turns. We did it day after day. For months.' But nobody told them why, and few dared ask. Those who did could find themselves swiftly dispatched by their leader, Paul Tibbets, a battle-hardened bomber pilot, to hardship posts above the Arctic Circle. 'You learned to keep your mouth shut,' said Albury. But in that 4 August briefing a part of the secret was about to be revealed. Nine days earlier, on 26 July, President Truman had delivered his ultimatum to Japan in the Potsdam declaration: either surrender unconditionally, or face 'prompt and utter destruction'. The means of that destruction was not specified. And Japan had not surrendered. In the tropical heat of the briefing hut, Tibbets informed his crews that within 48 hours they would destroy a Japanese city with a single bomb unlike any in history, 'and hopefully', recalled Albury, 'win the war'. The bomb, said Tibbets, had been tested in New Mexico on 16 July. Its blast was equivalent to the destructive payload of 2,000 B-29s. The target would be one of three cities, in this order: Hiroshima, Kokura (now called Kitakyushu) or Nagasaki. The deciding factor would be the weather. On explicit orders from Washington, it had to be clear for the drop. 'Nobody and nothing moved in that room,' said Albury. 'We were just stunned.' Tibbets then introduced a quiet, balding naval captain, William 'Deak' Parsons, who would join the mission. Parsons had witnessed the New Mexico test. He told the men that the explosion would be the hottest and brightest thing since the creation. He warned them to wear welders' goggles because its light would be dazzling enough to blind them. But he didn't warn them that the bomb was radioactive. 'Nobody,' said Van Kirk, 'told us this was going to be an atomic bomb.' Van Kirk remembered Tibbets making a final announcement. 'He said anybody who isn't comfortable with this and doesn't want to go, doesn't have to go.' Nobody spoke. 'This was going to be a day history would remember,' Albury recalled. He had left a wife and baby daughter in America. If this bomb was successful, the war might be over. Then he could go home. By midnight the following night, they were ready. One of the men who would be flying was Morris Jeppson, a 23-year-old electronics specialist recruited by the atomic scientists at Los Alamos to work on the bomb's revolutionary fusing system. For two weeks in 1944 the FBI interrogated everybody in Jeppson's life before he found himself sharing a plane ride with Los Alamos's director, J Robert Oppenheimer, 'a real gentleman who talked nuclear physics with me but never talked weapons'. Sitting in his Las Vegas kitchen, Jeppson, then 82, chuckled at the memory. 'Perhaps he was checking me out.' If so, he passed the test. He and Parsons would monitor the electronic wizardry of the bomb – nicknamed 'Little Boy' – all the way to the drop. They would also have to arm it in flight, an exceptionally delicate job that should really have been carried out on the ground. But both men had recently watched too many heavily overloaded B-29s crashing on take-off. 'We saw them burning on the runway,' said Jeppson, 'and we saw it often.' Harold Agnew, a brilliant 24-year-old Los Alamos physicist who would be flying in an accompanying B-29 filled with blast‑measuring instruments, had also seen those crashes. If this happened with Little Boy, the consequences could be horrific. 'That bomb was completely unsafe,' Agnew, then 83, told me when we met at his San Diego home. And he would know. In 1942, as part of a secret team working in Chicago under the Nobel-prizewinning scientist Enrico Fermi, he had witnessed the world's first controlled nuclear chain reaction. 'If they'd crashed, anything could have happened.' Parsons would need to be able to improvise, fast. In the hours before take-off, he and Jeppson began practising how to arm an atomic bomb in flight. Over and over, the two men ran over the checklist, leaving nothing to chance. Out on the hardstand, the bomb-carrying B-29, now sporting the name of Tibbets' mother, Enola Gay, was bathed in floodlights. 'That was our first surprise,' said Van Kirk. 'The plane was all lit up and there were all these people – photographers, newspapermen – everywhere. It looked like a Hollywood premiere.' The analogy is eerily accurate. Back in May, before it was certain an atom bomb would even work, a secret target committee had stressed the importance of making its 'initial use sufficiently spectacular … when publicity on it is released'. What mattered was 'obtaining the greatest psychological effect against Japan'. But to Van Kirk, 'all the photos and questions from reporters felt like breakfast for the condemned man'. He was relieved that Tom Ferebee, Enola Gay's bombardier, had earlier cleaned out all the underwear and silk stockings the crew had stashed inside the plane as good luck charms. At last the surreal scrum was over. At 2.45am Enola Gay, along with Agnew's plane The Great Artiste, co-piloted by Albury and carrying blast instruments, and a third camera plane later dubbed Necessary Evil, took off from Tinian's North Field runways, lined with fire trucks in case of the worst. 'I really did have faith in Paul [Tibbets],' said Van Kirk. 'I knew we were grossly overloaded. But he got us off – just a few hundred feet from the end of the runway.' Under a moonless sky, the strike force struck north over the Pacific. Tibbets lit his pipe. One hour ahead, three reconnaissance aircraft also flew towards the three possible targets. In keeping with Washington's orders, their task would be to radio back how much cloud there was over the aiming points. Ultimately the weather would choose which city was obliterated – and which spared. Fifty miles out of Tinian, Parsons and Jeppson clambered into Enola Gay's bomb bay to begin arming Little Boy. 'Parsons knelt by the bomb with a wrench. I held a flashlight,' said Jeppson. The work was fiddly and dangerous. Part of the procedure involved inserting four bags of cordite – a form of gunpowder – into the bomb's breech plug. 'That worried me more than anything,' said Van Kirk. 'Loading all that damn gunpowder while we were on the aeroplane, for Chrissake.' In 15 minutes the checklist was completed. But there was still one final step before the bomb was fully armed. That would come later. Enola Gay sped through the night into a golden dawn.'That morning the sunrise was the most beautiful I'd ever seen,' Van Kirk remembered. He plotted a course to Iwo Jima, an island that had seen appalling battles in early 1945. Now it was the rendezvous point for the three planes. 'My biggest fear was: don't screw this up,' said Van Kirk. But his calculations were spot on. Iwo emerged dead ahead, along with The Great Artiste and Necessary Evil. An hour and 20 minutes from the Japanese coast, Jeppson – now by himself – climbed back into the bomb bay, to replace Little Boy's three green safety plugs with three red arming plugs. He double-checked the red plugs were correctly set, gave the third one a final twist – 'That was a moment,' he remembered – and left. He was the last person to touch or see the bomb. Enola Gay's co-pilot, Bob Lewis, pencilled in his log: 'The bomb is now live. It's a funny feeling knowing it's in back of you. Knock wood.' But on which city would it be dropped? The answer soon came from the weather planes ahead, radioed in code. Conditions were excellent over the primary target. Tibbets switched on the intercom: 'It's Hiroshima.' 'Everybody was getting excited,' recalled Van Kirk. 'I could see the city out the window. We all formally identified it.' Ahead was the point from which Enola Gay would begin its bomb run. 'By this time it was a game for me. I was trying to hit that initial point exactly at nine o'clock.' Van Kirk smiled. 'I'm a punctual person. When I say I'm going to pick my daughter up at five o'clock, that's when I pick her up.' He was punctual now. On cue, Enola Gay swung towards a striking T-shaped bridge that Tibbets later described as 'the most perfect aiming point in the whole damn war'. Ferebee hunched over his bombsight. Unlike almost every other city in Japan, this one, with a population of about 350,000, had almost never been bombed. It had been preserved instead for atomic obliteration. It satisfied every requirement: it had a sufficient military presence to claim it as a valid military target. It had hills on three sides that would concentrate the blast, creating even greater damage. And, as it had been kept intact, it would demonstrate with brutal clarity to the Japanese what an atom bomb could do to a city. Fifteen seconds before the drop, Ferebee flicked a switch. A warning tone sounded across the airwaves. Agnew heard it on The Great Artiste. 'We were flying right beside the bomb plane when the tone went. We opened our bomb bay doors, ready to drop our blast-measuring instruments.' His pilot Albury stared down at the city. 'We could see everything, the bridge, everything. It was a sunny, beautiful day.' Then the tone stopped and Little Boy tumbled out. 'Tibbets went hard into that steep turn,' said Van Kirk. 'Engines going full blast. I started timing.' Oppenheimer had told Tibbets that the shockwave could crush their plane like a giant hand swatting an ant. There were 43 seconds before Little Boy exploded. 'Everybody was counting,' continued Van Kirk. 'Everybody was waiting for that bomb to go off because there was a real possibility it was going to be a dud.' Jeppson counted in his head – too quickly. 'I had a moment of panic. I thought: it's a dud. And then, within two seconds, there was this flash.' Van Kirk was wearing his goggles, but still 'it was like a photographer's flash going off in your face'. 'The whole plane lit up with a white light,' said Agnew. 'I scribbled a note: 'Boy, this thing just went off, it really did.'' On Enola Gay, the tail gunner, George 'Bob' Caron, screamed a warning as the shockwave tore up towards them. 'And then, whang!' continued Agnew. 'We got whacked. And then a few seconds later we got whacked again.' 'The whole plane suddenly bounced hard, twice,' said Jeppson. For a horrified instant he thought the shockwave might smash through Enola Gay's hull. 'Then,' he said, 'we headed to the windows. I watched this churning on the ground. And this cloud started building up, rising, rising, rising. It was awesome.' From his navigator's window, Van Kirk also stared in amazement. 'It was already up to, oh God, 25,000ft and going up rapidly. Anything and everything had been kicked up by that bomb.' The sunlit city he had been looking at moments before was now a huge cauldron of boiling black tar. In The Great Artiste, Albury gazed, transfixed. 'We watched that cloud rise. It had every colour of the world up there, beautiful colours. To me it looked like salmon colours, blues, greens.' Behind him, Agnew's oscilloscopes measured the size of the blast – the equivalent of about 13,500 tonnes of high explosive, four times the tonnage that had wiped out Dresden in February 1945. He grabbed a 16mm cine camera he had smuggled into the bomber before takeoff. He began filming, his hands shaking. 'The city wasn't there. There was just nothing there. That dust cloud covered the whole city.' He didn't know it yet, but Necessary Evil's official cameras would all fail. Agnew's illicit camera would yield the only movie footage of the Hiroshima bomb. 'My God, what have we done?' wrote Enola Gay's co-pilot Lewis in his logbook. 'If I live for 100 years I will never get these few minutes out of my mind.' Then Tibbets spoke to the crew. 'Fellows,' he said, 'you have just dropped the first atomic bomb in history.' 'You just can't imagine something that big,' said Van Kirk. 'We couldn't see how the Japanese could continue the war. Nobody said anything about the people on the ground. That wasn't mentioned at all.' The same theme rippled across all three crews. 'To me it was a great relief – that it worked,' said Jeppson. 'I was happy. I thought I'd be going home.' 'Did I think the war was over?' asked Albury. 'I was hoping it was. I knew Hiroshima wasn't there any more anyway.' But the mushroom cloud was. They could still see it, even when they were 400 miles away. Enola Gay landed back at Tinian to a heroes' welcome. Hundreds were cheering as they taxied in. 'We got out of the plane,' said Van Kirk, 'and there were more generals than I'd ever seen in my life. We wondered what the hell they were doing there.' They soon found out. Barely had Tibbets stepped from his B-29 before the Distinguished Service Cross was pinned to his chest. It was so unexpected that he was still holding his pipe. Most of the exhausted crew went to bed. Jeppson went drinking with friends. 'I remember one of them asked: 'So what did you do today?' And I said: 'Well, we ended the war.' They thought I was pulling their leg.' But the war didn't end. And three days later, on 9 August, the atomic squadron did it all over again. Hiroshima, Van Kirk told me, was 'the perfect mission' where everything went right. But the next one would be 'screwed up', the mission where almost everything would go wrong. Frederick Ashworth went on it. When I interviewed him in Santa Fe he was 92, a long-retired vice-admiral, but in August 1945 he was a young atomic weaponeer who would fill Parsons' role, babysitting the bomb to the target. The primary target wasn't Nagasaki. It was Kokura, 100 miles further north and home to one of Japan's largest military arsenals. With Hiroshima devastated, this number two city had now moved up to the top slot; Nagasaki was the backup, in case Kokura was socked in. 'Originally the second bomb was intended to be dropped on 11 August – five days after Hiroshima,' said Ashworth. A lean, spare man, he spoke quietly with great precision. 'But a typhoon was coming in. So we had this window. And the thinking was: we hit them, bang, with the second one, right off the bat.' The bang would come from a different kind of bomb. Unlike Little Boy, 'Fat Man' was far more sophisticated, utilising plutonium, rather than enriched uranium. 'I actually carried the plutonium core in its funny little case,' Agnew told me. 'I wanted to see what it felt like. And I wanted my picture taken.' He dug out the photo for me. Grinning for the camera, he holds the small case in his left hand. It was impossible to imagine that something so inconsequential and light – approximately 6kg – could erase a city. Agnew wouldn't be flying this time. But at midnight on 8 August, two days after Hiroshima, Albury found himself once again in the briefing room alongside his aircraft commander, Charles 'Chuck' Sweeney. Tonight he would be co-piloting Bockscar, the plane carrying the bomb. 'It was tense,' he told me. 'I hadn't been sleeping too much. I just lay on my bed. I'd written to my wife, telling her I loved her. I just wanted to get on with this mission and get home.' The briefing was short. Conditions at Kokura were forecast clear, but, because of major thunderstorms en route, Bockscar would rendezvous with the instrument and camera planes over Yakushima, an island south of Japan. 'Tibbets reminded us we were under strict orders from Washington to bomb visually,' recalled Ashworth. 'Under no circumstances were we to bomb otherwise.' Then they went out to the ramp. 'And that's when we had the first problem,' said Albury. A fuel transfer pump had broken, meaning there were 600 gallons of fuel on board they couldn't use. Normally they wouldn't need it, but ahead were those storms. Tibbets called a rapid conference. The stakes were tremendous. With their short weather window, any delay might affect the outcome of the war. 'He said: 'Chuck, it's up to you. You're commander of the aeroplane.' And Chuck said: 'To hell with it, we've never used that fuel before: it's just ballast. I think we should go.'' At nearly 4am and running late, Bockscar gunned down Tinian's wet runway, once again lined end to end with fire trucks in case of a catastrophic crash. Thirteen minutes after takeoff, Ashworth's assistant, Philip Barnes, climbed into the bomb bay to replace the green safety plugs with the red plugs. With Fat Man now fully armed, the plane ran headlong into the first of the thunderstorms. 'It was bumpy,' said Albury. 'We flew into some pretty big clouds and we saw typhoons go by.' Back near the bomb bay, Ashworth and Barnes watched their bomb control panel like hawks, monitoring Fat Man's warning lights as lightning stabbed the night skies. 'Then this white light suddenly came on,' said Ashworth. 'That's what you see when you're about to drop the bomb.' There was a silence as I took this in. Did he think the bomb might go off? 'Absolutely. Sure. That was precisely what was concerning us.' His next sentence was a masterpiece of understatement. 'I told Sweeney we were having problems and we were working on it.' Barnes saved the day, coolly tracing the fault to a misplaced switch. The mission continued into a storm‑tossed dawn. But when Bockscar joined up with the instrument plane over Yakushima, the third camera plane – captained by James Hopkins – wasn't there. 'Everybody was looking out the window,' said Albury. 'We were circling all the time but we couldn't see him.' They kept circling. What nobody knew was that Hopkins was 10,000ft too high. 'Fifteen minutes goes by, then another 15 minutes,' said Ashworth. They were using up valuable fuel. 'I said to Sweeney: let's get out of here. We've got to get on with the mission.' 'We were pretty late by now,' said Albury, 'maybe a couple of hours late when we got to Kokura.' The bombardier, Kermit Beahan, started the bomb run. But the winds had changed direction. Thick smoke from a raid on nearby Yahata the previous night was blanketing Kokura. In an appalling irony, American bombs were preventing the use of the atom bomb. 'Kermit said: 'I can't find the aiming point!'' Albury continued. 'We made a second try and it was still the same thing. Now our engineer started talking about fuel.' They tried a third run from a different direction. That failed, too. Flak was bursting below. Each bomb run was taking 20 minutes and tempers were mounting. Sweeney and Ashworth argued about what to do, finally agreeing to divert. Kokura had been saved by an accident of the weather. Now it was Nagasaki's turn to be attacked. But when they got there, the city was covered in cloud. 'We had to get rid of that bomb,' said Ashworth. With their critically low fuel, they might now not make it to base – which would mean ditching in the sea. Their options were stark: ditch with the atom bomb; jettison it over the ocean; or break direct orders and drop it on Nagasaki through cloud with their primitive radar. They had just minutes to decide. 'By now everybody's talking back and forth,' said Albury. 'There was too much tension.' Then Beahan began the final bomb run. 'There was no other choice,' said Ashworth. 'We had to get that bomb on Nagasaki. But bombing by radar is notoriously inaccurate.' With seconds to spare, Beahan suddenly spotted a stadium he recognised through a cloud gap. Moments later, he yelled, 'Bombs away' – then corrected himself: 'Bomb away'. 'Thank God,' thought Albury as Sweeney threw Bockscar into the rollercoaster turn. 'But we didn't know where the hell that bomb had gone off,' Ashworth said. In fact, in one of the most bizarre coincidences of the war, Fat Man had detonated almost directly over the factory that once made the torpedoes used in the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. It killed almost 40,000 people instantly. At least another 40,000 would die later from injuries and radiation sickness. This was Albury's second atomic explosion in three days. The same Technicolor images pepper his interview, the same 'greens, blues, pinks' of the mushroom cloud, 'every colour of the rainbow, always changing and moving up pretty fast. I was just thinking: thank God we dropped it safely.' The jarring adverb hung between us. How do you drop an atom bomb safely? But Ashworth was seeing it for the first time. 'This was new to me … It was like nothing you ever saw.' His language became suddenly reluctant as I pressed him further. 'I try to keep a relatively neutral reaction to these things – it's a personal psychological reaction. This is the job I'm here for, this is what I'm supposed to be doing. I don't have time to reflect: should I be worried about those guys down on the ground?' He didn't, perhaps couldn't, answer his own question. Bockscar barely made it back, landing unannounced at Okinawa, the closest American airbase, with a minute's fuel left in the tanks. There were no crowds to greet them, no generals to pin medals on their chests. Nobody even knew they were coming. There also was no official investigation into their breach of orders. In the end, accuracy was irrelevant. The bomb had done its job. And six days later, on 15 August, battered by both nuclear attacks, as well as a crushing Soviet invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria, Japan finally surrendered. About 200,000 people ultimately died from the two bombings, and possibly many more. The exact figures will never be known. Eighty years afterwards, arguments still rage about whether these annihilations were justified, avoidable or saved more lives than they ended. But what did the crews themselves believe? 'I will not say I was guilty. I will not apologise for it,' Van Kirk told me. 'In fact, under the same conditions I'd do it again, because I truly, honestly believe it saved a lot of lives.' Most of his crewmates clung to this mantra with the same granite faith. Ashworth, who died in 2005 aged 93, always remained proud of his participation in what he called 'a major contribution to the war'. Agnew, who later became a director of Los Alamos, held the same view until his death in 2013 at 92. 'We had to drop it,' he explained. 'The Japanese began this war. If there hadn't been a Pearl Harbor, Hiroshima would never have happened.' Tibbets went several leagues further. In 1976 he caused an international incident when he simulated the nuclear attack, flying a B-29 in a Texas airshow, complete with a mushroom-shaped explosion. He said he'd 'never lost a night's sleep over the fact that I commanded the bombing'. But there are occasional peepholes into troubled consciences. 'You don't brag about wiping out 60‑70,000,' admitted Robert Shumard, a flight engineer on Enola Gay, who died in 1967. And Caron, its tail gunner, confessed to 'a partial feeling of guilt' when he saw photos of burned children from Hiroshima. 'I wish I hadn't seen them,' he added. Jeppson, who died in 2010, once suggested the bomb might have been demonstrated 'without the need for destroying a city'. He personally wrote to me of his 'sorrow' at Hiroshima's 'great tragedy'. And then there was this unexpected postscript. At the end of our interview, Albury told me how he had returned to Nagasaki – barely three weeks after bombing it. Tibbets had decided to fly to Japan with some of his team on the strangest of sightseeing trips. They wanted to visit Hiroshima but the airfield there was badly damaged, so they landed at Nagasaki instead. Van Kirk was also on that trip. 'We arrived two or three days before any American troops,' Van Kirk told me. 'There were maybe 20 Americans in the whole city. Nobody knew who we were. We didn't put a sign on ourselves. It was eerie. Very eerie.' They drove into the city. 'There's all this damage you see from just one bomb. I was amazed,' said Van Kirk. 'It scares the hell out of you.' 'We took pictures,' said Albury. 'The people didn't look very happy, I can tell you.' In the ruins, he saw 'a shadow on the wall, where somebody was probably walking by when the bomb went off'. There was no trace of the body. The thousands-of-degrees heat from the bomb had simply vaporised it. Then, in a hospital, he saw the dead and dying, 'some of the people laying out on the ground outside. It was the only place I saw bodies. They were treating some of the people on the lower floors.' He suddenly stopped. 'It was devastation,' he said finally. 'I can't go back there. I don't dwell on this too much. It's been almost 60 years.' There was a long silence. We ended the interview there and I thanked him. But it seemed his mind was still in that hospital. Then he said, very quietly: 'Never again.' Shockwave: Countdown to Hiroshima by Stephen Walker is published by William Collins.

I talked dozens out of boarding doomed Titan sub over catastrophic safety risks – Brit victims were deceived, says diver
I talked dozens out of boarding doomed Titan sub over catastrophic safety risks – Brit victims were deceived, says diver

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

I talked dozens out of boarding doomed Titan sub over catastrophic safety risks – Brit victims were deceived, says diver

A LEADING deep sea diver who warned Stockton Rush over Titan sub's catastrophic safety risks says victims were "deceived". Titanic expedition leader Rob McCallum talked almost 40 people out of going on the doomed sub - which claimed five lives when it imploded two years ago. 9 9 9 9 McCallum, who has led seven dives to the Titanic, implored OceanGate boss Rush to let an independent agency test his vessel. But his warnings over the sub's critical safety failings fell on deaf ears and "intolerant" Rush simply brushed aside cautions from experts. The world was put in a chokehold when the unclassed sub vanished from radar during a 12,500ft dive down to the Titanic wreckage. Five days after it disappeared on June 18, 2023, a piece of debris was found on the ocean floor - confirming fears it had imploded. All five on board - Rush, British billionaire Hamish Harding, 58, French Titanic expert Paul-Henri Nargeolet, 77, British-Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, 48, and son Suleman, 19 - were killed. Harrowing emails show McCallum tried to warn Rush over Titan's danger - but the OceanGate CEO replied he was "tired of industry players who try to use a safety argument to stop innovation". Rush wrote: "We have heard the baseless cries of 'you are going to kill someone' way too often. I take this as a serious personal insult." McCallum said their tense email exchange ended after OceanGate's lawyers threatened legal action, and so he focussed on limiting the number of people who boarded Titan. He told The Sun: "I'd written to him three or four times, and he wasn't going to change. "I'd run out of options. I thought the sub would not survive sea trials and so I just focused on trying to limit the number of people that got into that thing. 'What's that bang?' Chilling moment sound of doomed Titan sub imploding heard from support ship "I probably talked three dozen people out of going on Titan, and I wouldn't get melodramatic about it, because I didn't want to over dramatise it. "Both because I wanted them to keep listening to what I was saying, but also I didn't want to become a drama queen and sort of written off as hysterical. "And so my simple answer was always, I would never get in an unclassed vehicle and nor should you." McCallum said he spoke to both Harding and Nargeolet, who both decided to take the risk. But he said Dawood and his son Suleman would have had "no idea" about the danger they were putting themselves in on the £195,000 dive as OceanGate downplayed the risk. McCallum said: "Hamish and Paul-Henri knew it was risky, but not the level of risk that they were taking. "The other two had no idea at all. And the reason that there's that uncertainty is because I think there was a concerted effort of deception. 9 9 9 "If you look at the culture of OceanGate, they weren't willing to take outside commentary, and anyone inside the camp that spoke out got fired or worse. "And so you've got this diminishing group of people that are only listening to themselves and they just tuned out the talk of the risk. "The risk was still there. But they just weren't talking about it anymore." McCallum, who founded expedition company EYOS, said all of those who he successfully advised not to board Titan realise they had a "close call". He added: "Within 48 hours of the implosion one rang up in tears and said, 'I owe you my life. I was going to get into that sub, and I couldn't get your voice out of my head, and so I turned around and came home'. "He lost his deposit but he said 'I just couldn't get your voice out of my head', and he was in tears. "People are very conscious that they had a close call." McCallum said on the fateful day of the sub's disappearance from radar he "just felt sick". After the sub lost contact with its support ship Polar Prince rescue crews worked around the clock in what was thought to be a race against time to save the crew. But McCallum said it was clear the sub had imploded. 9 "I knew immediately what had happened," he said. "There were two or three days when everyone was going through the search and rescue. "I didn't understand that because we knew it had imploded. "I was sad to lose some friends and shipmates. But I was grateful for small mercies that it would have been instantaneous." Engineer Rush, who co-founded OceanGate in 2009, created Titan with an experimental design made up of a carbon-fiber pod with titanium rings bolted on. McCallum said carbon fiber material is not fit for submerging so deep underwater. But McCallum's warning that carbon fiber would not withstand such pressure, Rush informed him he was "going to carry on regardless". In 2018, OceanGate's then chief pilot David Lochridge was fired after his inspection report laid bare a series of safety risks. A report from the Marine Board of Investigation is expected to be released in the coming weeks. McCallum said: "The report will be comprehensive and should cover all of the attributing elements that led to the disaster. "It will also indicate who is responsible and who might be subject to prosecution." 9 How the Titan tragedy unfolded By Katie Davis, Chief Foreign Reporter (Digital) FIVE men plunged beneath the surface of the North Atlantic in a homemade sub in a bid to explore the Titanic wreckage. Four passengers paid £195,000 each to go on the sub, with the fifth member of the trip being a crew member. But what was supposed to be a short trip spiralled into days of agony as the doomed Titan vanished without a trace on June 18, 2023. The daring mission had been months in the making - and almost didn't happen at the hands of harsh weather conditions in Newfoundland, Canada. In a now chilling Facebook post, passenger Hamish Harding wrote: "Due to the worst winter in Newfoundland in 40 years, this mission is likely to be the first and only manned mission to the Titanic in 2023. "A weather window has just opened up and we are going to attempt a dive tomorrow." It would be his final Facebook post. The following morning, he and four others - led by Stockton Rush - began the 12,5000ft descent towards the bottom of the Atlantic. But as it made its way down into the depths, the vessel lost all contact with its mother ship on the surface, the Polar Prince. It sparked a frantic four-day search for signs of life, with the hunt gripping the entire world. There was hope that by some miracle, the crew was alive and desperately waiting to be saved. But that sparked fears rescue teams faced a race against time as the passengers only had a 96-hour oxygen supply when they set out, which would be quickly dwindling. Then, when audio of banging sounds was detected under the water, it inspired hope that the victims were trapped and signalling to be rescued. It heartbreakingly turned out that the banging noises were likely either ocean noises or from other search ships, the US Navy determined. Countries around the world deployed their resources to aid the search, and within days the Odysseus remote-operated vehicle (ROV) was sent down to where the ghostly wreck of the Titanic sits. The plan was for the ROV to hook onto the sub and bring it up 10,000ft, where it would meet another ROV before heading to the surface. But any hopes of a phenomenal rescue were dashed when Odysseus came across a piece of debris from the sub around 1,600ft from the Titanic. The rescue mission tragically turned into a salvage task, and the heartbroken families of those on board were told the devastating news. It was confirmed by the US Coast Guard that the sub had suffered a "catastrophic implosion".

Harvard professor who studied love for 25 years reveals the one sign that your relationship will last a lifetime - and it's nothing to do with romantic passion
Harvard professor who studied love for 25 years reveals the one sign that your relationship will last a lifetime - and it's nothing to do with romantic passion

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Harvard professor who studied love for 25 years reveals the one sign that your relationship will last a lifetime - and it's nothing to do with romantic passion

A Harvard professor who studied love for more than two decades has revealed the secret behind a long-lasting relationship - and it's nothing to do with romantic passion. Arthur Brooks, a social science expert, appeared on The Drive podcast with Peter Attia MD and the pair shared the signs that a relationship will last a lifetime. During their chat, the pro explained that the key is finding a partner who is also your best friend - as the bond will remain even as the initial chemistry sizzles. 'One of the most important things for a happy life is a partnership with somebody who will be the last person who you set eyes on as you take your last dying breath, that is really, really important,' he explained. 'The goal of your marriage is not passion, it's friendship. This is the goal, you must be close friends, ideally best friends, with your spouse. 'I'm going to be with my wife Ester until death do us part, that has to be the juice of the relationship where the love actually makes happiness and love is truly the great secret to happiness.' He said that there are also a couple of indicators that a marriage may end in divorce - including people who feel lonely in their relationship. Arthur used the example of 'empty nest syndrome' which refers to parents experiencing sadness or distress when their children have grown into adults and moved out of the family home. He said: 'The people who suffer the most from empty nest syndrome is not the empty nest it's the fact that they are with one other bird and they don't really like that bird.' Arthur said that when two people have been together for a long time it can be normal - and even 'advisable' - that their passion levels are not as high as when they were fresh into their relationship. He described lacking intimacy levels as 'healthy, normal and actually advisable because it's more sustainable in the long run'. 'But some people are very happy and don't have that. What do they have in common? Very, very close personal lifelong friends,' the professor continued. 'Here is the key, if you don't have a spouse you need real friends. These are people who know your secrets, take your 2am phone call and that you talk to a lot.' However, Arthur also said that it is still very important to ensure that you upkeep friendships with others even if you are in a marriage; adding that men are usually worse at keeping in touch with their pals. 'You've got to work on these things for sure for a lot of reasons besides the fact that it's just healthy and good. You might, at some point, be left alone if you're widowed. You don't want to be alone under those circumstances. 'That is one of the reasons why men do so poorly when they lose their wives because a lot of them don't have real friendships.' The expert added that one of the red flags a marriage will end in separation is when a couple only have their children in common and nothing else. 'A companion in love that is your wife that turns out to be much more indicative of your happiness than actually having a relationship with your kids because your kids are turning into different people every year - that's super fun and interesting but that is not the key,' Arthur said. 'One of the greatest predictors of divorce is partners who are lonely while living together and this [means] that the only thing you have in common is your kids. '[When] that one point of commonality disappears and you're sitting across the table blinking at each other during dinner and not talking because you literally have nothing to talk about.' To prevent this from happening, Arthur said that it is important for married couples to partake in activities together, whether that is reading the same book, playing the same sports or even practicing the same religion to keep their bond strong and allow them to have things in common. He remarked: 'They should develop philosophical interests in common, they're talking about deep things. 'There's got to be something bigger than "Did you change his diaper?" because that's not going to be in common forever and you're going to be lonely in your relationship.' This comes as dating coach Paige Moyce, from the south east of England, also revealed the five signs that your relationship is doomed. She said the first sign that things are coming to an end is that you are staying together for a whole list of reasons - but your happiness is not one of them. 'Maybe you're staying for the kids, maybe you're staying because you fear being alone or you don't want them with anyone else,' she said. 'Maybe you're staying because you are scared of what it would look like to leave, or you don't want to hurt that person.' Whatever the reason, your own happiness does not come anywhere near the top of the list, or even on it at all. The second sign is when communication turns into a conflict. Even when you watch your tone or pick the 'right time' to talk it seems to end up in an argument. She said: 'All this does is drive a bigger and larger wedge between you and this person. If our needs are not being met, then how long is this relationship going to last for?' Paige added that loneliness is another indicator that the relationship is doomed, saying that people can actually feel more lonely in a relationship than out of one. She added: 'Just because we are physically with someone, doesn't mean we are emotionally with someone. If you're honest, when was the last time you felt special in this relationship? When was the last time you felt valued?' The fourth sign that your relationship is over is that you have lost your sense of individuality because you have put your partner first. 'You have put this person before you so many times that it is now normal to do so, but now you don't know what you want,' she said. 'Because you have prioritised the other person, you are now left wondering what it is that you want, which can leave you feeling overwhelmed. Lastly, Paige said that if you were given a magic wand with the option to leave, you would take the opportunity. She said: 'If someone could guarantee that you could get through it, that it wouldn't be hell, that you would be happy again, that you would meet someone else and that would be confident again, you would take it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store